Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background Weil osteotomies are performed to surgically treat metatarsalgia, by shortening the metatarsal via either a single distal oblique cut with translation of the metatarsal head (flat-cut) or through the removal of a slice of bone (wedge-cut). The wedge-cut technique purportedly has functional and mechanical advantages over the flat-cut procedure; however, in vivo data and quality of evidence are currently lacking. This study aims to investigate whether wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to traditional flat-cut Weil is associated with increased pain relief and fewer complications up to 12 months postoperatively. Methods Patient, surgical and clinical data will be collected for 80 consecutive consenting patients electing to undergo surgical treatment of propulsive metatarsalgia in a randomised control trial, embedded within a clinical registry. The primary outcome is patient-reported pain as assessed by the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) - Pain subscale, and the secondary outcome is the incidence of procedure-specific complications at up to 12 months postoperatively. The groups will be randomised using a central computer-based simple randomisation system, with a 1:1 allocation without blocking and allocation concealment. A mixed-effects analysis of covariance will be used to assess the primary outcome, with confounders factored into the model. A binary logistic regression will be used to assess the secondary outcome in a multivariable model containing the same confounders. Discussion To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the trial will be the first to examine the clinical efficacy of the wedge-cut Weil osteotomy compared to the flat-cut technique with a prospective, randomised control design. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001251910. Registered on 23 November 2020.

Purpose Based on the tripod concept of load distribution, our study aimed to evaluate whether a slight extension of first metatarsal (M1) that may occur after the Lapidus procedure (LP) could alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot and influence clinical and functional outcomes. Methods Twenty-five patients (27 feet) were reviewed. Hindfoot radiographic analysis was based on seven measurements. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated with self-reported questionnaires. Transfer metatarsalgia was also assessed. Correlation analysis was performed according to variations of the studied variables. Results The average extension of the M1 was 4.26 degrees ( p  < 0.001). None of the hindfoot radiographic measurements changed significantly ( p  = 0.13, p  = 0.50, p  = 0.19, p  = 0.70, p  = 0.11, p  = 0.36, p  = 0.83). Patients improved on most questionnaires ( p  < 0.001). None presented transfer metatarsalgia. No correlation between M1 extension and clinical and functional outcomes was found. Conclusion Possibly there is a tolerance of M1 extension in which it does not alter the radiographic measurements of the hindfoot, overload the lesser metatarsals, or compromise clinical and functional outcomes.

Chronic metatarsalgia (CM) causes significant pain and disability, affecting quality of life. Foot orthoses (FOs) including medially wedged designs with a metatarsal pad decrease excessive plantar pressure under the metatarsal heads, which is a suggested risk factor for developing CM. This FOs model may be effective in diminishing pain and improving function in these individuals. Thus, the objective of this trial will be to compare the effects of medially wedged FOs with a metatarsal pad and sham FOs on pain and foot function in individuals with CM. This participant- and assessor-blinded superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups will be conducted in Trois-Rivières, Canada. Sixty-four participants with CM will be recruited from the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières outpatient podiatry clinic and via social media invitations. They will be randomized into intervention (customized FOs) or control (sham FOs) groups and will be evaluated at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome will be: (1) mean pain during walking for the most painful foot during the past week. The secondary outcomes will be: (1) Foot Function Index, (2) Global rating of change and (3) the 5-level EQ-5D. Medially wedged FOs with a metatarsal pad are expected to provide a greater reduction in pain and improvement in foot function compared to sham FOs. This trial will help guide FOs prescription recommendations for managing foot pain in individuals with CM in the future. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06962475.

Backgrounds There has long been a consensus that shortening of the first metatarsal during hallux valgus reconstruction could lead to postoperative transfer metatarsalgia. However, appropriate shortening is sometimes beneficial for correcting severe deformities or relieving stiff joints. This study is to investigate, from the biomechanical perspective, whether and how much shortening of the first metatarsal could be allowed. Methods A finite element model of the human foot simulating the push-off phase of the gait was established. Progressive shortening of the first metatarsal from 2 to 8 mm at an increment of 2 mm were sequentially applied to the model, and the corresponding changes in forefoot loading pattern during push-off phase, especially the loading ratio at the central rays, was calculated. The effect of depressing the first metatarsal head was also investigated. Results With increasing shortening level of the first metatarsal, the plantar pressure of the first ray decreased, while that of the lateral rays continued to rise. When the shortening reaches 6 mm, the load ratio of the central rays exceeds a critical threshold of 55%, which was considered risky; but it could still be manipulated to normal if the distal end of the first metatarsal displaced to the plantar side by 3 mm. Conclusions During the first metatarsal osteotomy, a maximum of 6 mm shortening length is considered to be within the safe range. Whenever a higher level of shortening is necessary, pushing down the distal metatarsal segment could be a compensatory procedure to maintain normal plantar force distributions.

This study compared muscle strength and foot pressure among patients with metatarsalgia, patients with plantar fasciitis, and healthy controls. A total of 31 patients with foot pain (14 metatarsalgia and 17 plantar fasciitis) and 29 healthy controls participated in the study. The strengths of the plantar flexor and hip muscles were measured using isokinetic and handheld dynamometers, respectively. Foot pressure parameters, including the pressure–time integral (PTI) and foot arch index (AI), were assessed using pedobarography. Compared with the healthy control group, plantar flexor strength was significantly reduced in the affected feet of the metatarsalgia and plantar fasciitis groups (F = 0.083, all p  < 0.001); however, hip strength was significantly decreased only in the affected feet of the metatarsalgia group (F = 20.900, p  < 0.001). Plantar flexor ( p  < 0.001) and hip ( p  = 0.004) strength were significantly lower in the metatarsalgia group than in the plantar fasciitis group. The PTI was lower in the forefeet of the affected feet in the metatarsalgia ( p  < 0.001) and plantar fasciitis ( p  = 0.004) groups. Foot AI ( p  < 0.001) was significantly reduced only in the metatarsalgia group. These results suggest the need to consider the evaluation of muscle strength and foot pressure in both feet for the diagnosis and treatment of foot pain.

Purpose The interdigital nerve neuroma of the forefoot is commonly known as Morton’s Neuroma. Many authors have described and treated this condition before and after Morton. This study aims to investigate the past scientific literature to better understand what comprehension and treatments have been used to master this pathology. Methods Historical and modern scientific accounts were searched for descriptions of interdigital nerve neuroma or metatarsalgia (as some authors described it) to have a thorough overview of the subject. The scientific literature was searched to highlight the evolution of the nomenclature and to summarise historical and current treatments, especially conservative ones. Results Influential authors described the interdigital nerve neuroma and its symptoms. Durlacher, the King’s podiatrist in England in the 1800s, was the first to understand that this was a neuralgic affection; with his practical approach, he treated the Neuroma using pressure-relieving footwear. The first anatomical description should be credited to the Italian anatomist Civinini. Morton, the American Civil War surgeon, was the first to understand the aetiology of pain better and the first to propose a surgical treatment to relieve symptoms. Tubby, the British alpine climber, linguist, archaeologist and orthopaedic surgeon, observed a nodular mass on the third common digital nerve and proposed surgical treatment with resection of the metatarso-phalangeal joint. Conclusion the use of a term widely accepted and recognised by all its users with a precise meaning and symbolisation makes it easily understandable and lasting. Also, if it is known that what is called Morton’s neuroma is not a neuroma but a benign perineural fibrosis of a common plantar digital nerve, the use of the terminology Morton’s neuroma is still universally accepted and recognised.

Background Primary metatarsalgia of the lesser metatarsals is common and caused by mechanical overload of the affected metatarsal heads. Increased metatarsal length generally is believed to be a factor in the development of primary metatarsalgia. However, there is no clear biomechanical evidence supporting this theory. Questions/purposes We asked whether metatarsal length correlated with plantar-loading parameters under the corresponding metatarsal heads. Patients and Methods We prospectively followed two groups of patients 46 (51 feet) with and 45 (51 feet) without metatarsalgia. Each foot was physically examined and underwent standardized full-weightbearing radiography and dynamic pedobarography to assess maximal peak pressure and maximal force under the first, second, and third metatarsal heads. We correlated the relative length of the first and third metatarsals with the corresponding two plantar-loading parameters. We compared maximal peak pressure and maximal force in patients with metatarsalgia with those of symptom-free patients. Results The relative length of the first and third metatarsals did not correlate (r < 0.13) with the maximal peak pressure or maximal force under the corresponding metatarsal heads. Maximal force under the first metatarsal head was decreased in the metatarsalgia group. There was no difference in maximal peak pressure between the metatarsalgia and nonmetatarsalgia groups. Conclusions Relative metatarsal length had no influence on plantar-loading parameters. Shortening of a symptomatic ray to decrease plantar-loading parameters cannot be supported from a biomechanical rationale.

Introduction Several studies have suggested that an increased body mass index (BMI) is a negative factor for forefoot plantar pain but its influence in the surgical correction of metatarsalgia is unknown. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the influence of the BMI on the surgical outcomes of metatarsalgia. It has been hypothesized that the higher the BMI, the worse the functional outcomes after metatarsalgia surgical treatment at one year follow-up. Material and methods A prospective cohort study that included all patients operated on for third rocker metatarsalgia was conducted. Weil’s osteotomy was performed on all the patients operated on. The patients’ pre-operative height, weight, and BMI were recorded. The patients were subsequently divided into three groups based on their BMI. There was group 1 or the normal group (18.5 > BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2), group 2 or the overweight group (25 > BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2), and group 3 or the obese group (BMI > 30 kg/m2). Pre-operative, post-operative, and differential AOFAS were used to evaluate and compare the groups. The post-operative VAS was also measured to assess pain. The correlation between the BMI and those variables was also analyzed. Results After the exclusion criteria were applied, 107 patients were finally assessed. There were 22 patients (20.6%) in group 1, 52 patients (48.6%) in group 2, and 33 patients (30.8%) in group 3. No correlation was observed between the BMI and AOFAS ( p  > 0.05). Neither were any differences found when the three groups were compared ( p  > 0.05). Moreover, no correlation between the BMI and the VAS score was observed ( p  = 0.690). Conclusion Obesity does not negatively influence functional outcomes after surgery for metatarsalgia in short to medium term. Regardless of their BMI, patients with propulsive metatarsalgia improve in functionality after surgical treatment.

Purpose In primary metatarsalgia, Distal Minimally invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy (DMMO) achieves a correct load distribution which is a factor in pain relief, but contrary to the elevation of the metatarsal head, shortening the metatarsal length has no influence on plantar-loading parameters, while the increased metatarsal length is a factor in the development of metatarsalgia. Thus, we hypothesized that metatarsalgia could be partly related to a functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissues and pain relief after DMMO results from soft tissue relaxation. Methods Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension. To test our hypothesis, we measured intra-operatively the MTPJ pressure of 19 patients suffering from primary metatarsalgia, before and after DMMO. This pressure is being analyzed as a reflection of joint decompression and forefoot soft tissue release. Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension. Results Lower metatarsals presenting metatarsalgia show a significantly lower MTPJ pressure compared to asymptomatic rays, and DMMO induces a significant increase of MTPJ pressure. Conclusion Those variations reflect the functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissue in primary metatarsalgia. The biomechanical rationale of the shortening effect of DMMO could therefore be explained by the release of forefoot soft tissue, which could take part in the pain relief by restoring this balance.

Purpose This study examined the clinical and radiographic outcomes of modified Mitchell’s osteotomy using three-point fixation with a full-thread headless screw. This technique was described to resolve the problem of excessive shortening and overshifting of the metatarsal. Methods A total of 33 feet of 26 patients underwent modified Mitchell’s osteotomy with three-point fixation for hallux valgus. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at specific time points of follow-up by using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA). Results The global AOFAS scale score (0–100) significantly improved from 50.7 ± 9.9 preoperatively to 84.4 ± 8.7 at the final follow-up. The HVA significantly improved from 30.2 ∘ ± 6.0 ∘ to 9.0 ∘ ± 5.0 ∘ , and the IMA significantly improved from 14.2 ∘ ± 2.6 ∘ to 5.1 ∘ ± 2.0 ∘ . None of the patients experienced nonunion and transfer metatarsalgia. Complications were observed in two feet, and one foot had recurrence of hallux valgus. Conclusion Modified Mitchell’s osteotomy using three-point fixation with a full-thread headless screw is a reliable alternative treatment for hallux valgus, even in patients with severe deformities.