Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundLittle is known about the prevalence of a history of cancer and its impact on clinical outcome in mitral regurgitation (MR) patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR).ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of cancer, baseline inflammatory parameters, and clinical outcome in MR patients undergoing TMVR.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing a MitraClip procedure were enrolled, and the patients were stratified into two groups: cancer and non-cancer. Baseline complete blood counts (CBC) with differential hemograms were collected prior to the procedure to calculate the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). All-cause death within a one-year was examined.ResultsIn total, 82 out of 446 patients (18.4%) had a history of cancer. Cancer patients had a significantly higher baseline PLR [181.4 (121.1–263.9) vs. 155.4 (109.4–210.4); P = 0.012] and NLR [5.4 (3.5–8.3) vs. 4.0 (2.9–6.1); P = 0.002] than non-cancer patients. A Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that cancer patients had a significantly worse prognosis than non-cancer (estimated 1-year mortality, 20.2 vs. 9.2%; log-rank P = 0.009), and multivariable analyses of three models showed that cancer history was an independent factor for 1-year mortality. Patients who died during follow-up had a significantly higher baseline PLR [214.2 (124.2–296.7) vs. 156.3 (110.2–212.1); P = 0.007] and NLR [6.4 (4.2–12.5) vs. 4.0 (2.9–6.2); P < 0.001] than survivors.ConclusionsIn MitraClip patients, a history of cancer was associated with higher inflammatory parameters and worse prognosis compared to non-cancer patients.Central Illustration. Clinical outcomes and baseline PLR and NLR values accord-ing to one-year mortality. (Left) Patients who died within the follow-up period had a significantly higher baseline PLR (214.2 [124.2–296.7] vs 156.3 [110.2–212.1]; P = 0.007) and NLR (6.4 [4.2–12.5] vs 4.0 [2.9–6.2]; P < 0.001) than patients who survived. PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (Right) A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that cancer patients had a significantly worse prognosis than non-cancer patients (estimated one-year mortality, 20.2 vs 9.2%; log-rank P = 0.009).

In a randomized trial involving patients undergoing mitral-valve surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation, the addition of tricuspid repair resulted in a lower risk of the primary outcome, a composite of reoperation for tricuspid regurgitation, progression of tricuspid regurgitation, or death. Tricuspid repair resulted in more frequent permanent pacemaker implantation.

Among patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation, transcatheter mitral-valve repair resulted in a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure and lower mortality than medical therapy alone. The goal for freedom from device-related complications was exceeded.

Current treatment recommendations for patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation include transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and mitral-valve surgery. Data from randomized trials comparing these therapies are lacking in this patient population. In this noninferiority trial conducted in Germany, patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation who continued to have symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (intervention group) or surgical mitral-valve repair or replacement (surgery group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, hospitalization for heart failure, mitral-valve reintervention, implantation of an assist device, or stroke within 1 year after the procedure. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure. A total of 210 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 70.5±7.9 years, 39.9% were women, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 43.0±11.7%. Within 1 year, at least one of the components of the primary efficacy end point occurred in 16 of the 96 patients with available data (16.7%) in the intervention group and in 20 of the 89 with available data (22.5%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17 to 6; P<0.001 for noninferiority). A primary safety end-point event occurred in 15 of the 101 patients with available data (14.9%) in the intervention group and in 51 of the 93 patients with available data (54.8%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -40 percentage points; 95% CI, -51 to -27; P<0.001). Among patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was noninferior to mitral-valve surgery with respect to a composite of death, rehospitalization for heart failure, stroke, reintervention, or implantation of an assist device in the left ventricle at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; MATTERHORN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02371512.).

BackgroundThe change in right-ventricular function (RVF) after transcatheter mitral valve repair is still poorly understood. We assessed the early response of RVF to the MitraClip procedure and its clinical relevance.MethodsWe analyzed consecutive patients who underwent a MitraClip procedure to treat MR between August 2010 and March 2019 in the Heart Failure Network Rhineland registry. RVF was assessed before and after the procedure. Impaired RVF was defined as an RV fractional area change (RVFAC) < 35% or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) < 16 mm.Results816 eligible patients (77 ± 9 years, 58.5% male) were included in the analysis. Baseline values of RVF were: RVFAC 38.6 (IQR 29.7–46.7) % and TAPSE 17.0 (IQR 14.0–21.0) mm. At a median time of 3 (IQR 2–5) days after the procedure, the RVF remained normal in 34% (n = 274), normalized in 17% (n = 140), deteriorated in 15% (n = 125), and was persistently impaired in 34% (n = 277) of patients. The RVF response was significantly associated with a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure within a 2-year follow-up. Compared to stable/normal RVF, the adjusted hazard ratios for the outcome were 1.78 (95% CI 1.10–2.86) for normalized RVF, 1.89 (95% CI 1.34–3.15) for deteriorated RVF, and 2.25 (95% CI 1.47–3.44) for persistently impaired RVF. Changes in TAPSE and RVFAC as continuous variables were significantly correlated with the outcome.ConclusionAn early change in RVF following transcatheter mitral valve repair is predictive of mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure during follow-up.Graphic abstractEarly response of RVF after MitraClip and its clinical significance. An acute, early change in RVF can be observed following the MitraClip procedure, which is associated with the risk of mortality and hospitalization for HF.

Transcatheter repair of secondary mitral regurgitation was associated with a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure and lower all-cause mortality than medical therapy at 5 years of follow-up.

Among patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation who were assigned to mitral-valve repair or replacement, there were no significant between-group differences in left ventricular remodeling or mortality at 2 years. Mitral regurgitation recurred more frequently in the repair group. Ischemic mitral regurgitation is a serious consequence of coronary artery disease that carries a substantial risk of death from cardiovascular causes in proportion to its severity. 1 , 2 Ischemic mitral regurgitation is anatomically characterized by remodeling or distortion of left ventricular geometry that ultimately results in papillary-muscle displacement, leaflet tethering, and impaired coaptation. For the subgroup of patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation, the prognosis is grave, with rates of death ranging from 15 to 40% at 1 year. 2 – 4 For patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation, the benefit of surgical revascularization is undisputed, provided that the patient has suitable coronary . . .

This study compared a percutaneous, catheter-based method, in which a clip is placed to approximate the edges of the two mitral-valve leaflets, with conventional surgery. The procedure obviated the need for open-heart surgery in 80% of the patients who received it. Severe mitral regurgitation is associated with progressive left ventricular dysfunction and congestive heart failure. 1 Without intervention, symptomatic patients have an annual rate of death of 5% or more. 1 – 3 Medical management alleviates symptoms but does not alter the progression of the disease. 2 Current guidelines recommend surgery for moderate-to-severe (grade 3+) or severe (4+) mitral regurgitation in patients with symptoms or evidence of left ventricular dysfunction. 4 – 6 One surgical approach for mitral-valve repair involves approximation of the mitral leaflets with suture to create a double orifice. 7 – 9 This procedure has been described for treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation and is usually . . .

After 2 years of follow-up in a randomized trial involving 301 patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing CABG, the addition of mitral-valve repair did not improve left ventricular function or remodeling. Ischemic mitral regurgitation of moderate severity develops in approximately 10% of patients after myocardial infarction. 1 , 2 Mitral regurgitation is caused by the displacement of papillary muscle, leaflet tethering, reduced closing forces, and annular dilatation. Over time, the condition has an adverse effect on the rate of survival free of heart failure. 3 Because most patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have multivessel coronary artery disease requiring revascularization, surgeons have to consider whether to add mitral-valve repair to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). The appropriate surgical management of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation at the time of CABG remains controversial. Some experts advocate revascularization alone . . .

This clinical trial compared mitral-valve repair with replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. There were no significant between-group differences in left ventricular remodeling and clinical outcomes, but replacement was associated with more durable correction. Functional ischemic mitral regurgitation affects 1.6 million to 2.8 million patients in the United States and is associated with a doubling in mortality among patients with mild or greater degrees of mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction. 1 – 3 Ischemic mitral regurgitation is a consequence of adverse left ventricular remodeling after myocardial injury with enlargement of the left ventricular chamber and mitral annulus, apical and lateral migration of the papillary muscles, leaflet tethering, and reduced closing forces. These processes lead to malcoaptation of the leaflets and variable degrees of mitral regurgitation that can fluctuate dynamically as a function of volume status, afterload, . . .