Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Item TypeItem Type
-
SubjectSubject
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersSourceLanguage
Done
Filters
Reset
8,555
result(s) for
"Linearization"
Sort by:
Invariance of Lyapunov exponents and Lyapunov dimension for regular and irregular linearizations
by
Leonov, G. A.
,
Alexeeva, T. A.
,
Kuznetsov, N. V.
in
Automotive Engineering
,
Chaos theory
,
Classical Mechanics
2016
Nowadays the Lyapunov exponents and Lyapunov dimension have become so widespread and common that they are often used without references to the rigorous definitions or pioneering works. It may lead to a confusion since there are at least two well-known definitions, which are used in computations: the upper bounds of the exponential growth rate of the norms of linearized system solutions (
Lyapunov characteristic exponents
, LCEs) and the upper bounds of the exponential growth rate of the singular values of the fundamental matrix of linearized system (
Lyapunov exponents
, LEs). In this work, the relation between Lyapunov exponents and Lyapunov characteristic exponents is discussed. The invariance of Lyapunov exponents for regular and irregular linearizations under the change of coordinates is demonstrated.
Journal Article
Transformation and Linearization Techniques in Optimization: A State-of-the-Art Survey
by
Asghari, Mohammad
,
Fathollahi-Fard, Amir M.
,
Dulebenets, Maxim A.
in
Approximation
,
Complexity
,
Computing time
2022
To formulate a real-world optimization problem, it is sometimes necessary to adopt a set of non-linear terms in the mathematical formulation to capture specific operational characteristics of that decision problem. However, the use of non-linear terms generally increases computational complexity of the optimization model and the computational time required to solve it. This motivates the scientific community to develop efficient transformation and linearization approaches for the optimization models that have non-linear terms. Such transformations and linearizations are expected to decrease the computational complexity of the original non-linear optimization models and, ultimately, facilitate decision making. This study provides a detailed state-of-the-art review focusing on the existing transformation and linearization techniques that have been used for solving optimization models with non-linear terms within the objective functions and/or constraint sets. The existing transformation approaches are analyzed for a wide range of scenarios (multiplication of binary variables, multiplication of binary and continuous variables, multiplication of continuous variables, maximum/minimum operators, absolute value function, floor and ceiling functions, square root function, and multiple breakpoint function). Furthermore, a detailed review of piecewise approximating functions and log-linearization via Taylor series approximation is presented. Along with a review of the existing methods, this study proposes a new technique for linearizing the square root terms by means of transformation. The outcomes of this research are anticipated to reveal some important insights to researchers and practitioners, who are closely working with non-linear optimization models, and assist with effective decision making.
Journal Article
Design, modeling, and control of a variable stiffness elbow joint
2022
New technological advances are changing the way robotics are designed for safe and dependable physical human–robot interaction and human-like prosthesis. Outstanding examples are the adoption of soft covers, compliant transmission elements, and motion control laws that allow compliant behavior in the event of collisions while preserving accuracy and performance during motion in free space. In this scenario, there is growing interest in variable stiffness actuators (VSAs). Herein, we present a new design of an anthropomorphic elbow VSA based on an architecture we developed previously. A robust dynamic feedback linearization algorithm is used to achieve simultaneous control of the output link position and stiffness. This actuation system makes use of two compliant transmission elements, characterized by a nonlinear relation between deflection and applied torque. Static feedback control algorithms have been proposed in literature considering purely elastic transmission; however, viscoelasticity is often observed in practice. This phenomenon may harm the performance of static feedback linearization algorithms, particularly in the case of trajectory tracking. To overcome this limitation, we propose a dynamic feedback linearization algorithm that explicitly considers the viscoelasticity of the transmission elements, and validate it through simulations and experimental studies. The results are compared with the static feedback case to showcase the improvement in trajectory tracking, even in the case of parameter uncertainty.
Journal Article
General splitting methods with linearization for the split feasibility problem
2021
In this article, we introduce a general splitting method with linearization to solve the split feasibility problem and propose a way of selecting the stepsizes such that the implementation of the method does not need any prior information about the operator norm. We present the constant and adaptive relaxation parameters, and the latter is “optimal” in theory. These ways of selecting stepsizes and relaxation parameters are also practised to the relaxed splitting method with linearization where the two closed convex sets are both level sets of convex functions. The weak convergence of two proposed methods is established under standard conditions and the linear convergence of the general splitting method with linearization is analyzed. The numerical examples are presented to illustrate the advantage of our methods by comparing with other methods.
Journal Article
Precise model of LC active power filter and feedback linearization control
2022
The problems of regulating power quality are more prevalent. In general, Active power filter(APF) is one of the best solution. But the influence of load impedance and grid impedance were widely ignored by a great number of papers, supposed the load voltage is constant and modeling in APF singly, which can’t describe the system accurately. Firstly,there are build an accurate model, including LC APF, load and grid impedance. Secondly, applying feedback linearization and proportional resonant differentiation (FL-PRD) control in inner current loop. Then analyze the influence of load and grid impedance. Once more,checked the accuracy of builded accurate model by Simulink and experiment. Eventually, compare mentioned algorithm in the paper with classical proportional resonant (PR) controller. The results show that it is rather important to set up an accurate model and the proposed algorithm gets a perfect capacity.
Journal Article
A note on the differentiability of discrete Palmer's linearization
2024
In the context of discrete nonautonomous dynamics, we prove that the homeomorphisms in the linearization theorem are $C^2$ diffeomorphisms. In contrast to other related works, our result does not involve non-resonance conditions or spectral gaps. Our approach is based on the interlacing of the properties of nonautonomous hyperbolicity of the linear part, and boundedness and Lipschitzness of the nonlinearities. Moreover, we propose a functional approach to find conditions for regularity of arbitrary degree.
Journal Article
Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations
by
Liu, Jin-Peng
,
Kolden, Herman Øie
,
Trivisa, Konstantina
in
Algorithms
,
Carleman linearization
,
CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS
2021
Nonlinear differential equations model diverse phenomena but are notoriously difficult to solve. While there has been extensive previous work on efficient quantum algorithms for linear differential equations, the linearity of quantum mechanics has limited analogous progress for the nonlinear case. Despite this obstacle, we develop a quantum algorithm for dissipative quadratic n-dimensional ordinary differential equations. Assuming R < 1, where R is a parameter characterizing the ratio of the nonlinearity and forcing to the linear dissipation, this algorithm has complexity T²q poly(log T, log n, log 1/ϵ)ϵ where T is the evolution time, ϵ is the allowed error, and q measures decay of the solution. This is an exponential improvement over the best previous quantum algorithms, whose complexity is exponential in T. While exponential decay precludes efficiency, driven equations can avoid this issue despite the presence of dissipation. Our algorithm uses the method of Carleman linearization, for which we give a convergence theorem. This method maps a system of nonlinear differential equations to an infinite-dimensional system of linear differential equations, which we discretize, truncate, and solve using the forward Euler method and the quantum linear system algorithm. We also provide a lower bound on the worst-case complexity of quantum algorithms for general quadratic differe pntial equations, showing that the problem is intractable for R ≥ √2. Finally, we discuss potential applications, showing that the R < 1 condition can be satisfied in realistic epidemiological models and giving numerical evidence that the method may describe a model of fluid dynamics even for larger values of R.
Journal Article
A study on iterative methods for solving Richards’ equation
2016
This work concerns linearization methods for efficiently solving the Richards equation, a degenerate elliptic-parabolic equation which models flow in saturated/unsaturated porous media. The discretization of Richards’ equation is based on backward Euler in time and Galerkin finite elements in space. The most valuable linearization schemes for Richards’ equation, i.e. the Newton method, the Picard method, the Picard/Newton method and the
L
-scheme are presented and their performance is comparatively studied. The convergence, the computational time and the condition numbers for the underlying linear systems are recorded. The convergence of the
L
-scheme is theoretically proved and the convergence of the other methods is discussed. A new scheme is proposed, the
L
-scheme/Newton method which is more robust and quadratically convergent. The linearization methods are tested on illustrative numerical examples.
Journal Article