Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
1,051
result(s) for
"Mailboxes"
Sort by:
My city
\"A young boy discovers the excitement and unexpected delight of exploring his city--and so will readers of this vibrant picture book.\"--Publisher's description.
Book
Peer review declaration
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Firstly, authors send their papers to the conference mailbox, and all submissions will go through a preliminary review. Secondly, papers that out of scope will be rejected outright, papers that in the scope will enter the peer review process. • Number of submissions received: 494 • Number of submissions sent for review: 429 • Number of submissions accepted:378 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):76.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.1 • Total number of reviewers involved:39 Any additional info on review process: Step 1. Selected papers divided into several parts according to their topics. Step 2. Authors names, affiliations and email addresses removed from papers. Step 3. Papers sent to the reviewers who are professional in the related area for peer review. Step 4. Papers sent back to the writer if two reviewers reject the same paper, papers sent for publication if two reviewers accept the same paper, and if two reviewers disagree on the same paper, the paper will be sent to the chief editor for final decision. Step 5. If needed, authors must revise their paper according to the reviewers’ comments, and the revised version must meet the requirements. Contact person for queries: Junxin Bao, Central South University, 2013102160001@whu.edu.cn
Journal Article
La boîte aux lettres
\"Octave envie beaucoup son amie Félicie qui reçoit des lettres de sa cousine Célestine. Pourquoi n'en reçoit-il jamais, lui? Probablement parce qu'il n'a ni boîte aux lettres ni cousine. Pour régler ces petits détails, Octave se rend chez le quincaillier. Celui-ci lui vend une magnifique boîte aux lettres et lui donne l'adresse de sa cousine Winifred, qui vit en Australie. Maintenant qu'Octave a tout ce qu'il faut, il peut envoyer sa première lettre. Il choisit le W, pour Winifred.\"--Back cover.
Book
Peer review declaration
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe): Open, Each article will be reviewed by two judges and give their opinions: the authors with excellent articles will be given the opinion of “direct recruitment”; the authors will be given the suggestion of revising the articles with medium level, and the authors will resubmit the articles after revision; and the authors will directly reject the manuscripts with poor articles and refuse to accept them. • Conference submission management system: Filezilla/mailbox • Number of submissions received: 350 • Number of submissions sent for review: 320 • Number of submissions accepted: 286 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 81.7 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: nothing • Contact person for queries: eiconferences@163.com
Journal Article
Peg + Cat : the big dog problem
Peg's mom has given her and Cat five important letters to mail. \"She says it's because we're growing up,\" says Peg. And sure enough, the height marks on the wall show that they're getting taller! But there's a problem: when they get to the mailbox, they find a very big dog sitting in front of it. How can they get around or behind this scary-looking canine to mail the letters? Or could it be that they're jumping to conclusions -- and the obstacle itself might help them reach a solution?
BOOK
