Explore the vast range of titles available.

To reduce leprosy risk in contacts of patients with leprosy by around 50%, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using single-dose rifampicin (SDR). Results from a cluster randomized trial in the Comoros and Madagascar suggest that PEP with a double dose of rifampicin led to a similar reduction in incident leprosy, prompting the need for stronger PEP. The objective of this Phase 2 trial was to assess safety of a bedaquiline-enhanced PEP regimen (intervention arm, bedaquiline 800 mg with rifampicin 600 mg, BE-PEP), relative to the WHO recommended PEP with rifampicin 600 mg alone (control arm, SDR-PEP). From July 2022 to January 2023, consenting participants were screened for eligibility, including a heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) <450 ms and liver enzyme tests (ALT/AST) below 3× the upper limit of normal (ULN), before they were individually randomized 1:1 in an open-label design. Recruitment was sequential, by age group. Pediatric dosages were weight adjusted. Follow-up was done at day 1 post-dose (including ECG) and day 14 (including ALT/AST), with repeat of ALT/AST on the last follow-up at day 30 in case of elevation on day 14. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of BE-PEP based on a <10 ms difference in QTc 24 h after treatment administration, both unadjusted and adjusted for baseline QTc. Of 408 screened participants, 313 were enrolled, starting with 187 adults, then 38 children aged 13 to 17 years, and finally 88 children aged 5 to 12 years, of whom 310 (99%) completed all visits. Across all ages, the mean QTc change on BE-PEP was from 393 ms to 396 ms, not significantly different from the change from 392 ms to 394 ms on SDR-PEP (difference between arms 1.8 ms, 95% CI -1.8, 5.3, p = 0.41). No individual's QTc increased by >50 ms or exceeded 450 ms after PEP administration. Per protocol, all children were analyzed together, with no significant difference in mean QTc increase for BE-PEP compared to SDR-PEP, although non-inferiority of BE-PEP in children was not demonstrated in unadjusted analysis, as the upper limit of the 95% CI of 10.4 ms exceeded the predefined margin of 10 ms. Adjusting for baseline QTc, the regression coefficient and 95% CI (3.3; -1.4, 8.0) met the 10 ms non-inferiority margin. No significant differences in ALT or AST levels were noted between the intervention and control arms, although a limitation of the study was false elevation of ALT/AST during adult recruitment due to a technical error. In both study arms, one serious adverse event was reported, both considered unlikely related to the study drugs. Dizziness, nausea, headache, and diarrhea among adults, and headaches in children, were nonsignificantly more frequently observed in the BE-PEP group. In this study, we observed that safety of single-dose bedaquiline 800 mg in combination with rifampicin is comparable to rifampicin alone, although non-inferiority of QTc changes was demonstrated in children only after adjusting for the baseline QTc measurements. A Phase 3 cluster randomized efficacy trial is currently ongoing in the Comoros. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05406479.

In this trial in China, the 4-year cumulative incidence of leprosy among household contacts of persons with the disease was 0.09% with rifapentine, 0.33% with rifampin, and 0.55% with no intervention.

Background Leprosy is an ancient infectious disease with a global annual incidence that has plateaued above 200,000 new cases since over a decade. New strategies are required to overcome this stalemate. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with a single dose of Rifampicin (SDR) has conditionally been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), based on a randomized-controlled-trial in Bangladesh. More evidence is required. The Post ExpOsure Prophylaxis for Leprosy (PEOPLE) trial will assess effectiveness of different modalities of PEP on the Comoros and Madagascar. Methods PEOPLE is a cluster-randomized trial with villages selected on previous leprosy-incidence and randomly allocated to four arms. Four annual door-to-door surveys will be performed in all arms. All consenting permanent residents will be screened for leprosy. Leprosy patients will be treated according to international guidelines and eligible contacts will be provided with SDR-PEP. Arm-1 is the comparator in which no PEP will be provided. In arms 2, 3 and 4, SDR-PEP will be provided at double the regular dose (20 mg/kg) to eligible contacts aged two years and above. In arm 2 all household-members of incident leprosy patients are eligible. In arm 3 not only household-members but also neighbourhood contacts living within 100-m of an incident case are eligible. In arm 4 such neighbourhood contacts are only eligible if they test positive to anti-PGL-I, a serological marker. Incidence rate ratios calculated between the comparator arm 1 and each of the intervention arms will constitute the primary outcome. Discussion Different trials on PEP have yielded varying results. The pivotal COLEP trial in Bangladesh showed a 57% reduction in incidence over a two-year period post-intervention without any rebound in the following years. A study in a high-incidence setting in Indonesia showed no effect of PEP provided to close contacts but a major effect of PEP provided as a blanket measure to an entire island population. High background incidence could be the reason of the lack of effect of PEP provided to individual contacts. The PEOPLE trial will assess effectiveness of PEP in a high incidence setting and will compare three different approaches, to identify who benefits most from PEP. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.Gov . NCT03662022 . Initial Protocol Version 1.2, 27-Aug-2018.

Leprosy continues to be the belligerent public health hazard for the causation of high disability and eventual morbidity cases with stable prevalence rates, even with treatment by the on-going multidrug therapy (MDT). Today, dapsone (DDS) resistance has led to fear of leprosy in more unfortunate people of certain developing countries. Herein, DDS was chemically conjugated with five phytochemicals independently as dapsone-phytochemical conjugates (DPCs) based on azo-coupling reaction. Possible biological activities were verified with computational chemistry and quantum mechanics by molecular dynamics simulation program before chemical synthesis and spectral characterizations viz., proton-HNMR, FTIR, UV and LC-MS. The in vivo antileprosy activity was monitored using the ‘mouse-foot-pad propagation method’, with WHO recommended concentration 0.01% mg/kg each DPC for 12 weeks, and the host-toxicity testing of the active DPC4 was seen in cultured-human-lymphocytes in vitro . One-log bacilli cells in DDS-resistant infected mice footpads decreased by the DPC4, and no bacilli were found in the DDS-sensitive mice hind pads. Additionally, the in vitro host toxicity study also confirmed that the DCP4 up to 5,000 mg/L level was safety for oral administration, since a minor number of dead cells were found in red color under a fluorescent microscope. Several advanced bioinformatics tools could help locate the potential chemical entity, thereby reducing the time and resources required for in vitro and in vitro tests. DPC4 could be used in place of DDS in MDT, evidenced from in vivo antileprosy activity and in vitro host toxicity study.

Some anti‐mycobacterial drugs are known to cause QT interval prolongation, potentially leading to life‐threatening ventricular arrhythmia. However, the highest leprosy and tuberculosis burden occurs in settings where electrocardiographic monitoring is challenging. The feasibility and accuracy of alternative strategies, such as the use of automated measurements or a mobile electrocardiogram (mECG) device, have not been evaluated in this context. As part of the phase II randomized controlled BE‐PEOPLE trial evaluating the safety of bedaquiline‐enhanced post‐exposure prophylaxis (bedaquiline and rifampicin, BE‐PEP, versus rifampicin, SDR‐PEP) for leprosy, all participants had corrected QT intervals (QTc) measured at baseline and on the day after receiving post‐exposure prophylaxis. The accuracy of mECG measurements as well as automated 12L‐ECG measurements was evaluated. In total, 635 mECGs from 323 participants were recorded, of which 616 (97%) were of sufficient quality for QTc measurement. Mean manually read QTc on 12L‐ECG and mECG were 394 ± 19 and 385 ± 18 ms, respectively (p < 0.001), with a strong correlation (r = 0.793). The mean absolute QTc difference between both modalities was 11 ± 10 ms. Mean manual and automated 12L‐ECG QTc were 394 ± 19 and 409 ± 19 ms, respectively (n = 636; p < 0.001), corresponding to moderate agreement (r = 0.655). The use of a mECG device for QT interval monitoring was feasible and yielded a median absolute QTc error of 8 ms. Automated QTc measurements were less accurate, yielding longer QTc intervals.

Dapsone is an important medication for the treatment of leprosy, but a life-threatening drug hypersensitivity syndrome develops in some patients. In this report from China, an HLA-B locus is identified as a strong genetic risk factor for the syndrome. Dapsone (4-4′-sulfonyldianiline), which was first synthesized in 1908, 1 is both an antibiotic and an antiinflammatory agent. Dapsone alone or in combination with other drugs has been used for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases (e.g., leprosy, malaria, and actinomycetoma, as well as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in persons with human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection) and chronic inflammatory diseases characterized by the infiltration of neutrophils or eosinophils (e.g., dermatitis herpetiformis, linear IgA dermatosis, subcorneal pustular dermatosis, and erythema elevatum diutinum). 2 , 3 About 0.5 to 3.6% of persons treated with dapsone have a drug hypersensitivity syndrome, 3 – 5 which was first described by . . .

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends rifampicin, dapsone and clofazimine multi-drug therapy (MDT) for the treatment of leprosy. Severe adverse effects include dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome, skin pigmentation, haemolytic anaemia, and hepatitis. At the Hospital for Tropical Diseases (HTD), London, United Kingdom monthly rifampicin, ofloxacin and minocycline (mROM) is used as first line treatment for leprosy. To determine the clinical outcomes and experiences of individuals treated with mROM. A retrospective study of individuals with leprosy who were prescribed mROM at HTD was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected on outcomes including relapses, leprosy reactions, bacterial index (BI) and adverse effects. Individuals were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire to understand their experiences of mROM. 29 individuals were identified and 20 interviewed. 26 (89.7%) individuals completed monthly mROM. 9 (31%) had switched from WHO MDT to mROM (five of whom (55.6%) were interviewed). BI reduced significantly following mROM treatment (p = 0.04). 17 individuals (58.6%) experienced a leprosy reaction. One of the 29 (3.4%) relapsed. The relapse rate was 9.5/1000 person years. 49 reports of adverse effects were either mild or moderate. The most frequent adverse effect (14/49) reported was orange discolouration of urine. No adverse effect required hospitalisation or discontinuation of mROM. Most individuals reported that skin lesions improved by the time they had completed mROM. In this small study in a non-endemic setting mROM was safe, effective and acceptable. mROM therapy is associated with improvement in skin lesions, decline in bacterial index and acceptable adverse effects. Larger, prospective, randomised studies are needed to determine whether relapse rates with mROM are equivalent or better than WHO MDT and to provide robust data on the seemingly better adverse effect profile of mROM.

Surgical debridement was the standard treatment for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection (Buruli ulcer disease) until WHO issued provisional guidelines in 2004 recommending treatment with antimicrobial drugs (streptomycin and rifampicin) in addition to surgery. These recommendations were based on observational studies and a small pilot study with microbiological endpoints. We investigated the efficacy of two regimens of antimicrobial treatment in early-stage M ulcerans infection. In this parallel, open-label, randomised trial undertaken in two sites in Ghana, patients were eligible for enrolment if they were aged 5 years or older and had early (duration <6 months), limited (cross-sectional diameter <10 cm), M ulcerans infection confirmed by dry-reagent-based PCR. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular streptomycin (15 mg/kg once daily) and oral rifampicin (10 mg/kg once daily) for 8 weeks (8-week streptomycin group; n=76) or streptomycin and rifampicin for 4 weeks followed by rifampicin and clarithromycin (7·5 mg/kg once daily), both orally, for 4 weeks (4-week streptomycin plus 4-week clarithromycin group; n=75). Randomisation was done by computer-generated minimisation for study site and type of lesion (ulceration or no ulceration). The randomly assigned allocation was sent from a central site by cell-phone text message to the study coordinator. The primary endpoint was lesion healing at 1 year after the start of treatment without lesion recurrence or extensive surgical debridement. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00321178. Four patients were lost to follow-up (8-week streptomycin, one; 4-week streptomycin plus 4-week clarithromycin, three). Since these four participants had healed lesions at their last assessment, they were included in the analysis for the primary endpoint. 73 (96%) participants in the 8-week streptomycin group and 68 (91%) in the 4-week streptomycin plus 4-week clarithromycin group had healed lesions at 1 year (odds ratio 2·49, 95% CI 0·66 to infinity; p=0·16, one-sided Fisher's exact test). No participants had lesion recurrence at 1 year. Three participants had vestibulotoxic events (8-week streptomycin, one; 4-week streptomycin plus 4-week clarithromycin, two). One participant developed an injection abscess and two participants developed an abscess close to the initial lesion, which was incised and drained (all three participants were in the 4-week streptomycin plus 4-week clarithromycin group). Antimycobacterial treatment for M ulcerans infection is effective in early, limited disease. 4 weeks of streptomycin and rifampicin followed by 4 weeks of rifampicin and clarithromycin has similar efficacy to 8 weeks of streptomycin and rifampicin; however, the number of injections of streptomycin can be reduced by switching to oral clarithromycin after 4 weeks. European Union (EU FP6 2003-INCO-Dev2-015476) and Buruli Ulcer Groningen Foundation.

Leprosy has been treated with multidrug therapy, which has been distributed for free across the globe and regarded as highly efficient. However, the impossibility of growing Mycobacterium leprae in axenic media has historically impaired assessments of M. leprae resistance, a parameter only recently detectable through molecular methods. A systematic, population-based search for M. leprae resistance in suspected leprosy relapse cases and contacts was performed in Prata Village, an isolated, hyperendemic, former leprosy colony located in the Brazilian Amazon. Results led to an extended active search involving the entire Prata population. Confirmed leprosy cases were investigated for bacterial resistance using a combination of in vivo testing and direct sequencing of resistance genes folP1, rpoB, and gyrA. A molecular epidemiology analysis was performed using data from 17 variable number tandem repeats (VNTR). Mycobacterium leprae was obtained from biopsies of 37 leprosy cases (18 relapses and 19 new cases): 16 (43.24%) displayed drug-resistance variants. Multidrug resistance to rifampicin and dapsone was observed in 8 relapses and 4 new cases. Single resistance to rifampicin was detected in 1 new case. Resistance to dapsone was present in 2 relapses and 1 new case. Combined molecular resistance and VNTR data revealed evidence of intra-familial primary transmission of resistant M. leprae. A comprehensive, population-based systematic approach to investigate M. leprae resistance in a unique population revealed an alarming scenario of the emergence and transmission of resistant strains. These findings may be used for the development of new strategies for surveillance of drug resistance in other populations.

The Maltalep trial in Bangladesh assessed whether single-dose rifampicin (SDR) given 8-12 weeks after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination was able to prevent excess leprosy cases due to BCG in contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. After previous publication of the two years follow-up results of the trial, we now review the results after five years. Furthermore, to better understand the long-term protective effects of BCG against leprosy, we conduct post-hoc in-depth secondary statistical analyses based on the prospective interventional (randomized) Maltalep trial and a non-interventional (non-randomized) cohort study that was conducted simultaneously in the same project area. The Maltalep trial is a single center, cluster-randomized controlled trial consisting of two arms. In one arm, SDR was given 8-12 weeks after BCG vaccination (SDR+), in the other arm no SDR was given after BCG revaccination (SDR-). The Maltalep trial included 1,552 index patients. Of these, 14,986 eligible contacts were randomized into two arms SDR- and SDR+ of the trial. During the 5-year observation period, 95 and 100 new cases appeared among the contacts in two arms SDR- and SDR+ , respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the leprosy incidence between the contacts of two arms of the trial. The non-intervention cohort included 554 index patients and 4,216 eligible contacts, with a total of 82 new leprosy cases appearing during the 5-year observation period. After adjustment for risk factors, the leprosy incidence was statistically significantly 1.70 [95% CI (1.03-2.80)] times higher in the contacts of the non-intervention cohort as compared to the contacts in the Maltalep trial. In the Maltalep trial, adjusted for both observed and unobserved differences, SDR- arm contacts of MB, slit skin smear (SSS) positive, blood-related (brother/sister, child, parent), and 'blood-related other' to index patients had higher risks for leprosy (AOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.20-4.60; AOR: 6.35; CI: 2.42-16.72; AOR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.83-10.26 and AOR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.37-7.90) compared to PB, SSS negative, and not blood-related index patients. Household members of index patients had an increased risk (AOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-7.27) for leprosy. In the SDR+ arm, leprosy incidences were statistically significantly less in the contacts of MB, SSS positive, and 'blood-related other' index patients as compared to the same kind of contacts in the SDR- arm. Leprosy incidence increased with age of contacts, with a peak at age group 45+ years (AOR:3.45; 95% CI: 1.44-8.23). BCG vaccination of contacts is effective in preventing leprosy, overall there is no clear benefit of adding SDR after BCG to reduce the number of excess leprosy cases after vaccination. SDR after BCG, however, appears effective to prevent leprosy in contacts of MB patients, smear positive index patients, and second degree blood-related contacts of index patients. Genetic relationship is a more profound risk factor for leprosy in contacts than being a household contact only. Leprosy incidence is clustered at levels of index patients and contacts, and this should be taken into account when assessing the effect of risk factors.