Explore the vast range of titles available.

Objective To compare the relative bioavailability, safety and tolerability of oral methotrexate (MTX) and subcutaneous (SC) MTX administered via an auto-injector (MTXAI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods In this randomised, multicenter, open-label, three-way crossover study, patients ≥18 years with adult RA undergoing treatment with MTX for ≥3 months were assigned to receive MTX 10, 15, 20 and 25 mg weekly in a random sequence of three treatments: oral, SC into the abdomen and SC into the thigh. For 24 h after administration of each treatment, blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis and injection sites were assessed. Results Forty-seven patients completed the study. Systemic exposure of oral MTX plateaued at doses ≥15 mg/week. In contrast, SC MTX demonstrated a linear increase in systemic exposure that was greater than oral MTX at each dose. No unexpected AEs were noted for either formulation. Conclusions Unlike oral MTX, the systemic exposure of SC MTX did not plateau over the doses studied, particularly at doses ≥15 mg/week. In this study, higher systemic MTX exposure was not associated with increases in AEs. Patients with an inadequate clinical response to oral MTX may benefit from higher drug exposure by switching to SC MTX. Trial registration number NCT01618968.

Background Equivalent efficacy and comparable pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 and reference tocilizumab (TCZ) in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported up to week 24 (treatment period [TP] 1) of the phase 3 study. Here we present results for TP2 (study weeks 24–48). Methods In this phase 3, multicenter, multiregional, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study, participants with active RA despite methotrexate were randomized (1:1:2) to intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks to week 48 (TCZ group), or TCZ to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800 group), or BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (BAT1806/BIIB800 group). Efficacy in TP2 was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and change from baseline in Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28). Pharmacokinetics (trough levels), safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. Results Of 621 randomized participants, 577 (92.9%) completed TP1 and entered TP2 (TCZ: N  = 145 [93.5%]; TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800: N  = 142 [92.2%]; BAT1806/BIIB800: N  = 290 [92.9%]). Proportions of ACR20 responders were similar between treatment groups throughout TP2 (87.8%, 90.3%, and 90.4%, respectively, at week 48), as were proportions of ACR50 and ACR70 responders, and reduction in DAS28. Drug trough levels and antidrug antibody incidences were comparable between the treatment groups. Adverse events were balanced across the treatment groups and no fatal events were reported. Conclusion In TP2, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between the TCZ, TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800, and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups. Trial registration NCT03830203 and EudraCT 2018-002202-31.

High‐dose methotrexate (HD‐MTX) infusions are commonly used to consolidate remission in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We investigate the potential role of candidate polymorphisms in SLCO1B1 (rs4149056 and rs2306283), ABCB1 (rs1045642), ABCC2 (rs717620), ABCC3 (rs9895420), and ABCC4 (rs7317112) drug transporters genes on HD‐MTX pharmacokinetics and patients' outcome (meant both as relapse and drug‐related toxicities) in an Italian cohort of 204 ALL pediatric patients treated according to the AIEOP‐BFM ALL 2009 protocol. TaqMan SNP genotyping assays determined patient's genotypes. Measurements of HD‐MTX plasma concentration were available for 814 HD‐MTX courses in 204 patients; MTX clearance was estimated by a two‐compartmental linear pharmacokinetic model with first‐order elimination and a Bayesian approach, via ADAPT. Independent contributions of age and ABCC4 SNP rs7317112 (A>G, intronic) on MTX clearance were detected in a multivariate analysis (p = 1.57 × 10−8 and p = 2.06 × 10−5, respectively), suggesting a delayed elimination of the drug in older patients and an accelerated one in carriers of the variant GG genotype. After multiple corrections, the association between ABCC2 SNP rs717620 (−24 C>T) and severe hematological toxicity was found (p < 0.005). Moreover, SLCO1B1 SNP rs4149056 (c.521T>C, p.V174A) affected patients' outcomes: carriers of the variant C allele presented a reduced risk of relapse compared to wild‐type TT (hazard risk: 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08–0.90, p = 0.037). Taken together, these data highlighted the importance of variants in drug transporters genes on HD‐MTX disposition in the AIEOP‐BFM ALL 2009 protocol consolidation phase, and their putative role as predictive markers of outcome.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab + methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods 269 Japanese patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX were randomised (1:1:1) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 2) or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 3). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks; stable doses of oral MTX (6–8 mg/week) were continued. Patients were allowed to enter early escape (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 3 continued golimumab 100 mg) based on swollen/tender joint counts at week 14. The primary study endpoint was achievement of at least 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response criteria at week 14. To control for multiplicity of testing, treatment group comparisons were first made between combined Groups 2 and 3 versus Group 1, followed by comparisons of Group 2 and Group 3 versus Group 1. Results The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 14 was significantly higher in combined Groups 2 and 3 (73.4%, 127/173) and in each of Group 2 (72.1%, 62/86) and Group 3 (74.7%, 65/87) compared with Group 1 (27.3%, 24/88; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). Golimumab + MTX also elicited a significantly better response than placebo + MTX in other efficacy parameters, including disease activity score (DAS28) response/remission and radiographic assessments. During the 16-week fixed treatment regimen study period, 72.7%, 75.6% and 78.2% of patients had adverse events and 1.1%, 1.2% and 2.3% had serious adverse events in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion In Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX therapy, golimumab + MTX was significantly more effective than MTX monotherapy in reducing RA signs/symptoms and limiting radiographic progression with no unexpected safety concerns.

BACKGROUNDInterpatient differences in the accumulation of methotrexate's active polyglutamylated metabolites (MTXPGs) in leukemia cells influence its antileukemic effects.METHODSTo identify genomic and epigenomic and patient variables determining the intracellular accumulation of MTXPGs, we measured intracellular MTXPG levels in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells from 388 newly diagnosed patients after in vivo high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) (1 g/m2) treatment, defined ALL subtypes, and assessed genomic and epigenomic variants influencing folate pathway genes (mRNA, miRNA, copy number alterations [CNAs], SNPs, single nucleotide variants [SNVs], CpG methylation).RESULTSWe documented greater than 100-fold differences in MTXPG levels, which influenced its antileukemic effects (P = 4 × 10-5). Three ALL subtypes had lower MTXPG levels (T cell ALL [T-ALL] and B cell ALL [B-ALL] with the TCF3-PBX1 or ETV6-RUNX1 fusions), and 2 subtypes had higher MTXPG levels (hyperdiploid and BCR-ABL like). The folate pathway genes SLC19A1, ABCC1, ABCC4, FPGS, and MTHFD1 significantly influenced intracellular MTXPG levels (P = 2.9 × 10-3 to 3.7 × 10-8). A multivariable model including the ALL subtype (P = 1.1 × 10-14), the SLC19A1/(ABCC1 + ABCC4) transporter ratio (P = 3.6 × 10-4), the MTX infusion time (P = 1.5 × 10-3), FPGS mRNA expression (P = 2.1 × 10-3), and MTX systemic clearance (P = 4.4 × 10-2) explained 42% of the variation in MTXPG accumulation (P = 1.1 × 10-38). Model simulations indicated that a longer infusion time (24 h vs. 4 h) was superior in achieving higher intracellular MTXPG levels across all subtypes if ALL.CONCLUSIONSThese findings provide insights into mechanisms underlying interpatient differences in intracellular accumulation of MTXPG in leukemia cells and its antileukemic effectsFUNDINGTHE National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH, the Basque Government Programa Posdoctoral de Perfeccionamiento de Personal Investigador doctor, and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Background Infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with high-dose methotrexate may have reduced methotrexate clearance (CL) due to renal immaturity, which may predispose them to toxicity. Objective The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of methotrexate in infants with ALL. Methods A total of 672 methotrexate plasma concentrations were obtained from 71 infants enrolled in the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Clinical Trial P9407. Infants received methotrexate 4 g/m 2 intravenously for four cycles during weeks 4–12 of intensification. A population PK analysis was performed using NONMEM ® version 7.4. The final model was evaluated using a non-parametric bootstrap and a visual predictive check. Simulations were performed to evaluate methotrexate dose and the utility of a bedside algorithm for dose individualization. Results Methotrexate was best characterized by a two-compartment model with allometric scaling. Weight was the only covariate included in the final model. The coefficient of variation for interoccasion variability (IOV) on CL was relatively high at 25.4%, compared with the interindividual variability for CL and central volume of distribution (10.7% and 13.2%, respectively). Simulations identified that 21.1% of simulated infants benefitted from bedside dose adjustment, and adjustment of methotrexate doses during infusions can avoid supratherapeutic concentrations. Conclusion Infants treated with high-dose methotrexate demonstrated a relatively high degree of IOV in methotrexate CL. The magnitude of IOV in the CL of methotrexate suggests that use of a bedside algorithm may avoid supratherapeutic methotrexate concentrations resulting from high IOV in methotrexate CL.

Purpose BMS-986142 is an oral, small-molecule reversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. The main objectives of our phase I studies were to characterize the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986142 in healthy participants, and to investigate the potential for the effect of BMS-986142 on the PK of methotrexate (MTX) in combination. Methods In a combined single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose study, the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BMS-986142 were assessed in healthy non-Japanese participants following administration of a single dose (5–900 mg) or multiple doses (25–350 mg, once daily for 14 days). In a drug–drug interaction study, the effect of BMS-986142 (350 mg, once daily for 5 days) on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of MTX (7.5 mg) was assessed in healthy participants. Results BMS-986142 was generally well tolerated, alone and in combination with MTX. BMS-986142 was rapidly absorbed with peak concentrations occurring within 2 h, and was eliminated with a mean half-life ranging from 7 to 11 h. Exposure of BMS-986142 appeared dose proportional within the dose ranges tested. A dose- and concentration-dependent inhibition of CD69 expression was observed following administration of BMS-986142. BMS-986142 did not affect the pharmacokinetics of MTX. Conclusions BMS-986142 was well tolerated at the doses tested, had pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles which support once-daily dosing, and can be coadministered with MTX without the pharmacokinetic interaction of BMS-986142 on MTX.

Persistent upregulation of signaling by cytokine tumor necrosis factor–like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) through its receptor fibroblast growth factor–inducible molecule-14 (Fn14) promotes chronic inflammation and tissue destruction. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and tolerability of the TWEAK-blocking monoclonal antibody BIIB023 and determine its pharmacokinetics and effects on TWEAK pathway pharmacodynamic markers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Phase I, first-in-human, 2-part, multicenter, double-blind, dose-escalation study. Patients were randomized to a single dose of BIIB023 (0.03–20 mg/kg) (n = 38) or placebo (n = 15) as an add-on to methotrexate. Three open-label cohorts of RA patients taking background disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and stable tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy (n = 12) received a single-dose of BIIB023 of 2, 10, or 20 mg/kg and were assessed over 70 days. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events for the BIIB023 monotherapy cohorts and open-label cohorts of BIIB023 as add-on therapy to TNF inhibitors compared with placebo were 47% and 50% versus 33%, respectively. Serum exposure to BIIB023 increased in a dose-dependent manner from 0.03 to 20 mg/kg, but not in direct proportion to dose level. After administration, the time course of BIIB023 serum concentration was multiphasic and showed expedited elimination when levels decreased to < 10 µg/mL. Serum-soluble TWEAK levels were suppressed at all dose levels by 6 hours post-dose and recovered to baseline between days 7 and 28. A trend toward downward modulation of serum biomarkers of inflammatory response was suggested in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, inducible protein 10, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 in the BIIB023 group versus placebo. Single-dose BIIB023 showed a favorable safety and tolerability profile in RA. Suppression of serum-soluble TWEAK for ≤ 28 days was observed and downward trends in serum biomarkers suggested.

In this randomized trial of children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, methotrexate achieved slightly better outcomes than leflunomide; at 16 weeks the respective rates of 30 percent improvement were 89 percent and 68 percent. In each group, the clinical improvement observed at 16 weeks was maintained at 48 weeks. Methotrexate appears to be slightly more effective than leflunomide for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, but both drugs produced high rates of response. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, with an estimated prevalence of 0.07 to 4.01 per 1000 children, 1 has three major subtypes differentiated on the basis of onset: systemic, pauciarticular, and polyarticular (defined by the involvement of at least five joints). Treatments for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis include nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). 2 – 7 DMARDs have been shown radiographically to inhibit progression in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. 8 Methotrexate is the most commonly used DMARD for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. In six-month trials, both methotrexate and sulfasalazine were more effective than placebo in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and had acceptable short-term safety . . .

Background: This analysis was initiated to define the predictive value of the area under the curve of high-dose methotrexate (AUC HD-MTX ) in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Patients and methods: We included 55 patients with PCNSL and available pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) no. 20 trial, randomised to HD-MTX ( n =30) or HD-MTX and high-dose cytarabine (HD-AraC) ( n =25). Individual AUC HD-MTX from population PK analysis was tested on drug toxicity and clinical outcome using multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox hazards modelling. Results: AUC HD-MTX , the IELSG score and treatment group were significant predictors for treatment response (complete or partial) in the adjusted model. The AUC HD-MTX did not predict toxicity, with the exception of liver toxicity and neutropaenia. A high AUC HD-MTX was associated with better event-free survival (EFS) ( P =0.01) and overall survival (OAS) ( P =0.02). Both the AUC HD-MTX and the IELSG score were significant predictors of EFS and OAS in the adjusted model, with a hazard ratio of 0.82 and 0.73, respectively, per 100  μ mol l −1  h −1 increase in AUC HD-MTX . Conclusions: Individualised dosing of HD-MTX might have the potential to improve clinical outcome in patients with PCNSL, even when administered concurrently with HD-AraC. In the future, this could be carried out by using first-cycle PK modelling with determination of potential dose adaptations for later cycles using Bayesian analysis.