Catalogue Search | MBRL
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
{{itemTitle}}
448,629
result(s) for
"Methodology"
Sort by:
Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited
Representation in Scientific Practice, published by the MIT Press in 1990, helped coalesce a long-standing interest in scientific visualization among historians, philosophers, and sociologists of science and remains a touchstone for current investigations in science and technology studies. This volume revisits the topic, taking into account both the changing conceptual landscape of STS and the emergence of new imaging technologies in scientific practice. It offers cutting-edge research on a broad array of fields that study information as well as short reflections on the evolution of the field by leading scholars, including some of the contributors to the 1990 volume. The essays consider the ways in which viewing experiences are crafted in the digital era; the embodied nature of work with digital technologies; the constitutive role of materials and technologies -- from chalkboards to brain scans -- in the production of new scientific knowledge; the metaphors and images mobilized by communities of practice; and the status and significance of scientific imagery in professional and popular culture.ContributorsMorana Alac, Michael Barany, Anne Beaulieu, Annamaria Carusi, Catelijne Coopmans, Lorraine Daston, Sarah de Rijcke, Joseph Dumit, Emma Frow, Yann Giraud, Aud Sissel Hoel, Martin Kemp, Bruno Latour, John Law, Michael Lynch, Donald MacKenzie, Cyrus Mody, Natasha Myers, Rachel Prentice, Arie Rip, Martin Ruivenkamp, Lucy Suchman, Janet Vertesi, Steve Woolgar
eBook
Impact of AIR™ Recon DL on magnetic resonance imaging-based quantitative brain structure measurements
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate how the AIR™ Recon DL algorithm influences magentic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and quantitative brain morphometry relative to conventional reconstruction (CR). Seventy-four healthy adults underwent 3D T1-weighted MRI reconstructed with CR and AIR™ Recon DL. Image quality was rated by two neuroradiologists (κ = 0.74–0.97). Voxel-based morphometry assessed total, gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal (CSF) volumes; surface-based morphometry analyzed cortical thickness, sulcal depth, fractal dimension, and gyrification across 148 regions. Hippocampal volumes were extracted using the Neuromorphometrics atlas. Reconstruction times were compared. AIR™ Recon DL significantly improved image quality (reduced noise and artifacts, P < 0.001) but introduced systematic morphometric shifts—smaller total and WM volumes, larger GM and CSF volumes, and widespread regional thickness increases (effect sizes d ≈ 0.3–0.5). Hippocampal volumes increased bilaterally (ΔL = +0.15 mL, +3.97%; ΔR = +0.15 mL, +3.88%; both P < 0.05). Mean reconstruction time was longer for deep learning-based reconstruction (11.6 ± 1.6 s) than CR (9.9 ± 1.4 s; Δ = +1.7 s, P < 0.001). AIR™ Recon DL enhances image quality but causes modest, systematic volumetric biases. Harmonizing reconstruction methods is essential for reliable morphometric comparisons in neuropsychiatric imaging.
Journal Article