Explore the vast range of titles available.

Many decisions in drug development and medical practice are based on measuring blood concentrations of endogenous and exogenous molecules. Yet most biochemical and pharmacological events take place in the tissues. Also, most drugs with few notable exceptions exert their effects not within the bloodstream, but in defined target tissues into which drugs have to distribute from the central compartment. Assessing tissue drug chemistry has, thus, for long been viewed as a more rational way to provide clinically meaningful data rather than gaining information from blood samples. More specifically, it is often the extracellular (interstitial) tissue space that is most closely related to the site of action (biophase) of the drug. Currently microdialysis (microD) is the only tool available that explicitly provides data on the extracellular space. Although microD as a preclinical and clinical tool has been available for two decades, there is still uncertainty about the use of microD in drug research and development, both from a methodological and a regulatory point of view. In an attempt to reduce this uncertainty and to provide an overview of the principles and applications of microD in preclinical and clinical settings, an AAPS-FDA workshop took place in November 2005 in Nashville, TN, USA. Stakeholders from academia, industry and regulatory agencies presented their views on microD as a tool in drug research and development.

Microdialysis (MD) was introduced as an intracerebral sampling method for clinical neurosurgery by Hillered et al. and Meyerson et al. in 1990. Since then MD has been embraced as a research tool to measure the neurochemistry of acute human brain injury and epilepsy. In general investigators have focused their attention to relative chemical changes during neurointensive care, operative procedures, and epileptic seizure activity. This initial excitement surrounding this technology has subsided over the years due to concerns about the amount of tissue sampled and the complicated issues related to quantification. The interpretation of mild to moderate MD fluctuations in general remains an issue relating to dynamic changes of the architecture and size of the interstitial space, blood–brain barrier (BBB) function, and analytical imprecision, calling for additional validation studies and new methods to control for in vivo recovery variations. Consequently, the use of this methodology to influence clinical decisions regarding the care of patients has been restricted to a few institutions. Clinical studies have provided ample evidence that intracerebral MD monitoring is useful for the detection of overt adverse neurochemical conditions involving hypoxia/ischemia and seizure activity in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), thromboembolic stroke, and epilepsy. There is some data strongly suggesting that MD changes precede the onset of secondary neurological deterioration following SAH, hemispheric stroke, and surges of increased ICP in fulminant hepatic failure. These promising investigations have relied on MD-markers for disturbed glucose metabolism (glucose, lactate, and pyruvate) and amino acids. Others have focused on trying to capture other important neurochemical events, such as excitotoxicity, cell membrane degradation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) formation, cellular edema, and BBB dysfunction. However, these other applications need additional validation. Although these cerebral events and their corresponding changes in neurochemistry are important, other promising MD applications, as yet less explored, comprise local neurochemical provocations, drug penetration to the human brain, MD as a tool in clinical drug trials, and for studying the proteomics of acute human brain injury. Nevertheless, MD has provided new important insights into the neurochemistry of acute human brain injury. It remains one of very few methods for neurochemical measurements in the interstitial compartment of the human brain and will continue to be a valuable translational research tool for the future. Therefore, this technology has the potential of becoming an established part of multimodality neuro-ICU monitoring, contributing unique information about the acute brain injury process. However, in order to reach this stage, several issues related to quantification and bedside presentation of MD data, implantation strategies, and quality assurance need to be resolved. The future success of MD as a diagnostic tool in clinical neurosurgery depends heavily on the choice of biomarkers, their sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for secondary neurochemical events, and the availability of practical bedside methods for chemical analysis of the individual markers. The purpose of this review was to summarize the results of clinical studies using cerebral MD in neurosurgical patients and to discuss the current status of MD as a potential method for use in clinical decision-making. The approach was to focus on adverse neurochemical conditions in the injured human brain and the MD biomarkers used to study those events. Methodological issues that appeared critical for the future success of MD as a routine intracerebral sampling method were addressed.

Microdialysis (MD) in the skin is a unique technique for in vivo sampling of topically as well as systemically administered drugs at the site of action, e.g. sampling the unbound tissue concentrations in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue. MD as a research method has undergone significant development, improvement and validation during the last decade and has proved to be a versatile, safe and valuable tool for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. This review gives an overview of the current state and future perspectives of dermal MD sampling. Methodological issues such as choice of instrumentation, calibration and experimental procedures are discussed along with the analytical considerations necessary for successful sampling. Clinical MD studies in the skin are reviewed with emphasis on pharmacokinetic studies of topically applied drugs with or without impairment of skin barrier function by skin disease or barrier perturbation. A comparison between MD and other tissue sampling techniques reveals the advantages and limitations of the method. Subsequently, an in-depth discussion of the application of MD for the evaluation of bioavailability and bioequivalence of topical formulations is concluded by the current regulatory point of view. The future perspective includes further expansion and validation of the use of MD in the experimental and clinical setting as well as in the optimization of the method for regulatory purposes, i.e. the commercialization of bioequivalent, generic drug products.

The need for fast and continuous measurements in the biomedical field is driving scientists to look for an alternative to blood sampling. This implies the adoption of invasive approaches, which, in some cases, may lead to reduced safety for the patient; consequently this strategy is pursued only if it is unavoidable. Microdialysis-based sensing provides a minimally invasive solution, with biological samples drawn by means of a microdialysis catheter and examined outside the human body. Therefore, it has become a promising approach to investigate the interstitial fluid in human brain and subcutaneous adipose tissue, providing important information on the tissue biochemistry and metabolism. Advantages and limitations of microdialysis are considered here and the applications in the clinical field are described, with the provision of some examples and with a view to the new perspectives in the field. [graphic removed]

The past few years have witnessed remarkable advances in continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG). The indications and applications for cEEG are broadening, including detection of nonconvulsive seizures, spell characterization, and prognostication. Seizures are common in the critically ill, are usually nonconvulsive, and can easily be missed without cEEG. Interpretation and clinical management of the complex periodic and rhythmic EEG patterns commonly identified in these patients require further study. With the use of quantitative analysis techniques, cEEG can detect cerebral ischemia very early, before permanent neuronal injury occurs. This article reviews the indications and recent advances in cEEG in critically ill patients. Continuous brain monitoring with cEEG is rapidly becoming the standard of care in critically ill patients with neurologic impairment.

Assessment of the intestinal circulation in a clinical setting still presents a significant diagnostic challenge. In patients suspected of having intestinal ischemia pre- or postoperatively, there is no clinically relevant marker which can determine whether the bowel is suffering from lack of oxygen or not. Microdialysis is a microinvasive technique that makes it possible to continuously detect tissue-specific metabolic changes. Recently, it has been demonstrated that intestinal ischemia can be detected and monitored continuously by the use of a microdialysis catheter placed in the proximity of the ischemic bowel. This review summarizes the clinical dilemma of intestinal ischemia and the latest experimental results using the microdialysis technique to detect critical perfusion in the small intestine. The possibility of using microdialysis in a clinical setting is outlined with the perspective of using it as a pre- or postoperative monitoring tool in relevant patients.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is followed by secondary injury mechanisms strongly involving neuroinflammation. To monitor the complex inflammatory cascade in human TBI, we used cerebral microdialysis (MD) and multiplex proximity extension assay (PEA) technology and simultaneously measured levels of 92 protein biomarkers of inflammation in MD samples every three hours for five days in 10 patients with severe TBI under neurointensive care. One μL MD samples were incubated with paired oligonucleotide-conjugated antibodies binding to each protein, allowing quantification by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Sixty-nine proteins were suitable for statistical analysis. We found five different patterns with either early (<48 h; e.g., CCL20, IL6, LIF, CCL3), mid (48–96 h; e.g., CCL19, CXCL5, CXCL10, MMP1), late (>96 h; e.g., CD40, MCP2, MCP3), biphasic peaks (e.g., CXCL1, CXCL5, IL8) or stable (e.g., CCL4, DNER, VEGFA)/low trends. High protein levels were observed for e.g., CXCL1, CXCL10, MCP1, MCP2, IL8, while e.g., CCL28 and MCP4 were detected at low levels. Several proteins (CCL8, -19, -20, -23, CXCL1, -5, -6, -9, -11, CST5, DNER, Flt3L, and SIRT2) have not been studied previously in human TBI. Cross-correlation analysis revealed that LIF and CXCL5 may play a central role in the inflammatory cascade. This study provides a unique data set with individual temporal trends for potential inflammatory biomarkers in patients with TBI. We conclude that the combination of MD and PEA is a powerful tool to map the complex inflammatory cascade in the injured human brain. The technique offers new possibilities of protein profiling of complex secondary injury pathways.

Skin microdialysis (SMD) is a versatile sampling technique that can be used to recover soluble endogenous and exogenous molecules from the extracellular compartment of human skin. Due to its minimally invasive character, SMD can be applied in both clinical and preclinical settings. Despite being available since the 1990s, the technique has still not reached its full potential use as a tool to explore pathophysiological mechanisms of allergic and inflammatory reactions in the skin. Therefore, an EAACI Task Force on SMD was formed to disseminate knowledge about the technique and its many applications. This position paper from the task force provides an overview of the current use of SMD in the investigation of the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, chronic urticaria, psoriasis, and in studies of cutaneous events during type 1 hypersensitivity reactions. Furthermore, this paper covers drug hypersensitivity, UVB-induced- and neurogenic inflammation, and drug penetration investigated by SMD. The aim of this paper is to encourage the use of SMD and to make the technique easily accessible by providing an overview of methodology and applications, supported by standardized operating procedures for SMD in vivo and ex vivo.

Neurochemicals, crucial for nervous system function, influence vital bodily processes and their fluctuations are linked to neurodegenerative diseases and mental health conditions. Monitoring these compounds is pivotal, yet the intricate nature of the central nervous system poses challenges. Researchers have devised methods, notably electrochemical sensing with micro-nanoscale electrodes, offering high-resolution monitoring despite low concentrations and rapid changes. Implantable sensors enable precise detection in brain tissues with minimal damage, while microdialysis-coupled platforms allow in vivo sampling and subsequent in vitro analysis, addressing the selectivity issues seen in other methods. While lacking temporal resolution, techniques like HPLC and CE complement electrochemical sensing’s selectivity, particularly for structurally similar neurochemicals. This review covers essential neurochemicals and explores miniaturized electrochemical sensors for brain analysis, emphasizing microdialysis integration. It discusses the pros and cons of these techniques, forecasting electrochemical sensing’s future in neuroscience research. Overall, this comprehensive review outlines the evolution, strengths, and potential applications of electrochemical sensing in the study of neurochemicals, offering insights into future advancements in the field.

•This study dealt with changes of brain tissue chemistry during percutaneous dilative tracheostomy.•Significant disturbancies of cerebral metabolism could be excluded in our study.•Overall glycerol and glutamate did not rise after percutaneous dilative tracheostomy.•We can support the safety of percutaneous dilative tracheostomy in patients with acute brain injury. The purpose of this study was to analyze changes in brain tissue chemistry around percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) in a retrospective single-center analysis. We included 19 patients who had continuous monitoring of brain tissue chemistry and intracranial pressure (ICP) during a 20h period before and after PDT. Different microdialysis parameters (lactate, pyruvate, lactate pyruvate ratio (LPR), glycerol and glutamate) and values of ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and brain tissue oxygenation (PBrO2) were recorded per hour. Mean values were compared between a 10h period before PDT (prePDT) and after PDT (postPDT). Mean values of cerebral lactate, pyruvate, LPR, glycerol and glutamate did not differ significantly between prePDT and postPDT. In addition, the rate of patients, which exceeded the known threshold was similar between prePDT and postPDT. Only one patient showed a strong increase of cerebral glycerol during the postPDT period, but analysis of subcutaneous glycerol could exclude an intracerebral event. ICP, CPP and PBrO2 did not exhibit significant changes. We could exclude the occurrence of cerebral metabolic crisis and the excess release of cerebral glutamate and glycerol in a series of 19 patients. Our results support the safety of PDT in patients with ABI.