Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Regorafenib is an oral multi-tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor. It exhibits high selectivity for VEGFR1/2/3, while also inhibiting PDGFRβ, FGFR1, and oncogenic signaling cascades involving c-RAF/RAF1 and BRAF. These pathways are highly expressed in meningiomas, particularly in high-grade meningiomas. Methods The MIRAGE trial (NCT06275919) is a multicenter, open-label, controlled, randomized phase 2 clinical trial evaluating grade 2/3 meningioma patients who have progressed following surgery and radiotherapy. A total of 94 participants are being randomized (1:1) to receive either regorafenib (160 mg orally for 3 weeks on, 1 week off) or local standard-of-care therapies (e.g., bevacizumab, hydroxyurea, somatostatin analogs). Major inclusion criteria include histological confirmation of grade 2 or grade 3 meningioma according to the WHO 2021 classification, radiologically documented progression according to RANO criteria with at least 1 measurable lesion (minimum 10 × 10 mm) on baseline MRI, ineligibility for further surgery and/or radiotherapy, and a WHO performance status of 0–1. The primary endpoint is 6-month progression-free survival (6m-PFS) and secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory analysis will also be performed. MIRAGE, initiated in September 2024, is an academic trial promoted by the Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IOV-IRCCS, and will recruit patients across 15 neuro-oncology centers in Italy with an estimated study duration of 18 months. Discussion MIRAGE is a phase 2 trial designed to determine the role of regorafenib in prolonging the PFS of grade 2–3 meningioma patients ineligible for further surgery and/or radiotherapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06275919. Registered before start of inclusion, 7 February 2024. EuCT no. 2024–510954-28.

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign intracranial meningiomas is an established treatment. OBJECTIVE To summarize the literature and provide evidence-based practice guidelines on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). METHODS Articles in English specific to SRS for benign intracranial meningioma, published from January 1964 to April 2018, were systematically reviewed. Three electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register, were searched. RESULTS Out of the 2844 studies identified, 305 had a full text evaluation and 27 studies met the criteria to be included in this analysis. All but one were retrospective studies. The 10-yr local control (LC) rate ranged from 71% to 100%. The 10-yr progression-free-survival rate ranged from 55% to 97%. The prescription dose ranged typically between 12 and 15 Gy, delivered in a single fraction. Toxicity rate was generally low. CONCLUSION The current literature supporting SRS for benign intracranial meningioma lacks level I and II evidence. However, when summarizing the large number of level III studies, it is clear that SRS can be recommended as an effective evidence-based treatment option (recommendation level II) for grade 1 meningioma.

Treatment of the tumor and dural margin with surgery and sometimes radiation are cornerstones of therapy for meningioma. Molecular classifications have provided insights into the biology of disease; however, response to treatment remains heterogeneous. In this study, we used retrospective data on 2,824 meningiomas, including molecular data on 1,686 tumors and 100 prospective meningiomas, from the RTOG-0539 phase 2 trial to define molecular biomarkers of treatment response. Using propensity score matching, we found that gross tumor resection was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) across all molecular groups and longer overall survival in proliferative meningiomas. Dural margin treatment (Simpson grade 1/2) prolonged PFS compared to no treatment (Simpson grade 3). Molecular group classification predicted response to radiotherapy, including in the RTOG-0539 cohort. We subsequently developed a molecular model to predict response to radiotherapy that discriminates outcome better than standard-of-care classification. This study highlights the potential for molecular profiling to refine surgical and radiotherapy decision-making. In a large, partially prospective cohort of patients with molecularly profiled and clinically annotated meningioma, the extent of surgical resection and radiotherapy (RT) response correlate with molecular classification, which can be used in a molecular model to predict clinical outcomes in response to RT.

IntroductionThere is a critical need for innovative therapies beyond the current standard of care for meningiomas and gliomas. Radioligand therapy (RLT), with its theranostic approach, holds significant promise in this regard. Although several reviews on this topic have been published, none yet have combined the utilization of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology with the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) analysis, along with a dedicated subsection specifically addressing ongoing and completed clinical trials. This review aims to fill this gap in the literature by providing a comprehensive assessment of the current evidence on RLT in these tumors.Materials and methodsPublished studies were searched through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to 30 April 2025. Only original articles and clinical studies were included. Following a structured selection process, data extraction was performed. Study quality was critically appraised using CASP analyses. For clinical trials, an additional search was conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov beginning on 12 May 2025.ResultsA total of 30 studies were included in the review: 22 on meningiomas (290 patients) and 8 on gliomas (259 patients). For each study, first author, journal, year of publication, somatostatin receptor imaging, study design, radiopharmaceutical used, main topics, response criteria, toxicity assessment, post-therapy scintigraphy, number of patients, WHO grade, demographics, findings and median follow-up were considered. Among clinical trials, 22 were analyzed, including study site, year of first submission, proposed radiopharmaceutical, study type, primary endpoints and status. Efficacy and toxicity data were the primary focus, and the findings were generally encouraging. Studies on RLT in meningiomas was more robust, while in gliomas remained largely experimental. Nevertheless, the authors’ critical appraisal was generally positive. Clinical trials confirmed the more “traditional” nature of research in meningiomas compared to gliomas.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneity of the studies, RLT emerges as a promising therapeutic strategy in neuro-oncology. Its theranostic paradigm offers a distinctive advantage, enabling patient selection, treatment personalization, and response monitoring. The development of potentially novel radiopharmaceuticals and the conduct of well-designed multicenter trials with standardized response criteria are needed to further increase the impact and clinical translation of RLT in neuro-oncology.

PurposePreoperative embolization of radiographically suspected meningiomas is often performed to facilitate tumor resection. Its effects on the subsequent disease course of meningioma patients have not been studied in detail and randomized trials are lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore associations of preoperative meningioma embolization with postoperative outcome.Patients and methodsPatients undergoing resection of an intracranial meningioma at the University Hospital Zurich 2000–2013 (N = 741) were reviewed for the inclusion of pre-operative embolization in the management strategy. Annotations included demographics, radiographic, surgical, histological and hematological parameters, cardiovascular risk factors, pre- and postoperative neurological function and gene methylation-based classification. Binary regression and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to determine factors associated with outcome.ResultsPre-operative embolization was performed in 337 patients (42%). Cardiovascular events after surgery comprised mostly deep vein thrombosis (N = 39) and pulmonary embolisms (N = 64). On multivariate analyses of post-operative cardiovascular adverse events controlling for established risk factors, there were associations with embolization (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.37–4.00), and with female gender (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.17–4.08). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) of embolized patients was less favorable among patients with WHO grade II or grade III meningiomas (median RFS: 4.3 vs. 7.0 years, P = 0.029) or in patients with intermediate or malignant gene methylation subtype meningiomas (median RFS: 2.0 vs. 8.2 years, P = 0.005).ConclusionPre-operative meningioma embolization may cause adverse outcomes. Randomized trials to determine benefit-risk ratios are warranted to clarify the role of pre-operative embolization for the treatment of meningioma patients.

Purpose To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. Methods This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). Results Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. Conclusion These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017 ;19(12):1576–87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.

BACKGROUND:The efficacies of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for atypical meningiomas (AMs) after subtotal resection (STR) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE:To analyze the clinical, histopathological, and radiographic features associated with progression in AM patients after STR. METHODS:Fifty-nine primary AMs after STR were examined for predictors of progression, including the impact of SRS and EBRT, in a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS:Twenty-seven patients (46%) progressed after STR (median, 30 months). On univariate analysis, spontaneous necrosis positively (hazard ratio = 5.2; P = .006) and adjuvant radiation negatively (hazard ratio = 0.3; P = .009) correlated with progression; on multivariate analysis, only adjuvant radiation remained independently significant (hazard ratio = 0.3; P = .006). SRS and EBRT were associated with greater local control (LC; P = .02) and progression-free survival (P = .007). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial LC rates after STR vs STR/EBRT were 60%, 34%, and 34% vs 96%, 65%, and 45%. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial progression-free survival rates after STR vs STR/EBRT were 60%, 30%, and 26% vs 96%, 65%, and 45%. Compared with STR alone, adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved LC in AMs that lack spontaneous necrosis (P = .003) but did not improve LC in AMs with spontaneous necrosis (P = .6). CONCLUSION:Adjuvant SRS or EBRT improved LC of AMs after STR but only for tumors without spontaneous necrosis. Spontaneous necrosis may aid in decisions to administer adjuvant SRS or EBRT after STR of AMs. ABBREVIATIONS:AM, atypical meningiomaEBRT, external beam radiation therapyGTR, gross total resectionLC, local controlNTR, near-total resectionPFS, progression-free survivalRT, radiation therapySRS, stereotactic radiosurgerySTR, subtotal resection

The primary treatment of meningiomas is surgery which can be curative if the tumor is completely removed. For parasagittal, lateral sphenoid wing and olfactory groove meningiomas, gross-total resection should be the goal. Tuberculum and diaphragma sella meningiomas can be resected through the subfrontal or the pterional approaches. In meningiomas of the sphenoid wing with osseous involvement or involvement of the cavernous sinus subtotal resection can be achieved via several surgical approaches. Similarly, subtotal resection rather than gross-total resection of meningiomas of the petroclival, parasellar, and posterior fossa regions can preserve neurological function. Prior to surgery, embolization may reduce intraoperative bleeding and prevent postoperative complications. Stereotactic radiosurgery can be used as an alternative treatment to surgery either as a first-line treatment or at recurrence. Various conventional radiotherapy techniques can be employed for residual tumor post surgery or at recurrence. Chemotherapy has modest activity and is reserved for selected cases.

Background Atypical meningiomas are an intermediate grade brain tumour with a recurrence rate of 39–58 %. It is not known whether early adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of tumour recurrence and whether the potential side-effects are justified. An alternative management strategy is to perform active monitoring with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to treat at recurrence. There are no randomised controlled trials comparing these two approaches. Methods/Design A total of 190 patients will be recruited from neurosurgical/neuro-oncology centres across the United Kingdom, Ireland and mainland Europe. Adult patients undergoing gross total resection of intracranial atypical meningioma are eligible. Patients with multiple meningioma, optic nerve sheath meningioma, previous intracranial tumour, previous cranial radiotherapy and neurofibromatosis will be excluded. Informed consent will be obtained from patients. This is a two-stage trial (both stages will run in parallel): Stage 1 (qualitative study) is designed to maximise patient and clinician acceptability, thereby optimising recruitment and retention. Patients wishing to continue will proceed to randomisation. Stage 2 (randomisation) patients will be randomised to receive either early adjuvant radiotherapy for 6 weeks (60 Gy in 30 fractions) or active monitoring. The primary outcome measure is time to MRI evidence of tumour recurrence (progression-free survival (PFS)). Secondary outcome measures include assessing the toxicity of the radiotherapy, the quality of life, neurocognitive function, time to second line treatment, time to death (overall survival (OS)) and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Discussion ROAM/EORTC-1308 is the first multi-centre randomised controlled trial designed to determine whether early adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the risk of tumour recurrence following complete surgical resection of atypical meningioma. The results of this study will be used to inform current neurosurgery and neuro-oncology practice worldwide. Trial registration ISRCTN71502099 on 19 May 2014.

To review our current understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of meningiomas, to suggest topics for future investigations, and to present perspectives for clinical application. Significant progress has been made in recent years in delineating the molecular mechanisms involved in meningioma formation, growth, and malignant progression. However, many questions remain unanswered. Mutations in the NF2 gene probably account for the formation of more than half of all meningiomas. On the other hand, the molecular events underlying the initiation of meningiomas without NF2 mutations have yet to be identified. Investigating hereditary conditions associated with an increased meningioma incidence and the mechanisms underlying the development of radiation-induced meningiomas could potentially yield relevant insights. Meningioma growth is sustained by the dysregulated expression of steroid hormones, growth factors, their receptors, and activation of signal transduction cascades. The underlying genetic causes are unknown. Malignant progression of meningiomas probably involves the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes on chromosomes 1p, 9p, 10q, and 14q. However, with the possible exception of INK4A/INK4B, the actual targets of these chromosomal losses have remained largely elusive. Cell cycle dysregulation and telomerase activation have been recognized as important steps in meningioma progression. Telomere dynamics, cell cycle control, and the mechanisms responsible for deoxyribonucleic acid damage control are tightly interwoven. Investigating genes involved in the maintenance of genomic integrity might significantly deepen the understanding of meningioma progression. An area that has received relatively little attention thus far is the genetic background of meningioma spread and invasion. Possible clinical applications of the molecular data available may include a meningioma grading system based on genetic alterations, as well as therapeutic strategies for refractory meningiomas aimed at interfering with signal transduction pathways.