Explore the vast range of titles available.

\"This study offers a new and detailed examination of parliamentary scrutiny of the British intelligence and security agencies. Through detailed analysis of parliamentary business, coupled with interviews with MPs, peers and senior officials, it examines the various mechanisms by which parliament seeks to scrutinise the secret state, and assesses the extent to which parliament has both the capacity and the will to provide effective oversight of intelligence and security policy and agencies. In addition to providing a detailed analysis of the impact of the Intelligence and Security Committee, this is the first book to examine the various other means by which a range of parliamentary bodies including select committees, all-party groups and individual parliamentarians have sought to scrutinise the intelligence agencies and the handling of intelligence by government\"-- Provided by publisher.

Tasked with investigating Britain's role in the Iraq War, the evidence presented to the Chilcot Inquiry was devastating and stark. Drawing together testimonies from leading political players with the forgotten voices of Iraqi refugees, veterans and military families against war – this pertinent and bold piece of documentary theatre explores the accountability of those who have power over us.

Ovaj rad analizira zakonodavne okvire i mehanizme nadzora sigurnosno-obavještajnih sustava u Republici Hrvatskoj, Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama, Velikoj Britaniji i Izraelu. U radu se koristi deskriptivno-komparativna metoda za analizu zakonodavnih okvira i nadzornih mehanizama u odabranim zemljama, s ciljem pružanja preporuka za unaprjeđenje hrvatskog zakonodavnog okvira. Naglasak je stavljen na usporedbu pravnog uređenja područja djelovanja sigurnosno-obavještajnih službi, s posebnim naglaskom na pitanja nadzora i transparentnosti. Rad istražuje kako različiti zakonodavni pristupi utječu na učinkovitost zaštite nacionalne sigurnosti te na očuvanje prava i sloboda građana. Detaljnom analizom identificiraju se sličnosti i razlike između nacionalnih sustava te se pružaju preporuke za unaprjeđenje postojećih pravnih okvira u Republici Hrvatskoj, s ciljem postizanja zadovoljavajuće ravnoteže između zaštite sigurnosti države i zaštite privatnosti građana. Predložene preporuke temelje se na najboljoj praksi i nastoje osigurati da hrvatski pravni okvir bude u skladu s najboljim međunarodnim praksama u obavještajnoj zajednici. This paper analyzes the legislative frameworks and mechanisms for monitoring security and intelligence systems in the Republic of Croatia, the United States of America (USA), Great Britain and Israel. The paper uses a descriptive-comparative method in order to identify the similarities and differences between the systems in these four countries and to present recommendations for improving the Croatian legislative framework governing the security-intelligence system. Emphasis is placed on the comparison of the legal regulation of the area of ​​activity of the security-intelligence services, with special emphasis on the issues of supervision over the work of the security-intelligence services, transparency and the impact of these services on the rights and freedoms of citizens. The comparative analysis provides a deeper insight into the surveillance mechanisms that are implemented in different political and legal frameworks and suggests adjustments for the security and intelligence system of the Republic of Croatia. In relation to the Republic of Croatia, the importance of developing a legislative framework that enables effective supervision of the security-intelligence system, while simultaneously respecting fundamental human rights, was highlighted. The most important regulations are covered, such as the Law on the Security and Intelligence System of the Republic of Croatia, which regulates, among other things, the work of the civilian and military security and intelligence agencies, and the Law on Information Security. Supervision in the Republic of Croatia is carried out at several levels, including parliamentary, professional, civil and judicial supervision. Nevertheless, there are areas that require further improvements to ensure greater transparency and accountability in the work of security-intelligence agencies. The paper investigates how different legislative approaches affect the effectiveness of the protection of national security and the preservation of the rights and freedoms of citizens. Through a comparison with Great Britain, the USA and Israel, certain legal norms and practices are analyzed that enable transparency, but at the same time limit the rights of citizens when it comes to national security. For example, the British model allows for a high level of executive control over security-intelligence agencies, while Israel applies rigorous methods, including targeted killings in the interest of protecting national security, thereby reducing transparency and civilian oversight. A comparative analysis shows that the US has a complex security-intelligence system, especially after the attacks on “Gemini” on September 11, 2001, with an emphasis on interagency coordination, improving information sharing, and preventing terrorist threats. Great Britain has centralized parliamentary oversight, but with limited public influence on intelligence processes. On the other hand, Israel, which is constantly facing threats from abroad, applies strict security measures that are widely accepted by the Israeli public, despite reduced transparency and limited civilian oversight of intelligence operations. Based on the analysis, it is recommended to improve the legislative framework in the Republic of Croatia, including the establishment of an independent body for the supervision of security-intelligence agencies, which would have expanded powers in monitoring operational activities such as wiretapping and control over the financial operations of security-intelligence agencies. Such an independent body could contribute to greater public trust in the work of agencies and ensure additional protection of the constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens. There is a crucial need to achieve a balance between national security and the protection of citizens’ privacy, and the analysis of best international practices provides guidelines for the further development and improvement of the security and intelligence system of the Republic of Croatia. The proposed recommendations are based on the best practices from USA, Great Britain and Israel, taking into account certain challenges that the Republic of Croatia is facing. The goal is to ensure that the Croatian security-intelligence system is effective in dealing with threats, and at the same time responsible and transparent towards its own citizens, while respecting basic human rights and freedoms. The continuous development of the Croatian legislative framework governing the security-intelligence system is an urgent need, given the contemporary challenges that affect the national security of the Republic of Croatia.

Social scientists have proposed several different models for the relationship between social science theory, empirical social research and the actual making of public social policy. This book, first published in 1980, seeks to provide a critical analysis of the impact of research on policy through the detailed examination of the part which research played in the work of Royal Commissions of Inquiry, the bodies set up by government to consider, gather evidence on, report and make recommendations about specific policy areas. This titles varied and stimulating chapters will serve to shed considerable light, not all of it positive, upon the potential contribution of the social sciences to the practice of government. This book will be of interest to students of the social sciences, particularly sociology and politics.