Explore the vast range of titles available.

Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease, but chronic treatment is associated with the development of potentially disabling motor complications. Experimental studies suggest that motor complications are due to non-physiological, intermittent administration of the drug, and can be reduced with continuous delivery. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel delivered continuously through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube. In our 12-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, double-titration trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥30 years) with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications at 26 centres in Germany, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible participants had jejunal placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube, and were then randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa plus placebo intestinal gel infusion or levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion plus oral placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, with a mixed block size of 2 or 4. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in motor off-time. We assessed change in motor on-time without troublesome dyskinesia as a prespecified key secondary outcome. We assessed efficacy in a full-analysis set of participants with data for baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, and imputed missing data with the last observation carried forward approach. We assessed safety in randomly allocated patients who underwent the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy procedure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00660387 and NCT0357994. From baseline to 12 weeks in the full-analysis set, mean off-time decreased by 4·04 h (SE 0·65) for 35 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group compared with a decrease of 2·14 h (0·66) for 31 patients allocated to immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa (difference −1·91 h [95% CI −3·05 to −0·76]; p=0·0015). Mean on-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4·11 h (SE 0·75) in the intestinal gel group and 2·24 h (0·76) in the immediate-release oral group (difference 1·86 [95% CI 0·56 to 3·17]; p=0·0059). In the safety analyses 35 (95%) of 37 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group had adverse events (five [14%] serious), as did 34 (100%) of 34 patients allocated to the immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa group (seven [21%] serious), mainly associated with the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube. Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa with an intestinal gel offers a promising option for control of advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications. Benefits noted with intestinal gel delivery were of a greater magnitude than were those obtained with medical therapies to date, and our study is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of the benefit of continuous levodopa delivery in a double-blind controlled study. AbbVie.

Opicapone is a novel, once-daily, potent third-generation catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa compared with placebo or entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Patients aged 30–83 years were enrolled at 106 specialist centres across 19 European countries and Russia and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by a proprietary computer-generated sequence to oral treatment with opicapone (5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg once daily), placebo, or entacapone (200 mg with every levodopa intake) for 14–15 weeks. Patients and investigators (ie, outcome assessors) were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of study treatment in absolute time in the off state, as assessed by daily paper patient diaries; the primary analysis followed a hierarchical procedure for each opicapone dose in which superiority compared with placebo in the full analysis set was first tested and then, if positive, non-inferiority to entacapone was tested in the per-protocol set with a margin of 30 min. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2010-021860-13, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01568073. Between March 31, 2011, and Nov 30, 2013, of 679 patients screened, 600 were randomly assigned. 590 patients were included in the full analysis set (120 in the placebo group, 120 in the entacapone group, 119 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 116 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group) and 537 in the per-protocol set (112 in the placebo group, 104 in the entacapone group, 110 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 105 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 106 in the opicapone 50 mg group). The mean change in time in the off state was −56·0 min (SE 13·4; 95% CI −82·3 to −29·7) for placebo, −96·3 min (13·4; −122·6 to −70·0) for entacapone, −91·3 min (13·5; −117·7 to −64·8) for opicapone 5 mg, −85·9 min (13·7; −112·8 to −59·1) for opicapone 25 mg, and −116·8 min (14·0; −144·2 to −89·4) for opicapone 50 mg. Treatment with opicapone 50 mg was superior to placebo (mean difference in change from baseline −60·8 min, 95% CI −97·2 to −24·4; p=0·0015) and non-inferior to entacapone (−26·2 min, −63·8 to 11·4; p=0·0051). Treatment with opicapone 5 mg (p=0·056) or 25 mg (p=0·080) was not significantly different from treatment with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 60 (50%) of 121 patients in the placebo group, 69 (57%) of 122 in the entacapone group, 63 (52%) of 122 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 65 (55%) of 119 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 62 (54%) of 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group. The most common adverse events were dyskinesia (in five patients in the placebo group, ten in the entacapone group, 17 in the opicapone 5 mg group, nine in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 18 in the opicapone 50 mg group), insomnia (in one, seven, two, seven, and seven patients, respectively), and constipation (in three, five, four, none, and seven patients, respectively). Serious adverse events were reported in six patients in the placebo group, eight in the entacapone group, four each in the opicapone 5 mg and opicapone 50 mg groups, and one in the opicapone 25 mg group. The addition of opicapone 50 mg to levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations could enable a simplified drug regimen that allows physicians to individually tailor the existing levodopa daily regimen, by potentially reducing the total daily levodopa dose, increasing the dosing interval, and ultimately reducing the number of intakes, thereby maximising its benefit. BIAL.

Levodopa (LD) is the most effective oral pharmacotherapy for the management of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. However, LD use is complicated by a progressive shortening of the duration of efficacy of a dose, resulting in episodes of inadequate responsiveness, or OFF periods. OFF periods may also occur unpredictably, partly due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of oral LD, resulting from gastrointestinal dysfunction and from the effects of food on absorption. CVT-301 is a levodopa inhalation powder for the treatment of OFF period symptoms in patients on oral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor/LD. PK and safety profiles of single dose CVT-301, administered with oral carbidopa (CD) and oral CD/LD, were examined in patients with Parkinson's disease in the fed state. Eligible patients were aged 30–85 years, with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and a body mass index of 18–32 kg/m2, and were receiving treatment with a stable regimen that included oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) (total LD, ≤800 mg/d). A high-fat/protein meal was eaten 4–5 h after the administration of the morning oral CD/LD dose. Blood samples for predose PK analysis were obtained after the meal, followed by a single inhaled dose of CVT-301 84 mg (+25 mg of oral CD) or oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) or vice versa in 2 dosing periods in a crossover design. Blood was sampled at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h postdose. Tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (65.2% male; 87.0% white; mean age, 69.3 years; mean body mass index, 26.9 kg/m2; mean Parkinson's disease duration, 8.2 years; mean baseline LD dosage, 460.9 mg/d; 73.9% at Hoehn and Yahr stage <2.5). PK analyses were based on LD concentrations without baseline adjustment. Median Tmax values with CVT-301 and oral CD/LD were 15 and 120 min (P < 0.001). Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than with oral CD/LD (590.3 vs 844.3 ng/mL). C10min and C30min values with CVT-301 were approximately twice those with CD/LD (522.9 and 531.5 ng/mL vs 247.3 and 300.9 ng/mL, respectively). %CV for C5min to Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than that with oral CD/LD. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was cough (CVT-301, 7 patients [30.4%]; oral CD/LD, 1 patient [4.5%]). PK properties showed that CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed, with higher plasma LD concentrations in the first 45 min, and demonstrated lower interpatient variability, than was oral CD/LD in the fed condition. The study findings suggest that CVT-301 can be used without regard to food intake. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887884. •CVT-301 is an inhaled levodopa treatment for OFF periods in Parkinson's disease.•Pharmacokinetics of CVT-301 and oral ingested carbidopa/levodopa were examined.•Levodopa from CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed than from oral carbidopa/levodopa.•CVT-301 produced lower interpatient levodopa variability than oral carbidopa/levodopa.•Findings support inhaled levodopa for adjunctive treatment of OFF periods.

In a randomized, delayed-start trial of levodopa in Parkinson’s disease, with one group receiving the drug for 80 weeks and the other starting at 40 weeks, the difference between the groups in the progression of symptoms was not significant.

Background The wearing-off phenomenon is a key driver of medication change for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) treated with levodopa. Common first-line options include increasing the levodopa dose or adding a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, but there are no trials comparing the efficacy of these approaches. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjunct opicapone versus an additional 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early wearing-off using pooled data from 2 randomized studies. Methods The ADOPTION study program included two similarly designed 4-week, open-label studies conducted in South Korea (NCT04821687) and Europe (NCT04990284). Patients with PD, treated with 3–4 daily doses of levodopa therapy and with signs of early wearing-off were randomized (1:1) to adjunct opicapone 50 mg or an additional dose of levodopa 100 mg. Patient-level data from the two studies were pooled. Results The adjusted mean [SE] change from baseline to week 4 in absolute OFF time (key endpoint) was − 62.8 min [8.8] in the opicapone group and − 33.8 min [9.0] in the levodopa 100 mg group, the difference significantly favoring opicapone (− 29.0 [− 53.8, − 4.2] min, p  = 0.02). Significant differences in the Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III subscore (− 4.1 with opicapone vs − 2.5 with levodopa 100 mg), also favored opicapone (− 1.7 [− 3.3, − 0.04], p  < 0.05). Dyskinesia was the most frequently reported adverse event (opicapone 7.2% vs. levodopa 100 mg 4.2%). Conclusions In these short-term trials, introducing adjunct opicapone was more effective at reducing OFF time than adding another 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early signs of wearing-off.

Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa [PRODUODOPA (EU); VYALEV (USA, Canada, Japan)] is a soluble formulation of levodopa and carbidopa prodrugs for 24-h continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion. It is approved for the treatment of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Administered via an ambulatory infusion pump, it allows for personalized dosing based on individual needs. In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, continuous SC infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa provided a significant and clinically meaningful increase in hours of 'on' time without troublesome dyskinesia and a reduction in hours of 'off' time compared with oral immediate-release levodopa/carbidopa. The benefits of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa were maintained over the longer term (up to 124 weeks). Continuous SC infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa was generally well tolerated, including over the longer term. However, infusion site events were common, necessitating regular monitoring, cannula replacement, infusion site rotation and aseptic techniques. Although further long-term data are required, foslevodopa/foscarbidopa represents a promising non-surgical alternative to the available device-aided therapies for patients with advanced PD whose motor fluctuations are inadequately controlled by other oral PD medications.

Treatment with levodopa, a precursor of dopamine (DA), to compensate for the loss of endogenous DA in Parkinson’s disease (PD), has been a success story for over 50 years. However, in late stages of PD, the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons and the ongoing reduction in endogenous DA concentrations make it increasingly difficult to maintain normal-like DA function. Typically, in late PD, higher doses of levodopa are required, and the fluctuations in striatal DA concentrations—reflecting the timing pattern of levodopa administrations—become more pronounced. These DA fluctuations can include highs that induce involuntary movements (levodopa-induced dyskinesia, LID) or lows that result in insufficient suppression of PD symptoms (“OFF” phases). The enhanced fluctuations primarily arise from the loss of DA buffering capacity, resulting from the degeneration of DA neurons, and an increased reliance on levodopa-derived DA release as a “false neurotransmitter” by serotonergic neurons. In many patients, the LID and OFF-phases can be alleviated by modifying the levodopa therapy to provide a more continuous delivery or by using additional medications, such as monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors, amantadine, or dopaminergic receptor agonists. Understanding the challenges faced by levodopa therapy also requires considering that the PD striatum is characterized not only by the loss of DA neurons but also by neuroplastic adaptations and PD-induced degenerations of other neural populations. This review provides a broad overview on the use of levodopa in treating PD, with a focus on the underlying science of the challenges encountered in late stages of the disease.

Safinamide and rasagiline are adjuncts to levodopa for the motor fluctuations of Parkinson’s Disease (PD). However, there remains a scarcity of head-to-head studies that directly compare safinamide and rasagiline. This study compared safinamide and rasagiline as adjuncts to levodopa in Chinese PD patients with motor fluctuations by matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Baseline age, sex, BMI, and OFF time were adjusted for matching. Efficacy outcomes were the mean changes in total daily OFF time, UPDRS III, and PDQ-39 from baseline to week 16, which calculated by a weighted covariance model. Safety outcomes included rates of AEs, SAEs, and DCAEs. Bucher method was used for mean difference (MD) of efficacy and odds ratio (OR) of safety outcomes. Combination therapy of safinamide 50-100 mg/day and levodopa significantly reduced the mean total daily OFF time by 0.7 h (− 1.40 to − 0.02) compared to the combination therapy of rasagiline 1 mg/day and levodopa. Safinamide more effectively reduced UPDRS III (− 2.9, − 5.28 to − 0.52). Changes in PDQ-39 scores indicated a trend toward greater improvement in safinamide. There was no significant difference in safety outcomes. Compared to rasagiline, the combined therapy of safinamide and levodopa could significantly improve motor fluctuations for PD patients in China, without compromising safety.

Background and objectives Opicapone is a novel third generation catechol- O -methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to compare the levodopa pharmacokinetic profile throughout a day driven by the COMT inhibition either following repeated doses of opicapone or concomitant administration with entacapone. Methods A randomized, double-blind, gender-balanced, parallel-group study was performed in 4 groups of 20 healthy subjects each. Four subjects in each group received placebo during the entire study. Sixteen subjects in one group received placebo once daily for 11 days and on day 12, 200 mg entacapone concomitantly with each levodopa/carbidopa dose (three times separated by a 5-h interval). Sixteen subjects in each of the remaining three groups received respectively 25, 50, and 75 mg opicapone once daily for 11 days and on day 12, placebo concomitantly with each levodopa/carbidopa dose. Results Levodopa minimum plasma concentration (C min ) for each levodopa/carbidopa dose and for the mean of all levodopa/carbidopa doses increased substantially with all active treatments (entacapone and opicapone) when compared to the control group (placebo), with values ranging from 1.7-fold (200 mg entacapone) to 3.3-fold (75 mg opicapone). No statistical difference was found for levodopa peak of systemic exposure (as assessed by maximum observed plasma concentration (C max )) between all active treatments and placebo. A significant increase in the levodopa extent of systemic exposure (as assessed by concentration-time curve (AUC)) occurred with all opicapone treatments in relation to placebo. No statistical difference was found for levodopa AUC when entacapone was compared to placebo. When compared to entacapone, both 50 and 75 mg opicapone presented a significant increase for the levodopa AUC. All active treatments significantly inhibited both peak (as assessed by E max ) and extent (as assessed by effect-time curve (AUEC)) of the COMT activity in relation to placebo. When compared to entacapone, all opicapone treatments significantly decreased the extent (AUEC) of the COMT activity due to a long-lasting and sustained effect. The tolerability profile was favorable for all active treatments. Conclusion Opicapone, a novel third generation COMT inhibitor, when compared to entacapone, provides a superior response upon the bioavailability of levodopa associated to more pronounced, long-lasting, and sustained COMT inhibition. The tolerability profile was favorable. On the basis of the results presented in this study and along with the earlier pharmacology studies, it is anticipated that opicapone adjunct therapy at the dosages of 25 and 50 mg will provide an enhancement in levodopa availability that will translate into clinical benefit for Parkinson’s disease patients.