Explore the vast range of titles available.

The benefit of regional nodal irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer is well established for patients with pathologically positive axillary nodes, but whether it is also beneficial for patients whose nodes become pathologically tumor free (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. We evaluated whether regional nodal irradiation improves outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancer who reach ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer with a clinical stage of T1 to T3 (tumor size, ≤2 cm to >5 cm), N1, and M0 (indicating spread to one to three axillary lymph nodes but no distant metastasis) who had ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive regional nodal irradiation or no regional nodal irradiation. The primary end point was the interval of freedom from invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer (invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval). Secondary end points included the locoregional recurrence-free interval, the distant recurrence-free interval, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed. A total of 1641 patients were enrolled in the trial; 1556 were included in the primary-event analysis: 772 in the irradiation group and 784 in the no-irradiation group. After a median follow-up of 59.5 months, 109 primary end-point events (50 in the irradiation group and 59 in the no-irradiation group) had occurred. Regional nodal irradiation did not significantly increase the invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.28; P = 0.51). Point estimates of survival free from the primary end-point events were 92.7% in the irradiation group and 91.8% in the no-irradiation group. Regional nodal irradiation did not increase the locoregional recurrence-free interval, the distant recurrence-free interval, disease-free survival, or overall survival. No deaths related to the protocol-specified therapy were reported, and no unexpected adverse events were observed. Grade 4 adverse events occurred in 0.5% of patients in the irradiation group and 0.1% of those in the no-irradiation group. The addition of adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer in patients who had negative axillary nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; NSABP B-51-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01872975.).

Primary lymphatic anomalies may present in a myriad of ways and are highly heterogenous. Careful consideration of the presentation can lead to an accurate clinical and/or molecular diagnosis which will assist with management. The most common presentation is lymphoedema, swelling resulting from failure of the peripheral lymphatic system. However, there may be internal lymphatic dysfunction, for example, chylous reflux, or lymphatic malformations, including the thorax or abdomen. A number of causal germline or postzygotic gene mutations have been discovered. Some through careful phenotyping and categorisation of the patients based on the St George’s classification pathway/algorithm. The St George’s classification algorithm is aimed at providing an accurate diagnosis for patients with lymphoedema based on age of onset, areas affected by swelling and associated clinical features. This has enabled the identification of new causative genes. This update brings the classification of primary lymphatic disorders in line with the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies 2018 classification for vascular anomalies. The St George’s algorithm considers combined vascular malformations and primary lymphatic anomalies. It divides the types of primary lymphatic anomalies into lymphatic malformations and primary lymphoedema. It further divides the primary lymphoedema into syndromic, generalised lymphatic dysplasia with internal/systemic involvement, congenital-onset lymphoedema and late-onset lymphoedema. An audit and update of the algorithm has revealed where new genes have been discovered and that a molecular diagnosis was possible in 26% of all patients overall and 41% of those tested.

Key Points The lymphatic system serves an integral role in fluid homeostasis, lipid metabolism and immune defence, and influences a diverse range of diseases, including infection, inflammatory and metabolic diseases, and cancer. Targeted delivery to the lymphatics and lymphoid tissues has the potential to improve oral bioavailability, enhance vaccination and tolerance induction, target delivery to lymph-resident cancer metastasis and infection, and promote the utility of treatments for diseases ranging from infections such as HIV to cancer and inflammatory and metabolic disease. Selective delivery to the lymph is largely dictated by size, as macromolecules or particulate carriers are excluded from access to blood capillaries, whereas interstitial fluid flow sweeps larger constructs into the more permeable lymphatics. Lymphatic targeting may be achieved via the delivery of macromolecular therapeutics (for example, proteins and peptides), small-molecule therapeutics in association with macromolecular carriers (for example, nanoparticles, polymers, liposomes and dendrimers) or small-molecule therapeutics that associate, in situ , with endogenous macromolecular constructs (for example, lipoproteins and proteins) or cells that are transported from interstitial tissues via lymphatic rather than blood capillaries. The design of lymphatic delivery systems ranges from simple systems that rely on passive lymphatic access to more complex structures that integrate into endogenous lymph transport processes. Recent studies have suggested the presence of active transport processes that facilitate entry across the lymphatic endothelium, and delivery systems that harness these processes are emerging. In many cases, disease progression results in lymphatic remodelling. Next-generation lymphatic targeting approaches will probably seek to harness a better understanding of changes to lymphatic structure and function in disease to promote targeting to the lymphatics and enhance therapeutic utility. Future efforts in lymphatic drug delivery might usefully address barriers to the clinical translation of lymphotropic delivery vehicles, such as the lack of well-validated models to predict lymphatic uptake in humans. Targeted delivery to the lymphatic system has the potential to improve bioavailability, enhance prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination or tolerance induction, and target drug delivery to lymph-resident infection or metastasis. In this Review, Trevaskis, Kaminskas and Porter provide an overview of lymphatic targeting and delivery strategies in drug development, and discuss the clinical applications of these approaches. The lymphatic system serves an integral role in fluid homeostasis, lipid metabolism and immune control. In cancer, the lymph nodes that drain solid tumours are a primary site of metastasis, and recent studies have suggested intrinsic links between lymphatic function, lipid deposition, obesity and atherosclerosis. Advances in the current understanding of the role of the lymphatics in pathological change and immunity have driven the recognition that lymph-targeted delivery has the potential to transform disease treatment and vaccination. In addition, the design of lymphatic delivery systems has progressed from simple systems that rely on passive lymphatic access to sophisticated structures that use nanotechnology to mimic endogenous macromolecules and lipid conjugates that 'hitchhike' onto lipid transport processes. Here, we briefly summarize the lymphatic system in health and disease and the varying mechanisms of lymphatic entry and transport, as well as discussing examples of lymphatic delivery that have enhanced therapeutic utility. We also outline future challenges to effective lymph-directed therapy.

Blood vessels form a closed circulatory system, whereas lymphatic vessels form a one-way conduit for tissue fluid and leukocytes. In most vertebrates, the main function of lymphatic vessels is to collect excess protein-rich fluid that has extravasated from blood vessels and transport it back into the blood circulation. Lymphatic vessels have an important immune surveillance function, as they import various antigens and activated antigen-presenting cells into the lymph nodes and export immune effector cells and humoral response factors into the blood circulation. Defects in lymphatic function can lead to lymph accumulation in tissues, dampened immune responses, connective tissue and fat accumulation, and tissue swelling known as lymphedema. This review highlights the most recent developments in lymphatic biology and how the lymphatic system contributes to the pathogenesis of various diseases involving immune and inflammatory responses and its role in disseminating tumor cells.

Various locoregional treatments exist for PET–CT-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrences in patients with prostate cancer. We aimed to assess whether elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) to the pelvis would be superior to metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). PEACE V–STORM is a phase 2, open-label, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 21 hospitals in Australia, Belgium, Italy, Norway, Spain, and Switzerland. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with WHO performance status 0–1 and a histologically confirmed initial diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with a PET-detected pelvic nodal oligorecurrence (up to five nodes) following radical local treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to MDT or ENRT. Randomisation was done online by minimisation with randomisation factor 0·80 and was stratified by type of PET tracer (choline vs prostate-specific membrane antigen) and type of MDT used (salvage lymph node dissection vs stereotactic body radiotherapy or simultaneous integrated boost). Participants and researchers were not masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the MDT group had salvage lymph node dissection or stereotactic body radiotherapy (30 Gy in three fractions every other day), with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients in the ENRT group received a 45 Gy dose in 25 fractions to the pelvis with a simultaneous integrated boost of 65 Gy to the PET-positive nodes or salvage lymph node dissection, with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, defined as the time between randomisation and the appearance of a metastatic recurrence (any M1) on PET imaging or death due to any cause, and was analysed per modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569241, and the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal, SNCTP000002947, and is active, not recruiting. Between June 11, 2018, and April 30, 2021, 198 patients were screened for eligibility, 196 of whom were randomly assigned to MDT (n=99) or ENRT (n=97), with 190 evaluable patients (MDT n=97 and ENRT n=93). All patients were male. Data on race and ethnicity were not collected. Median follow-up was 50 months (IQR 42–58). 4-year metastasis-free survival was 63% (80% CI 56–69) in the MDT group and 76% (69–81) in the ENRT group (HR 0·62 [80% CI 0·44–0·86]; p=0·063). The most common grade 3 adverse events were urinary incontinence (six [6%] of 97 in the MDT group vs nine [10%] in the ENRT group) and diarrhoea (one [1%] in the MDT group vs two [2%] in the ENRT group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. To our knowledge, this is the first randomised trial for metachronous PET-detected nodal recurrences comparing two local treatment approaches (MDT and ENRT) in combination with 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. By showing an improved metastasis-free survival with ENRT, this trial establishes ENRT as a potential standard treatment approach, awaiting a phase 3 trial confirming these results. Movember Foundation, Kom Op Tegen Kanker, Stichting tegen Kanker.

The lymphatic system is essential for fluid balance and immune regulation, but its anatomy and function in translational models remain insufficiently defined. Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared fluorescence lymphography enables real-time visualization of superficial lymphatics, yet baseline functional data in non-human primates are lacking. Cynomolgus monkeys closely resemble humans and represent a relevant model for lymphatic research. This study established baseline drainage patterns and functional contractility metrics of the lower limb lymphatic system. Five healthy female cynomolgus monkeys were studied, with a total of 10 lower limbs evaluated. Lymphatic drainage was mapped using 11 intradermal injection sites and near-infrared fluorescence imaging. For functional analysis, ICG was injected into the anteromedial and anterolateral regions, which consistently exhibited clear lymphatic channels suitable for signal extraction. Fluorescence signals were analyzed using peak-valley and wavelet methods to quantify contraction metrics. Functional parameters were assessed at multiple time points for temporal stability. Comparisons were performed within each pathway, and pooled values were used for paired comparisons between the medial and lateral pathways. Anatomical mapping revealed four major drainage groups. The anteromedial, posteromedial, and anterolateral regions drained predominantly to the inguinal lymph node, whereas posterolateral regions drained mainly to the popliteal lymph node. Functionally, lymphatic contractions remained temporally stable, and medial pathways exhibited significantly higher peak frequency, wavelet mean frequency, amplitude, and wavelet amplitude compared with that of the lateral pathways, indicating more frequent and stronger contractions. Lateral pathways showed slightly greater variability in contraction rhythm. This study provides the first integrated anatomical and functional characterization of lower limb lymphatics in cynomolgus monkeys. The findings establish baseline parameters that may guide comparative analyses, support pathway-specific investigations, and serve as baseline data for future studies of lymphatic dysfunction and disease modeling in non-human primates.

If treatment of the axilla is indicated in patients with breast cancer who have a positive sentinel node, axillary lymph node dissection is the present standard. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. We aimed to assess whether axillary radiotherapy provides comparable regional control with fewer side-effects. Patients with T1–2 primary breast cancer and no palpable lymphadenopathy were enrolled in the randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive either axillary lymph node dissection or axillary radiotherapy in case of a positive sentinel node, stratified by institution. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of 5-year axillary recurrence, considered to be not more than 4% for the axillary radiotherapy group compared with an expected 2% in the axillary lymph node dissection group. Analyses were by intention to treat and per protocol. The AMAROS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00014612. Between Feb 19, 2001, and April 29, 2010, 4823 patients were enrolled at 34 centres from nine European countries, of whom 4806 were eligible for randomisation. 2402 patients were randomly assigned to receive axillary lymph node dissection and 2404 to receive axillary radiotherapy. Of the 1425 patients with a positive sentinel node, 744 had been randomly assigned to axillary lymph node dissection and 681 to axillary radiotherapy; these patients constituted the intention-to-treat population. Median follow-up was 6·1 years (IQR 4·1–8·0) for the patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. In the axillary lymph node dissection group, 220 (33%) of 672 patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection had additional positive nodes. Axillary recurrence occurred in four of 744 patients in the axillary lymph node dissection group and seven of 681 in the axillary radiotherapy group. 5-year axillary recurrence was 0·43% (95% CI 0·00–0·92) after axillary lymph node dissection versus 1·19% (0·31–2·08) after axillary radiotherapy. The planned non-inferiority test was underpowered because of the low number of events. The one-sided 95% CI for the underpowered non-inferiority test on the hazard ratio was 0·00–5·27, with a non-inferiority margin of 2. Lymphoedema in the ipsilateral arm was noted significantly more often after axillary lymph node dissection than after axillary radiotherapy at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Axillary lymph node dissection and axillary radiotherapy after a positive sentinel node provide excellent and comparable axillary control for patients with T1–2 primary breast cancer and no palpable lymphadenopathy. Axillary radiotherapy results in significantly less morbidity. EORTC Charitable Trust.

Malignant tumors release growth factors such as VEGF-C to induce lymphatic vessel expansion (lymphangiogenesis) in primary tumors and in draining sentinel LNs, thereby promoting LN metastasis. Surprising recent evidence suggests that lymphatic vessels do not merely represent passive channels for tumor spread, but that they may actively promote tumor cell recruitment to LNs, cancer stem cell survival, and immune modulation. New imaging approaches allow the sensitive visualization of the earliest LN metastases and the quantitative, noninvasive measurement of the function of tumor-draining lymphatic vessels, with potential applications in the development of biomarkers for prognosis and measurement of therapeutic response.

The eye, an anatomical extension of the central nervous system (CNS), exhibits many molecular and cellular parallels to the brain. Emerging research demonstrates that changes in the brain are often reflected in the eye, particularly in the retina 1 . Still, the possibility of an immunological nexus between the posterior eye and the rest of the CNS tissues remains unexplored. Here, studying immune responses to herpes simplex virus in the brain, we observed that intravitreal immunization protects mice against intracranial viral challenge. This protection extended to bacteria and even tumours, allowing therapeutic immune responses against glioblastoma through intravitreal immunization. We further show that the anterior and posterior compartments of the eye have distinct lymphatic drainage systems, with the latter draining to the deep cervical lymph nodes through lymphatic vasculature in the optic nerve sheath. This posterior lymphatic drainage, like that of meningeal lymphatics, could be modulated by the lymphatic stimulator VEGFC. Conversely, we show that inhibition of lymphatic signalling on the optic nerve could overcome a major limitation in gene therapy by diminishing the immune response to adeno-associated virus and ensuring continued efficacy after multiple doses. These results reveal a shared lymphatic circuit able to mount a unified immune response between the posterior eye and the brain, highlighting an understudied immunological feature of the eye and opening up the potential for new therapeutic strategies in ocular and CNS diseases. A study provides evidence for a shared lymphatic circuit that connects the posterior eye and the brain, allowing the generation of immune responses to protect the CNS against pathogens and tumours following intravitreal immunization.