Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
795 result(s) for "Malaria, Vivax - drug therapy"
Sort by:
Resolving the cause of recurrent Plasmodium vivax malaria probabilistically
Relapses arising from dormant liver-stage Plasmodium vivax parasites (hypnozoites) are a major cause of vivax malaria. However, in endemic areas, a recurrent blood-stage infection following treatment can be hypnozoite-derived (relapse), a blood-stage treatment failure (recrudescence), or a newly acquired infection (reinfection). Each of these requires a different prevention strategy, but it was not previously possible to distinguish between them reliably. We show that individual vivax malaria recurrences can be characterised probabilistically by combined modelling of time-to-event and genetic data within a framework incorporating identity-by-descent. Analysis of pooled patient data on 1441 recurrent P. vivax infections in 1299 patients on the Thailand–Myanmar border observed over 1000 patient follow-up years shows that, without primaquine radical curative treatment, 3 in 4 patients relapse. In contrast, after supervised high-dose primaquine only 1 in 40 relapse. In this region of frequent relapsing P. vivax , failure rates after supervised high-dose primaquine are significantly lower (∼3%) than estimated previously. Relapse, reinfection and recrudescence can all cause recurrent infection after treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in endemic areas, but are difficult to distinguish. Here the authors show that they can be differentiated probabilistically and thereby demonstrate the high efficacy of primaquine treatment in preventing relapse.
Supervised versus unsupervised primaquine radical cure for the treatment of falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: a cluster-randomised, controlled, open-label superiority trial
There is a high risk of Plasmodium vivax recurrence in patients treated for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in co-endemic areas. Primaquine radical cure has the potential to reduce P vivax recurrences in patients presenting with P falciparum as well as P vivax malaria but is undermined by poor adherence to the currently recommended 14-day regimen. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of supervised versus unsupervised primaquine radical cure in patients presenting with uncomplicated malaria. We did a cluster-randomised, controlled, open-label superiority trial in Papua, Indonesia. 21 clusters of village health posts, matched by annual parasite index, were randomly assigned (1:1) to treat patients (age >12 months and body weight >5 kg) presenting with confirmed uncomplicated P falciparum or P vivax malaria with oral dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine plus either a supervised or unsupervised 14-day course of oral primaquine (0·5 mg/kg per day). Patients in the supervised group were supervised taking their primaquine dose on alternate days. Patients were followed-up for 6 months and those who presented again with malaria were retreated with the same drug regimen. Masking was not possible due to the nature of the study. The primary outcome was the incidence risk of P vivax malaria over 6 months, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who were assigned to a treatment group, excluding patients who were lost to follow-up after their first visit). This trial is now complete, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02787070. Between Sept 14, 2016, and July 31, 2018, 436 patients were screened for eligibility and 419 were enrolled; 223 (53%) patients in 11 clusters were assigned to supervised primaquine treatment and 196 (47%) in ten clusters to unsupervised primaquine treatment. 161 (72%) of 223 patients in the supervised group and 151 (77%) of 196 in the unsupervised group completed 6 months of follow-up. At 6 months, the incidence risk of P vivax recurrence in the supervised group was 29·7% (95% CI 16·4–49·9) versus 55·8% (32·3–81·8) in the unsupervised group (hazard ratio 0·23 [95% CI 0·07–0·76]; p=0·016). The incidence rate for P vivax recurrence was 539 (95% CI 390–747) infections per 1000 person-years in the supervised group versus 859 (673–1096) in the unsupervised group (incidence rate ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·42–0·94]; p=0·025). The corresponding rates in the 224 patients who presented with P falciparum malaria were 346 (95% CI 213–563) and 660 (446–977; incidence rate ratio 0·52 [95% CI 0·28–0·98]; p=0·043). Seven serious adverse events were reported (three in the supervised group, four in the unsupervised group), none of which were deemed treatment-related, and there were no deaths. In this area of moderate malaria transmission, supervision of primaquine radical cure treatment reduced the risk of P vivax recurrence. This finding was apparent for patients presenting with either P falciparum or P vivax malaria. Further studies are warranted to investigate the safety and efficacy of radical cure for patients presenting with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in other co-endemic areas. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade of the Australian Government. For the Indonesian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Primaquine radical cure in patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria in areas co-endemic for P falciparum and Plasmodium vivax (PRIMA): a multicentre, open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial
In areas co-endemic for Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum there is an increased risk of P vivax parasitaemia following P falciparum malaria. Radical cure is currently only recommended for patients presenting with P vivax malaria. Expanding the indication for radical cure to patients presenting with P falciparum malaria could reduce their risk of subsequent P vivax parasitaemia. We did a multicentre, open-label, superiority randomised controlled trial in five health clinics in Bangladesh, Indonesia, and Ethiopia. In Bangladesh and Indonesia, patients were excluded if they were younger than 1 year, whereas in Ethiopia patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years. Patients with uncomplicated P falciparum monoinfection who had fever or a history of fever in the 48 h preceding clinic visit were eligible for enrolment and were required to have a glucose-6-dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity of 70% or greater. Patients received blood schizontocidal treatment (artemether–lumefantrine in Ethiopia and Bangladesh and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine in Indonesia) and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either high-dose short-course oral primaquine (intervention arm; total dose 7 mg/kg over 7 days) or standard care (standard care arm; single dose oral primaquine of 0·25 mg/kg). Random assignment was done by an independent statistician in blocks of eight by use of sealed envelopes. All randomly assigned and eligible patients were included in the primary and safety analyses. The per-protocol analysis excluded those who did not complete treatment or had substantial protocol violations. The primary endpoint was the incidence risk of P vivax parasitaemia on day 63. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03916003. Between Aug 18, 2019, and March 14, 2022, a total of 500 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, and 495 eligible patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (246 intervention and 249 control). The incidence risk of P vivax parasitaemia at day 63 was 11·0% (95% CI 7·5–15·9) in the standard care arm compared with 2·5% (1·0–5·9) in the intervention arm (hazard ratio 0·20, 95% CI 0·08–0·51; p=0·0009). The effect size differed with blood schizontocidal treatment and site. Routine symptom reporting on day 2 and day 7 were similar between groups. In the first 42 days, there were a total of four primaquine-related adverse events reported in the standard care arm and 26 in the intervention arm; 132 (92%) of all 143 adverse events were mild. There were two serious adverse events in the intervention arm, which were considered unrelated to the study drug. None of the patients developed severe anaemia (defined as haemoglobin <5 g/dL). In patients with a G6PD activity of 70% or greater, high-dose short-course primaquine was safe and relatively well tolerated and reduced the risk of subsequent P vivax parasitaemia within 63 days by five fold. Universal radical cure therefore potentially offers substantial clinical, public health, and operational benefits, but these benefits will vary with endemic setting. Australian Academy of Science Regional Collaborations Program, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and National Health and Medical Research Council.
Microhaplotype deep sequencing assays to capture Plasmodium vivax infection lineages
Plasmodium vivax elimination is challenged by dormant liver stages (hypnozoites) that can reactivate months after initial infection resulting in relapses. Relapsing infections confound antimalarial clinical efficacy trials due to the inability to distinguish between recurrences arising from blood-stage treatment failure (recrudescence), reinfection or relapse. Genetic relatedness of paired parasite isolates, measured by identity-by-descent (IBD), can provide important information on whether individuals have had single or multiple mosquito inoculations, thus informing on recurrence origin. We developed a high-throughput amplicon sequencing assay comprising 93 multi-SNP (microhaplotype) markers to determine IBD between P. vivax clinical isolates. The assay was evaluated in 745 global infections, including 128 infection pairs from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01680406). Simulations demonstrate low error in pairwise IBD estimation at the panel (RMSE < 0.12) and IBD-based networks illustrate strong clustering by geography. IBD analysis in the RCT demonstrates a lower frequency of suspected relapses or recrudescence in patients treated with primaquine compared to those without primaquine; the impact is greater when paired with chloroquine than with artemether-lumefantrine. Our results demonstrate the potential to derive new information on P. vivax treatment and transmission using IBD generated by amplicon sequencing data that can be further improved with time-to-event models. Dormant liver stages of Plasmodium vivax complicate malaria elimination efforts by causing relapses that obscure the efficacy of antimalarial treatments. Here, the authors develop a high-throughput amplicon sequencing assay to reconstruct P. vivax lineages, demonstrating its capacity for geospatial infection tracking, and distinguishing recurrent malaria caused by new infections versus untreated dormant liver stages.
Antimalarial activity of artefenomel (OZ439), a novel synthetic antimalarial endoperoxide, in patients with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria: an open-label phase 2 trial
Artefenomel (OZ439) is a novel synthetic trioxolane with improved pharmacokinetic properties compared with other antimalarial drugs with the artemisinin pharmacophore. Artefenomel has been generally well tolerated in volunteers at doses up to 1600 mg and is being developed as a partner drug in an antimalarial combination treatment. We investigated the efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of artefenomel at different doses in patients with Plasmodium falciparum or Plasmodium vivax malaria. This phase 2a exploratory, open-label trial was done at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Bangkok, and the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit in Thailand. Adult patients with acute, uncomplicated P falciparum or P vivax malaria received artefenomel in a single oral dose (200 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, or 1200 mg). The first cohort received 800 mg. Testing of a new dose of artefenomel in a patient cohort was decided on after safety and efficacy assessment of the preceding cohort. The primary endpoint was the natural log parasite reduction per 24 h. Definitive oral treatment was given at 36 h. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01213966. Between Oct 24, 2010, and May 25, 2012, 82 patients were enrolled (20 in each of the 200 mg, 400 mg, and 800 mg cohorts, and 21 in the 1200 mg cohort). One patient withdrew consent (before the administration of artefenomel) but there were no further dropouts. The parasite reduction rates per 24 h ranged from 0·90 to 1·88 for P falciparum, and 2·09 to 2·53 for P vivax. All doses were equally effective in both P falciparum and P vivax malaria, with median parasite clearance half-lives of 4·1 h (range 1·3–6·7) to 5·6 h (2·0–8·5) for P falciparum and 2·3 h (1·2–3·9) to 3·2 h (0·9–15·0) for P vivax. Maximum plasma concentrations, dose-proportional to 800 mg, occurred at 4 h (median). The estimated elimination half-life was 46–62 h. No serious drug-related adverse effects were reported; other adverse effects were generally mild and reversible, with the highest number in the 1200 mg cohort (17 [81%] patients with at least one adverse event). The most frequently reported adverse effect was an asymptomatic increase in plasma creatine phosphokinase concentration (200 mg, n=5; 400 mg, n=3; 800 mg, n=1; 1200 mg, n=3). Artefenomel is a new synthetic antimalarial peroxide with a good safety profile that clears parasitaemia rapidly in both P falciparum and P vivax malaria. Its long half-life suggests a possible use in a single-dose treatment in combination with other drugs. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, and UK Department for International Development.
Tafenoquine plus chloroquine for the treatment and relapse prevention of Plasmodium vivax malaria (DETECTIVE): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 2b dose-selection study
Clinical effectiveness of previous regimens to treat Plasmodium vivax infection have been hampered by compliance. We aimed to assess the dose–response, safety, and tolerability of single-dose tafenoquine plus 3-day chloroquine for P vivax malaria radical cure. In this double-blind, randomised, dose-ranging phase 2b study, men and women (aged ≥16 years) with microscopically confirmed P vivax monoinfection (parasite density >100 to <100 000 per μL blood) were enrolled from community health centres and hospitals across seven sites in Brazil, Peru, India, and Thailand. Patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme activity of less than 70% were excluded. Eligible patients received chloroquine (days 1–3) and were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive single-dose tafenoquine 50 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 600 mg, primaquine 15 mg for 14 days, or chloroquine alone. Randomisation was stratified by baseline parasite count (≤7500 and >7500 per μL blood). The primary efficacy endpoint was relapse-free efficacy at 6 months from initial dose (ie, clearance of initial infection without subsequent microscopically confirmed infection), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01376167. Between Sept 19, 2011, and March 25, 2013, 329 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (chloroquine plus tafenoquine 50 mg [n=55], 100 mg [n=57], 300 mg [n=57], 600 mg [n=56]; or to chloroquine plus primaquine [n=50]; or chloroquine alone [n=54]). Relapse-free efficacy at 6 months was 57·7% (95% CI 43–70) with tafenoquine 50 mg, 54·1% (40–66) with tafenoquine 100 mg, 89·2% (77–95) with tafenoquine 300 mg, 91·9% (80–97) with tafenoquine 600 mg, 77·3% (63–87) with primaquine, and 37·5% (23–52) with chloroquine alone. Tafenoquine 300 mg and 600 mg had better efficacy than chloroquine alone (treatment differences 51·7% [95% CI 35–69], p<0·0001, with tafenoquine 300 mg and 54·5% [38–71], p<0·0001, with tafenoquine 600 mg), as did primaquine (treatment difference 39·9% [21–59], p=0·0004). Adverse events were similar between treatments. 29 serious adverse events occurred in 26 (8%) of 329 patients; QT prolongation was the most common serious adverse event (11 [3%] of 329), occurring in five (2%) of 225 patients receiving tafenoquine, four (8%) of 50 patients receiving primaquine, and two (4%) of 54 patients receiving chloroquine alone, with no evidence of an additional effect on QT of chloroquine plus tafenoquine coadministration. Single-dose tafenoquine 300 mg coadministered with chloroquine for P vivax malaria relapse prevention was more efficacious than chloroquine alone, with a similar safety profile. As a result, it has been selected for further clinical assessment in phase 3. GlaxoSmithKline, Medicines for Malaria Venture.
Antimalarial Activity of KAF156 in Falciparum and Vivax Malaria
With the emergence and spread of artemisinin resistance, new therapies for malaria are needed. This study shows that the imidazolopiperazine KAF156, a new antimalarial compound, has in vivo antimalarial activity. Expanding artemisinin resistance and worsening partner-drug resistance in Southeast Asia threaten the global control of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. 1 – 5 New drugs are needed. KAF156 represents a new class of antimalarial agents (imidazolopiperazines) 6 identified by high-throughput phenotypic screening. KAF156 has potent in vitro activity against both asexual and sexual blood stages and the preerythrocytic liver stages of the malarial parasite. 7 The mechanism of antimalarial action is unknown, but drug resistance, mediated by mutations in the P. falciparum cyclic amine resistance locus ( PfCARL ) gene, which encodes a protein of unknown function, can be selected. 7 In a study of 70 healthy . . .
Comparison of the Cumulative Efficacy and Safety of Chloroquine, Artesunate, and Chloroquine-Primaquine in Plasmodium vivax Malaria
Vivax malaria relapses frequently even in low-transmission settings. Chloroquine delays but does not prevent recurrences. Adding primaquine to a slowly eliminated schizonticide significantly reduces recurrences and improves hematocrit, but this advantage is offset by hemolysis in G6PD-deficient females. Abstract Background Chloroquine has been recommended for Plasmodium vivax infections for >60 years, but resistance is increasing. To guide future therapies, the cumulative benefits of using slowly eliminated (chloroquine) vs rapidly eliminated (artesunate) antimalarials, and the risks and benefits of adding radical cure (primaquine) were assessed in a 3-way randomized comparison conducted on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Methods Patients with uncomplicated P. vivax malaria were given artesunate (2 mg/kg/day for 5 days), chloroquine (25 mg base/kg over 3 days), or chloroquine-primaquine (0.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days) and were followed for 1 year. Recurrence rates and their effects on anemia were compared. Results Between May 2010 and October 2012, 644 patients were enrolled. Artesunate cleared parasitemia significantly faster than chloroquine. Day 28 recurrence rates were 50% with artesunate (112/224), 8% with chloroquine (18/222; P < .001), and 0.5% with chloroquine-primaquine (1/198; P < .001). Median times to first recurrence were 28 days (interquartile range [IQR], 21-42) with artesunate, 49 days (IQR, 35-74) with chloroquine, and 195 days (IQR, 82-281) with chloroquine-primaquine. Recurrence by day 28, was associated with a mean absolute reduction in hematocrit of 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], .3%-2.0%; P = .009). Primaquine radical cure reduced the total recurrences by 92.4%. One-year recurrence rates were 4.51 (95% CI, 4.19-4.85) per person-year with artesunate, 3.45 (95% CI, 3.18-3.75) with chloroquine (P = .002), and 0.26 (95% CI, .19-.36) with chloroquine-primaquine (P < .001). Conclusions Vivax malaria relapses are predominantly delayed by chloroquine but prevented by primaquine. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01074905.
14 days of high-dose versus low-dose primaquine treatment in patients with Plasmodium vivax infection in Cambodia: a randomised, single-centre, open-label efficacy study
Most malaria-endemic countries, including Cambodia, use a total dose of 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine to eliminate Plasmodium vivax hypnozoites and prevent relapses. There are, however, indications that the lower dose of 3·5 mg/kg is insufficient for tropical P vivax isolates, particularly in southeast Asia, and WHO now recommends a total dose of 7·0 mg/kg in most countries. We aimed to determine the most effective regimen to eliminate P vivax hypnozoites to support elimination efforts of this malaria parasite. We conducted an open-label, randomised controlled trial in Kampong Speu province, western Cambodia. Patients infected with P vivax aged at least 15 years were offered to participate. Exclusion criteria were severe malaria or other diseases requiring treatment, low haemoglobin (<8·0 g/dL), pregnancy or breastfeeding, sensitivity to study drugs, and use of antimalarials in the preceding month. Enrolled patients were treated with an artesunate regimen of 2 mg/kg per day for 7 days. Patients with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) levels were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive 3·5 mg/kg (low dose [0·25 mg/kg per day]), 7·0 mg/kg (high dose [0·5 mg/kg per day]), or no primaquine for 14 days. Patients with deficient G6PD levels were assigned to the no primaquine comparator arm. Patients were relocated to the study site in Aoral town where no malaria transmission occurs to ensure that they were not reinfected during their 90-day follow-up. After 90 days of relocation, G6PD-normal patients in the no primaquine arm were provided 3·5 mg/kg of primaquine for 14 days to be taken unsupervised. At day 90, relocation was terminated, and patients were followed up monthly for 3 months until day 180. The primary outcome was P vivax recurrence within 90 days of relocated follow-up, assessed in all patients who completed treatment and complied with relocation without interruption. All patients enrolled and assigned to an intervention arm were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and recruitment is completed (NCT04706130). Between Nov 10, 2021, and Feb 10, 2024, 160 patients were enrolled and 147 were included in the primary analysis—59 were assigned to the no primaquine arm (37 assigned as G6PD deficient [median age 22 years, IQR 18–28]; 22 randomly assigned [18, 17–25]), 45 to the low-dose primaquine arm (23, 19–30), and 43 to the high-dose primaquine arm (22, 18–25). Participants were mostly male (135 [92%] of 147) and all Cambodian. 48 (81% [95% CI 69·6–89·2]) participants in the no primaquine arm had at least one P vivax recurrence within 90 days, as did 11 (24%, 14·2–38·7) in the low-dose group and two (5%, 0·8–15·5) in the high-dose group (p=0·0141 for high vs low). After imputation for missing data, low-dose primaquine remained associated with more recurrences than high-dose primaquine (hazard ratio 0·17 [95% CI 0·04–0·79], p=0·0229). Both primaquine regimens were well tolerated with no serious adverse events reported. Not providing primaquine to patients led to a considerable rate of P vivax recurrence. The risk of P vivax recurrence was substantially lower for 7·0 mg/kg primaquine treatment compared with 3·5 mg/kg. Tolerability and safety of both primaquine regimens in G6PD normal individuals was comparable. US National Institutes of Health (R01AI146590).
FocaL mass drug administration for Plasmodium vivax malaria elimination (FLAME): study protocol for an open-label cluster randomized controlled trial in Peru
Background Outside of sub-Saharan Africa, Plasmodium vivax has become the dominant species of malaria. Focal mass drug administration (fMDA) is a potential strategy to support elimination efforts, but controlled studies are lacking. Methods The FocaL mass drug Administration for Plasmodium vivax Malaria Elimination (FLAME) study is a 3-year cluster randomized controlled trial to determine the impact and safety of fMDA to reduce P. vivax transmission. The study will be conducted in Loreto, Peru, where standard interventions have reduced P. vivax cases, but transmission persists due to a high proportion of subclinical infections. Thirty low transmission communities (API < 250 cases/1000 population) will be randomized 1:1 to fMDA versus control using a restricted randomization. All communities will receive Peruvian national standard malaria control measures. In the intervention arm, high-risk individuals (living within 200 m of a P. vivax case reported in the prior 2 years) without contraindication to study medications, including G6PD deficiency, will receive three cycles of fMDA over a 2-year period. Each cycle will include two rounds of directly observed therapy delivered 2 months apart. The fMDA regimen will include 25 mg/kg chloroquine (CQ) plus a single 300 mg dose of tafenoquine (TQ) for individuals age ≥ 16 years, and 25 mg/kg of CQ plus 7 days of 0.5 mg/kg/day of primaquine (PQ) if younger. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of symptomatic P. vivax malaria. The sample size provides 80% power to detect at least a 68% relative reduction in cumulative P. vivax incidence, based on alpha of 0.05 and a coefficient of variation ( k ) of 0.87. Secondary outcomes include safety, cost-effectiveness, and infection prevalence and seroprevalence which will be assessed in annual cross-sectional surveys. Safety will be assessed in passive and active pharmacovigilance, including post-treatment screening for G6PD-associated hemolysis by assessing for anemia and hematuria in a sample. Discussion The trial will generate evidence regarding fMDA for P. vivax and inform malaria elimination efforts in Peru and similarly endemic settings. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and through stakeholder meetings in Peruvian and international research forums. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05690841. This trial was registered on 09 January 2023. Peruvian Clinical Trial Registry (REPEC) 020–23. This trial was registered on 21 February 2024.