Explore the vast range of titles available.

To explore the effect of lupus nephritis (LN) on graft survival in renal transplant patients. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies. The target population of interest was adult patients (aged >18 years) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and no history of previous renal transplants. Primary outcomes of interest were graft survival and patient survival. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 15 studies were included. Compared to patients with ESRD due to other causes, patients with LN undergoing kidney transplant had lower patient survival rate (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.31;  = 15, I =34.3%) and worse graft survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11;  = 16, I =0.0%), especially when studies with deceased donor were pooled together. Studies with a larger sample size (>200) showed that LN was strongly associated with lower graft and patient survival rates. Elevated risk of mortality in LN patients was detected in case-control studies, but not RCTs. On the other hand, RCTs, but not case-control studies, showed an increased risk of poor graft survival in LN patients. The findings suggest that the presence of LN might have a negative impact on both the graft survival and the overall patient survival of post-transplant ESRD patients. Further studies that account for factors such as study methodology, donor characteristics, and sample size are needed to reach definitive conclusions. Renal transplant patients with LN should undergo regular follow-up examinations.

We report a 58-year-old Asian woman who was diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis, together with a mixed pulmonary bacterial and fungal infection including Aspergillus. The infection did not respond well to the routine administration of anti-bacterial and anti-fungal drugs, and the patient’s creatinine levels continued to rise and protein remained in her urine. The patient’s SLE persisted without going into remission. Finally, surgical resection of the pulmonary aspergilloma brought the SLE back under control.

Purpose of review Lupus nephritis (LN) is a severe complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), significantly impacting patient outcomes. Despite advances in immunosuppressive therapies, many patients progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and kidney transplantation becomes essential for improving survival. However, the unique characteristics of autoimmune diseases make the timing of kidney transplantation and post-transplant management challenging. This review evaluates authoritative guidelines and recent studies to identify optimal timing for kidney transplantation and effective pre- and post-transplant management measures for patients with LN. Recent findings Advancements in immunosuppressive therapies, including calcineurin inhibitors, Voclosporin, and biologic agents such as belimumab, have significantly improved LN management. Emerging biomarkers, such as urinary MCP-1 and BAFF, offer promising tools for monitoring LN activity and predicting recurrence risk post-transplantation. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of achieving disease quiescence before transplantation, while new evidence supports the benefits of preemptive transplantation and personalized immunosuppressive regimens in improving patient and graft survival. Summary This review highlights the latest evidence and strategies for optimizing kidney transplantation outcomes in LN patients, focusing on timing, immunosuppression, and disease monitoring.

This stydy aimed to evaluate the epidemiological and clinical profile and outcome of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) submitted to renal transplantation. Retrospective cohort study based on the records of 35 LN patients submitted to renal transplantation at a single center in Brazil between July 1996 and May 2016. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 6-month, 1-year and 5-year graft survival. The sample included 38 transplantations (3 of which retransplantations). The mean age at the time of SLE diagnosis was 23.7 ± 9.0 years. Most patients were female (94.7%) and 68.4% were non-Caucasian. Twenty-two (57.9%) underwent renal biopsy prior to transplantation. The mean time from SLE diagnosis to transplantation was 10.3 ± 6.4 years. The mean pre-transplantation dialysis time was 3.8 ± 3.7 years. The grafts came from living related (n = 11) or deceased (n = 27) donors. Three (7.9%) patients experienced acute rejection in the first year. Graft and patient survival rates were, respectively, 97.1% and 100% at 6 months, 84.9% and 96.9% at 1 year, and 76.3% and 92.5% at 5 years. One (2.6%) patient had SLE recurrence. Venous thrombosis ( p  = 0.017) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) ( p  = 0.036) were more prevalent in patients with graft loss. In our cohort of LN patients submitted to renal transplantation, the 5-year survival rate was high, and APS was an important predictor of poor renal outcome (graft loss).

Objectives To determine the incidence of recurrent lupus nephritis (LN) in renal transplant recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods All patients with SLE that had undergone transplant with a functioning graft were asked in 2008 to participate in a cross-sectional study. The study included a standardised clinical examination, laboratory tests and a biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Results A total of 41 (93%) of a cohort of 44 patients with SLE with renal transplants participated. Of the biopsies, 3 were indication biopsies and 38 were surveillance biopsies. In all, 22 patients (54%) had biopsy-proven recurrence of LN. The majority of the cases were subclinical and characterised as class I/class II LN. Proteinuria (mg protein/mmol creatinine) was significantly increased in patients with recurrence, 70.6 (104.9) mg/mmol versus 11.9 (6.7) mg/mmol in patients without recurrence (p=0.038). Lupus anticoagulant was found more frequently in the patients with recurrence, nine versus two patients (p=0.033). Recurrence of LN was associated with receiving a kidney from a living donor (p=0.049). In all, 83% (34 of 41) had chronic allograft nephropathy in the transplanted kidneys with no difference between patients with recurrence or without. Conclusions Subclinical recurrence of LN is common in patients with renal transplants with SLE. The majority of the patients have chronic allograft nephropathy.

Kidney transplant (KT) is the best treatment for patients who progress to end-stage renal disease. Short-term outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) following KT are not well known. To describe the postoperative outcomes and complications in SLE patients undergoing KT, we conducted a case–control study from 2010 to 2015 including SLE recipients compared to non-SLE controls matched by age and sex. Demographics, comorbidities, donor characteristics, and preoperative tests were retrieved. Main outcomes were 30-day postoperative allograft function, development of infectious or non-infectious complications, and mortality. 68 patients (34 SLE, 34 non-SLE) were included. SLE recipients had median disease duration of 9 years; SLEDAI-2K of 2, and SLICC/ACR damage index of 3; 16 (47%) were taking prednisone (median dose 5 mg daily) before KT. SLE recipients had a lower frequency of diabetes (0 vs. 27%, p = 0.002). No differences were found in the development of any complication (50% SLE vs. 47% non-SLE, p = 1.00); infectious (44% vs. 41%, p = 1.00), or non-infectious (15% vs. 21%, p = 1.00). There were no deaths in either group, and none of the SLE recipients presented lupus disease activity 30 days after the KT. Allograft function determined by serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, delayed graft function, and allograft loss was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). There were no differences between SLE recipients with and without complications. Early postoperative outcomes in SLE patients who undergo KT, including allograft function, development of infectious, non-infectious complications, and mortality, are similar to patients without SLE.

The prognosis of severe lupus nephritis (LN) is very different among individual patients. None of the current biomarkers can be used to predict the development of refractory LN. Because kidney histology is the gold standard for diagnosing LN, the authors hypothesize that molecular signatures detected in kidney biopsy tissue may have predictive value in determining the therapeutic response. Sixty-seven patients with biopsy-proven severely active LN by International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification III/IV were recruited. Twenty-three kidney tissue samples were used for RNA microarray analysis, while the remaining 44 samples were used for validation by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) gene expression analysis. From hundreds of differential gene expressions in refractory LN, 12 candidates were selected for validation based on gene expression levels as well as relevant functions. The candidate biomarkers were members of the innate immune response molecules, adhesion molecules, calcium-binding receptors, and paracellular tight junction proteins. S100A8, ANXA13, CLDN19 and FAM46B were identified as the best kidney biomarkers for refractory LN, and COL8A1 was identified as the best marker for early loss of kidney function. These new molecular markers can be used to predict refractory LN and may eventually lead to novel molecular targets for therapy.

Objective: To determine the epidemiological profile and outcome of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) undergoing renal transplantation. Methods: The archival records of 50 patients with LN and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated by kidney transplantation from March 1992 to December 2010 were reviewed. All patients met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Results: Fourteen patients were included in the study. The majority were women (85.7%) and non-Caucasian (85.7%); the mean age at diagnosis of SLE and LN was 24 ± 8 and 25 ± 8 years, respectively. Renal biopsy was performed in 12 patients, with 75% of them showing proliferative lesions (class III and IV according to the World Health Organization and International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification). Thirteen patients (93%) underwent intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis before transplantation. The median time between the start of dialysis and transplantation was 30 months (range 3–103 months); 67% of the procedures involved deceased donors and 33% involved living-related donors. The graft survival rates were 93.3%, 90.9%, and 85.7% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Post-transplant immunosuppressive agents were mycophenolate mofetil (84%), azathioprine (17%), tacrolimus (25%), sirolimus (58%) and cyclosporine (8%). Eight episodes of acute rejection were noted in six patients. There was a graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis in the one patient with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. The mean SLICC by the time of kidney transplantation was 5 ± 2. In total, 13 patients (92.8%) developed at least one infectious event during the follow-up, with one dying in the immediate post-transplant period because of sepsis. Two patients (14%) had a lupus flare. There was no clinical or histological evidence of LN recurrence. Conclusion: LN is the major cause of morbidity in SLE, with progression to ESRD in 10–22% of cases. Despite concerns about LN recurrence after renal transplantation, the data obtained in our sample indicate this procedure as a safe alternative therapy for ESRD in this population.

Background African Americans with lupus who receive kidney transplants have high prevalence of predictors of allograft failure, which can explain their poor outcomes. Methods Of 1223 African Americans and 1029 Caucasian Americans with lupus who received kidney transplants from deceased donors between 1987 and 2006 with complete records in the UNOS program, 741 pairs were matched in 16 predictors employing a predicted probability of group membership. The primary outcome was allograft failure. Main secondary outcomes were rejection, allograft failure due to rejection, and mortality. Results Matched pairs were predominantly women (82%) with a mean age of 39 years. Twenty-four percent of recipients received kidneys from expanded criteria donors. African Americans and Caucasian Americans matched well (p ≥ 0.05): donor age, gender and race; recipient age, gender, education and insurance; dialysis prior to transplant, kidneys from expanded criteria donors, cold ischemia time, history of prior kidney transplant, panel reactive antibodies, human leukocyte antigens mismatch, blood type compatibility, transplant Era, and follow-up time. Contrary to the unmatched cohort with significantly higher allograft failure rate (events per 100 patient-years) in African Americans compared to Caucasian Americans (10.49 vs 6.18, p < 0.001), matched pairs had similar allograft failure rates (8.41 vs 7.81, p = 0.418). Matched pairs also had similar rates of rejections (9.82 vs 9.39, p = 0.602), allograft failure due to rejection (6.19 vs 5.71, p = 0.453), and mortality (2.79 vs 3.52, p = 0.097). Conclusion In lupus recipients of kidney transplants from deceased donors, African American and Caucasian Americans have similar allograft failure rates when predictors are matched between groups.

Key Points Primary disease recurrence after renal transplantation accounts for 7–8% of graft losses Disease recurrence after paediatric renal transplantation can be associated with a high or low risk of graft loss depending on the underlying primary disease Understanding of the pathophysiology of most kidney diseases has advanced dramatically in the past few years, which will hopefully lead to improvements in the global prognosis of paediatric renal transplantation Targeted treatment strategies are available for specific diseases that can improve graft survival in patients with disease recurrence Renal transplantation is the optimal form of renal replacement therapy for children with end-stage renal disease; however, disease recurrence can lead to graft loss, morbidity and death. In this Review, Justine Bacchetta and Pierre Cochat provide an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, effects and management of disease recurrence after paediatric renal transplantation. They also describe pretransplantation and post-transplantation risk-reduction strategies that aim to minimize the possibility of disease recurrence, and thus improve both graft and patient outcomes. Primary disease recurrence after renal transplantation is mainly diagnosed by examination of biopsy samples, but can also be associated with clinical symptoms. In some patients, recurrence can lead to graft loss (7–8% of all graft losses). Primary disease recurrence is generally associated with a high risk of graft loss in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis, primary hyperoxaluria or atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome. By contrast, disease recurrence is associated with a limited risk of graft loss in patients with IgA nephropathy, renal involvement associated with Henoch–Schönlein purpura, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis or lupus nephritis. The presence of systemic diseases that affect the kidneys, such as sickle cell anaemia and diabetes mellitus, also increases the risk of delayed graft loss. This Review provides an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology and management of primary disease recurrence in paediatric renal graft recipients, and describes the overall effect on graft survival of each of the primary diseases listed above. With appropriate management, few paediatric patients should be excluded from renal transplantation programmes because of an increased risk of recurrence.