Explore the vast range of titles available.

Existing structural models of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt in Kumaun, northwest India, are based on a tectono-stratigraphy that assigns different stratigraphy to the Ramgarh, Berinag, Askot, and Munsiari thrusts and treats the thrusts as separate structures. We reassess the tectono-stratigraphy of Kumaun, based on new and existing U-Pb zircon ages and whole-rock Nd isotopic values, and present a new structural model and deformation history through kinematic analysis using a balanced cross section. This study reveals that the rocks that currently crop out as the Ramgarh, Berinag, Askot, and Munsiari thrust sheets were part of the same, once laterally continuous stratigraphic unit, consisting of Lesser Himalayan Paleoproterozoic granitoids (ca. 1850 Ma) and metasedimentary rocks. These Paleoproterozoic rocks were shortened and duplexed into the Ramgarh-Munsiari thrust sheet and other Paleoproterozoic thrust sheets during Himalayan orogenesis. Our structural model contains a hinterland-dipping duplex that accommodates ∼541-575 km or 79%-80% of minimum shortening between the Main Frontal thrust and South Tibetan Detachment system. By adding in minimum shortening from the Tethyan Himalaya, we estimate a total minimum shortening of ∼674-751 km in the Himalayan fold-thrust belt. The Ramgarh-Munsiari thrust sheet and the Lesser Himalayan duplex are breached by erosion, separating the Paleoproterozoic Lesser Himalayan rocks of the Ramgarh-Munsiari thrust into the isolated, synclinal Almora, Askot, and Chiplakot klippen, where folding of the Ramgarh-Munsiari thrust sheet by the Lesser Himalayan duplex controls preservation of these klippen. The Ramgarh-Munsiari thrust carries the Paleoproterozoic Lesser Himalayan rocks ∼120 km southward from the footwall of the Main Central thrust and exposed them in the hanging wall of the Main Boundary thrust. Our kinematic model demonstrates that propagation of the thrust belt occurred from north to south with minor out-of-sequence thrusting and is consistent with a critical taper model for growth of the Himalayan thrust belt, following emplacement of midcrustal Greater Himalayan rocks. Our revised stratigraphy-based balanced cross section contains ∼120-200 km greater shortening than previously estimated through the Greater, Lesser, and Subhimalayan rocks.

The measurements of radon concentrations in drinking water sources in and around the Main Central Thrust (MCT) region in Garhwal Himalaya, India, were carried out using the scintillation detector-based SMART RnDuo technique for radiation protection purposes. Radon values in the analyzed samples were observed between 1.1 and 183.9 Bq L −1 (AM = 19.7 Bq L −1 ). Radon values in 94% of the samples were found well below the World Health Organization (WHO) reference limit. The estimated radiation doses for different age groups were found higher than the WHO safe limit of 100 µSv y −1 (from all sources including radon) except for the age groups of 0–12 months infants and 1–3 years children. The results of this study may be useful for future studies on epidemiology, examining hidden faults, uranium exploration etc.

The present study focuses on measuring radon concentrations in soil gas at various depths, radon exhalation rate (surface and mass) from soil samples, and gamma dose rate along and across the Main Central Thrust of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Radon concentration in soil gas, surface, and mass exhalation rates was measured using a portable SMART radon monitor (RnDuo). Furthermore, the gamma dose rate was measured using a pocket radiation monitor. The soil gas radon concentration varied from 15 ± 4 to 579 ± 82 Bq m−3 at a depth of 25 cm, 10 ± 2 to 533 ± 75 Bq m−3 at a depth of 30 cm, and 9 ± 1 to 680 ± 95 Bq m−3 at a depth of 35 cm. The surface and mass exhalation rates were found 3 ± 0.7 to 98 ± 3 Bq m−2 h−1 (with AM ± SD = 36 ± 28 Bq m−2 h−1) and 1 ± 0.2 to 95 ± 2 mBq kg−1 h−1 (with AM ± SD = 30 ± 22 mBq kg−1 h−1), respectively. The gamma dose rate for the present study area varies from 0.11 ± 0.05 to 0.28 ± 0.05 µSv h−1 with a mean value of 0.17 ± 0.05 µSv h−1. The correlation analysis between the exhalation rates (mass and surface) and radon concentration of soil gas at various depths was carried out in the current study.

Ionizing radiation emitted from radionuclides is present everywhere in the environment. It is the main source of health hazards to the general public. The present study elaborates on the analysis of primordial radionuclides in the collected soil samples from the Main Central Thrust (MCT) region of Uttarakhand Himalaya in a grid pattern. The naturally occurring radionuclides radium ( 226 Ra), thorium ( 232 Th) and potassium ( 40 K) were analyzed using a thallium-doped sodium iodide detector-based gamma-ray spectrometer. The activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th and 40 K were found to vary from 9.82 ± 2.35 to 39.17 ± 5.50 Bq kg −1 (arithmetic mean 15.76 Bq kg −1 ), 15.09 ± 6.93 to 32.90 ± 7.80 Bq kg −1 (arithmetic mean 21.66 Bq kg −1 ), and 165.71 ± 43 to 417.16 ± 61.73 Bq kg −1 (arithmetic mean 320.30 Bq kg −1 ) respectively. The spatial distribution and radiation hazards of primordial radionuclides are discussed in the paper.

An inverted metamorphic field gradient associated with a crustal-scale south-vergent thrust fault, the Main Central Thrust, has been recognized along the Himalaya for over 100 years. A major problem in Himalayan structural geology is that recent workers have mapped the Main Central Thrust within the Greater Himalayan Sequence high-grade metamorphic sequence along several different structural levels. Some workers map the Main Central Thrust as coinciding with a lithological contact, others as coincident with the kyanite isograd, up to 1-3 km structurally up-section into the Tertiary metamorphic sequence, without supporting structural data. Some workers recognize a Main Central Thrust zone of high ductile strain up to 2-3 km thick, bounded by an upper thrust, MCT-2 (= Vaikrita thrust), and a lower thrust, MCT-1 (= Munsiari thrust). Some workers define an \"upper Lesser Himalaya\" thrust sheet that shows similar P-T conditions to the Greater Himalayan Sequence. Others define the Main Central Thrust either on isotopic (Nd, Sr) differences, differences in detrital zircon ages, or as being coincident with a zone of young (<5 Ma) Th-Pb monazite ages. Very few papers incorporate any structural data in justifying the position of the Main Central Thrust. These studies, combined with recent quantitative strain analyses from the Everest and Annapurna Greater Himalayan Sequence, show that a wide region of high strain characterizes most of the Greater Himalayan Sequence with a concentration along the bounding margins of the South Tibetan Detachment along the top, and the Main Central Thrust along the base. We suggest that the Main Central Thrust has to be defined and mapped on strain criteria, not on stratigraphic, lithological, isotopic or geochronological criteria. The most logical place to map the Main Central Thrust is along the high-strain zone that commonly occurs along the base of the ductile shear zone and inverted metamorphic sequence. Above that horizon, all rocks show some degree of Tertiary Himalayan metamorphism, and most of the Greater Himalayan Sequence metamorphic or migmatitic rocks show some degree of pure shear and simple shear ductile strain that occurs throughout the mid-crustal Greater Himalayan Sequence channel. The Main Central Thrust evolved both in time (early-middle Miocene) and space from a deep-level ductile shear zone to a shallow brittle thrust fault.

The metamorphic pressure–temperature (P–T) conditions across the Main central thrust (MCT) in the Arun area have been investigated. The MCT marks the tectono-metamorphic boundary between the overlying high-grade High Himalaya crystalline sequences (HHCS) and the underlying low-grade Lesser Himalaya sequences (LHS). The metamorphic rocks regionally preserve an inverted Barrovian sequence (i.e., intermediate P/T type metamorphism) devoid of previously reported high-pressure metamorphism. The metamorphic grade increases upwards from 670–740 °C and 6.9–9.4 kbar in the MCT zone and lower HHCS to 760–835 °C and 10.0–11.1 kbar in the middle HHCS. Orthoamphibole gneisses in the middle HHCS yield prograde Barrovian-type metamorphism, such as staurolite inclusions in garnets, showing an intermediate P/T gradient. The differences in the tectonic setting and metamorphic evolution imply that the metamorphic units in the Arun area do not correspond to the other high-pressure units in eastern Himalaya. Zircon and monazite U–Pb ages from kyanite gneiss of the lower HHCS reveal the MCT activity, associated with fluid-present anatexis, at ca. 20–14 Ma. Furthermore, similar K–Ar white mica ages (ca. 13–7 Ma) in the hanging wall and footwall of the MCT could represent the timing of later deformation events in shear zones or cooling, possibly associated with exhumation accompanied by activities on younger, structurally lower thrust faults such as the lower MCT. The similar P–T conditions near the MCT in this area could result from recrystallization during syn-metamorphic thrusting, whereas the middle HHCS away from the MCT preserve the original Barrovian metamorphic sequences related to crustal thickening. This and previous studies imply that different P–T profiles near the MCT according to each transect observed in Nepal could be apparent and the cumulative result of polyphase metamorphism.

Structural analysis, petrochronology and metamorphic petrology enable identification and bracketing of the timing of a newly mapped high-temperature ductile shear zone (Jagat Shear Zone (JSZ)) in the Himalayan metamorphic core in Central-Western Nepal. In situ U-Th-Pb monazite petrochronology constrains the timing of top-to-the-S/SW shearing between 28-27 Ma and 17 Ma. Burial and prograde metamorphisms in footwall rocks were linked to thrust-sense movement along the JSZ, while the hanging wall rocks were retrogressed and exhumed. The identification and age of the JSZ (as part of a regional system of shear zones: the High Himalayan Discontinuity (HHD)) coupled with the localization and timing of activity of the Main Central Thrust (MCT) (i) fills a gap in tracing the HHD along orogenic strike, (ii) supports the identification of the position and timing of the long-debated MCT and (iii) helps to place the boundaries of the Himalayan metamorphic core and its internal architecture. Thus, our study is a significant step towards a precise identification of the burial, assembly and exhumation mechanisms of the Himalayan metamorphic core.

The historical and the present seismicity catalogues of the Garhwal Himalaya have been studied for their spatio-temporal variations and their implications on the seismotectonics of the region. The Micro-Seismicity, Fractal dimensions (Dc) and Frequency Magnitude Distribution (b-value) coupled with the available literature on geology, geomorphology and geophysics have been used to derive the seismotectonics and stress level changes in the region. The seismic cross sections for the relocated micro-seismicity, focal mechanisms and the swath profiles (for the presence of Physiographic Transition 2 (PT2) at the foothill of the Higher Himalaya) indicate the constant presence of the Mid-Crustal Ramp (MCR) in the detachment plane and its active seismogenic nature. The comparison of this scenario suggests the constant presence of seismogenically active MCR structure throughout the Central Seismic Gap. The seismic cross sections further reveal that the sensu stricto Main Central Thrust (Munsiari Thrust) is also a site of generation of the micro-seismicity in few segments due to its reactivation by thrusting along the MCR. The high fractal dimension value (Dc = 1.47) suggests the heterogeneous nature of the region, owing to the presence of local faults and transverse tectonics. The high stress accumulation in the Garhwal Himalaya with low b value (b = 0.70) suggests the high probability of occurrence of a larger or greater earthquake in the near-future. Further, the study also reveals that the 2011 Chamoli earthquake of M 5.0, preceded by a quiescence period of nearly a year shows different stress levels before and after its occurrence, which is well constrained with the increased moderate earthquake activity around the Chamoli region. This increased seismic activity and stress conditions in the Chamoli region suggest the high possibility of the occurrence of major earthquakes, hence the study recommend for a detailed seismic hazard evaluation of the region.

The Main Central Thrust (MCT) features prominently in the Cenozoic evolution of the Himalaya, but no consensus exists on its definition and position. The MCT is best defined by a protolith boundary-structural definition: a high-strain zone with thrust-sense transporting the Greater Himalayan Sequence (GHS) rocks over the Lesser Himalayan Sequence (LHS) rocks. Protolith signatures have proved useful in distinguishing the GHS and LHS, but delineating the structural break of the MCT is still challenging. We have used the conceptual framework of shear zones to delineate the structural break of the MCT at different structural levels in Sikkim Himalaya, India, and identified rock units on either of its sides by available protolith signatures. Previous workers placed the MCT at different locations in Sikkim, varying up to ∼12 km structural distance, without providing any insights on its geometry. Our study shows that thickness and geometry of the MCT vary spatially along and across strike. In the relatively thicker exposures (∼2.5–5.4 km), the MCT shows “island-channel geometry” with mylonites anastomosing around relatively undeformed rocks, transporting the GHS over the LHS and straddling both units. In the thinner exposures (∼1 km), the MCT shows three-dimensional zone-type geometry with a core of highly deformed mylonites flanked by relatively less-deformed protomylonite zones and has a minor portion of the GHS in its footwall. We define the MCT in Sikkim as a mappable shear zone that transported the GHS over the LHS, straddling both units in the thicker exposures, but has a minor part of the GHS in the footwall of the thinner exposures. Our shear zone framework–based approach can be used with protolith signatures along the Himalayan arc to map and study the MCT in detail.

The Himalayan Mountain Range has originated from the ongoing collision of the Eurasian and the Indo-Australian plates since the Paleogene. It is widely accepted that this tectonically-driven uplift is still continuing, as reflected by a large number of earthquakes in the area. Apart from the sub-surface and geophysical signatures, the surficial geomorphic markers deserve due attention. Fluvial systems, which preserve the evidence of the past and present tectonic perturbations on the surface, have often been investigated to assess the imprints of uplift in a region. Sensitive to long-term tectonic, structural and climatic regimes, the general forms of the longitudinal profile and its derivatives have been analysed across the globe for determining the varying roles of tectonics, litho-structure and climate. This article assesses the degree of tectonic and lithological control on the drainage network of the Rangit Basin in the Eastern Himalayas. One of the important characteristics of the studied basin is that the Main Central Thrust (MCT), which is located between the Greater Himalayas and the Lesser Himalayas, divides the basin into two distinct domains. Longitudinal profiles and their derivatives of 16 major tributaries of the Rangit River were extracted from the ALOS–PALSAR DEM and analysed. The controls on this Himalayan river were evaluated based on investigations of longitudinal profile shapes, stream gradient (SL) indices, longitudinal profile concavities and steepness. Prominent drainage anomalies such as above-grade conditions, exponential and linear fitting of longitudinal profiles, elevated values of SL indices, barbed drainage, over-steepened stream segments and fluvial hanging valleys imply rapid erosion rates in the basin. This is noticeable particularly in the lower domain of the Rangit Basin, especially in the areas located downstream of the MCT. A comparison of steep segments with the geological and lineament maps reveals that many of these anomalies are lineament-controlled. Furthermore, a large number of such features do not conform to lithological intersections, suggesting a possible tectonic factor behind the occurrence of such anomalies.