Explore the vast range of titles available.

Several studies have suggested that patients with kidney failure may benefit from high-dose hemodiafiltration as compared with standard hemodialysis. However, given the limitations of the various published studies, additional data are needed. We conducted a pragmatic, multinational, randomized, controlled trial involving patients with kidney failure who had received high-flux hemodialysis for at least 3 months. All the patients were deemed to be candidates for a convection volume of at least 23 liters per session (as required for high-dose hemodiafiltration) and were able to complete patient-reported outcome assessments. The patients were assigned to receive high-dose hemodiafiltration or continuation of conventional high-flux hemodialysis. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Key secondary outcomes were cause-specific death, a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events, kidney transplantation, and recurrent all-cause or infection-related hospitalizations. A total of 1360 patients underwent randomization: 683 to receive high-dose hemodiafiltration and 677 to receive high-flux hemodialysis. The median follow-up was 30 months (interquartile range, 27 to 38). The mean convection volume during the trial in the hemodiafiltration group was 25.3 liters per session. Death from any cause occurred in 118 patients (17.3%) in the hemodiafiltration group and in 148 patients (21.9%) in the hemodialysis group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.93). In patients with kidney failure resulting in kidney-replacement therapy, the use of high-dose hemodiafiltration resulted in a lower risk of death from any cause than conventional high-flux hemodialysis. (Funded by the European Commission Research and Innovation; CONVINCE Dutch Trial Register number, NTR7138.).

In this randomized trial, the discontinuation of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease did not lead to a significant between-group difference in the long-term rate of decline in the eGFR.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients undergoing hemodialysis who had moderate-to-severe pruritus were randomly assigned to receive the selective kappa opioid receptor agonist difelikefalin or placebo for 12 weeks. Difelikefalin significantly reduced itch intensity and improved quality of life as compared with placebo.

In this trial, patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who were undergoing dialysis were assigned to receive either the calcimimetic agent cinacalcet or placebo. Cinacalcet did not significantly reduce the risk of death or major cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular disease is very common among patients with chronic kidney disease, including those treated with hemodialysis, among whom the risk of death from cardiovascular disease is increased by a factor of 10 or more as compared with the risk in the general population. 1 , 2 Cardiovascular risk factors that have been linked to chronic kidney disease include heightened states of inflammation, 3 oxidative stress, 4 activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system 5 and the sympathetic nervous system, 6 endothelial dysfunction, 7 retention of uremic toxins promoting atherosclerosis and arteriosclerosis, 8 abnormalities in platelet aggregation, 9 anemia, 10 and disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, including hyperphosphatemia, hypercalcemia, and secondary hyperparathyroidism. . . .

Prior small studies have shown multiple benefits of frequent nocturnal hemodialysis compared to conventional three times per week treatments. To study this further, we randomized 87 patients to three times per week conventional hemodialysis or to nocturnal hemodialysis six times per week, all with single-use high-flux dialyzers. The 45 patients in the frequent nocturnal arm had a 1.82-fold higher mean weekly stdKt/Vurea, a 1.74-fold higher average number of treatments per week, and a 2.45-fold higher average weekly treatment time than the 42 patients in the conventional arm. We did not find a significant effect of nocturnal hemodialysis for either of the two coprimary outcomes (death or left ventricular mass (measured by MRI) with a hazard ratio of 0.68, or of death or RAND Physical Health Composite with a hazard ratio of 0.91). Possible explanations for the left ventricular mass result include limited sample size and patient characteristics. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance, self-reported depression, laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism and anemia, blood pressure and rates of hospitalization, and vascular access interventions. Patients in the nocturnal arm had improved control of hyperphosphatemia and hypertension, but no significant benefit among the other main secondary outcomes. There was a trend for increased vascular access events in the nocturnal arm. Thus, we were unable to demonstrate a definitive benefit of more frequent nocturnal hemodialysis for either coprimary outcome.

Use of antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1 infection has decreased AIDS-related morbidity and mortality and prevents sexual transmission of HIV-1. However, the best time to initiate antiretroviral treatment to reduce progression of HIV-1 infection or non-AIDS clinical events is unknown. We reported previously that early antiretroviral treatment reduced HIV-1 transmission by 96%. We aimed to compare the effects of early and delayed initiation of antiretroviral treatment on clinical outcomes. The HPTN 052 trial is a randomised controlled trial done at 13 sites in nine countries. We enrolled HIV-1-serodiscordant couples to the study and randomly allocated them to either early or delayed antiretroviral treatment by use of permuted block randomisation, stratified by site. Random assignment was unblinded. The HIV-1-infected member of every couple initiated antiretroviral treatment either on entry into the study (early treatment group) or after a decline in CD4 count or with onset of an AIDS-related illness (delayed treatment group). Primary events were AIDS clinical events (WHO stage 4 HIV-1 disease, tuberculosis, and severe bacterial infections) and the following serious medical conditions unrelated to AIDS: serious cardiovascular or vascular disease, serious liver disease, end-stage renal disease, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and non-AIDS malignant disease. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00074581. 1763 people with HIV-1 infection and a serodiscordant partner were enrolled in the study; 886 were assigned early antiretroviral treatment and 877 to the delayed treatment group (two individuals were excluded from this group after randomisation). Median CD4 counts at randomisation were 442 (IQR 373–522) cells per μL in patients assigned to the early treatment group and 428 (357–522) cells per μL in those allocated delayed antiretroviral treatment. In the delayed group, antiretroviral treatment was initiated at a median CD4 count of 230 (IQR 197–249) cells per μL. Primary clinical events were reported in 57 individuals assigned to early treatment initiation versus 77 people allocated to delayed antiretroviral treatment (hazard ratio 0·73, 95% CI 0·52–1·03; p=0·074). New-onset AIDS events were recorded in 40 participants assigned to early antiretroviral treatment versus 61 allocated delayed initiation (0·64, 0·43–0·96; p=0·031), tuberculosis developed in 17 versus 34 patients, respectively (0·49, 0·28–0·89, p=0·018), and primary non-AIDS events were rare (12 in the early group vs nine with delayed treatment). In total, 498 primary and secondary outcomes occurred in the early treatment group (incidence 24·9 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 22·5–27·5) versus 585 in the delayed treatment group (29·2 per 100 person-years, 26·5–32·1; p=0·025). 26 people died, 11 who were allocated to early antiretroviral treatment and 15 who were assigned to the delayed treatment group. Early initiation of antiretroviral treatment delayed the time to AIDS events and decreased the incidence of primary and secondary outcomes. The clinical benefits recorded, combined with the striking reduction in HIV-1 transmission risk previously reported, provides strong support for earlier initiation of antiretroviral treatment. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Patients undergoing maintenance dialysis for kidney failure are at substantial risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We aimed to establish if spironolactone reduces heart failure and cardiovascular deaths in these patients. ACHIEVE was an international, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial done in 143 dialysis programmes in 12 countries. Patients were aged 45 years or older, or aged 18 years or older with a history of diabetes, and were receiving maintenance dialysis for kidney failure for at least 3 months at the time of recruitment. Patients who were able to tolerate and adhere to spironolactone 25 mg daily orally during an open-label run-in were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue spironolactone or matching placebo, using a central computerised block randomisation system (block sizes of 4) stratified by centre. Participants, health-care providers, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular mortality or hospitalisation for heart failure analysed as time-to-event in all randomly assigned participants. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03020303. After a planned interim analysis of 75% of the expected primary outcome events, the external safety and efficacy monitoring committee recommended the trial be stopped early for futility. From Sept 19, 2017, to Oct 31, 2024, 3689 patients were screened for inclusion, 3565 of whom were enrolled in the open-label run-in phase, and 2538 were randomly assigned to spironolactone (n=1260) or placebo (n=1278). 931 (36·7%) participants were female and 1607 (63·3%) were male. Median follow-up was 1·8 years (IQR 0·85–3·35). The composite primary outcome occurred in 258 participants (10·46 events per 100 patient-years) in the spironolactone group and in 276 participants (11·33 per 100 patient-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92 [95% CI 0·78–1·09]; p=0·35). Death from any cause was similar between groups (HR 0·95 [0·83–1·09]) as was hospitalisation for any cause (HR 0·96 [0·87–1·06]). Among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, spironolactone 25 mg daily orally did not reduce the composite outcome of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation due to heart failure compared with placebo. This trial did not identify a benefit of initiating spironolactone in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. Future research should consider alternatives to steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, The Medical Research Future Fund, The Health Research Council, The British Heart Foundation, Population Health Research Institute/Hamilton Health Sciences Research Institute, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton Division of Nephrology, Accelerating Clinical Trials Consortium, Can-SOLVE CKD Network, and the Dalhousie Department of Medicine.

In this study, adults with progressive chronic kidney disease and an estimated glomerular filtration rate between 10 and 15 ml per minute per 1.73 m 2 (stage V chronic kidney disease) were randomly assigned to early or late initiation of dialysis. Early initiation of dialysis was not associated with an improvement in survival or clinical outcomes. The worldwide prevalence of long-term dialysis continues to rise, 1 , 2 driven in part by strong trends toward the initiation of dialysis earlier in the natural history of chronic kidney disease than was the practice previously. 3 – 5 Traditionally, the indicators for starting dialysis were the presence of signs and symptoms of uremia in combination with the results of biochemical measurements in serum and plasma. 6 However, a number of observational cohort and case–control studies have suggested that starting dialysis early may improve patients' survival, quality of life, and capacity for employment and decrease complications. 7 – 9 Although such studies were potentially limited by . . .

This study assessed the relationship between initial responsiveness to darbepoetin alfa and outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A poor initial hematopoietic response was associated with an increased risk of death or cardiovascular events. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been credited with a reduced need for red-cell transfusion and improved quality of life for patients with end-stage kidney disease who have severe anemia. 1 In patients with chronic kidney disease who do not require dialysis and have moderate anemia, the use of ESAs remains substantial, despite little evidence of benefit and increased concern that these agents may confer harm. 2 – 4 Trials comparing lower and higher hemoglobin targets have been interpreted to suggest that targeting of a lower hemoglobin range would be a safer approach in these patients, 2 , 5 , 6 leading to recommendations for continued use of . . .

The Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through Combination Therapy in Patients Living with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial showed that initial antihypertensive therapy with benazepril plus amlodipine was superior to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We assessed the effects of these drug combinations on progression of chronic kidney disease. ACCOMPLISH was a double-blind, randomised trial undertaken in five countries (USA, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland). 11 506 patients with hypertension who were at high risk for cardiovascular events were randomly assigned via a central, telephone-based interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio to receive benazepril (20 mg) plus amlodipine (5 mg; n=5744) or benazepril (20 mg) plus hydrochlorothiazide (12·5 mg; n=5762), orally once daily. Drug doses were force-titrated for patients to attain recommended blood pressure goals. Progression of chronic kidney disease, a prespecified endpoint, was defined as doubling of serum creatinine concentration or end-stage renal disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1·73 m 2 or need for dialysis). Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00170950. The trial was terminated early (mean follow-up 2·9 years [SD 0·4]) because of superior efficacy of benazepril plus amlodipine compared with benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide. At trial completion, vital status was not known for 143 (1%) patients who were lost to follow-up (benazepril plus amlodipine, n=70; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, n=73). All randomised patients were included in the ITT analysis. There were 113 (2·0%) events of chronic kidney disease progression in the benazepril plus amlodipine group compared with 215 (3·7%) in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group (HR 0·52, 0·41–0·65, p<0·0001). The most frequent adverse event in patients with chronic kidney disease was peripheral oedema (benazepril plus amlodipine, 189 of 561, 33·7%; benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide, 85 of 532, 16·0%). In patients with chronic kidney disease, angio-oedema was more frequent in the benazepril plus amlodipine group than in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group. In patients without chronic kidney disease, dizziness, hypokalaemia, and hypotension were more frequent in the benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide group than in the benazepril plus amlodipine group. Initial antihypertensive treatment with benazepril plus amlodipine should be considered in preference to benazepril plus hydrochlorothiazide since it slows progression of nephropathy to a greater extent. Novartis.