Explore the vast range of titles available.

Targeted therapy with BRAFi has significantly improved outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. However, resistance mechanisms, particularly metabolic adaptations, such as increased glutaminolysis, present substantial clinical challenges. This study investigated the metabolic changes underlying BRAFi resistance in melanoma cells. Using pharmacological agents, including dabrafenib (BRAFi), pimasertib (MEKi), dasatinib (cKITi), and CB-839 (glutaminase inhibitor), we explored metabolic adaptations in melanoma cell lines harboring various mutations. Our methodologies included cell culture, qPCR, polysome profiling, animal studies in nude mice, and analyses of patient samples to evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting glutaminolysis. Our findings confirmed that melanoma cells, with resistance to targeted therapies, exhibit metabolic adaptations, including enhanced glutaminolysis, increased mitochondrial content, and elevated antioxidative capacities. We evaluated the efficacy of CB-839 and demonstrated its ability to reduce the proliferation of resistant melanoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic studies revealed that CB-839 suppressed ATP production and TCA cycle intermediates in resistant cells while inducing oxidative stress in sensitive cells, thereby inhibiting their proliferation. High glutaminase expression in primary patient tumor samples was associated with poor prognosis. We identified a metabolic signature in tumors from patients responsive or unresponsive to BRAFi prior to treatment, which could serve as a predictive factor for BRAFi response. This study underscores the metabolic alterations driving resistance to BRAFi in melanoma cells and highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting glutaminolysis with CB-839. The identification of metabolic signatures in patient samples provides valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies, aiming to overcome resistance mechanisms and improve patient outcomes in melanoma management.

Advances in the use of targeted and immune therapies have revolutionized the clinical management of melanoma patients, prolonging significantly their overall and progression-free survival. However, both targeted and immune therapies suffer limitations due to genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications, which determine a great heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity of melanoma cells. Acquired resistance of melanoma patients to inhibitors of BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK (MEKi), which block the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, limits their prolonged use. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors improve the outcomes of patients in only a subset of them and the molecular mechanisms underlying lack of responses are under investigation. There is growing evidence that altered expression levels of microRNAs (miRNA)s induce drug-resistance in tumor cells and that restoring normal expression of dysregulated miRNAs may re-establish drug sensitivity. However, the relationship between specific miRNA signatures and acquired resistance of melanoma to MAPK and immune checkpoint inhibitors is still limited and not fully elucidated. In this review, we provide an updated overview of how miRNAs induce resistance or restore melanoma cell sensitivity to mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors (MAPKi) as well as on the relationship existing between miRNAs and immune evasion by melanoma cell resistant to MAPKi.

Alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and its receptor, melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), have been proposed as potential target for anti-cancer strategies in melanoma research, due to their tissue specific expression and involvement in melanocyte homeostasis. However, their role in prevention and treatment of melanoma is still debated and controversial. Although a large body of evidence supports α-MSH in preventing melanoma development, some preclinical findings suggest that the α-MSH downstream signalling may promote immune escape and cancer resistance to therapy. Additionally, in metastatic melanoma both MC1R and α-MSH have been reported to be overexpressed at levels much higher than normal cells. Furthermore, targeted therapy (e.g. BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600E mutant tumours) has been shown to enhance this phenomenon. Collectively, these data suggest that targeting MC1R could serve as an approach in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. In this review, we explore the molecular biology of α-MSH with particular emphasis into its tumor-related properties, whilst elaborating the experimental evidence currently available regarding the interplay between α-MSH/MC1R axis, melanoma and antitumor strategies.

The role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor growth and therapy has recently attracted more attention in research and drug development. The ability of the microenvironment to trigger tumor maintenance, progression, and resistance is the main cause for treatment failure and tumor relapse. Accumulated evidence indicates that the maintenance and progression of tumor cells is determined by components of the microenvironment, which include stromal cells (endothelial cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem cells, and immune cells), extracellular matrix (ECM), and soluble molecules (chemokines, cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles). As a solid tumor, melanoma is not only a tumor mass of monolithic tumor cells, but it also contains supporting stroma, ECM, and soluble molecules. Melanoma cells are continuously in interaction with the components of the microenvironment. In the present review, we focus on the role of the tumor microenvironment components in the modulation of tumor progression and treatment resistance as well as the impact of the tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target in melanoma.

A high resistance and heterogeneous response to conventional anti-cancer chemotherapies characterize malignant cutaneous melanoma, the most aggressive and deadly form of skin cancer. Withaferin A (WFA), a withanolide derived from the medicinal plant Withania somnifera , has been reported for its anti-tumorigenic activity against various cancer cells. For the first time, we examined the death-inducing potential of WFA against a panel of four different human melanoma cells and investigated the cellular mechanisms involved. WFA induces apoptotic cell death with various IC 50 ranging from 1.8 to 6.1 μM. The susceptibility of cells toward WFA-induced apoptosis correlated with low Bcl-2/Bax and Bcl-2/Bim ratios. In all cell lines, the apoptotic process triggered by WFA involves the mitochondrial pathway and was associated with Bcl-2 down regulation, Bax mitochondrial translocation, cytochrome c release into the cytosol, transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) dissipation, caspase 9 and caspase 3 activation and DNA fragmentation. WFA cytotoxicity requires early reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and glutathione depletion, the inhibition of ROS increase by the antioxidant N -acetylcysteine resulting in complete suppression of mitochondrial and nuclear events. Altogether, these results support the therapeutic potential of WFA against human melanoma.

Background Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has improved the survival of patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma, but most patients relapse upon the onset of drug resistance induced by mechanisms including genetic and epigenetic events. Among the epigenetic alterations, microRNA perturbation is associated with the development of kinase inhibitor resistance. Here, we identified and studied the role of miR-146a-5p dysregulation in melanoma drug resistance. Methods The miR-146a-5p-regulated NFkB signaling network was identified in drug-resistant cell lines and melanoma tumor samples by expression profiling and knock-in and knock-out studies. A bioinformatic data analysis identified COX2 as a central gene regulated by miR-146a-5p and NFkB. The effects of miR-146a-5p/COX2 manipulation were studied in vitro in cell lines and with 3D cultures of treatment-resistant tumor explants from patients progressing during therapy. Results miR-146a-5p expression was inversely correlated with drug sensitivity and COX2 expression and was reduced in BRAF and MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells and tissues. Forced miR-146a-5p expression reduced COX2 activity and significantly increased drug sensitivity by hampering prosurvival NFkB signaling, leading to reduced proliferation and enhanced apoptosis. Similar effects were obtained by inhibiting COX2 by celecoxib, a clinically approved COX2 inhibitor. Conclusions Deregulation of the miR-146a-5p/COX2 axis occurs in the development of melanoma resistance to targeted drugs in melanoma patients. This finding reveals novel targets for more effective combination treatment. 4ZiY3nqT8xQ_yvPXVejWjw Video Abstract Graphical Abstract

Background Most advanced melanomas initially respond to targeted therapy but eventually relapse. Increasing evidence suggests that drug-tolerant persister cells can adopt a reversible drug-refractory state and represent a key driver of therapeutic resistance. Methods We developed MeRLin, a lineage tracing platform that integrates cellular barcoding, single-cell transcriptomic profiling, RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, and computational analyses to track clonal and transcriptional dynamics in a patient-derived melanoma model during prolonged targeted therapy. Longitudinal analyses enabled the characterization of clonal fates, transcriptional states, and spatial organization of persister populations. Results Clonal dynamics showed that persister subpopulations initially responded to therapy, persisted through minimal residual disease, and expanded during tumor recurrence. Four persister-associated transcriptional states characterized by stress-like, lipid metabolism, PI3K signaling, and extracellular matrix remodeling programs were associated with persister populations arising from minor pre-treatment subpopulations under sustained drug pressure. Spatial transcriptomic analyses revealed structured spatial organization of these programs and suggested coordinated autocrine and paracrine interactions among persister states. Targeted barcode RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization enabled spatial mapping of clonal identity and gene expression, revealing in situ co-localization of a dominant resistant clone marked by SLC2A1 expression. Conclusions Together, MeRLin provides a robust framework for dissecting cancer heterogeneity and characterizing persister subpopulations. Our findings demonstrate that melanoma recurrence is associated with diverse, spatially organized persister states linked to adaptive transcriptional programs.

In the present study, the phenotype of melanoma cells resistant to dabrafenib (a B-RAF inhibitor) was investigated, to shed more light on melanoma resistance to B-RAF inhibition. Melanoma cells resistant to dabrafenib were generated using 3 different cell lines, A375, 397 and 624.38, all carrying B-RAFV600E, and they were characterized by cytofluorometric analysis, Ion Torrent technology, immunofluorescence and biochemistry. All dabrafenib-resistant cells showed, in addition to a re-activation of MAPK signaling, morphological changes compared to their sensitive counterparts, accompanied by an increase in CD90 (mesenchymal marker) expression and a decrease in E-cadherin (epithelial marker) expression, suggesting an epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like phenotypic transition. However, melanoma cells with TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) were more sensitive to dabrafenib treatment compared to the sensitivity noted in the non-TGF-β1-induced EMT melanoma cells, suggesting that TGF-β1-induced EMT was not associated with dabrafenib resistance. Although dabrafenib-resistant cells exhibited increased cell motility and E-cadherin/vimentin reorganization, as expected in EMT, all of them showed unvaried E-cadherin mRNA and unchanged Snail protein levels, while Twist1 protein expression was decreased with the exception of A375 dabrafenib-resistant melanoma cells, where it was unaffected. These findings suggest a distinct active EMT-like process adopted by melanoma cells under drug exposure. Furthermore, dabrafenib-resistant cells exhibited stem cell-like features, with Oct4 translocation from the cytoplasm to peri-nuclear sites and nuclei, and increased CD20 expression. In conclusion, our data, in addition to confirming that resistance to dabrafenib is dependent on re-activation of MAPK signaling, suggest that this resistance is linked to a distinct active EMT-like process as well as stem-cell features adopted by melanoma cells.

Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer with a high incidence and low survival rate. More than half of melanomas present the activating BRAF mutations, along which V600E mutant represents 70%–90%. Vemurafenib (Vem) is an FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitor that selectively targets activated BRAF V600E and inhibits its activity. However, the majority of patients treated with Vem develop acquired resistance. Hence, this study aims to explore a new treatment strategy to overcome the Vem resistance. Here, we found that a potential anticancer drug norcantharidin (NCTD) displayed a more significant proliferation inhibitory effect against Vem-resistant melanoma cells (A375R) than the parental melanoma cells (A375), which promised to be a therapeutic agent against BRAF V600E-mutated and acquired Vem-resistant melanoma. The metabolomics analysis showed that NCTD could, especially reverse the upregulation of pentose phosphate pathway and lipogenesis resulting from the Vem resistance. In addition, the transcriptomic analysis showed a dramatical downregulation in genes related to lipid metabolism and mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in A375R cells, but not in A375 cells, upon NCTD treatment. Moreover, NCTD upregulated butyrophilin (BTN) family genes, which played important roles in modulating T-cell response. Consistently, we found that Vem resistance led to an obvious elevation of the p-mTOR expression, which could be remarkably reduced by NCTD treatment. Taken together, NCTD may serve as a promising therapeutic option to resolve the problem of Vem resistance and to improve patient outcomes by combining with immunomodulatory therapy.

Patients with melanoma that progresses on ipilimumab and, if BRAFV600 mutant-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both, have few treatment options. We assessed the efficacy and safety of two pembrolizumab doses versus investigator-choice chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. We carried out a randomised phase 2 trial of patients aged 18 years or older from 73 hospitals, clinics, and academic medical centres in 12 countries who had confirmed progressive disease within 24 weeks after two or more ipilimumab doses and, if BRAFV600 mutant-positive, previous treatment with a BRAF or MEK inhibitor or both. Patients had to have resolution of all ipilimumab-related adverse events to grade 0–1 and prednisone 10 mg/day or less for at least 2 weeks, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and at least one measurable lesion to be eligible. Using a centralised interactive voice response system, we randomly assigned (1:1:1) patients in a block size of six to receive intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator-choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, carboplatin, dacarbazine, or oral temozolomide). Randomisation was stratified by ECOG performance status, lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and BRAFV600 mutation status. Individual treatment assignment between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy was open label, but investigators and patients were masked to assignment of the dose of pembrolizumab. We present the primary endpoint at the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704287. The study is closed to enrolment but continues to follow up and treat patients. Between Nov 30, 2012, and Nov 13, 2013, we enrolled 540 patients: 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg, 181 to receive pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, and 179 to receive chemotherapy. Based on 410 progression-free survival events, progression-free survival was improved in patients assigned to pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg (HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·45–0·73; p<0·0001) and those assigned to pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg (0·50, 0·39–0·64; p<0·0001) compared with those assigned to chemotherapy. 6-month progression-free survival was 34% (95% CI 27–41) in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 38% (31–45) in the 10 mg/kg group, and 16% (10–22) in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 20 (11%) patients in the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg group, 25 (14%) in the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 45 (26%) in the chemotherapy group. The most common treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse event in the pembrolizumab groups was fatigue (two [1%] of 178 patients in the 2 mg/kg group and one [<1%] of 179 patients in the 10 mg/kg group, compared with eight [5%] of 171 in the chemotherapy group). Other treatment-related grade 3–4 adverse events include generalised oedema and myalgia (each in two [1%] patients) in those given pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg; hypopituitarism, colitis, diarrhoea, decreased appetite, hyponatremia, and pneumonitis (each in two [1%]) in those given pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg; and anaemia (nine [5%]), fatigue (eight [5%]), neutropenia (six [4%]), and leucopenia (six [4%]) in those assigned to chemotherapy. These findings establish pembrolizumab as a new standard of care for the treatment of ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. Merck Sharp & Dohme.