Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
33,993
result(s) for
"Letters (Correspondence)"
Sort by:
Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention
Previous research suggests that observers can suppress salient-but-irrelevant stimuli in a top-down manner. However, one question left unresolved is whether such suppression is, in fact, solely due to distractor-feature suppression or whether it instead also reflects some degree of target-feature enhancement. The present study (N = 60) addressed this issue. On search trials (70% of trials), participants searched for a shape target when an irrelevant color singleton was either present or absent; performance was better when a color singleton was present. On interleaved probe trials (30% of trials), participants searched for a letter target. Responses were faster for the letter on a target-colored item than on a neutral-colored item, whereas responses were slower for the letter on a distractor-colored item than on a neutral-colored item. The results demonstrate that target-feature enhancement and distractor-feature suppression contribute to attentional guidance independently; enhancement and suppression flexibly guide attention as the occasion demands.
Journal Article
The Washerwomen of Jackson on the Strength of Collective Action
A letter from the Washerwomen of Jackson to Jackson MS Mayor Barrows is presented. The letter highlights the agreement raised during the June 18 meeting where the wage increase was considered the preamble and resolution were unanimously adopted. The Washerwomen of Jackson also reiterates that they join in charging a uniform rate for their labor, and any one belonging to the class of washerwomen, violating this, shall be liable to a fine regulated by the class.
Journal Article
Back to Basics
Whorls are relatively common in the hallucal region (area of the ball of the foot under the big toe). The ridge flow and pattern elements carry high search diagnosticity (indicators of right foot and distal orientation), if the examiner has the requisite knowledge of friction ridge skin of the feet. The ridge flows formed by the recurves and triradii of a hallucal whorl tend to form the letter \"b\" on the left foot and the letter \"d\" on the right foot. The stem of each letter (vertical stroke) forms the ridge flow between the great toe and index toe, while the bowl of each letter bulges toward the instep of the foot.
Journal Article
Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs
Researchers have long debated whether attentional capture is purely stimulus driven or purely goal driven. In the current study, we tested a hybrid account, called the signal-suppression hypothesis, which posits that stimuli automatically produce a bottom-up salience signal, but that this signal can be suppressed via top-down control processes. To test this account, we used a new capture-probe paradigm in which participants searched for a target shape while ignoring an irrelevant color singleton. On occasional probe trials, letters were briefly presented inside the search shapes, and participants attempted to report these letters. Under conditions that promoted capture by the irrelevant singleton, accuracy was greater for the letter inside the singleton distractor than for letters inside nonsingleton distractors. However, when the conditions were changed to avoid capture by the singleton, accuracy for the letter inside the irrelevant singleton was reduced below the level observed for letters inside nonsingleton distractors, an indication of active suppression of processing at the singleton location.
Journal Article
Do \Brain-Training\ Programs Work?
In 2014, two groups of scientists published open letters on the efficacy of brain-training interventions, or \"brain games,\" for improving cognition. The first letter, a consensus statement from an international group of more than 70 scientists, claimed that brain games do not provide a scientifically grounded way to improve cognitive functioning or to stave off cognitive decline. Several months later, an international group of 133 scientists and practitioners countered that the literature is replete with demonstrations of the benefits of brain training for a wide variety of cognitive and everyday activities. How could two teams of scientists examine the same literature and come to conflicting \"consensus\" views about the effectiveness of brain training? In part, the disagreement might result from different standards used when evaluating the evidence. To date, the field has lacked a comprehensive review of the brain-training literature, one that examines both the quantity and the quality of the evidence according to a well-defined set of best practices. This article provides such a review, focusing exclusively on the use of cognitive tasks or games as a means to enhance performance on other tasks. We specify and justify a set of best practices for such brain-training interventions and then use those standards to evaluate all of the published peer-reviewed intervention studies cited on the websites of leading brain-training companies listed on Cognitive Training Data (www.cognitivetrainingdata.org), the site hosting the open letter from brain-training proponents. These citations presumably represent the evidence that best supports the claims of effectiveness. Based on this examination, we find extensive evidence that brain-training interventions improve performance on the trained tasks, less evidence that such interventions improve performance on closely related tasks, and little evidence that training enhances performance on distantly related tasks or that training improves everyday cognitive performance. We also find that many of the published intervention studies had major shortcomings in design or analysis that preclude definitive conclusions about the efficacy of training, and that none of the cited studies conformed to all of the best practices we identify as essential to drawing clear conclusions about the benefits of brain training for everyday activities. We conclude with detailed recommendations for scientists, funding agencies, and policymakers that, if adopted, would lead to better evidence regarding the efficacy of brain-training interventions.
Journal Article