Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
3,457 result(s) for "Lymphocyte Transfusion"
Sort by:
Long-term results and GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia
We report on 318 patients with acute leukemia, receiving donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in complete hematologic remission (CHR) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). DLI were applied preemptively (preDLI) for minimal residual disease (MRD, n = 23) or mixed chimerism (MC, n = 169), or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients with complete chimerism and molecular remission (proDLI, n = 126). Median interval from alloSCT to DLI1 was 176 days, median follow-up was 7.0 years. Five-year cumulative relapse incidence (CRI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free and overall survival (LFS/OS) of the entire cohort were 29.1%, 12.7%, 58.2%, and 64.3%. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II–IV°/chronic GvHD were 11.9%/31%. Nineteen patients (6%) died from DLI-induced GvHD. Age ≥60 years (p = 0.046), advanced stage at transplantation (p = 0.003), shorter interval from transplantation (p = 0.018), and prior aGvHD ≥II° (p = 0.036) were risk factors for DLI-induced GvHD. GvHD did not influence CRI, but was associated with NRM and lower LFS/OS. Efficacy of preDLI was demonstrated by decreasing MRD/increasing blood counts in 71%, and increasing chimerism in 70%. Five-year OS after preDLI for MRD/MC was 51%/68% among responders, and 37% among non-responders. The study describes response and outcome of DLI in CHR and helps to identify candidates without increased risk of severe GvHD.
Transplantation strategy affects the risk of GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can boost Graft-versus-Leukaemia (GvL) reactivity but may induce Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). It is essential to understand which factors besides timing, donor type, and dose influence DLI alloreactivity. We previously identified viral infections, ≥ 5% patient cells in bone marrow chimerism, and lymphopenia at the time of DLI as relevant factors for GvHD after DLI following alemtuzumab-based T-cell depletion. Here, we investigated these factors and the alloreactivity after DLI following alloSCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide in 83 patients with acute leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome receiving a prophylactic or preemptive DLI. 5% had viral infections close to DLI, 6% had ≥ 5% mixed chimerism, and 17% had lymphopenia. 2-year cumulative incidence of GvHD requiring systemic treatment was low: 7% (95%-confidence interval 1–14%). 22 of the 28 patients with ≥ 1% mixed chimerism at the time of DLI (79%) converted to full-donor chimerism. None of these responders relapsed, indicating achievement of GvL despite the low incidence of GvHD. Our data show that DLI alloreactivity is determined by the conditions at the time of DLI which are influenced by the transplantation strategy. Adjusting the DLI dose based on these conditions may improve the balance between GvHD and GvL.
Changes in donor lymphocyte infusion for relapsed patients post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a 30-year single-center experience
Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a therapeutic approach for relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Despite their reported efficacy, the evolution of DLI practices over time remains underexplored. This study provided a comprehensive analysis of DLI strategies and outcomes over 30 years at a single institution. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 75 patients who underwent DLI for disease relapse between April 1994 and March 2024. The primary endpoint was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate after DLI. Secondary endpoints included the 100-day complete remission (CR) rate and incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The median age at the first DLI was 49 years (range, 20-69 years). The most common underlying diseases in all 75 cases were acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 46) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS, n = 12). Until 2014, DLI was only performed in patients with AML (n = 14), MDS (n = 2), or chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 5). However, since 2015, patients with various diseases, including lymphoid malignancies, have also undergone DLI. Azacitidine was the most frequently used combination therapy with DLI (n = 34). Regimens including venetoclax and FLT3 inhibitors have been commonly used since 2019 (n = 18). The 3-year OS rate was 29.1% (95% CI, 18.8-40.2%). Factors negatively influencing OS included age ≥50 years and a high or very high refined disease risk index. The 100-day CR rate was 52.1%, and acute GVHD occurred in 25.3% of the patients, with no strong correlation between GVHD incidence and CR achievement. Among 18 patients who underwent three or more DLIs since 2018, 88.9% achieved remission following DLI or second HSCT, with a median follow-up of 949.5 days for survivors. This study highlighted the evolving trends in DLI practices and the diversification of combination therapies. Future research should focus on further validating these findings and optimizing DLI protocols to improve patient outcomes.
Pre-radiation lymphocyte harvesting and post-radiation reinfusion in patients with newly diagnosed high grade gliomas
Radiation (RT), temozolomide (TMZ), and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed high grade gliomas (HGG) produces severe treatment-related lymphopenia (TRL) that is associated with early cancer-related deaths. This TRL may result from inadvertent radiation to circulating lymphocytes. This study reinfused lymphocytes, harvested before chemo-radiation, and assessed safety, feasibility, and trends in lymphocyte counts. Patients with newly diagnosed HGG and total lymphocyte counts (TLC) ≥ 1000 cells/mm 3 underwent apheresis. Cryopreserved autologous lymphocytes were reinfused once radiation was completed. Safety, feasibility, and trends in TLC, T cell subsets and cytokines were studied. Serial TLC were also compared with an unreinfused matched control group. Ten patients were harvested (median values: age 56 years, dexamethasone 3 mg/day, TLC/CD4 1980/772 cells/mm 3 ). After 6 weeks of RT/TMZ, TLC fell 69 % (p < 0.0001) with similar reductions in CD4, CD8 and NK cells but not Tregs. Eight patients received lymphocyte reinfusions (median = 7.0 × 10 7  lymphocytes/kg) without adverse events. A post-reinfusion TLC rise of ≥300 cells/mm 3 was noted in 3/8 patients at 4 weeks and 7/8 at 14 weeks which was similar to 23 matched controls. The reduced CD4/CD8 ratio was not restored by lymphocyte reinfusion. Severe lymphopenia was not accompanied by elevated serum interleukin-7 (IL-7) levels. This study confirms that severe TRL is common in HGG and is not associated with high plasma IL-7 levels. Although lymphocyte harvesting/reinfusion is feasible and safe, serial lymphocyte counts are similar to unreinfused matched controls. Studies administering higher lymphocyte doses and/or IL-7 should be considered to restore severe treatment-related lymphopenia in HGG.
Escalated lymphodepletion followed by donor lymphocyte infusion can induce a graft-versus-host response without overwhelming toxicity
Treatment of relapse of hematological malignancies following allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) remains very challenging and relies usually on the readministration of chemotherapy combined with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). To enhance DLI effectiveness, lymphodepletion (LD) with fludarabine (Flu) and/or CY before the injection of lymphocytes is an attractive modality to modify the immune environment, leading possibly to suppression of regulatory T cells (T reg ) and exposing the patient to cytokine activation. However, LD before DLI may lead to induction of deleterious GVHD. To avoid inducing overwhelming toxicity, we proceeded by escalating doses of both LD and DLI. Eighteen patients with various non-CML hematological malignancies who relapsed following allo-HSCT were treated with chemotherapy and LD-DLI or LD-DLI upfront. T-cell subpopulation and DC levels as well as cytokine plasma levels (IL-7, IL-15) were measured before and following LD-DLI. Cumulative incidence of acute grade II–IV GVHD was 29.4% similar to that reported in patients receiving DLI without LD. In addition, Flu alone with low dose of DLI was not associated with severe GHVD. CY/Flu at the respective doses of 600 mg/m 2 on day 1 and Flu 25 mg/m 2 /day on days 1–3 did not result in a marked decrease of T reg cells, nor in endogenous IL-7 and IL-15 production. However, a peripheral expansion of DCs was observed. These findings suggest that the escalated dose procedure appears safe and prevent overwhelming toxicity. A dose-limiting toxicity has not yet been reached.
Successful Treatment of Primary Poor Graft Function After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Low‐Dose Decitabine Followed by Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Eltrombopag
Objective Primary poor graft function (PGF) is a common and serious complication after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo‐HSCT). This study retrospectively evaluates the efficacy and safety of a novel combination therapy consisting of low‐dose decitabine, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), and eltrombopag for the treatment of primary PGF subsequent to haplo‐HSCT. Methods In this analysis of ten patients, decitabine was administered at a dose of 7 mg/m2/day for three consecutive days, followed by DLI on the fifth day and eltrombopag, which was started at 50 mg/day and titrated up to 150 mg. The primary endpoints of the study encompassed hematologic recovery. Results Nine patients (90%) achieved a complete response with normalized blood counts, while one patient (10%) showed a partial response with transfusion independence. Adverse events included manageable graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) in four patients. Conclusion These findings indicate that this triple therapy represents a promising approach for the management of primary PGF following haplo‐HSCT.
Phase I study of α-galactosylceramide-pulsed antigen presenting cells administration to the nasal submucosa in unresectable or recurrent head and neck cancer
Background Human Vα24 natural killer T (NKT) cells are activated by the specific ligand, α-galactosylceramide (α-GalCer), in a CD1d-dependent manner. Potent anti-tumor activity of activated NKT cells has been previously demonstrated. Methods We conducted a phase I study with α-GalCer-pulsed antigen presenting cells (APCs) administered in the nasal submucosa of patients with head and neck cancer, and evaluated the safety and feasibility of such a treatment. Nine patients with unresectable or recurrent head and neck cancer received two treatments 1 week apart, of 1 × 10 8 of α-GalCer-pulsed autologous APCs into the nasal submucosa. Results During the clinical study period, no serious adverse events (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 greater than grade 3) were observed. After the first and the second administration of α-GalCer-pulsed APCs, an increased number of NKT cells was observed in four patients and enhanced natural killer activity was detected in the peripheral blood of eight patients. Conclusion The administration of α-GalCer-pulsed APCs into the nasal submucosa was found to be safe and induce anti-tumor activity in some patients.
Combination of anti‐CD4 antibody treatment and donor lymphocyte infusion ameliorates graft‐versus‐host disease while preserving graft‐versus‐tumor effects in murine allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) is not only a well‐established immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, but is potentially useful for treating solid tumors refractory to available therapies. However, application of allo‐HSCT to solid tumors is limited, despite the beneficial antitumor effects, by the risk of graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). CD4+ T cells have been implicated in several aspects of GVHD, and suppress antitumor CD8+ T‐cell responses. In the present study, we investigated clinically applicable allo‐HSCT protocols designed to maximize antitumor effects while reducing the risk of GVHD. We used a mouse model of allo‐HSCT with s.c. tumors. We found that myeloablative conditioning was associated with better inhibition of tumor growth but with severe acute GVHD. Early treatment with anti‐CD4 mAb substantially ameliorated GVHD while preserving antitumor effects, leading to improved survival in myeloablative allo‐HSCT. Late treatment with anti‐CD4 mAb also ameliorated GVHD to some extent. Donor lymphocyte infusion in GVHD mice treated with anti‐CD4 mAb further suppressed tumor growth without exacerbating GVHD. Collectively, our results suggest that myeloablative allo‐HSCT followed by anti‐CD4 mAb treatment and donor lymphocyte infusion could be a potent and safe immunotherapy for patients with cancers refractory to available therapies. Early anti‐CD4 mAb treatment ameliorates GVHD, while preserving anti‐tumor effects, leading to improved survival in myeloablative allo‐HSCT. DLI in GVHD mice treated with anti‐CD4 mAb augments anti‐tumor effects without exacerbating GVHD.
Donor Bone Marrow-Derived T Cells Inhibit GVHD Induced by Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Established Mixed Allogeneic Hematopoietic Chimeras
Delayed administration of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) to established mixed chimeras has been shown to achieve anti-tumor responses without graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD). Herein we show that de novo donor BM-derived T cells that are tolerant of the recipients are important in preventing GVHD in mixed chimeras receiving delayed DLI. Mixed chimeras lacking donor BM-derived T cells developed significantly more severe GVHD than those with donor BM-derived T cells after DLI, even though both groups had comparable levels of total T cells at the time of DLI. Post-DLI depletion of donor BM-derived T cells in mixed chimeras, as late as 20 days after DLI, also provoked severe GVHD. Although both CD4 and CD8 T cells contributed to the protection, the latter were significantly more effective, suggesting that inhibition of GVHD was not mainly mediated by CD4 regulatory T cells. The lack of donor BM-derived T cells was associated with markedly increased accumulation of DLI-derived alloreactive T cells in parenchymal GVHD target tissues. Thus, donor BM-derived T cells are an important factor in determining the risk of GVHD and therefore, offer a potential therapeutic target for preventing and ameliorating GVHD in the setting of delayed DLI in established mixed chimeras.
Gene Editing of CCR5 in Autologous CD4 T Cells of Persons Infected with HIV
In this small study, investigators genetically disrupted the HIV receptor CCR5 in CD4 T cells of aviremic persons who were infected with HIV. After reinfusion and during viremia, the modified cells declined at a significantly slower rate than did the unmodified cells. The ability to make site-specific modifications to (or “edit”) the human genome has been an objective in medicine since the recognition of the gene as the basic unit of heredity. 1 , 2 The challenge of genome editing is the ability to generate a single double-strand break at a specific point in the DNA molecule. Numerous agents, including meganucleases, oligonucleotides that form DNA triplexes, and peptide nucleic acids, have been tested and shown to be limited by inefficiency. 3 – 5 Another class of reagents, the zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), have proved versatile for genome editing, and the use of ZFNs is now well established . . .