Explore the vast range of titles available.

Incidence rates of Lyme borreliosis, a tickborne disease attributed to infection by Borrelia species, are increasing, and limitations to existing treatments potentiate the possibility of severe outcomes. Nevertheless, there are no licensed vaccines for Lyme borreliosis prevention in humans. This study investigated the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of VLA15, an investigational outer surface protein A (OspA)-based Lyme borreliosis vaccine that has previously shown safety and immunogenicity when administered as a primary vaccination series, following a primary VLA15 vaccination series. We report the results of the booster phase of a randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 2 study that enrolled healthy adults aged 18–65 years from five US clinical study centres to receive 135 μg or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo at months 0, 2, and 6 in the main study phase. Participants who received 180 μg VLA15 in the main study phase and did not have relevant protocol deviations were eligible for the booster phase (months 18–30). Participants were randomly reassigned (2:1) to receive an intramuscular injection of a VLA15 booster or placebo 1 year after the completion of primary vaccination (month 18) via a randomisation list generated by an unmasked statistician with a block size of six. Individuals involved in data safety monitoring, rerandomisation, vaccine handling, and vaccine accountability were unmasked; the study sponsor and statisticians were only unmasked after analysis of data up to 1 month after booster administration. All other individuals remained masked throughout the booster phase. The outcomes for the booster phase were the immunogenicity (evaluated in the booster per-protocol population) and safety (evaluated for all participants who received the booster) of the booster dose up to month 30. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03970733) and is completed. Between Feb 4 and March 23, 2021, 58 participants (28 men and 30 women) were screened, randomly assigned, and received VLA15 (n=39) or placebo (n=19). One participant in the placebo group was lost to follow-up. The IgG geometric mean titres for each OspA serotype (serotypes 1–6) in the VLA15 group peaked at 1 month after the booster dose (1277·0 U/mL [95% CI 861·8–1892·3] to 2194·5 U/mL [1566·8–3073·7] vs 23·6 U/mL [18·1–30·8] to 36·8 U/mL [26·4–51·3] in the placebo group [p<0·0001 for all serotypes]), remained elevated at month 24 (137·4 U/mL [95·8–196·9] to 265·8 U/mL [202·9–348·2] vs 22·3 U/mL [17·7–28·0] to 29·1 U/mL [20·8–40·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes), and declined by month 30 (54·1 U/mL [38·6–75·7] to 101·6 U/mL [77·6–133·1] vs 21·9 U/mL [18·0–26·6] to 24·9 U/mL [19·0–32·6] in the placebo group; p<0·0001 for all serotypes except serotype 1 [p=0·0006]). Solicited local adverse events were reported more frequently in the VLA15 group (35 [92%, 95% CI 79–97] of 38 participants) than the placebo group (six [32%, 15–54] of 19 participants; p<0·0001) after booster vaccination. There was no significant difference in the frequency of solicited systemic adverse events between groups (20 [59%, 42–74] of 34 participants in the VLA15 group vs six [38%, 18–61] of 16 participants in the placebo group). Related unsolicited adverse events (none severe) were reported by two (5%, 1–17) of 39 participants in the VLA15 group and none (0%, 0–17) of 19 participants in the placebo group. There were no severe solicited local or systemic adverse events or deaths during the study. A booster dose of VLA15 is safe and induces substantial anamnestic immune responses against all six OspA serotypes. As with previously investigated OspA-based Lyme borreliosis vaccines, waning immune responses were observed with VLA15, and annual boosters might therefore be required. Valneva.

A synthetic review of research on the ecology of Lyme disease in North America.

Increasing incidence rates, insufficient effectiveness of exposure prevention strategies, and the potential for serious outcomes despite antibiotic treatment highlight the need for a preventive vaccine against Lyme borreliosis. VLA15, an investigational Lyme borreliosis vaccine based on outer surface protein A (OspA) variants from clinically relevant Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies in North America and Europe, has shown safety and immunogenicity in adults when administered with various three-dose schedules. We aimed to investigate the safety and immunogenicity of two-dose and three-dose schedules of VLA15 within a broader population, including children and adolescents, who are among those at increased risk of Lyme borreliosis. This randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial is taking place at 14 clinical study centres in Lyme borreliosis-endemic areas in the USA. Healthy, eligible participants aged 5–65 years were enrolled in a 2:1:1 ratio to age cohorts of 18–65 years, 12–17 years, and 5–11 years through a staggered age-descending enrolment process. Within each age cohort, participants were randomly assigned with an electronic data capture system in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive intramuscular injections of 180 μg VLA15 at months 0, 2, and 6 (VLA15 M0-2-6 group); 180 μg VLA15 at months 0 and 6, and placebo at month 2 (VLA15 M0-6 group); or placebo at months 0, 2, and 6. Unmasked individuals included site staff and clinical research associates involved in randomisation and handling the investigational product, as well as specific individuals, both internal and external to the sponsor, who regularly reviewed trial safety data (including statisticians preparing relevant tables). All other individuals were masked; unmasking after the database snapshot for month 7 analyses for each age cohort was limited to the trial sponsor, collaboration partner, and statisticians. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was OspA serotype (ST)-specific IgG geometric mean titres (GMTs) assessed by ELISAs at month 7 (ie, 1 month after the third vaccination) and was evaluated in the per-protocol analysis set. The primary safety endpoint was the frequency of solicited local and systemic adverse events occurring within 7 days after each and any vaccination and were assessed in the safety analysis set (ie, all individuals who received at least one vaccination). This report includes safety and immunogenicity data through to month 12. This trial is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants, and is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04801420). Between March 15, 2021, and Feb 24, 2022, 625 participants (321 [51%] female, 304 [49%] male) received one or more vaccinations and were included in the safety analysis set. Of these, 190 participants were included in the VLA15 M0-2-6 group, 187 were included in the VLA15 M0-6 group, and 208 were included in the placebo group; 40 additional VLA15 recipients could not be allocated to either VLA15 group because their vaccination schedules were non-compliant with both VLA15 groups due to missed or incorrect vaccinations; however, these individuals were included in safety analyses. OspA-specific ELISA IgG GMTs at month 7 in the overall population (aged 5–65 years) were significantly higher in the VLA15 M0-2-6 group (333·2 [95% CI 275·2–403·4; ST1] to 656·0 [560·2–768·2; ST2] units per mL) and VLA15 M0-6 group (197·3 [156·2–249·3; ST1] to 460·3 [370·6–571·8; ST2] units per mL) compared with the placebo group (21·9 [20·2–23·7; ST2] to 24·3 [22·1–26·7; ST6] units per mL; p<0·0001 for all comparisons); GMTs were also significantly higher in the VLA15 M0-2-6 group than in the VLA15 M0-6 group (all p<0·0001 except for ST2 [p=0·0010] and ST3 [p=0·011]). Among VLA15 recipients, GMTs were highest in children followed by adolescents and then adults. Solicited local adverse events after any vaccination occurred more frequently among VLA15 recipients (M0-2-6, 178 [94%; 95% CI 89–96] of 190; M0-6, 176 [94%; 90–97] of 187) than placebo recipients (71 [34%; 28–41] of 208; p<0·0001 for both comparisons); the same was true for solicited systemic adverse events (M0-2-6, 128 [67%; 95% CI 60–74] of 190, p=0·0015 vs placebo; M0-6, 128 [68%; 61–75] of 187, p=0·0007 vs placebo; placebo, 107 [51%; 45–58] of 208). Most solicited adverse events were mild or moderate in severity; none was grade 4. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of unsolicited adverse events, related unsolicited adverse events, unsolicited serious adverse events (serious adverse events), and adverse events of special interest across groups in the overall population. None of the severe unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events, or adverse events of special interest were considered related to vaccination and no deaths occurred through to month 12 of the trial. These findings confirm previously observed safety and immunogenicity profiles of VLA15 in adults and extend them to children aged 5 years and older and adolescents. The greater immunogenicity of VLA15 among children and adolescents might translate to increased flexibility in the real-world clinical setting. Pfizer and Valneva.

Rising Lyme borreliosis incidence rates, potential for severe outcomes, and limitations in accurate and timely diagnosis for treatment initiation suggest the need for a preventive vaccine; however, no vaccine is currently available for human use. We performed two studies in adults to optimise the dose level and vaccination schedule for VLA15, an investigational Lyme borreliosis vaccine targeting outer surface protein A (OspA) serotypes 1–6, which are associated with the most common pathogenic Borrelia species in Europe and North America. Both randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 2 studies included participants aged 18–65 years without recent history of Lyme borreliosis or tick bites. Study one was conducted at nine clinical research and study centre sites in the USA (n=6), Germany (n=2), and Belgium (n=1); study two was conducted at five of the study one US sites. Based on a randomisation list created by an unmasked statistician for each study, participants were randomly assigned via an electronic case report form randomisation module to receive 90 μg (study one only), 135 μg, or 180 μg VLA15 or placebo by intramuscular injection at months 0, 1, and 2 (study one) or 0, 2, and 6 (study two). Study one began with a run-in phase to confirm safety, after which the Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended the removal of the 90 μg group and continuation of the study. In the study one run-in phase, randomisation was stratified by study site, whereas in the study one main phase and in study two, randomisation was stratified by study site, age group, and baseline B burgdorferi (sensu lato) serostatus. All individuals were masked, other than staff involved in randomisation, vaccine preparation or administration, or safety data monitoring. The primary endpoint for both studies was OspA-specific IgG geometric mean titres (GMTs) at 1 month after the third vaccination and was evaluated in the per-protocol population. Safety endpoints were evaluated in the safety population: all participants who received at least one vaccination. Both studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study one NCT03769194 and study two NCT03970733) and are completed. For study one, 573 participants were screened and randomly assigned to treatment groups between Dec 21, 2018, and Sept, 26, 2019. For study two, 248 participants were screened and randomly assigned between June 26 and Sept 3, 2019. In study one, 29 participants were assigned to receive 90 μg VLA15, 215 to 135 μg, 205 to 180 μg, and 124 to placebo. In study two, 97 participants were assigned to receive 135 μg VLA15, 100 to 180 μg, and 51 to placebo. At 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 3), OspA-specific IgG GMTs in study one ranged from 74·3 (serotype 1; 95% CI 46·4–119·0) to 267·4 units per mL (serotype 3; 194·8–367·1) for 90 μg VLA15, 101·9 (serotype 1; 87·1–119·4) to 283·2 units per mL (serotype 3; 248·2–323·1) for 135 μg, and 115·8 (serotype 1; 98·8–135·7) to 308·6 units per mL (serotype 3; 266·8–356·8) for 180 μg. In study two, ranges at 1 month after the third vaccination (ie, month 7) were 278·5 (serotype 1; 214·9–361·0) to 545·2 units per mL (serotype 2; 431·8–688·4) for 135 μg VLA15 and 274·7 (serotype 1; 209·4–360·4) to 596·8 units per mL (serotype 3; 471·9–754·8) for 180 μg. Relative to placebo, the VLA15 groups had more frequent reports of solicited local adverse events (study one: 94%, 95% CI 91–96 vs 26%, 19–34; study two: 96%, 93–98 vs 35%, 24–49 after any vaccination) and solicited systemic adverse events (study one: 69%, 65–73 vs 43%, 34–52; study two: 74%, 67–80 vs 51%, 38–64); most were mild or moderate. In study one, unsolicited adverse events were reported by 52% (48–57) of participants in the VLA15 groups and 52% (43–60) of those in the placebo groups; for study two these were 65% (58–71) and 69% (55–80), respectively. Percentages of participants reporting serious unsolicited adverse events (study one: 2%, 1–4; study two: 4%, 2–7) and adverse events of special interest (study one: 1%, 0–2; study two: 1%, 0–3) were low across all groups. A single severe, possibly related unsolicited adverse event was reported (worsening of pre-existing ventricular extrasystoles, which resolved after change of relevant concomitant medication); no related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. VLA15 was safe, well tolerated, and elicited robust antibody responses to all six OspA serotypes. These findings support further clinical development of VLA15 using the 180 μg dose and 0-2-6-month schedule, which was associated with the greatest immune responses. Valneva.

\"A riveting thriller reminiscent of The Hot Zone, this true story dives into the mystery surrounding one of the most controversial and misdiagnosed conditions of our time--Lyme disease--and of Willy Burgdorfer, the man who discovered the microbe behind it, revealing his secret role in developing bug-borne biological weapons, and raising terrifying questions about the genesis of the epidemic of tick-borne diseases affecting millions of Americans today. While on vacation on Martha's Vineyard, Kris Newby was bitten by an unseen tick. That one bite changed her life forever, pulling her into the abyss of a devastating illness that took ten doctors to diagnose and years to recover: Newby had become one of the 300,000 Americans who are afflicted with Lyme disease each year. As a science writer, she was driven to understand why this disease is so misunderstood, and its patients so mistreated. This quest led her to Willy Burgdorfer, the Lyme microbe's discoverer, who revealed that he had developed bug-borne bioweapons during the Cold War, and believed that the Lyme epidemic was started by a military experiment gone wrong. In a superb, meticulous work of narrative journalism, Bitten takes readers on a journey to investigate these claims, from biological weapons facilities to interviews with biosecurity experts and microbiologists doing cutting-edge research, all the while uncovering darker truths about Willy. It also leads her to uncomfortable questions about why Lyme can be so difficult to both diagnose and treat, and why the government is so reluctant to classify chronic Lyme as a disease. A gripping, infectious page-turner, Bitten will shed a terrifying new light on an epidemic that is exacting an incalculable toll on us, upending much of what we believe we know about it\"-- Provided by publisher.

While most patients fully recover after treatment for Lyme disease with recommended antibiotic regimens, some report non-specific symptoms after treatment. When these symptoms are unexplained by other conditions and persist for ≥  6 months, this condition is called post-treatment Lyme disease symptoms or syndrome (PTLDS). The pathogenesis of PTLDS is unknown and no specific diagnostic biomarkers have been identified. In this study, we used a high-density peptide array to examine antibody responses to > 60 primary antigens of B. burgdorferi from a cohort of patients diagnosed with PTLDS and recovered patients with similar Lyme disease manifestations. Using matched serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we mapped the primary reactive B. burgdorferi epitopes associated with PTLDS. We found that VlsE had a greater antibody response within the PTLDS cohort than recovered patients. The reactivity to OspC-specific epitopes revealed a predominance of antibodies to OspC type K and A in the PTLDS cohort. However, the major immunodominant epitopes were similar in PTLDS and recovered patients, and we were unable to identify specific diagnostic targets for PTLDS. We found a more robust reactivity in the serum over CSF and did not identify antigenic regions that were specifically associated with the infection of the central nervous system.

By using commercial insurance claims data, we estimated that Lyme disease was diagnosed and treated in ≈476,000 patients in the United States annually during 2010-2018. Our results underscore the need for accurate diagnosis and improved prevention.

The burden of tickborne diseases is growing substantially and seems likely to continue to do so. Prevention and management are hampered by suboptimal diagnostics, lack of treatment options for emerging viruses, and a paucity of vaccines.