Explore the vast range of titles available.

Levodopa is the most effective therapy for Parkinson's disease, but chronic treatment is associated with the development of potentially disabling motor complications. Experimental studies suggest that motor complications are due to non-physiological, intermittent administration of the drug, and can be reduced with continuous delivery. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel delivered continuously through an intrajejunal percutaneous tube. In our 12-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, double-titration trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥30 years) with advanced Parkinson's disease and motor complications at 26 centres in Germany, New Zealand, and the USA. Eligible participants had jejunal placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube, and were then randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment with immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa plus placebo intestinal gel infusion or levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion plus oral placebo. Randomisation was stratified by site, with a mixed block size of 2 or 4. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to final visit in motor off-time. We assessed change in motor on-time without troublesome dyskinesia as a prespecified key secondary outcome. We assessed efficacy in a full-analysis set of participants with data for baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, and imputed missing data with the last observation carried forward approach. We assessed safety in randomly allocated patients who underwent the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy procedure. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00660387 and NCT0357994. From baseline to 12 weeks in the full-analysis set, mean off-time decreased by 4·04 h (SE 0·65) for 35 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group compared with a decrease of 2·14 h (0·66) for 31 patients allocated to immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa (difference −1·91 h [95% CI −3·05 to −0·76]; p=0·0015). Mean on-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased by 4·11 h (SE 0·75) in the intestinal gel group and 2·24 h (0·76) in the immediate-release oral group (difference 1·86 [95% CI 0·56 to 3·17]; p=0·0059). In the safety analyses 35 (95%) of 37 patients allocated to the levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel group had adverse events (five [14%] serious), as did 34 (100%) of 34 patients allocated to the immediate-release oral levodopa-carbidopa group (seven [21%] serious), mainly associated with the percutaneous gastrojejunostomy tube. Continuous delivery of levodopa-carbidopa with an intestinal gel offers a promising option for control of advanced Parkinson's disease with motor complications. Benefits noted with intestinal gel delivery were of a greater magnitude than were those obtained with medical therapies to date, and our study is, to our knowledge, the first demonstration of the benefit of continuous levodopa delivery in a double-blind controlled study. AbbVie.

Levodopa is the most effective symptomatic therapy for Parkinson's disease, but patients with advanced Parkinson's disease develop motor fluctuations with chronic oral levodopa therapy. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa is a soluble formulation of levodopa and carbidopa prodrugs that is delivered as a 24-h/day continuous subcutaneous infusion, and we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of this formulation in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. A 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study was done at 65 academic and community study centres in the USA and Australia. Patients with levodopa-responsive advanced Parkinson's disease inadequately controlled on current therapy, including at least 2·5 h of average daily off time, were randomly assigned (1:1) to continuous subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa-foscarbidopa plus oral placebo or to oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa plus continuous subcutaneous infusion of placebo solution. Randomisation was stratified by site by means of a permutated-block schedule with a block size of two. The participants, treating investigators, study site personnel, and sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary and first key secondary endpoint in the hierarchical testing strategy were change from baseline to week 12 in on time without troublesome dyskinesia and off time, respectively; both endpoints were evaluated by an intention-to-treat analysis applying a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. The study is completed and is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04380142. Between Oct 19, 2020, and Sept 29, 2021, of 270 participants screened and 174 enrolled, 141 were randomly assigned and received continuous subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa-foscarbidopa plus oral placebo capsules (n=74) or oral encapsulated immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa plus continuous subcutaneous infusion of placebo solution (n=67). Compared with levodopa-carbidopa, foslevodopa-foscarbidopa showed a significantly greater increase in on time without troublesome dyskinesia (model-based mean [SE] 2·72 [0·52] vs 0·97 [0·50] h; difference 1·75 h, 95% CI 0·46 to 3·05; p=0·0083) and a significantly greater reduction in off time (−2·75 [0·50] vs −0·96 [0·49] h; difference −1·79 h, −3·03 to −0·54; p=0·0054). Hierarchical testing ended after the first secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported in 63 (85%) of 74 patients in the foslevodopa-foscarbidopa group versus 42 (63%) of 67 in the levodopa-carbidopa group, and incidences of serious adverse events were similar between the groups (six [8%] of 74 vs four [6%] of 67, respectively). The most frequent adverse events in the foslevodopa-foscarbidopa group were infusion site adverse events (erythema 20 [27%]), pain 19 [26%]), cellulitis (14 [19%]), and oedema (nine [12%]), most of which were non-serious and mild–moderate in severity. The only system organ class that had more than one serious adverse event in the foslevodopa-foscarbidopa group was infections and infestations (catheter site cellulitis [one [1%]] and infusion site cellulitis [one [1%]). Adverse events led to premature discontinuation of study drug in 16 (22%) of 74 participants in the foslevodopa-foscarbidopa group versus one (1%) of 67 participants in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa improved motor fluctuations, with benefits in both on time without troublesome dyskinesia and off time. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa has a favourable benefit-risk profile and represents a potential non-surgical alternative for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. AbbVie.

In a randomized, delayed-start trial of levodopa in Parkinson’s disease, with one group receiving the drug for 80 weeks and the other starting at 40 weeks, the difference between the groups in the progression of symptoms was not significant.

Opicapone is a novel, once-daily, potent third-generation catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa compared with placebo or entacapone in patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations. We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled trial of opicapone as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Patients aged 30–83 years were enrolled at 106 specialist centres across 19 European countries and Russia and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) by a proprietary computer-generated sequence to oral treatment with opicapone (5 mg, 25 mg, or 50 mg once daily), placebo, or entacapone (200 mg with every levodopa intake) for 14–15 weeks. Patients and investigators (ie, outcome assessors) were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of study treatment in absolute time in the off state, as assessed by daily paper patient diaries; the primary analysis followed a hierarchical procedure for each opicapone dose in which superiority compared with placebo in the full analysis set was first tested and then, if positive, non-inferiority to entacapone was tested in the per-protocol set with a margin of 30 min. This trial is registered with EudraCT, 2010-021860-13, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01568073. Between March 31, 2011, and Nov 30, 2013, of 679 patients screened, 600 were randomly assigned. 590 patients were included in the full analysis set (120 in the placebo group, 120 in the entacapone group, 119 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 116 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group) and 537 in the per-protocol set (112 in the placebo group, 104 in the entacapone group, 110 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 105 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 106 in the opicapone 50 mg group). The mean change in time in the off state was −56·0 min (SE 13·4; 95% CI −82·3 to −29·7) for placebo, −96·3 min (13·4; −122·6 to −70·0) for entacapone, −91·3 min (13·5; −117·7 to −64·8) for opicapone 5 mg, −85·9 min (13·7; −112·8 to −59·1) for opicapone 25 mg, and −116·8 min (14·0; −144·2 to −89·4) for opicapone 50 mg. Treatment with opicapone 50 mg was superior to placebo (mean difference in change from baseline −60·8 min, 95% CI −97·2 to −24·4; p=0·0015) and non-inferior to entacapone (−26·2 min, −63·8 to 11·4; p=0·0051). Treatment with opicapone 5 mg (p=0·056) or 25 mg (p=0·080) was not significantly different from treatment with placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 60 (50%) of 121 patients in the placebo group, 69 (57%) of 122 in the entacapone group, 63 (52%) of 122 in the opicapone 5 mg group, 65 (55%) of 119 in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 62 (54%) of 115 in the opicapone 50 mg group. The most common adverse events were dyskinesia (in five patients in the placebo group, ten in the entacapone group, 17 in the opicapone 5 mg group, nine in the opicapone 25 mg group, and 18 in the opicapone 50 mg group), insomnia (in one, seven, two, seven, and seven patients, respectively), and constipation (in three, five, four, none, and seven patients, respectively). Serious adverse events were reported in six patients in the placebo group, eight in the entacapone group, four each in the opicapone 5 mg and opicapone 50 mg groups, and one in the opicapone 25 mg group. The addition of opicapone 50 mg to levodopa treatment in patients with Parkinson's disease and end-of-dose motor fluctuations could enable a simplified drug regimen that allows physicians to individually tailor the existing levodopa daily regimen, by potentially reducing the total daily levodopa dose, increasing the dosing interval, and ultimately reducing the number of intakes, thereby maximising its benefit. BIAL.

Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa [PRODUODOPA (EU); VYALEV (USA, Canada, Japan)] is a soluble formulation of levodopa and carbidopa prodrugs for 24-h continuous subcutaneous (SC) infusion. It is approved for the treatment of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Administered via an ambulatory infusion pump, it allows for personalized dosing based on individual needs. In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, continuous SC infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa provided a significant and clinically meaningful increase in hours of 'on' time without troublesome dyskinesia and a reduction in hours of 'off' time compared with oral immediate-release levodopa/carbidopa. The benefits of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa were maintained over the longer term (up to 124 weeks). Continuous SC infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa was generally well tolerated, including over the longer term. However, infusion site events were common, necessitating regular monitoring, cannula replacement, infusion site rotation and aseptic techniques. Although further long-term data are required, foslevodopa/foscarbidopa represents a promising non-surgical alternative to the available device-aided therapies for patients with advanced PD whose motor fluctuations are inadequately controlled by other oral PD medications.

Background The wearing-off phenomenon is a key driver of medication change for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) treated with levodopa. Common first-line options include increasing the levodopa dose or adding a catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor, but there are no trials comparing the efficacy of these approaches. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjunct opicapone versus an additional 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early wearing-off using pooled data from 2 randomized studies. Methods The ADOPTION study program included two similarly designed 4-week, open-label studies conducted in South Korea (NCT04821687) and Europe (NCT04990284). Patients with PD, treated with 3–4 daily doses of levodopa therapy and with signs of early wearing-off were randomized (1:1) to adjunct opicapone 50 mg or an additional dose of levodopa 100 mg. Patient-level data from the two studies were pooled. Results The adjusted mean [SE] change from baseline to week 4 in absolute OFF time (key endpoint) was − 62.8 min [8.8] in the opicapone group and − 33.8 min [9.0] in the levodopa 100 mg group, the difference significantly favoring opicapone (− 29.0 [− 53.8, − 4.2] min, p  = 0.02). Significant differences in the Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III subscore (− 4.1 with opicapone vs − 2.5 with levodopa 100 mg), also favored opicapone (− 1.7 [− 3.3, − 0.04], p  < 0.05). Dyskinesia was the most frequently reported adverse event (opicapone 7.2% vs. levodopa 100 mg 4.2%). Conclusions In these short-term trials, introducing adjunct opicapone was more effective at reducing OFF time than adding another 100 mg levodopa dose in PD patients with early signs of wearing-off.

Levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs) are the most common and disabling adverse motor effect of therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. In this study, we investigated serotonergic mechanisms in LIDs development in PD patients using 11C-DASB PET to evaluate serotonin terminal function and 11C-raclopride PET to evaluate dopamine release. PD patients with LIDs showed relative preservation of serotonergic terminals throughout their disease. Identical levodopa doses induced markedly higher striatal synaptic dopamine concentrations in PD patients with LIDs compared with PD patients with stable responses to levodopa. Oral administration of the serotonin receptor type 1A agonist buspirone prior to levodopa reduced levodopa-evoked striatal synaptic dopamine increases and attenuated LIDs. PD patients with LIDs that exhibited greater decreases in synaptic dopamine after buspirone pretreatment had higher levels of serotonergic terminal functional integrity. Buspirone-associated modulation of dopamine levels was greater in PD patients with mild LIDs compared with those with more severe LIDs. These findings indicate that striatal serotonergic terminals contribute to LIDs pathophysiology via aberrant processing of exogenous levodopa and release of dopamine as false neurotransmitter in the denervated striatum of PD patients with LIDs. Our results also support the development of selective serotonin receptor type 1A agonists for use as antidyskinetic agents in PD.

Safinamide and rasagiline are adjuncts to levodopa for the motor fluctuations of Parkinson’s Disease (PD). However, there remains a scarcity of head-to-head studies that directly compare safinamide and rasagiline. This study compared safinamide and rasagiline as adjuncts to levodopa in Chinese PD patients with motor fluctuations by matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Baseline age, sex, BMI, and OFF time were adjusted for matching. Efficacy outcomes were the mean changes in total daily OFF time, UPDRS III, and PDQ-39 from baseline to week 16, which calculated by a weighted covariance model. Safety outcomes included rates of AEs, SAEs, and DCAEs. Bucher method was used for mean difference (MD) of efficacy and odds ratio (OR) of safety outcomes. Combination therapy of safinamide 50-100 mg/day and levodopa significantly reduced the mean total daily OFF time by 0.7 h (− 1.40 to − 0.02) compared to the combination therapy of rasagiline 1 mg/day and levodopa. Safinamide more effectively reduced UPDRS III (− 2.9, − 5.28 to − 0.52). Changes in PDQ-39 scores indicated a trend toward greater improvement in safinamide. There was no significant difference in safety outcomes. Compared to rasagiline, the combined therapy of safinamide and levodopa could significantly improve motor fluctuations for PD patients in China, without compromising safety.

Levodopa (LD) is the most effective oral pharmacotherapy for the management of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. However, LD use is complicated by a progressive shortening of the duration of efficacy of a dose, resulting in episodes of inadequate responsiveness, or OFF periods. OFF periods may also occur unpredictably, partly due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of oral LD, resulting from gastrointestinal dysfunction and from the effects of food on absorption. CVT-301 is a levodopa inhalation powder for the treatment of OFF period symptoms in patients on oral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor/LD. PK and safety profiles of single dose CVT-301, administered with oral carbidopa (CD) and oral CD/LD, were examined in patients with Parkinson's disease in the fed state. Eligible patients were aged 30–85 years, with a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and a body mass index of 18–32 kg/m2, and were receiving treatment with a stable regimen that included oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) (total LD, ≤800 mg/d). A high-fat/protein meal was eaten 4–5 h after the administration of the morning oral CD/LD dose. Blood samples for predose PK analysis were obtained after the meal, followed by a single inhaled dose of CVT-301 84 mg (+25 mg of oral CD) or oral CD/LD (25/100 mg) or vice versa in 2 dosing periods in a crossover design. Blood was sampled at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h postdose. Tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (65.2% male; 87.0% white; mean age, 69.3 years; mean body mass index, 26.9 kg/m2; mean Parkinson's disease duration, 8.2 years; mean baseline LD dosage, 460.9 mg/d; 73.9% at Hoehn and Yahr stage <2.5). PK analyses were based on LD concentrations without baseline adjustment. Median Tmax values with CVT-301 and oral CD/LD were 15 and 120 min (P < 0.001). Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than with oral CD/LD (590.3 vs 844.3 ng/mL). C10min and C30min values with CVT-301 were approximately twice those with CD/LD (522.9 and 531.5 ng/mL vs 247.3 and 300.9 ng/mL, respectively). %CV for C5min to Cmax with CVT-301 was lower than that with oral CD/LD. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was cough (CVT-301, 7 patients [30.4%]; oral CD/LD, 1 patient [4.5%]). PK properties showed that CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed, with higher plasma LD concentrations in the first 45 min, and demonstrated lower interpatient variability, than was oral CD/LD in the fed condition. The study findings suggest that CVT-301 can be used without regard to food intake. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03887884. •CVT-301 is an inhaled levodopa treatment for OFF periods in Parkinson's disease.•Pharmacokinetics of CVT-301 and oral ingested carbidopa/levodopa were examined.•Levodopa from CVT-301 was more rapidly absorbed than from oral carbidopa/levodopa.•CVT-301 produced lower interpatient levodopa variability than oral carbidopa/levodopa.•Findings support inhaled levodopa for adjunctive treatment of OFF periods.

Many patients with Parkinson's disease have motor fluctuations despite treatment with available drugs. Tozadenant (SYN115) is an oral, selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist that improves motor function in animal models of Parkinson's disease. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of tozadenant as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease who have motor fluctuations on levodopa. We did an international, multicentre, phase 2b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding clinical trial of tozadenant in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease who had motor fluctuations (at least 2·5 h off-time per day). Eligible patients were randomly assigned via a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive tozadenant 60, 120, 180, or 240 mg or matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. All study management, site personnel, and patients were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 12 in hours per day spent in the off-state (assessed from Parkinson's disease diaries completed by patients). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01283594. Of 420 randomised patients (mean age 63·3 [SD 8·3] years; mean duration of Parkinson's disease 8·7 [4·7] years), 403 provided post-baseline diary data and 337 completed study treatment. Compared with placebo, mean daily off-time was significantly reduced in the combined tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily and 180 mg twice-daily group (−1·1 h, 95% CI −1·8 to −0·5; p=0·0006), the tozadenant 120 mg twice-daily group (−1·1 h, −1·8 to −0·4; p=0.0039), and the tozadenant 180 mg twice-daily group (−1·2 h, −1·9 to −0·4; p=0·0039). The most common adverse events in these groups were dyskinesia (seven [8%] of 84 patients in the placebo group, 13 [16%] of 82 in the 120 mg twice-daily group, and 17 [20%] of 85 in the 180 mg twice-daily group), nausea (three [4%], 9 [11%], and ten [12%]), and dizziness (one [1%], four [5%], and 11 [13%]). Tozadenant 60 mg twice daily was not associated with a significant reduction in off-time, and tozadenant 240 mg twice daily was associated with an increased rate of discontinuation because of adverse events (17 [20%] of 84 patients). Tozadenant at 120 or 180 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated and was effective at reducing off-time. Further investigation of tozadenant treatment in phase 3 trials is warranted. Biotie Therapies.