Explore the vast range of titles available.

In a randomized, delayed-start trial of levodopa in Parkinson’s disease, with one group receiving the drug for 80 weeks and the other starting at 40 weeks, the difference between the groups in the progression of symptoms was not significant.

The efficacy of l -dopa treatment for Parkinson's disease is hugely variable between individuals, depending on the composition of their microbiota. l -Dopa is decarboxylated into active dopamine, but if the gut microbiota metabolize l -dopa before it crosses the blood-brain barrier, medication is ineffective. Maini Rekdal et al. found that different species of bacterium are involved in l -dopa metabolism (see the Perspective by O'Neill). Tyrosine decarboxylase (TDC) from Enterococcus faecalis and dopamine dehydroxylase (Dadh) from Eggerthella lenta A2 sequentially metabolized l -dopa into m -tyramine. The microbial l -dopa decarboxylase can be inactivated by ( S )-α-fluoromethyltyrosine (AFMT), which indicates possibilities for developing combinations of Parkinson's drugs to circumvent microbial inactivation. Science , this issue p. eaau6323 ; see also p. 1030 An interspecies metabolic pathway allows human gut bacteria to metabolize the Parkinson’s drug levodopa. The human gut microbiota metabolizes the Parkinson’s disease medication Levodopa ( l -dopa), potentially reducing drug availability and causing side effects. However, the organisms, genes, and enzymes responsible for this activity in patients and their susceptibility to inhibition by host-targeted drugs are unknown. Here, we describe an interspecies pathway for gut bacterial l -dopa metabolism. Conversion of l -dopa to dopamine by a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent tyrosine decarboxylase from Enterococcus faecalis is followed by transformation of dopamine to m -tyramine by a molybdenum-dependent dehydroxylase from Eggerthella lenta . These enzymes predict drug metabolism in complex human gut microbiotas. Although a drug that targets host aromatic amino acid decarboxylase does not prevent gut microbial l -dopa decarboxylation, we identified a compound that inhibits this activity in Parkinson’s patient microbiotas and increases l -dopa bioavailability in mice.

Opicapone is a novel, once-daily, potent third-generation catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa compared with placebo or entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Patients aged 30–83 years were enrolled at 106 specialist centres across 19 European countries and Russia and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by a proprietary computer-generated sequence to oral treatment with opicapone (5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg once daily), placebo, or entacapone (200 mg with every levodopa intake) for 14–15 weeks. Patients and investigators (ie, outcome assessors) were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of study treatment in absolute time in the off state, as assessed by daily paper patient diaries; the primary analysis followed a hierarchical procedure for each opicapone dose in which superiority compared with placebo in the full analysis set was first tested and then, if positive, non-inferiority to entacapone was tested in the per-protocol set with a margin of 30 min. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2010-021860-13, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01568073. Between March 31, 2011, and Nov 30, 2013, of 679 patients screened, 600 were randomly assigned. 590 patients were included in the full analysis set (120 in the placebo group, 120 in the entacapone group, 119 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 116 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group) and 537 in the per-protocol set (112 in the placebo group, 104 in the entacapone group, 110 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 105 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 106 in the opicapone 50 mg group). The mean change in time in the off state was −56·0 min (SE 13·4; 95% CI −82·3 to −29·7) for placebo, −96·3 min (13·4; −122·6 to −70·0) for entacapone, −91·3 min (13·5; −117·7 to −64·8) for opicapone 5 mg, −85·9 min (13·7; −112·8 to −59·1) for opicapone 25 mg, and −116·8 min (14·0; −144·2 to −89·4) for opicapone 50 mg. Treatment with opicapone 50 mg was superior to placebo (mean difference in change from baseline −60·8 min, 95% CI −97·2 to −24·4; p=0·0015) and non-inferior to entacapone (−26·2 min, −63·8 to 11·4; p=0·0051). Treatment with opicapone 5 mg (p=0·056) or 25 mg (p=0·080) was not significantly different from treatment with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 60 (50%) of 121 patients in the placebo group, 69 (57%) of 122 in the entacapone group, 63 (52%) of 122 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 65 (55%) of 119 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 62 (54%) of 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group. The most common adverse events were dyskinesia (in five patients in the placebo group, ten in the entacapone group, 17 in the opicapone 5 mg group, nine in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 18 in the opicapone 50 mg group), insomnia (in one, seven, two, seven, and seven patients, respectively), and constipation (in three, five, four, none, and seven patients, respectively). Serious adverse events were reported in six patients in the placebo group, eight in the entacapone group, four each in the opicapone 5 mg and opicapone 50 mg groups, and one in the opicapone 25 mg group. The addition of opicapone 50 mg to levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations could enable a simplified drug regimen that allows physicians to individually tailor the existing levodopa daily regimen, by potentially reducing the total daily levodopa dose, increasing the dosing interval, and ultimately reducing the number of intakes, thereby maximising its benefit. BIAL.

Understanding how the brain translates a structured sequence of sounds, such as music, into a pleasant and rewarding experience is a fascinating question which may be crucial to better understand the processing of abstract rewards in humans. Previous neuroimaging findings point to a challenging role of the dopaminergic system in music-evoked pleasure. However, there is a lack of direct evidence showing that dopamine function is causally related to the pleasure we experience from music. We addressed this problem through a double blind within-subject pharmacological design in which we directly manipulated dopaminergic synaptic availability while healthy participants (n = 27) were engaged in music listening. We orally administrated to each participant a dopamine precursor (levodopa), a dopamine antagonist (risperidone), and a placebo (lactose) in three different sessions. We demonstrate that levodopa and risperidone led to opposite effects in measures of musical pleasure and motivation: while the dopamine precursor levodopa, compared with placebo, increased the hedonic experience and music-related motivational responses, risperidone led to a reduction of both. This study shows a causal role of dopamine in musical pleasure and indicates that dopaminergic transmission might play different or additive roles than the ones postulated in affective processing so far, particularly in abstract cognitive activities.

Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease, but chronic treatment is associated with the development of potentially disabling motor complications. Experimental studies suggest that motor complications are due to non-physiological, intermittent administration of the drug, and can be reduced with continuous delivery. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel delivered continuously through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube. In our 12-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, double-titration trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥30 years) with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications at 26 centres in Germany, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible participants had jejunal placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube, and were then randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa plus placebo intestinal gel infusion or levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion plus oral placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, with a mixed block size of 2 or 4. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in motor off-time. We assessed change in motor on-time without troublesome dyskinesia as a prespecified key secondary outcome. We assessed efficacy in a full-analysis set of participants with data for baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, and imputed missing data with the last observation carried forward approach. We assessed safety in randomly allocated patients who underwent the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy procedure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00660387 and NCT0357994. From baseline to 12 weeks in the full-analysis set, mean off-time decreased by 4·04 h (SE 0·65) for 35 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group compared with a decrease of 2·14 h (0·66) for 31 patients allocated to immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa (difference −1·91 h [95% CI −3·05 to −0·76]; p=0·0015). Mean on-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4·11 h (SE 0·75) in the intestinal gel group and 2·24 h (0·76) in the immediate-release oral group (difference 1·86 [95% CI 0·56 to 3·17]; p=0·0059). In the safety analyses 35 (95%) of 37 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group had adverse events (five [14%] serious), as did 34 (100%) of 34 patients allocated to the immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa group (seven [21%] serious), mainly associated with the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube. Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa with an intestinal gel offers a promising option for control of advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications. Benefits noted with intestinal gel delivery were of a greater magnitude than were those obtained with medical therapies to date, and our study is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of the benefit of continuous levodopa delivery in a double-blind controlled study. AbbVie.

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, over time, the clinical response to levodopa becomes complicated by a reduction in the duration and reliability of motor improvement (motor fluctuations) and the emergence of involuntary movements (levodopa-induced dyskinesia). Strategies that have been attempted in an effort to delay the development of these motor complications include levodopa sparing and continuous dopaminergic therapy. Once motor complications occur, a wide array of medical treatments is available to maximize motor function through the day while limiting dyskinesia. Here, we review the clinical features, epidemiology, and risk factors for the development of motor complications, as well as strategies for their prevention and medical management.

Background and purpose Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is a recently developed device‐aided therapy for advanced Parkinson disease (PD) patients. The aim of this study was to report real‐world evidence about the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of LECIG in PD patients. Methods A multicenter observational retrospective study of the first patients who initiated LECIG in Spain was performed. All neurologists with an experience of at least two patients treated until 30 March 2024 were invited to participate. Data about effectiveness and safety from the medical records (V0, pre‐LECIG; V1, initiation of LECIG; V2, post‐LECIG follow‐up) with a total of 246 variables were collected. Results Seventy‐three PD patients (61.6% males, 70.1 ± 9.1 years old) from 21 Spanish centers with a mean disease duration of 14.4 ± 6.3 years (range = 5–31) were included. Twenty‐six patients (35.6%) were switched directly from levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel. The mean exposure to LECIG was 177.3 ± 110.5 days (range = 7–476). The mean daily OFF time decreased from 5.2 ± 3 (pre‐LECIG) to 1.9 ± 1.8 (post‐LECIG; n = 66, p < 0.0001). Global improvement was observed in >85% of the patients. No significant change was detected in the levodopa equivalent daily dose from V0 to V2. Only 7% received 24‐h infusion, and 24.7% required more than one cartridge per day at V2. Thirty‐four patients (46.6%) had at least one adverse event related to LECIG and/or the device system. Five patients (6.8%) discontinued LECIG. Conclusions LECIG was safe and effective in advanced PD patients.

ABSTRACT Background The outcome of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in Parkinson's disease carriers of GBA1 mutations (GBA‐PD) remains uncertain. Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of LCIG in a large PD cohort, focusing on GBA1 variants. Methods This multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal “real‐world” study included consecutive patients with advanced PD treated with LCIG at 31 Italian centers; data were collected at baseline, 1‐, 5‐year, and last‐available follow‐up. Results Data from 512 PD patients (59% male, mean age and disease duration at LCIG initiation 67.0 ± 8.0 and 12.9 ± 5.0 years, respectively) were analyzed. GBA1 genotyping was available for 306 patients (60%), of whom 40 (13%) had GBA1 mutations or risk variants. Mean follow‐up on LCIG was 3.9 ± 2.9 years; 5‐year follow‐up data were available for 159 subjects. At baseline, GBA‐PD had a younger age, shorter PD duration, worse cognition, and more hallucinations than noncarriers. At 1‐ and 5‐year follow‐up, LCIG improved motor and non‐motor symptoms, OFF‐time, and dyskinesias in the entire population. In GBA‐PD, MDS‐UPDRS parts I, II, and III scores did not change, while part IV score improved significantly less than in noncarriers; cognition and orthostatic hypotension symptoms worsened more rapidly. Multivariate analysis of predictors for adverse events and LCIG discontinuation found no significant contribution from GBA1 mutation status. Conclusions GBA1 status does not increase the risk of adverse events or LCIG discontinuation. LCIG is a safe option for advanced GBA‐PD, even in patients with cognitive impairment at baseline. However, GBA‐PD experiences lower efficacy on motor disability and complications and faster cognitive decline than noncarriers.

Levodopa (LD) is the most effective oral pharmacotherapy for the management of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. However, LD use is complicated by a progressive shortening of the duration of efficacy of a dose, resulting in episodes of inadequate responsiveness, or OFF periods. OFF periods may also occur unpredictably, partly due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of oral LD, resulting from gastrointestinal dysfunction and from the effects of food on absorption. CVT-301 is a levodopa inhalation powder for the treatment of OFF period symptoms in patients on oral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor/LD. PK and safety profiles of single dose CVT-301, administered with oral carbidopa (CD) and oral CD/LD, were examined in patients with Parkinson's disease in the fed state. Eligible patients were aged 30–85 years, with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and a body mass index of 18–32 kg/m2, and were receiving treatment with a stable regimen that included oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) (total LD, ≤800 mg/d). A high-fat/protein meal was eaten 4–5 h after the administration of the morning oral CD/LD dose. Blood samples for predose PK analysis were obtained after the meal, followed by a single inhaled dose of CVT-301 84 mg (+25 mg of oral CD) or oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) or vice versa in 2 dosing periods in a crossover design. Blood was sampled at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h postdose. Tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (65.2% male; 87.0% white; mean age, 69.3 years; mean body mass index, 26.9 kg/m2; mean Parkinson's disease duration, 8.2 years; mean baseline LD dosage, 460.9 mg/d; 73.9% at Hoehn and Yahr stage <2.5). PK analyses were based on LD concentrations without baseline adjustment. Median Tmax values with CVT-301 and oral CD/LD were 15 and 120 min (P < 0.001). Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than with oral CD/LD (590.3 vs 844.3 ng/mL). C10min and C30min values with CVT-301 were approximately twice those with CD/LD (522.9 and 531.5 ng/mL vs 247.3 and 300.9 ng/mL, respectively). %CV for C5min to Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than that with oral CD/LD. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was cough (CVT-301, 7 patients [30.4%]; oral CD/LD, 1 patient [4.5%]). PK properties showed that CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed, with higher plasma LD concentrations in the first 45 min, and demonstrated lower interpatient variability, than was oral CD/LD in the fed condition. The study findings suggest that CVT-301 can be used without regard to food intake. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887884. •CVT-301 is an inhaled levodopa treatment for OFF periods in Parkinson's disease.•Pharmacokinetics of CVT-301 and oral ingested carbidopa/levodopa were examined.•Levodopa from CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed than from oral carbidopa/levodopa.•CVT-301 produced lower interpatient levodopa variability than oral carbidopa/levodopa.•Findings support inhaled levodopa for adjunctive treatment of OFF periods.

ABSTRACT Background Parkinson's disease (PD) treatments, such as apomorphine (APO) and levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), represent advanced therapeutic options for managing motor symptoms. However, clear selection criteria and well‐defined cognitive outcomes are lacking. This systematic review specifically aimed to address these gaps by assessing the cognitive impact of APO and LCIG in PD patients. Methods A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. Two authors screened studies based on key inclusion criteria, including at least two cognitive tests, and a follow‐up of 6 months or more. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). Results Fifteen studies were identified (7 APO and 8 LCIG). APO generally preserved cognitive function over a 12‐month follow‐up, with some decreases in visuospatial memory and executive functions. LCIG, with a 28‐month follow‐up, showed more extensive cognitive decline, particularly in patients with pre‐existing impairments. Variability in cognitive tests made direct comparisons difficult. Discussion APO may have a more favorable cognitive profile than LCIG. However, differences in follow‐up duration, moderate risk of bias, and inconsistent cognitive assessments warrant cautious interpretation. Improved patient selection and comprehensive cognitive evaluations are recommended for future practice.