Explore the vast range of titles available.

Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) has been regarded as an effective alternative for the treatment of cervical soft disc herniations. Repeated X-Ray scanning is essential when performing this technique. Technical note. We present a new method for the treatment of cervical disc herniation using ultrasound to guide the needle entry to the cervical disc, to avoid excess of radiation exposure during the surgical procedure. We evaluated the efficacy of this cervical approach. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 14 cases who underwent a PLDD under ultrasound guidance for the treatment of contained cervical disc herniation using a 1,470 Nm diode laser. The lower cervical discs (C5-C6 and C6-C7) were the most affected sites, accounting for 78.6% of surgical discs. A significant NRS reduction between baseline and 1 month (P = .0002) and between baseline and 12 months (P = .0007) was observed. Our results support the conclusion that ultrasound guided PLDD with fluoroscopic validation is a minimally invasive technique for patients affected by herniated cervical discs, but proper choice of patients is critical. This approach should not be performed except after adequate training under close supervision of surgeons experienced in this procedure and in interventional US.

Background: In recent years, minimally invasive treatment options for lumbar disc herniation, such as percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), have been introduced to avoid more invasive surgical methods. Combining these minimally invasive approaches with nutraceuticals that are effective in neuroprotection and pain management may lead to better long-term outcomes. Methods: The present study evaluated the beneficial effects of a new oral food supplement composed of acetyl-L-carnitine, α-lipoic acid, quercetin, bromelain, pantothenic acid, and vitamins C, B1, B2, B6, and B12 in patients with neuropathic pain due to herniated lumbar discs treated with PLDD. Patients were divided into two groups of 26 patients each: group A underwent PLDD alone, while group B underwent PLDD followed by a dietary supplement for two months after surgery. Preoperative VAS scores for leg pain were recorded for both groups and no significant difference was observed (8.7 for Group A and 8.6 for Group B). Results: In Group A, the mean postoperative VAS score for leg pain at a 1-month follow-up was 2.5, which remained stable at 3 months. In Group B, the mean postoperative VAS score was 2.0 at 1-month and improved to 1.6 at the 3-month follow-up. According to self-reported leg pain assessments, 66.5% of the patients using the dietary supplement reported a significantly better pain condition, and 43.5% reported a somewhat better situation. In contrast, 7.7% of the patients who underwent PLDD alone reported no changes in leg pain at the final follow-up. Conclusions: The results of our study indicate that the oral food supplement could provide a safe and effective treatment in patients with painful radiculopathy, enhancing the recovery of sensory fiber function in lumbar nerve roots after surgical lumbar disc decompression.

Introduction: As low back pain incidence is increasing, noninvasive modalities are gaining attention for their ability to achieve the best possible outcome with the least complications. Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) is currently popular for this purpose. This study aims to evaluate the effect of PLDD on disability and pain reduction in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods: Thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Spinal nerve blocks were conducted by laser discectomy single stage injection of a needle into the disc space. The nucleus pulposus of herniated discs were irradiated with laser in order to vaporize a small part of the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral discs and reduce the voluminosity of diseased discs. Patients were treated with 1000 J of 980 nm diode laser with 5 W energy. In order to measure the severity of pain, visual analog scale (VAS) and also ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) were used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 12. Results: Thirty patients participated in this trial including 11 men and 19 women with a mean age (SD) of 40.8 (10.8) years. The mean patients VAS score and ODI level before and after discectomy showed statistically significant differences. The mean VAS and ODI scores showed no statistical difference between males and females (P<0.05) and percutaneous laser discectomy decreased the VAS and ODI at both groups of patients similarly. Conclusion: We found the use of PLDD reduces pain and disability in patients as a noninvasive procedure.

Background and Objectives: Although percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) is one of the common treatment methods for patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), the recurrence of LDH after PLDD is estimated at 4–5%. This study compares the preoperative clinical data and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent primary microendoscopic discectomy (MED) or MED following PLDD. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2678 patients who underwent MED for LDH. The PLDD group included patients with previous PLDD history at the same level of LDH, and a matched control group was created using propensity score matching for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative data, preoperative radiographic findings, and surgical data of the groups were compared. To compare postoperative changes in clinical scores between the groups, a mixed-effect model was used. Results: As a result, 42 patients (1.6%) had previously undergone PLDD, and a control group with 42 patients were created. The disc degeneration severity was not significantly different between the groups. However, Modic changes were more frequent in the PLDD group than in the matched control group (p = 0.028). There were no significant differences in dural adhesion rate or surgery-related complications including dural injury, length of stay, and recurrence rate of LDH after surgery. In addition, the improvement of clinical scores did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.112, 0.913, respectively). Conclusions: We concluded that patients with recurrent LDH after PLDD have advanced endplate degeneration, which may reflect endplate injury from a previous PLDD. However, a previous history of PLDD does not have a negative impact on the clinical result of MED.

Background: Although percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), we specifically propose it for patients with contained herniations where standard surgical intervention is not the first option. This study evaluates PLDD compared to conservative therapy as an early treatment alternative. Methods: This retrospective observational study compared PLDD to conservative treatment in adult patients with contained LDH. All patients underwent 3 months of standard conservative therapy. Those who remained dissatisfied according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and/or Macnab criteria were then treated with PLDD. We analyzed outcomes from both treatment phases using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Results: 121 patients underwent outpatient evaluation for LDH and received an average of 90 days of conservative therapy. Of these 103 patients, dissatisfied with the outcomes of conservative treatment, subsequently underwent PLDD. Following conservative treatment, the average VAS score reduction was 4.1%. Six months after PLDD, the VAS scores demonstrated a significant reduction, with an average decrease of 30% (p < 0.0001). In terms of functional outcomes assessed by the Macnab criteria, 39.8% of patients treated with PLDD achieved ‘Excellent’ or ‘Good’ outcomes, compared to only 11.4% after conservative treatment. Conclusions: PLDD appears to be a viable alternative to conservative therapy for this subgroup of patients with contained LDH. It may be beneficial to propose PLDD early in the therapeutic regimen to accelerate short term clinical improvement. Further studies are required to evaluate the long term efficacy of this treatment approach.

Intervertebral disc herniation with the pressure on the surrounding neural structures is one of the most important causes of chronic low back pain, which sometimes leads to open surgery. Reducing the pressure inside the disc with intradiscal intervention such as laser irradiation or ozone injection is a minimally invasive method and an alternative to surgery with satisfactory results. These two methods were compared with each other in this research. In this clinical trial, 40 patients with back pain radiating to lower limb due to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were selected. These patients were randomly divided into two equal groups for percutaneous intradiscal intervention. The Laser Disc Decompression Group (LDG) (n=20) was exposed to 1500 J of laser irradiation into the disc center. In the Ozone Injection Group (OZG) patients (n=20), 6 mL of ozone 30 µg/mL was injected into the center of the disc. Considering the level of neural root involvement, both groups received 20 mg of triamcinolone injection via transforaminal epidural. Patients were followed up for 12 months regarding score on visual analogue scale and life performance improvement based on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and satisfaction level. According to the results, no difference was found between the two groups for ODI variable before intervention, whereas OZG showed better ODI scores in the measured time intervals. In LDG, only a significant difference in terms of ODI score was found between the times of before surgery and the first month. Intradiscal ozone injection could be an effective and cost-effective method for treatment of patients with discogenic back pain.

PurposeThis meta-analysis aims to compare the complication rates of discectomy/microdiscectomy (OD/MD), microendoscopic discectomy (MED), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), and tubular discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) using general classification and modified Clavien–Dindo classification (MCDC) schemes. MethodsWe searched three online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Overall complication rates and complication rates per the above-mentioned classification schemes were considered as primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated.ResultsSeventeen RCTs and 20 cohort studies met the eligibility criteria. RCTs reporting OD/MD, MED, PELD, PLDD, and tubular discectomies had overall complication rates of 16.8% and 16.1%, 21.2%, 5.8%, 8.4%, and 25.8%, respectively. Compared with the OD/MD, there was moderate-quality evidence suggesting that PELD had a lower risk of overall complications (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29–0.91) and high-quality evidence suggesting a lower risk of Type I complications per MCDC (RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.16–0.81). Compared with the OD/MD data from cohort studies, there was low-quality evidence suggesting a higher risk of Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 10.83, 95% CI 1.29–91.18) for MED, higher risk of reherniations (RR = 1.67,95% CI 1.05–2.64) and reoperations (RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.20–2.55) for PELD, lower risk of overall complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.70), post-operative complication rates (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.70), Type III complications per MCDC (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.69), reherniations (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.97) and reoperations (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.22–0.69) for PLDD.ConclusionsCompared with the OD/MD, results of this meta-analysis suggest that PELD has a lower risk of overall complications and a lower risk of complications necessitating conservative treatment.Graphic abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Objective To observe and analyze the mid-term efficacy of percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) for the treatment of cervical vertigo. Methods Thirty-five patients with cervical vertigo were admitted from September 2002 to December 2006, including 14 males and 21 females, aged between 35 and 79 years with an average of 59.1 years. All patients were treated with PLDD by the Nd:YAG laser therapy (wavelength: 1,064 nm) and were followed up. The improvement of vertigo and associated symptoms was evaluated by numerical rating scale (NRS) assessment, while fineness rate and efficient rate were evaluated using modified MacNab assessment criteria. Results No intraoperative and postoperative complication was reported. The patients were followed up for 24–66 months. At the end of the follow-up, the average NRS scores of the dizziness and complications are significantly smaller. The overall efficacy was evaluated based on modified MacNab criteria: excellent, 18 cases; good, 7 cases; acceptable, 5 cases; and poor, 5 cases. No statistical difference existed between age groups ( P  > 0.05) and also between gender groups ( P  > 0.05). Conclusion PLDD treatment of cervical vertigo trauma has many advantages, such as minimal trauma, high safety, and satisfactory mid-term efficacy with no significant difference in clinical efficacy between different age and gender groups.

PurposeThe aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the complication rates of discectomy/microdiscectomy, percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD), percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), microendoscopic discectomy (MED), and tubular discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH).MethodsWe searched three online databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Overall complication rates, complication rates per general and modified Clavien–Dindo classification schemes, and reoperation rates were considered as primary outcomes. Odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals for direct comparisons and 95% credible intervals for NMA results were reported. Surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to estimate ranks for each discectomy technique based on the complication rates.ResultsIn total, 18 RCTs with 2273 patients were included in this study. Our results showed that there was no significant difference in any of the pairwise comparisons. PELD (SUCRA: 0.856) ranked the lowest for overall complication rates. Discectomy/microdiscectomy (SUCRA: 0.599) and PELD (SUCRA: 0.939) ranked the lowest for intraoperative and post-operative complication rates, respectively. Concerning modified Clavien–Dindo classification scheme, PELD (SUCRA: 0.803), MED (SUCRA: 0.730), and PLDD (SUCRA: 0.605) ranked the lowest for the occurrence of type I, II, and III complications, respectively. Tubular discectomy (SUCRA: 0.699) ranked the lowest for reoperation rates.ConclusionsThe results of this NMA suggest that discectomy/microdiscectomy and PELD are the safest procedures for LDH with minimal intraoperative and post-operative complications, respectively. PELD, MED, and PLDD are the safest procedures for LDH in terms of minimal rates for complications necessitating conservative, pharmacological, and surgical treatment, respectively.Graphic abstractThese slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The number of interventions on intervertebral discs rapidly increased and the treatment options for lumbar disc surgery quickly evolved. It is important that the safety and efficacy of all new innovative procedures be compared with currently accepted forms of treatment; however, the previous pairwise meta-analyses could not develop the hierarchy of these treatments. The purpose of the study is to perform a network meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical results of 7 surgical interventions for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for multiple treatment comparisons of lumbar disc herniation. We performed a Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of RCTs to compare 7 surgical interventions for people with lumbar disc herniation. The eligible RCTs were identified by searching Embase, Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google scholar. Data from 3 outcomes (success, complications, and reoperation rate) were independently extracted by 2 authors. A total of 29 RCTs including 3,146 participants were finally included into this article. Our meta-analysis provides hierarchies of these 7 interventions. For the success rate the rank probability (from best to worst): percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy (PELD) > standard open discectomy (SOD) > standard open microsurgical discectomy (SOMD) > chemonucleolysis (CN) > microendoscopic discectomy (MED) > percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) > automated percutaneous lumber discectomy (APLD). For the complication rate the rank probability (from best to worst): PELD > SOMD > SOD > MED > PLDD > CN > APLD. For the reoperation rate the rank probability (from best to worst): SOMD > SOD > MED > PLDD > PELD > CN > APLD. The limitations of this network meta-analysis include the range of study populations and inconformity of the follow-up times and outcome measurements. This meta-analysis provides evidence that PELD might be the best choice to increase the success rate and decrease the complication rate, moreover SOMD might be the best option to drop the reoperation rate. APLD might lead to the lowest success rate and the highest complication and reoperation rate. Higher quality RCTs and direct head to head trials are needed to confirm these results.Key words: Lumbar disc herniation, discectomy, minimally invasive surgery, network meta-analysis.