Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
5,009
result(s) for
"Knowledge, Theory of, in literature"
Sort by:
Recognition and modes of knowledge : anagnorisis from antiquity to contemporary theory
by
Russo, Teresa G., 1972-, editor
,
University of Toronto. Centre for Comparative Literature, event place
,
From Ignorance to Knowledge: Recognition from Antiquity to the Postmodern and Beyond (Conference) (2008 : Toronto, Ont.)
in
Recognition in literature.
,
Recognition (Philosophy) History.
,
Knowledge, Theory of, in literature.
Sans objet
2021
Comment se produit le savoir dans la discipline littéraire ? De quel type de savoir il s’agit ? Comment interagit-t-il avec les productions d’autres domaines ? Sont ici étudiées les conditions de possibilité d’une épistémologie de la discipline littéraire. Si de nombreuses disciplines des sciences humaines et sociales ont développé ce type de réflexion, les théoriciens de la littérature se sont en revanche concentrés essentiellement sur les enjeux internes à leur champ d’études. Or, depuis au moins une décennie, l’évolution de l’objet littérature, les transformations radicales de son statut dans la société, l’éclatement et la multiplication des approches critiques, ont mis à l’épreuve la logique de la discipline, allant jusqu’à faire basculer les principes sur lesquels elle repose et ses réalisations institutionnelles. En envisageant quelques-uns des enjeux essentiels de la littérature à partir d’une perspective épistémologique, l’objectif de cet ouvrage est de mieux appréhender son présent et de penser son implantation future dans la constellation disciplinaire.
Escritura somática
How is a body written, and in which ways can literary texts shed light on the tension between immediate bodily expressions and writing if medieval writing practices compete with the new technology of printing? The present volume Escritura somática: La materialidad de la escritura en las literaturas ibéricas de la Edad Media a la temprana modernidad explores the relations between corporality and writing in genres and discourses that are key for understanding the phenomenon. The Iberian perspective, including contributions on Spanish and Portuguese texts, focusses on the materiality of writing with a shared epistemic frame. Contributors are Isabel de Barros Dias, Stephanie Béreiziat-Lang, Juan Casas Rigall, Robert Folger, Juan Pablo Mauricio García Álvarez, Miguel García-Bermejo Giner, Folke Gernert, Santiago Gutiérrez García, Simon Kroll, Miriam Palacios Larrosa, Adrián J. Sáez, and Margarida Santos Alpalhão.
'This review is useful' : The novel knowledge mobilisation contributions of narrative reviews in higher education
2025
While much has been written about the methods that should inform narrative and systematic reviews, far less consideration has been given to their purpose. While the narrative review is a common text type in higher education research, relatively little is known about how these reviews seek to make a novel contribution. Reviews can play a role in facilitating knowledge mobilisation, bridging the gap between academia and end- user purposes for professions, industry, government and the public. Our article reports on a content analysis of a sample of narrative reviews in higher education collected through a systematic method in order to determine if narrative reviews in higher education make a novel knowledge mobilisation contribution, and if so, the kinds of contributions they might make. Findings suggest that most of the contemporary reviews in higher education in the sample included a novel knowledge mobilisation contribution that had been extracted and developed during the review process, demonstrating a common willingness to engage with the review findings to derive practical implications, and these contributions targeted a broad range of topics and potential end-users in higher education.
Journal Article
Refiguring minds in narrative media
\"How do writers represent cognition, and what can these representations tell us about how our own minds work? Refiguring Minds in Narrative Media is the first single-author book to explore these questions across media, moving from analyses of literary narratives in print to those found where so much cultural and artistic production occurs today: computer screens. Expanding the domain of literary studies from a focus on representations to the kind of simulations that characterize narratives in digital media, such as those found in interactive, web-based digital fictions and story-driven video games, David Ciccoricco draws on new research in the cognitive sciences to illustrate how the cybernetic and ludic qualities characterizing narratives in new literary media have significant implications for how we understand the workings of actual minds in an increasingly media-saturated culture. Amid continued concern about the impact of digital media on the minds of readers and players today, and the alarming philosophical questions generated by the communion of minds and machines, Ciccoricco provides detailed examples illustrating how stories in virtually any medium can still nourish creative imagination and cultivate critical--and ethical--reflection. Contributing new insights on attention, perception, memory, and emotion, Refiguring Minds in Narrative Media is a book at the forefront of a new wave of media-conscious cognitive literary studies\"-- Provided by publisher.
'This review is useful': The novel knowledge mobilisation contributions of narrative reviews in higher education
2025
While much has been written about the methods that should inform narrative and systematic reviews, far less consideration has been given to their purpose. While the narrative review is a common text type in higher education research, relatively little is known about how these reviews seek to make a novel contribution. Reviews can play a role in facilitating knowledge mobilisation, bridging the gap between academia and end- user purposes for professions, industry, government and the public. Our article reports on a content analysis of a sample of narrative reviews in higher education collected through a systematic method in order to determine if narrative reviews in higher education make a novel knowledge mobilisation contribution, and if so, the kinds of contributions they might make. Findings suggest that most of the contemporary reviews in higher education in the sample included a novel knowledge mobilisation contribution that had been extracted and developed during the review process, demonstrating a common willingness to engage with the review findings to derive practical implications, and these contributions targeted a broad range of topics and potential end-users in higher education.
Journal Article