Explore the vast range of titles available.

This book describes a major literary culture caught in the act of becoming minor. In 1939, Virginia Woolf wrote in her diary, \"Civilisation has shrunk.\" Her words captured not only the onset of World War II, but also a longer-term reversal of national fortune. The first comprehensive account of modernism and imperialism in England,A Shrinking Islandtracks the joint eclipse of modernist aesthetics and British power from the literary experiments of the 1930s through the rise of cultural studies in the 1950s. Jed Esty explores the effects of declining empire on modernist form--and on the very meaning of Englishness. He ranges from canonical figures (T. S. Eliot and Virginia Woolf) to influential midcentury intellectuals (J. M. Keynes and J.R.R. Tolkien), from cultural studies pioneers (Raymond Williams and E. P. Thompson) to postwar migrant writers (George Lamming and Doris Lessing). Focusing on writing that converts the potential energy of the contracting British state into the language of insular integrity, he argues that an anthropological ethos of cultural holism came home to roost in late-imperial England. Esty's interpretation challenges popular myths about the death of English literature. It portrays the survivors of the modernist generation not as aesthetic dinosaurs, but as participants in the transition from empire to welfare state, from metropolitan art to national culture. Mixing literary criticism with postcolonial theory, his account of London modernism's end-stages and after-lives provides a fresh take on major works while redrawing the lines between modernism and postmodernism.

Während der Aufklärung rückt der Mensch ins Zentrum des wissenschaftlichen Interesses. Wie aber schlägt sich diese neue Menschenkunde in der 'schönen' Literatur nieder? Und wie lassen sich ihre Perspektiven für ein Verständnis literarischer Texte nutzen? Die zweite, überarbeitete Auflage des Studienbuchs bietet, auch durch Verweise auf den Reader \"Grundlagentexte\", einen umfassenden Überblick über die literarische Anthropologie. Pressestimmen zur ersten Auflage: \"Kaum einer hat sich beständiger in die [anthropologische Debatte des 18. Jahrhunderts in der Germanistik] eingemischt als Alexander Kosenina, der nun eine vornehmlich an Studenten adressierte Einführung zu diesem Komplex vorlegt. In kurzen Kapiteln stellt Kosenina [...] die einschlägigen theoretischen Texte ebenso vor wie die Auswirkungen auf die verschiedenen literarischen Gattungen oder den Niederschlag in diskursiven Feldern wie Traum oder Wahnsinn.\" Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 15. Dezember 2008 \"Die Einführung in die 'methodische Perspektive' der Literaturanthropologie ist anregend zu lesen und gut an Beispielen.\" Ronald Schneider in: ekz - Informationsdienst, 3/2009 \"Verfolgt wird hier ein stringentes Konzept, das mit wichtigen Autoren und Texten der Literatur des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts bekannt macht, sich aber nicht mit der statischen Darbietung von Wissen begnügt, sondern Einsichten und Lernprozesse provozieren und befördern möchte. Dies jedoch – und hier liegt die wohl größte Stärke des Buchs – in einer Weise, die unaufdringlich dazu verführt, Texte neu, anders und überhaupt zu lesen. Die Sprache, die Alexander Kosenina hierfür gefunden hat, wird auch eine nichtakademische Leserschaft gern zu diesem Buch greifen lassen. Das ist ein seltener Glücksfall.\" Jan Standke in: IASLonline, 08. September 2009 \"Obwohl als Studienbuch konzipiert und natürlich bestens geeignet wegen der Kürze der Darstellung, zeugt diese Quelle von besonderer Kompetenz durch die Auswahl und Darstellung des Materials. Für Studierende bietet deshalb Alexander Košeninas 'Literarische Anthropologie' unter der Prämisse der Neuentdeckung des Menschen eine konzise Einführung ins Thema - für all diejenigen, die davon ausgehend weiterlesen und denken möchten, einen wertvollen Anstoß.\" Bettina von Jagow in: Jahrbuch Literatur und Medizin, 3 (2009) \"Alexander Kosenina legt mit 'Literarische Anthropologie. Die Neuentdeckung des Menschen\" ein unverzichtbares Studienbuch vor, das auch für das Selbststudium sehr geeignet ist.\" Susan Mahmody in: literaturkritik.de, Nr.7 (Juli 2009)

As an anthropology student studying with Franz Boas, Zora Neale Hurston recorded African American folklore in rural central Florida, studied hoodoo in New Orleans and voodoo in Haiti, talked with the last ex-slave to survive the Middle Passage, and collected music from Jamaica. Her ethnographic work would serve as the basis for her novels and other writings in which she shaped a vision of African American Southern rural folk culture articulated through an antiracist concept of culture championed by Boas: culture as plural, relative, and long-lived. Meanwhile, a very different antiracist model of culture learned from Robert Park's sociology allowed Richard Wright to imagine African American culture in terms of severed traditions, marginal consciousness, and generation gaps. InA Genealogy of Literary Multiculturalism, Christopher Douglas uncovers the largely unacknowledged role played by ideas from sociology and anthropology in nourishing the politics and forms of minority writers from diverse backgrounds. Douglas divides the history of multicultural writing in the United States into three periods. The first, which spans the 1920s and 1930s, features minority writers such as Hurston and D'Arcy McNickle, who were indebted to the work of Boas and his attempts to detach culture from race. The second period, from 1940 to the mid-1960s, was a time of assimilation and integration, as seen in the work of authors such as Richard Wright, Jade Snow Wong, John Okada, and Ralph Ellison, who were influenced by currents in sociological thought. The third period focuses on the writers we associate with contemporary literary multiculturalism, including Toni Morrison, N. Scott Momaday, Frank Chin, Ishmael Reed, and Gloria Anzaldúa. Douglas shows that these more recent writers advocated a literary nationalism that was based on a modified Boasian anthropology and that laid the pluralist grounds for our current conception of literary multiculturalism. Ultimately, Douglas's \"unified field theory\" of multicultural literature brings together divergent African American, Asian American, Mexican American, and Native American literary traditions into one story: of how we moved from thinking about groups as races to thinking about groups as cultures-and then back again.

Culture, 1922traces the intellectual and institutional deployment of the culture concept in England and America in the first half of the twentieth century. With primary attention to how models of culture are created, elaborated upon, transformed, resisted, and ignored, Marc Manganaro works across disciplinary lines to embrace literary, literary critical, and anthropological writing. Tracing two traditions of thinking about culture, as elite products and pursuits and as common and shared systems of values, Manganaro argues that these modernist formulations are not mutually exclusive and have indeed intermingled in complex and interesting ways throughout the development of literary studies and anthropology. Beginning with the important Victorian architects of culture--Matthew Arnold and Edward Tylor--the book follows a number of main figures, schools, and movements up to 1950 such as anthropologist Franz Boas, his disciples Edward Sapir, Ruth Benedict, and Zora Neale Hurston, literary modernists T. S. Eliot and James Joyce, functional anthropologist Bronislaw Malinowski, modernist literary critic I. A. Richards, the New Critics, and Kenneth Burke. The main focus here, however, is upon three works published in 1922, the watershed year of Modernism--Eliot'sThe Waste Land, Malinowski'sArgonauts of the Western Pacific, and Joyce'sUlysses. Manganaro reads these masterworks and the history of their reception as efforts toward defining culture. This is a wide-ranging and ambitious study about an ambiguous and complex concept as it moves within and between disciplines.

'Literarische Anthropologie' hat sich in der literaturwissenschaftlichen Forschung und Lehre längst als prominentes Themenfeld durchgesetzt. Die repräsentative Sammlung von Studientexten enthält viele der im Studienbuch \"Literarische Anthropologie\" besprochenen Fallbeispiele. Ergänzt werden sie um zahlreiche weitere grundlegende Materialien von philosophischen Ärzten und erfahrungsseelenkundlichen Dichtern.

In ancient Greece, the spoken word connoted power, whether in the free speech accorded to citizens or in the voice of the poet, whose song was thought to know no earthly bounds. But how did silence fit into the mental framework of a society that valued speech so highly? Here Silvia Montiglio provides the first comprehensive investigation into silence as a distinctive and meaningful phenomenon in archaic and classical Greece. Arguing that the notion of silence is not a universal given but is rather situated in a complex network of associations and values, Montiglio seeks to establish general principles for understanding silence through analyses of cultural practices, including religion, literature, and law. Unlike the silence of a Christian before an ineffable God, which signifies the uselessness of words, silence in Greek religion paradoxically expresses the power of logos--for example, during prayer and sacrifice, it serves as a shield against words that could offend the gods. Montiglio goes on to explore silence in the world of the epic hero, where words are equated with action and their absence signals paralysis or tension in power relationships. Her other examples include oratory, a practice in which citizens must balance their words with silence in very complex ways in order to show that they do not abuse their right to speak. Inquiries into lyric poetry, drama, medical writings, and historiography round out this unprecedented study, revealing silence as a force in its own right.

A systematic exploration of Thomas Hardy's imaginative assimilation of particular Victorian sciences, this study draws on and swells the widening current of scholarly attention now being paid to the cultural meanings compacted and released by the nascent 'sciences of man' in the nineteenth century. Andrew Radford here situates Hardy's fiction and poetry in a context of the new sciences of humankind that evolved during the Victorian age to accommodate an immense range of literal and figurative 'excavations' then taking place. Combining literary close readings with broad historical analyses, he explores Hardy's artistic response to geological, archaeological and anthropological findings. In particular, he analyzes Hardy's lifelong fascination with the doctrine of 'survivals,' a term coined by E.B. Tylor in Primitive Culture (1871) to denote customs, beliefs and practices persisting in isolation from their original cultural context. Radford reveals how Hardy's subtle reworking of Tylor's doctrine offers a valuable insight into the inter-penetration of science and literature during this period. An important aspect of Radford's research focuses on lesser known periodical literature that grew out of a British amateur antiquarian tradition of the nineteenth century. His readings of Hardy's literary notebooks disclose the degree to which Hardy's own considerable scientific knowledge was shaped by the middlebrow periodical press. Thus Thomas Hardy and the Survivals of Time raises questions not only about the reception of scientific ideas but also the creation of nonspecialist forms of scientific discourse. This book represents a genuinely new perspective for Hardy studies. Contents: General editors' preface; Introduction; Opening the fan of time; Paganism revived?; Stories of today; The unmanned fertility figure; Killing the God; A bizarre farewell to fiction?; Bibliography; Index.

Writing is crucial to anthropology, but which genres are anthropologists expected to master in the 21st century? This book explores how anthropological writing shapes the intellectual content of the discipline and academic careers. First, chapters identify the different writing genres and contexts anthropologists actually engage with. Second, this book argues for the usefulness and necessity of taking seriously the idea of writing as a craft and of writing across and within genres in new ways. Although academic writing is an anthropologist's primary genre, they also write in many others, from drafting administrative texts and filing reports to composing ethnographically inspired journalism and fiction.

This book explores the ways in which the American writers Gertrude Stein, Ernest Hemingway, and Zora Neale Hurston used modernist primitivism to assert a uniquely American literary identity in the face of European cultural hegemony.

Modernist Goodsexamines such writers as Yeats, Conrad, Eliot, Woolf, Beckett, H.D., and Joyce to uncover what the author views as their displaced aboriginality and to investigate the relationship between literary modernism and aboriginal modernity.