Explore the vast range of titles available.

Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma is a recently defined subtype of liposarcoma, which preferentially involves the mediastinum of young patients and shows mixed histological features of conventional myxoid liposarcoma and pleomorphic liposarcoma. While myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma is known to lack the EWSR1/FUS-DDIT3 fusions characteristic of the former, additional genetic data are limited. To further understand this tumor type, we extensively examined a series of myxoid pleomorphic liposarcomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. The 12 tumors occurred in 6 females and 6 males, ranging from 17 to 58 years of age (mean 33 years, median 35 years), and were located in the mediastinum (n = 5), back, neck, cheek and leg, including thigh. Histologically, all cases consisted of relatively, bland, abundantly myxoid areas with a prominent capillary vasculature, admixed with much more cellular and less myxoid foci containing markedly pleomorphic spindled cells, numerous pleomorphic lipoblasts and elevated mitotic activity. Using sWGS, myxoid pleomorphic liposarcomas were found to have complex chromosomal alterations, including recurrent large chromosomal gains involving chromosomes 1, 6–8, 18–21 and losses involving chromosomes 13, 16 and 17. Losses in chromosome 13, in particular loss in 13q14 (including RB1, RCTB2, DLEU1, and ITM2B genes), were observed in 4 out of 8 cases analyzed. Additional FISH analyses confirmed the presence of a monoallelic RB1 deletion in 8/12 cases. Moreover, nuclear Rb expression was deficient in all studied cases. None showed DDIT3 gene rearrangement or MDM2 gene amplification. Using genome-wide DNA methylation profiling, myxoid pleomorphic liposarcomas and conventional pleomorphic liposarcomas formed a common methylation cluster, which segregated from conventional myxoid liposarcomas. While the morphologic, genetic and epigenetic characteristics of myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma suggest a link with conventional pleomorphic liposarcoma, its distinctive clinical features support continued separate classification for the time being.

A subgroup analysis of a randomized study demonstrated that patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma treated with eribulin had longer overall survival and progression-free survival compared to those treated with dacarbazine, suggesting eribulin as a therapeutic option for advanced liposarcoma. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eribulin versus dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced liposarcoma. We established a 10-year Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of eribulin and dacarbazine regimens. Clinical data were sourced from a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 trials. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were computed. The total cost of the dacarbazine scheme was $10,895.558, with a QALY of 0.533. In contrast, the total cost of the eribulin scheme was $16,961.891, with a QALY of 0.698. The ICER between the eribulin and dacarbazine schemes was $36,736.467, which is below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold in China ($37,877.469). From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, eribulin is cost-effective compared to dacarbazine at the WTP threshold.

A non-randomised, phase 2 study showed activity and tolerability of eribulin in advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. In this phase 3 study, we aimed to compare overall survival in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma who received eribulin with that in patients who received dacarbazine (an active control). We did this randomised, open-label, phase 3 study across 110 study sites in 22 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with intermediate-grade or high-grade advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma who had received at least two previous systemic regimens for advanced disease (including an anthracycline). Using an interactive voice and web response system, an independent statistician randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive eribulin mesilate (1·4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) or dacarbazine (850 mg/m2, 1000 mg/m2, or 1200 mg/m2 [dose dependent on centre and clinician] intravenously on day 1) every 21 days until disease progression. Randomisation was stratified by disease type, geographical region, and number of previous regimens for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma and in blocks of six. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01327885, and is closed to recruitment, but treatment and follow-up continue. Between March 10, 2011 and May 22, 2013, we randomly assigned patients to eribulin (n=228) or dacarbazine (n=224). Overall survival was significantly improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to dacarbazine (median 13·5 months [95% CI 10·9–15·6] vs 11·5 months [9·6–13·0]; hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62–0·95]; p=0·0169). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 224 (99%) of 226 patients who received eribulin and 218 (97%) of 224 who received dacarbazine. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in patients who received eribulin (152 [67%]) than in those who received dacarbazine (126 [56%]), as were deaths (10 [4%] vs 3 [1%]); one death (in the eribulin group) was considered treatment-related by the investigators. Overall survival was improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to an active control, suggesting that eribulin could be a treatment option for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. Eisai.

In tumours that harbour wild-type p53, p53 protein function is frequently disabled by the mouse double minute 2 protein (MDM2, or HDM2 in humans). Multiple HDM2 antagonists are currently in clinical development. Preclinical data indicate that TP53 mutations are a possible mechanism of acquired resistance to HDM2 inhibition; however, this resistance mechanism has not been reported in patients. Utilizing liquid biopsies, here we demonstrate that TP53 mutations appear in circulating cell-free DNA obtained from patients with de-differentiated liposarcoma being treated with an inhibitor of the HDM2–p53 interaction (SAR405838). TP53 mutation burden increases over time and correlates with change in tumour size, likely representing selection of TP53 mutant clones resistant to HDM2 inhibition. These results provide the first clinical demonstration of the emergence of TP53 mutations in response to an HDM2 antagonist and have significant implications for the clinical development of this class of molecules. Pre-clinical studies have shown that TP53 mutations can account for acquired resistance to HDM2 antagonists. This study provides clinical evidence for the emergence of TP53 mutations in circulating cell-free DNA, seen in 5 out of 20 de-differentiated liposarcoma patients treated with an HDM2 antagonist.

Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (MPLPS) is an exceedingly rare and recently recognized adipocytic neoplasm that primarily occurs in children and young adults and shows a strong predilection for the mediastinum. Clinically, MPLPS demonstrates aggressive behavior and exhibits a high propensity for systemic spread and a worse overall survival. Some cases have been associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Histologically, MPLPS is composed of a variable mixture of myxoid and pleomorphic liposarcoma-like components. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells show diffuse expression of CD34 and p16 and loss of nuclear RB expression. MPLPS lacks DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) rearrangements and MDM2 proto-oncogene (MDM2) amplifications but shows tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutations and RB transcriptional co-repressor 1 (RB1) deletions. Moreover, recent studies have demonstrated that the most consistent molecular feature of MPLPS is genome-wide loss of heterozygosity. Surgical excision with negative margins is the mainstay of treatment for localized MPLPS. The treatment of advanced/metastatic MPLPS still poses a huge therapeutic challenge. This review provides information about the clinicoradiological features, pathogenesis, histopathology, and management currently available for MPLPS. In addition, we discuss the differential diagnosis of this novel entity.

Background/Objectives: Giant Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas (giant RPLs) represent a rare malignant disease of adulthood that does not yet have a univocal definition in the scientific literature. The symptoms may be late, depending on the position and the size reached. The weight may exceed 20 kg, and the diameter 25 cm. The main treatment is the surgical approach. This systematic review aims to collect data from the present literature and to answer some questions on the nature of this pathology. Methods: We performed a search on the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases using specific search strings. Non-English written articles and abstracts were excluded. Results: Dimensional, histological, and pathological data of giant RPLs were extracted and recorded in an electronic database, and charts were used to synthesize the results. We selected 126 manuscripts, all case reports and case series, and obtained data for 157 giant RPLs. The major axis varied from 15 to 80 cm, and the weight ranged between 2.5 and 98 kg. Sex distribution was homogenous. Age was reported 146 times, and almost 1/3 of the study population was under 50 years old. The most frequent hystotype reported was well-differentiated liposarcomas, while the rarest was pleomorphic liposarcomas. In 139 cases, the symptoms were reported and generally included a mass effect on surrounding organs. The exclusive surgical operation was the most frequent treatment option, and it included both the resection of the tumor and other organs involved. Chemo- and radiotherapy were also performed, in a few cases. In 36 reports, distant metastasis was suspected, but only 6 were effectively positive. Conclusions: Giant RPLs are a clinical entity that shares some common features with normal-size liposarcomas but are different in dimensions, age distribution, histologic prevalence, rate of incidental diagnosis, organ sparing, and R0 resection. More studies are needed to completely characterize these tumors.

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours for which treatment options are limited in the advanced setting. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have shown activity in preclinical models of STS. Methods: We conducted a single-arm, open-label, multicentre phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of panobinostat given orally, 40 mg thrice weekly in patients with advanced pretreated STS. The primary endpoint was the 3-month progression-free rate. Results: Forty-seven STS patients were enrolled between January 2010 and December 2010. Median age was 59 (range 21–79) years, 22 (47%) patients were males. Panobinostat dose was lowered to 20 mg thrice weekly after nine patients were enrolled, based on the recommendation of an independent safety committee. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia, fatigue, lymphopenia and anaemia. Forty-five patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Among them, nine patients (20%, 95% CI (10–35%)) were progression-free at 3 months. No partial response was seen, but 17 patients (36%) had stable disease (SD) as their best response. Six patients were progression-free at 6 months. Conclusion: Panobinostat was poorly tolerated at 40 mg thrice a week. Efficacy in unselected advanced STS was limited, although some patients had prolonged SD.

AimsLiposarcoma is a malignant soft tissue tumour with adipocytic differentiation. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) and myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) are classified as high-grade liposarcomas. Lipid droplet-associated protein (also known as perilipin 1 (PLIN1)) is the predominant perilipin and has utility as a specific marker of adipogenic differentiation. Adipose differentiation-related protein (also known as adipophilin (ADRP)) is ubiquitously expressed in a range of tissues. High ADRP expression is reportedly a poor prognostic factor in several cancer types. However, no previous studies have examined the association between PLIN1 or ADRP expression and prognosis in sarcoma. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the association between PLIN1 or ADRP expression and prognosis in liposarcoma.MethodsIn total, 97 primary resection specimens (53 MLS and 44 DDLS) were examined in this study. PLIN1 and ADRP expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Survival analyses were performed for MLS and DDLS.ResultsOf the 53 MLS specimens, 15 (28.3%) exhibited high PLIN1 expression. PLIN1 expression was not observed in DDLS specimens. High PLIN1 expression was significantly associated with increased disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with MLS (p=0.045). Distinct ADRP expression was observed in 13 of 53 (24.5%) MLS specimens and 5 of 44 (11.4%) DDLS specimens. High ADRP expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in MLS (p=0.042) and DFS and shorter OS in DDLS (p=0.024 and p<0.001, respectively).ConclusionsPLIN1 and ADRP expression is associated with poor prognosis in high-grade liposarcoma.