Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
Content TypeContent Type
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
19,810
result(s) for
"JOB ADMINISTRATION"
Sort by:
Are charters different? : public education, teachers, and the charter school debate
Award-winning author Zachary Oberfield examines public schools and charters schools through a political science lens, asking whether there are organizational variances between the schools that foster dissimilar teaching climates. Are Charters Different? presents a fascinating example of how privatization affects the delivery of public services and provides valuable insights that can inform public policy in education. Drawing on the literature in public policy and organizational theory, Oberfield notes that one of the key rationales for the charter movement was the belief that public and private organizations have distinct characteristics. The book finds that while charters have made strides toward their initial goals (more autonomy for teachers, opportunities for innovation and leadership, and less red tape) there are also real costs (lower credentials, longer hours and more students per teacher). In addition, Oberfield compares the teachers' experiences in traditional public and charter schools based on a series of large-scale, longitudinal surveys. He draws a nuanced portrait of the distinctions that emerge and discusses patterns of change over time. Oberfield looks closely at variations in the survey findings within the charter sector to investigate whether changes in the organizational status or contexts of charter schools influence school culture. Are Charters Different? provides a unique analysis on the much debated charter school movement. Oberfield recognizes that there are different models of schooling, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses, and that we have to weigh the tradeoffs involved in choosing one over the other--Provided by publisher.
Framework, design, and baseline data of a collective impact initiative to strengthen the Community Health Worker workforce ecosystem in Texas
2025
Background
The Health Equity Collective (HEC), a multi-sector systems-level collective impact coalition in the Greater Houston region, partnered with the City of Houston Health Department (HHD) to launch a 2-year effort to implement a comprehensive approach towards strengthening the regional Community Health Workers (CHW) workforce infrastructure as a pathway to advancing health equity. Our paper presents the logic model, methods, and baseline qualitative and quantitative data from this initiative.
Methods
In the fall of 2022, the Health Equity Collective brought together a Network of CHW-employing or training organizations in the Greater Houston region. This Network was the working group of CHW employer/training organizations tasked with developing the shared agenda for collaborative action toward strengthening the regional CHW workforce. As part of the baseline needs assessment qualitative interviews were conducted to understand the role and add-value of CHWs in advancing health equity. A landscape scan survey was administered to assess CHW employer organization’s funding and sustainability mechanisms for their CHWs job stability, CHW focus areas, organizational health equity priorities, etc. A journey mapping exercise was also conducted to capture CHWs lived experiences in their own voices.
Results
The qualitative interviews outlined three themes that describe the role, barriers, and needs of CHWs. Landscape scan survey responses were obtained from 21 out of 29 organizations in the CHW Network. Responses provided insight into CHW employer organizational funding and sustainability mechanisms for CHWs job stability, CHW focus areas, etc. The journey mapping exercise outlines the various paths that brought the participants to pursue a CHW career path and their journey through CHW training and work.
Conclusion
In summary, our paper outlines the collective impact approach and baseline data guiding efforts to strengthen the regional CHW workforce. Strategies and priorities were developed based on CHW voices and engaging stakeholders across organizations employing and training CHWs.
Journal Article
Sustainable Employability of Emergency Nurses: The Effects of Precarious Work and Mental Toughness on Capabilities and Mental Health
by
Barnard, Neil B.
,
Lubbe, Welma
,
Rothmann, Sebastiaan
in
Adolescent
,
Adult
,
Cross-Sectional Studies
2023
Studying the sustainable employability of emergency nurses is important, given the precarious environment in which they work. This study used a cross-sectional survey of 204 emergency nursing professionals to investigate their sustainable employability in a South African context from the perspectives of precarious work, mental toughness, capabilities, and mental health. The Precarity Position Profile, Mental Toughness Questionnaire-Short Form, Capability Set for Work Questionnaire, and Flourishing-at-Work Scale-Short Form were administered. Three precarious work dimensions negatively predicted emergency nurses’ capabilities. Significantly, precarious work conditions and professional development were associated with most work capabilities. Emergency nurses’ capability set positively affected their mental health, with mental toughness moderating the effect of poor salary (a component of precarious work) on capabilities. Precariousness regarding salary, work conditions, and professional development affected emergency nurses’ mental health indirectly and negatively through a poor capability set, while mental toughness indirectly and positively affected their mental health through a strong capability set.
Journal Article