Explore the vast range of titles available.

The research included a comparative jurisprudential study of one of the choices of Imam Ibn al?Aqrab al-Hanafi - the imitation of the wicked judge (the requirement of justice for those who take over the judiciary) - in his book Care in the Abstraction of Questions of Guidance / Chapter on Judgment, so the study required: the following methodology: 1 - Naming this choice with an appropriate name for the study of jurisprudence, then reviewing the sayings of the jurists in it, then showing the evidence for each statement. 2- The hadiths came out and the judgment was made on them, and the characters unknown to the common people were translated in the margins, as well as the ambiguous words in the margins, and then I showed what I tend to prefer from the sayings, according to the strength of the evidence, regardless of whether it contradicts the public’s statement or agrees with it. 3- In the conclusion, some conclusions from this research were shown. This is according to the following plan: The plan required: an introduction, two chapters, and a conclusion. The first topic: a brief overview of the life of Imam Ibn Al-Aqrab . The second topic: a study of an issue: the requirement of justice for those who take over the judiciary, a comparative jurisprudential study.

This book explores themes of the judiciary's role in government, the separation of powers, judicial independence, and the impact of judicial decisions on public policy. It is particularly relevant to undergraduate students studying political science, law, and governance, offering them a deep understanding of the dynamics between the judiciary and government. Practitioners in the legal field and public administration enhance their knowledge of the intersection between law and governance, making it a valuable resource for professionals in these fields. Policymakers can draw from this knowledge to inform governance structures and policies that uphold the rule of law, and the general public gains awareness of the judiciary's vital role in shaping government policies and ensuring justice.

This thesis considers the concepts of identity, diversity and resilience in the context of the Cypriot judiciary. To do this it asks (1) how judicial identity is created, expressed and maintained (2) to what extent judicial identity is shaped by subgroup identities and what impact do these subgroup identities have on the collective identity and (3) what a diverse understanding of judicial identity might offer to the demands of a changing judiciary. These questions are answered through an empirical study of the Cypriot judiciary involving interviews and observation with current and former judges. It argues that judicial resilience is the product of a multi-vocal judicial identity. Judicial resilience and diversity go hand in hand. A diverse judiciary is a resilient judiciary - a judiciary able to transform and reproduce member relations in a multi-vocal way, to approach challenges as opportunities, to develop a 'growth mindset' and to learn, adapt and flourish.

Many Canadian physicians expressed anger, frustration and incredulity following the recent nonguilty verdict in the retrial of David and Collet Stephan, whose son Ezekiel died in 2012 from a treatable illness. One of these physicians is Dr. Linda Leblanc, a radiation oncologist in New Brunswick. She initiated a petition demanding action against the ruling, which gathered more than 2,600 signatures. Ezekiel died a few days shy of 19 months old, after several weeks of illness. His health deteriorated acutely in the days prior to his death. He was brought to a hospital only after he stopped breathing. An autopsy established the cause of death as bacterial meningitis. His parents were found guilty of failing to provide the necessaries of life for Ezekiel in the initial trial, in 2016. The Alberta Court of Appeals upheld the decision in 2017, but the Supreme Court of Canada ordered a new trial in 2018. On Sep 19, 2019, Justice Terry Clackson of the Alberta's Court of Queen's Bench overturned the original verdict.

In Supreme Bias, Christina L. Boyd, Paul M. Collins, Jr., and Lori A. Ringhand present for the first time a comprehensive analysis of the dynamics of race and gender at the Supreme Court confirmation hearings held before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Drawing on their deep knowledge of the confirmation hearings, as well as rich new qualitative and quantitative evidence, the authors highlight how the women and people of color who have sat before the Committee have faced a significantly different confirmation process than their white male colleagues. Despite being among the most qualified and well-credentialed lawyers of their respective generations, female nominees and nominees of color face more skepticism of their professional competence, are subjected to stereotype-based questioning, are more frequently interrupted, and are described in less-positive terms by senators. In addition to revealing the disturbing extent to which race and gender bias exist even at the highest echelon of U.S. legal power, this book also provides concrete suggestions for how that bias can be reduced in the future.

Purpose: This research aims to provide an overview of justice-based reconstruction regarding quality accountability in the legal profession, specifically focusing on the Advocate Organization System within Indonesia's legal framework.   Theoretical Framework: Grounded in Article 28 paragraph 1 of Law Number 18 of 2003, this study delves into the unique position of Advocate Organizations as the sole free and independent professional body for Advocates. It explores how these organizations contribute to enhancing the quality of legal advocacy while upholding principles of justice.   Method: The research adopts a normative juridical approach, analyzing legal norms, principles, applicable laws, regulations, legal theories, and doctrines pertinent to the subject matter. It synthesizes insights from legal science and relevant literature to inform the organizational restructuring of Advocate Organizations.   Result and Discussion: Through comprehensive analysis, this study proposes two key strategies for enhancing accountability and quality within the Advocate Organization System. Firstly, the formation of a National Team of Advocates and Advocate Honorary Council is advocated to establish an integrated governance structure. Secondly, the implementation of Standard Curriculum and Examination Standards in Advocate Education is recommended to ensure competency and ethical conduct among legal professionals.   Originality/Value: This research contributes novel perspectives to the discourse on legal certainty within professional organizations, particularly Advocates. By emphasizing justice-oriented quality standards, it offers practical insights for regulatory improvements and organizational enhancements.   Conclusion: In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of legal certainty and accountability mechanisms within the Advocate Organization System. By implementing the proposed strategies, the legal profession can align more effectively with principles of justice, thereby enhancing public trust and professional integrity.

No passado recente, os tribunais indianos têm frequentemente passado comentários críticos sobre a política de reservas, reforçando assim a narrativa e a retórica existente sobre castas superiores e reservas. E enquanto em todos esses casos, os tribunais não contestaram a legalidade da reserva baseada em castas, mas o constante exame judicial da reserva demonstra a influência das narrativas majoritárias sobre a casta e a reserva. As questões como por quantas gerações a reserva continuará? Ou sugestões para formular uma política de reservas baseada em critérios econômicos mostram um certo preconceito judicial em relação às reservas de castas superiores. Tais opiniões apresentadas sob a forma de discurso dão espaço para diluir ou dispensar a reserva na esfera pública. Este artigo argumenta que as opiniões judiciais sobre a reserva quando analisadas criticamente no contexto histórico demonstram como as narrativas das castas superiores encontram espaço judicial e as narrativas das classes atrasadas são marginalizadas. Para entender como o judiciário indiano perpetua as narrativas majoritárias, o artigo examina a opinião judicial sobre a casta e a reserva nas duas sentenças históricas - M.R. Balaji & outros contra o Estado de Mysore e Indra Sawhney & outros contra a União da Índia.