Explore the vast range of titles available.

Digital therapeutics (DTx) for children and adolescents with mental health problems have been developed in the health care industry. Despite reports of side effects from DTx for children and adolescents, there have been no guidelines to address the prevention of DTx overdependence among young users. This study aimed to identify the requirements for guidelines to prevent DTx overdependence in children and adolescents and to develop and evaluate these guidelines. We conducted 2 phases. This study first involved a phase I survey to develop guidelines, including assessments of smartphone usage and mental health conditions. The second phase evaluated the guidelines' effectiveness, reliability, necessity, and satisfaction using a visual analog scale through a randomized controlled trial. Participants-45 children and adolescents aged 9-16 years and 42 caregivers-were randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Phase I revealed that blocking mobile applications and notifications (mean 8.5, SD 1.8) and parental monitoring (mean 8.5, SD 2.1) were effective preventive features. Caregivers, children, and adolescents expressed concerns about the side effects and overdependence of DTx and decreased effects due to nonindividualized guidelines in subjective responses to the phase I survey. Based on these insights, personalized guidelines for phase II were developed, in which overall mean visual analog scale scores for guideline evaluation were higher in the experimental group, except for necessity among caregivers (mean 8.5, SD 1.3 versus mean 8.7, SD 1.2). Both caregivers and children and adolescents demonstrated the need for guidelines to prevent overdependence on DTx distinct from smartphone usage. Tailored guidelines may be acceptable for use in real-world therapeutic protocols. Guidelines to prevent overdependence on DTx in children and adolescents and to achieve a balance between their benefits and risks need to be established. Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS) of the Republic of Korea KCT0008893; https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=25609.

Attempted suicide is the main risk factor for suicide and repeated suicide attempts. However, the evidence for follow-up treatments reducing suicidal behavior in these patients is limited. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) in reducing suicidal behavior. ASSIP is a novel brief therapy based on a patient-centered model of suicidal behavior, with an emphasis on early therapeutic alliance. Patients who had recently attempted suicide were randomly allocated to treatment as usual (n = 60) or treatment as usual plus ASSIP (n = 60). ASSIP participants received three therapy sessions followed by regular contact through personalized letters over 24 months. Participants considered to be at high risk of suicide were included, 63% were diagnosed with an affective disorder, and 50% had a history of prior suicide attempts. Clinical exclusion criteria were habitual self-harm, serious cognitive impairment, and psychotic disorder. Study participants completed a set of psychosocial and clinical questionnaires every 6 months over a 24-month follow-up period. The study represents a real-world clinical setting at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital of psychiatry. The primary outcome measure was repeat suicide attempts during the 24-month follow-up period. Secondary outcome measures were suicidal ideation, depression, and health-care utilization. Furthermore, effects of prior suicide attempts, depression at baseline, diagnosis, and therapeutic alliance on outcome were investigated. During the 24-month follow-up period, five repeat suicide attempts were recorded in the ASSIP group and 41 attempts in the control group. The rates of participants reattempting suicide at least once were 8.3% (n = 5) and 26.7% (n = 16). ASSIP was associated with an approximately 80% reduced risk of participants making at least one repeat suicide attempt (Wald χ21 = 13.1, 95% CI 12.4-13.7, p < 0.001). ASSIP participants spent 72% fewer days in the hospital during follow-up (ASSIP: 29 d; control group: 105 d; W = 94.5, p = 0.038). Higher scores of patient-rated therapeutic alliance in the ASSIP group were associated with a lower rate of repeat suicide attempts. Prior suicide attempts, depression, and a diagnosis of personality disorder at baseline did not significantly affect outcome. Participants with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (n = 20) had more previous suicide attempts and a higher number of reattempts. Key study limitations were missing data and dropout rates. Although both were generally low, they increased during follow-up. At 24 months, the group difference in dropout rate was significant: ASSIP, 7% (n = 4); control, 22% (n = 13). A further limitation is that we do not have detailed information of the co-active follow-up treatment apart from participant self-reports every 6 months on the setting and the duration of the co-active treatment. ASSIP, a manual-based brief therapy for patients who have recently attempted suicide, administered in addition to the usual clinical treatment, was efficacious in reducing suicidal behavior in a real-world clinical setting. ASSIP fulfills the need for an easy-to-administer low-cost intervention. Large pragmatic trials will be needed to conclusively establish the efficacy of ASSIP and replicate our findings in other clinical settings. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02505373.

ObjectivesPatient’s and therapist’s expectations are considered an important factor influencing placebo response in experimental and therapeutic settings. Nevertheless, the placebo effects of common neurological facilitators that promote treatment efficacy have not been explored. In the present study we examined the estimations of patients, therapists, and staff members, regarding their treatment type and assessed their influence on the facilitating effects of oxytocin.MethodsPatients (N = 87) were randomized and double-blindly allocated to receive either oxytocin or placebo, twice daily for a period of four weeks, as part of a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient’s, therapist’s and staff’s expectations were assessed based on their estimation of treatment type (agent or placebo). Multilevel modeling and univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to assess the effects of patient’s, therapist’s, and staff’s estimations on treatment outcome beyond the effects of treatment type.ResultsStaff’s, therapist’s, and patient’s estimations were significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, only therapist’s and patient’s estimations significantly predicted improvement beyond actual administration, with therapist’s and patient’s estimations associated with improvement in trait anxiety (STAI-T, B=-1.80, p < .05, and B=-2.02, p < .05, respectively); therapist’s estimations were associated with improvement in general distress (OQ-45, B=-3.71, p < .05), and patient’s estimations were associated with symptom relief (HSCL-11, B=-0.13, p < .05). Overall, patient’s estimations had a higher relative contribution to treatment success, with standardized coefficients across scales ranging from − 0.06 to -0.26.ConclusionsThe neurobiological factors that promote treatment success are also influenced by patient’s and therapist’s expectations. Future studies should consider these effects when examining their impact in inpatient settings.

Test anxiety is a common issue among college students, which can affect their physical and psychological health. However, effective interventions or therapeutic strategies are still lacking. This study aims to evaluate the potential effects of JYLP-326 on test anxious college students. Sixty anxious students were enrolled and randomly allocated to the placebo group and the probiotic group. Both groups were instructed to take placebo and JYLP-326 products twice per day for three weeks, respectively. Thirty unanxious students with no treatments were assigned to a regular control group. The anxiety, depression, and insomnia questionnaires were used to measure students' mental states at the baseline and the end of this study. 16S rRNA sequencing and untargeted metabolomics were performed to analyze the changes in the gut microbiota and fecal metabolism. The questionnaire results suggested that JYLP-326 administration could relieve the symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in test anxious students. The gut microbiomes of the placebo group showed a significantly greater diversity index than the control group (p < 0.05). An increased abundance of and at the genus level was observed in the placebo group, and the relative abundance of and decreased. Whereas, JYLP-326 administration could partly restore the disturbed gut microbiota. Additionally, test anxiety was correlated with disordered fecal metabolomics such as a higher Ethyl sulfate and a lower Cyclohexylamine, which could be reversed after taking JYLP-326. Furthermore, the changed microbiota and fecal metabolites were significantly associated with anxiety-related symptoms. The results indicate that the intervention of JYLP-326 could be an effective strategy to alleviate anxiety, depression, and insomnia in test anxious college students. The potential mechanism underlying this effect could be related to the regulation of gut microbiota and fecal metabolites.

There is a push to shrink the anticipated 17-year research-to-practice gap for psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), offering precarious hope to those with disabling mental health conditions. However, numerous questions regarding how PAT works, how well it works, for whom and in what context remain. Substantial changes to current systems of care, including regulatory approvals, clinical training and access will all be required to accommodate PAT, a multimodal therapy that combines pharmacological and psychotherapy components that are not routinely available outside clinical research settings. Implementation science can help to reduce the gap in a way that maintains scientific rigour by simultaneously examining the safety, effectiveness and implementation of PAT. Specifically, precision implementation science methods (for example, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) designs), hybrid study designs, valid measurement of fidelity and use of theory-based models and frameworks for treatment development will accelerate the process of implementation while balancing safety and quality. The time to proceed, with accelerated caution, is now. In this Perspective the authors propose the use of implementation science methods concurrently with safety and effectiveness testing to accelerate the translation of psychedelic research into psychedelic-assisted therapy.