Explore the vast range of titles available.

The Mediator complex controls transcription of most eukaryotic genes with individual subunits required for the control of particular gene regulons in response to various perturbations. In this study, we reveal the roles of the plant Mediator subunits MED16, MED14, and MED2 in regulating transcription in response to the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) and we determine which cis elements are under their control. Using synthetic promoter reporters we established an effective system for testing relationships between subunits and specific cis- acting motifs in protoplasts. Our results demonstrate that MED16, MED14, and MED2 are required for the full transcriptional activation by ABA of promoters containing both the ABRE (ABA-responsive element) and DRE (drought-responsive element). Using synthetic promoter motif concatamers, we showed that ABA-responsive activation of the ABRE but not the DRE motif was dependent on these three Mediator subunits. Furthermore, the three subunits were required for the control of water loss from leaves but played no role in ABA-dependent growth inhibition, highlighting specificity in their functions. Our results identify new roles for three Mediator subunits, provide a direct demonstration of their function and highlight that our experimental approach can be utilized to identify the function of subunits of plant transcriptional regulators.

Background With the development of engineering the microbial cell factories, biosensors have been used widely for regulation of cellular metabolism and high-throughput screening. However, most of the biosensors constructed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are designed for transcriptional activation. Very few studies have dedicated to the development of genetic circuit for repressive regulation, which is also indispensable for the dynamic control of metabolism. Results In this study, through transcriptional deactivation design, we developed transcription-factor-based biosensors to allow repressive regulation in response to ligand. Using a malonyl-CoA sensing system as an example, the biosensor was constructed and systematically engineered to optimize the dynamic range by comparing transcriptional activity of the activators, evaluating the positions and numbers of the operators in the promoter and comparing the effects of different promoters. A biosensor with 82% repression ratio was obtained. Based on this design principle, another two biosensors, which sense acyl-CoA or xylose and downregulate gene expression, were also successfully constructed. Conclusions Our work systematically optimized the biosensors for repressive regulation in yeast for the first time. It provided useful framework to construct similar biosensors. Combining the widely reported biosensors for transcriptional activation with the biosensors developed here, it is now possible to construct biosensors with opposing transcriptional activities in yeast.