Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
358 result(s) for "Invasive Fungal Infections - prevention "
Sort by:
Biomarker Driven Antifungal Stewardship (BioDriveAFS) in acute leukaemia—a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to assess clinical and cost effectiveness: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Background Acute leukaemias (AL) are life-threatening blood cancers that can be potentially cured with treatment involving myelosuppressive, multiagent, intensive chemotherapy (IC). However, such treatment is associated with a risk of serious infection, in particular invasive fungal infection (IFI) associated with prolonged neutropenia. Current practice guidelines recommend primary antifungal (AF) prophylaxis to be administered to high-risk patients to reduce IFI incidence. AFs are also used empirically to manage prolonged neutropenic fever. Current strategies lead to substantial overuse of AFs. Galactomannan (GM) and β-D-glucan (BG) biomarkers are also used to diagnose IFI. Combining both biomarkers may enhance the predictability of IFI compared to administering each test alone. Currently, no large-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared a biomarker-based diagnostic screening strategy without AF prophylaxis to AF prophylaxis (without systematic biomarker testing). Methods BioDriveAFS is a multicentre, parallel, two-arm RCT of 404 participants from UK NHS Haematology departments. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to receive either a biomarker-based antifungal stewardship (AFS) strategy, or a prophylactic AF strategy, which includes existing standard of care (SoC). The co-primary outcomes will be AF exposure in the 12-month post randomisation and the patient-reported EQ-5D-5L measured at 12-month post randomisation. Secondary outcomes will include total AF exposure, probable/proven IFI, survival (all-cause mortality and IFI mortality), IFI treatment outcome, AF-associated adverse effects/events/complications, resource use, episodes of neutropenic fever requiring hospital admission or outpatient management, AF resistance in fungi (non-invasive and invasive) and a Desirability of Outcome Ranking. The trial will have an internal pilot phase during the first 9 months. A mixed methods process evaluation will be integrated in parallel to the internal pilot phase and full trial, aiming to robustly assess how the intervention is delivered. Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed. Discussion The BioDriveAFS trial aims to further the knowledge of strategies that will safely optimise AF use through comparison of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a biomarker-led diagnostic strategy versus prophylactic AF to prevent and manage IFI within acute leukaemia. The evidence generated from the study will help inform global clinical practice and approaches within antifungal stewardship. Trial registration ISRCTN11633399. Registered 24/06/2022.
The evaluation of atorvastatin as an adjunct to fluconazole for the anti-fungal prophylaxis in acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial
The development of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is a serious complication in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who undergo an induction to remission chemotherapy. Given the increased mortality in AML patients with IFI despite prophylaxis, we need to address this problem. Statins have traditionally been employed in clinical settings as agents for reducing lipid levels. Nonetheless, recent investigations have brought to light their antifungal properties in animals, as well as in vitro studies. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of atorvastatin when added to the routine IFI prophylaxis regimen in patients diagnosed with AML. A randomized, multicenter, triple-blind study was conducted on 76 AML patients aged 18–70, who received either placebo or atorvastatin in addition to fluconazole. Patients were followed for 30 days in case of developing IFIs, patient survival, and atorvastatin- related adverse drug reactions. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 26.0. A level of significance of 0.05 was utilized as the threshold for all statistical tests. The data were analyzed by adjusting for the effect of age, regarding that there was a significant difference between the two groups, and showed that atorvastatin reduced the development of both probable and proven IFI (based on EORTC/MSGERC criteria) compared to placebo. IFI-free survival was also significantly better in the atorvastatin group. The incidence of developing aspergillosis did not differ between the two groups. No serious adverse events related to atorvastatin were observed. The present investigation has substantiated the antecedent in vitro and animal research on the fungicidal impact of statins and has suggested the need for additional research involving larger sample sizes and an extended duration of follow-up. Trial registration: This study was registered on the Iranian registry of clinical trials as IRCT20210503051166N1 (Date of confirmation 2021.05.03).
Changing Epidemiology of Invasive Mold Infections in Patients Receiving Azole Prophylaxis
Breakthrough invasive mold infections (IMIs) that occur during posaconazole or voriconazole prophylaxis are rare complications for which epidemiological data are lacking. This retrospective analysis comparing 24 microbiologically documented breakthrough with 66 nonbreakthrough IMIs shows a shift towards non-Aspergillus molds with a significantly increased proportion of rare multidrug-resistant molds.
Intensive care medicine research agenda on invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients
Purpose To describe concisely the current standards of care, major recent advances, common beliefs that have been contradicted by recent trials, areas of uncertainty, and clinical studies that need to be performed over the next decade and their expected outcomes with regard to Candida and Aspergillus infections in non-neutropenic patients in the ICU setting. Methods A systematic review of the medical literature taking account of national and international guidelines and expert opinion. Results Severe invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are becoming increasingly frequent in critically ill patients. Approximately 80% of IFIs are due to Candida spp. and 0.3–19% to Aspergillus spp. Recent observations emphasize the necessity of building a worldwide sentinel network to monitor the emergence of new fungal species and changes in susceptibility. Robust data on the attributable mortality are essential for the design of clinical studies with mortality endpoints. Although early antifungal therapy for Candida has been recommended in patients with risk factors, sepsis of unknown cause, and positive Candida serum biomarkers [β-1 → 3- d -glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA)], its usefulness and influence on outcome need to be confirmed. Future studies may specifically address the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with abdominal candidiasis. Better knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of antifungal molecules and tissue penetration is a key issue for intensivists. Regarding invasive aspergillosis, further investigation is needed to determine its incidence in the ICU, its relationship with influenza outbreaks, the clinical impact of rapid diagnosis, and the significance of combination treatment. Conclusions Fundamental questions regarding IFI have to be addressed over the next decade. The clinical studies described in this research agenda should provide a template and set priorities for the clinical investigations that need to be performed.
Invasive Fungal Infection After Lung Transplantation
Abstract Background Lung transplant recipients commonly develop invasive fungal infections (IFIs), but the most effective strategies to prevent IFIs following lung transplantation are not known. Methods We prospectively collected clinical data on all patients who underwent lung transplantation at a tertiary care academic hospital from January 2007–October 2014. Standard antifungal prophylaxis consisted of aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex during the transplant hospitalization. For the first 180 days after transplant, we analyzed prevalence rates and timing of IFIs, risk factors for IFIs, and data from IFIs that broke through prophylaxis. Results In total, 156 of 815 lung transplant recipients developed IFIs (prevalence rate, 19.1 IFIs per 100 surgeries, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4–21.8%). The prevalence rate of invasive candidiasis (IC) was 11.4% (95% CI 9.2–13.6%), and the rate of non-Candida IFIs was 8.8% (95% CI 6.9–10.8%). First episodes of IC occurred a median of 31 days (interquartile range [IQR] 16–56 days) after transplant, while non-Candida IFIs occurred later, at a median of 86 days (IQR 40–121 days) after transplant. Of 169 IFI episodes, 121 (72%) occurred in the absence of recent antifungal prophylaxis; however, IC and non-Candida breakthrough IFIs were observed, most often representing failures of micafungin (n = 16) and aerosolized amphotericin B (n = 24) prophylaxis, respectively. Conclusions Lung transplant recipients at our hospital had high rates of IFIs, despite receiving prophylaxis with aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex during the transplant hospitalization. These data suggest benefit in providing systemic antifungal prophylaxis targeting Candida for up to 90 days after transplant and extending mold-active prophylaxis for up to 180 days after surgery. Lung transplant recipients experienced high rates of invasive fungal infection, despite receiving prophylaxis with aerosolized amphotericin B lipid complex during the transplant hospitalization. Antifungal prophylaxis after lung transplantation should include coverage for invasive candidiasis and prolonged prophylaxis against respiratory molds.
Breakthrough Fungal Infections in Patients With Leukemia Receiving Isavuconazole
Abstract We retrospectively assessed breakthrough invasive fungal infections (b-IFIs) in 100 consecutive patients with leukemia receiving single-agent isavuconazole; 13 had documented b-IFIs (candidiasis in 6, mucormycosis in 4). All b-IFIs were observed in patients with prolonged neutropenia and active leukemia.
A Heat-Killed Cryptococcus Mutant Strain Induces Host Protection against Multiple Invasive Mycoses in a Murine Vaccine Model
Invasive fungal infections kill more than 1.5 million people each year, with limited treatment options. There is no vaccine available in clinical use to prevent and control fungal infections. Our recent studies showed that a mutant of the F-box protein Fbp1, a subunit of the SCF(Fbp1) E3 ligase in Cryptococcus neoformans , elicited superior protective Th1 host immunity. Here, we demonstrate that the heat-killed fbp1 Δ cells (HK-fbp1) can be harnessed to confer protection against a challenge by the virulent parental strain, even in animals depleted of CD4 + T cells. This finding is particularly important in the context of HIV/AIDS-induced immune deficiency. Moreover, we observed that HK-fbp1 vaccination induces significant cross-protection against challenge with diverse invasive fungal pathogens. Thus, our data suggest that HK-fbp1 has the potential to be a broad-spectrum vaccine candidate against invasive fungal infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised populations. Cryptococcus neoformans is a fungal pathogen that infects the lungs and then often disseminates to the central nervous system, causing meningitis. How Cryptococcus is able to suppress host immunity and escape the antifungal activity of macrophages remains incompletely understood. We reported that the F-box protein Fbp1, a subunit of the SCF(Fbp1) E3 ligase, promotes Cryptococcus virulence by regulating host- Cryptococcus interactions. Our recent studies demonstrated that the fbp1 Δ mutant elicited superior protective Th1 host immunity in the lungs and that the enhanced immunogenicity of heat-killed fbp1 Δ yeast cells can be harnessed to confer protection against a subsequent infection with the virulent parental strain. We therefore examined the use of heat-killed fbp1 Δ cells in several vaccination strategies. Interestingly, the vaccine protection remains effective even in mice depleted of CD4 + T cells. This finding is particularly important in the context of HIV/AIDS-induced immune deficiency. Moreover, we observed that vaccinating mice with heat-killed fbp1 Δ induces significant cross-protection against challenge with diverse invasive fungal pathogens, including C. neoformans , C. gattii , and Aspergillus fumigatus , as well as partial protection against Candida albicans . Thus, our data suggest that the heat-killed fbp1Δ strain has the potential to be a suitable vaccine candidate against cryptococcosis and other invasive fungal infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised populations. IMPORTANCE Invasive fungal infections kill more than 1.5 million people each year, with limited treatment options. There is no vaccine available in clinical use to prevent and control fungal infections. Our recent studies showed that a mutant of the F-box protein Fbp1, a subunit of the SCF(Fbp1) E3 ligase in Cryptococcus neoformans , elicited superior protective Th1 host immunity. Here, we demonstrate that the heat-killed fbp1 Δ cells (HK-fbp1) can be harnessed to confer protection against a challenge by the virulent parental strain, even in animals depleted of CD4 + T cells. This finding is particularly important in the context of HIV/AIDS-induced immune deficiency. Moreover, we observed that HK-fbp1 vaccination induces significant cross-protection against challenge with diverse invasive fungal pathogens. Thus, our data suggest that HK-fbp1 has the potential to be a broad-spectrum vaccine candidate against invasive fungal infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised populations.
Breakthrough Invasive Mold Infections in the Hematology Patient: Current Concepts and Future Directions
Despite the effectiveness of mold-active prophylaxis, breakthrough invasive mold infections (bIMIs) are encountered in high risk hematology patients. This viewpoint outlines different clinical scenarios and presents the diagnostic and treatment challenges of bIMIs in that patient population. Abstract Although the widespread use of mold-active agents (especially the new generation of triazoles) has resulted in reductions of documented invasive mold infections (IMIs) in patients with hematological malignancies and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), a subset of such patients still develop breakthrough IMIs (bIMIs). There are no data from prospective randomized clinical trials to guide therapeutic decisions in the different scenarios of bIMIs. In this viewpoint, we present the current status of our understanding of the clinical, diagnostic, and treatment challenges of bIMIs in high-risk adult patients with hematological cancer and/or HSCT receiving mold-active antifungals and outline common clinical scenarios. As a rule, managing bIMIs demands an individualized treatment plan that takes into account the host, including comorbidities, certainty of diagnosis and site of bIMIs, local epidemiology, considerations for fungal resistance, and antifungal pharmacological properties. Finally, we highlight areas that require future investigation in this complex area of clinical mycology.
Invasive aspergillosis in solid organ transplant patients: diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment, and assessment of response
Background Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a rare complication in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Although IA has significant implications on graft and patient survival, data on diagnosis and management of this infection in SOT recipients are still limited. Methods Discussion of current practices and limitations in the diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of IA and proposal of means of assessing treatment response in SOT recipients. Results Liver, lung, heart or kidney transplant recipients have common as well as different risk factors to the development of IA, thus each category needs a separate evaluation. Diagnosis of IA in SOT recipients requires a high degree of awareness, because established diagnostic tools may not provide the same sensitivity and specificity observed in the neutropenic population. IA treatment relies primarily on mold-active triazoles, but potential interactions with immunosuppressants and other concomitant therapies need special attention. Conclusions Criteria to assess response have not been sufficiently evaluated in the SOT population and CT lesion dynamics, and serologic markers may be influenced by the underlying disease and type and severity of immunosuppression. There is a need for well-orchestrated efforts to study IA diagnosis and management in SOT recipients and to develop comprehensive guidelines for this population.
Epidemiology and risk factors for invasive fungal infections during induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study
This study investigated the epidemiology and risk factors associated with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) during induction chemotherapy in a cohort of Taiwanese patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IFIs are a significant complication in the management of immunocompromised cancer patients; such infections are associated with a high incidence of morbidity and mortality, particularly in many South-Asian countries, where IFI rates are increasing. We retrospectively analyzed IFI incidence data from 105 patients with newly diagnosed AML at a single center undergoing their first course of induction chemotherapy without primary antifungal prophylaxis between November 2008 and December 2014. Of 21 cases documented as proven/provable IFIs 16 (76%) were invasive aspergillosis, 2 (10%) were mucormycosis infections, and 3 (14%) were proven yeast infections. The lung was the most commonly affected site (n = 16; 76%); 2 patients (10%) developed fungal sinusitis. IFI cases were more often males (P = 0.020). In multivariate analysis, patients with neutropenia lasting>30 days were more than twice as likely to develop IFI (OR, 2.24 [95% CI, 2.81-31.11], P<0.001). We also confirmed patients with smoker and receiving parenteral nutrition during chemotherapy were significant associated with IFIs. Our findings suggest that antifungal prophylaxis should be considered for patients with AML during induction chemotherapy, particularly in patients from Southeastern Asia, an area of potentially high IFI rates. We recommend that clinicians determine which patients receiving induction chemotherapy for AML are at high risk of developing IFI, to allow for targeted therapeutic prophylaxis.