Explore the vast range of titles available.

This study investigated the return-to-work (RTW) rates and associated factors following endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (eTSS) among patients with pituitary and hypothalamic tumors in Japan. The primary research question aimed to determine the variables affecting early RTW post-surgery. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 44 preoperatively employed patients who underwent eTSS at a single center between April 2018 and January 2025. Clinical data, including demographics, tumor characteristics, comorbidities, and perioperative variables, were extracted from the medical records. The primary outcome was RTW within 3 months of surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using t-tests and Fisher’s exact tests. The median time to RTW was 5 weeks, and the RTW rates were 38.6%, 69.5%, and 75.0% at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, with an overall RTW rate of 84.1%. Factors such as a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), mental disorders, and the absence of prior TSS were significantly linked to delayed RTW at 3 months. Mental disorders also tended to decrease RTW at 6 months. No significant associations were found between adequate hormone replacement and age, sex, tumor type, or endocrinological dysfunction. Patients receiving multidisciplinary support for RTW tended to experience longer recovery periods, possibly reflecting a greater need. In patients undergoing eTSS for pituitary region tumors, a history of mental disorders, prolonged LOS, and no history of prior TSS were key factors could be associated with delayed RTW. Early identification of these factors may facilitate tailored multidisciplinary RTW support strategies.

Malnourished older inpatients referred to a nutrition support team (NST) usually receive multidisciplinary oral health management during NST intervention. However, the effects of multidisciplinary oral health management on the nutrition-intake method and oral health in these patients remain unclear. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate the effects of NST-mediated multidisciplinary oral health management on the nutrition-intake methods, oral health, and the systemic and oral factors influencing the changes in the nutrition-intake method. A total of 117 inpatients (66 men, 51 women, mean age, 71.9 ± 12.5 years) who underwent NST-mediated multidisciplinary oral health management between April 2016 and July 2019 were enrolled. Demographic data and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS), and Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) scores at the time of referral to the NST and completion of the NST intervention were evaluated. After multidisciplinary NST intervention, FOIS, DSS, and OHAT scores showed significant improvements (p < 0.001). Even after adjusting the results for systemic parameters, FOIS score improvement correlated positively with the length of NST intervention (p = 0.030) and DSS score improvement (p < 0.001) as well as OHAT score improvement (p = 0.047). NST interventions with multidisciplinary oral health management could improve the nutrition-intake method.

This study aims to identify the background factors and experiences of patients with cancer with eating-related problems who require nutrition counselling. Using a mixed-methods approach, this secondary analysis study was conducted on patients with head and neck, oesophageal, gastric, colorectal, or lung cancers who were receiving outpatient chemotherapy. They completed a questionnaire measuring nutrition impact symptoms, eating-related distress, and quality of life (QOL). Patients who required nutrition counselling were interviewed to identify the specific issues they experienced. We reported on nutritional status and nutrition impact symptoms in a previous study. Of the 151 participants, 42 required nutrition counselling. Background factors associated with nutrition counselling were related to the following psychosocial variables: small number of people in the household, undergoing treatment while working, low QOL, and eating-related distress. Four themes were extracted from the specific issues experienced by patients: motivation for self-management, distress from symptoms, seeking understanding and sympathy, and anxiety and confusion. The desire for nutrition counselling was attributable to ‘anxiety caused by the symptoms’ and ‘confusion about the information on eating’. Healthcare professionals should promote multidisciplinary collaboration after considering the factors associated with the required nutrition counselling to provide nutritional support.

•Two thirds of hospitals systematically implement some nutritional screening tool.•Most used nutritional screening tools are NRS 2002 (Nutrition Risk Screening) and NUTRIC Score (Nutrition risk in critically ill).•Nutritional evaluations most used are anthropometry and SGA (Subjective Global Assessment).•Prevalence of malnutrition at admission shows expected values, yet lower than that described in other reports from Latin America.•A low percentage of hospitals count on multidisciplinary nutritional support.•Low use of oral nutritional supplements. We describe the status of medical nutrition therapy in adult patients in several hospitals in Latin America in 2023. with the aim of deepening understanding of its implementation and thus, in turn, contributing to the advancement of future guidelines. This is a descriptive, multicenter, cross-sectional study. An electronic questionnaire was applied, containing screening, nutritional therapy, multidisciplinary nutritional support, and monitoring indicators. Descriptive statistics were used in data processing. A total of 132 hospitals from 14 Latin American countries participated; 68.2% were state-owned with a median of 23,804 patients. In 66% of hospitals (n = 87) nutritional screening is systematically implemented; NRS-2002 (n = 66; 75.9%) applied mostly by dietitians. Median malnutrition at admission was 33% (IQR = 30.8). Median indication for diet therapy was 54.4% (IQR = 44.3); oral supplementation 13.6% (IQR = 18), and enteral and parenteral nutritional support 14.6% (IQR = 10.2). Indication is carried out mostly by dietitians (n = 78; 59.1%). 29.5% (n = 39) of hospitals count on multidisciplinary nutritional support. 75% (n = 99) use industrialized formulas, mostly in closed systems (n = 53; 40.2%). For parenteral nutrition, individually compounded and preprepared solutions are used (n = 71; 53.8%) generally administered by central catheters. Most frequently cited monitoring indicators were hemodynamic instability, metabolic complications, abdominal distension, and gastric residue. There are still low implementation percentages of nutritional screening, formation of nutritional therapy teams, and use of oral supplements. Malnutrition upon admission is within the expected range.

To assess the effect of multidisciplinary nutritional support for undernutrition in older adults in nursing home and home-care identified with the validated Eating Validation Scheme (EVS). An 11 wk cluster randomized trial with a home-care (3 clusters) or nursing home (3 clusters) setting as the unit of randomization. Before starting the study, a train-the-trainer course was performed to educate the nutrition coordinators. In addition to the nutrition coordinator, the participants assigned to the intervention group strategy received multidisciplinary nutrition support. Focus was on treatment of the potentially modifiable nutritional risk factors identified with the EVS, by involving the physiotherapist, registered dietitian, and occupational therapist, as relevant and independent of the municipality's ordinary assessment and referral system. Outcome parameters were quality of life (by means of EuroQol-5D-3L), physical performance (30-seconds chair stand), nutritional status (weight and hand-grip strength), oral care, fall incidents, hospital admissions, rehabilitation stay, moving to nursing homes (participants from home-care), and mortality. Respectively, 55 (46 from 2 home-care clusters) and 40 (18 from 1 home-care cluster) were identified with the EVS and comprised the intervention and control group. A difference after 11 wk in quality of life (0.758 [0.222] versus 0.534 [0.355], P = 0.001), 30-seconds chair stand (47% versus 17% improved, P = 0.005) and oral care (1.1 [0.3] versus 1.3 [0.5], P = 0.021) was observed. There was a almost significant difference in mortality (2% versus 13%, P = 0.079). Multidisciplinary nutritional support in older adults in nursing home and home-care could have a positive effect on quality of life, muscle strength, and oral care. •Multidisciplinary nutritional support in Danish older adults in nursing home and home to care has a positive effect on quality of life, muscle strength, and oral care.•The multidisciplinary nutritional support was well-accepted by elderly participants.•The study contributes significantly to the knowledge about nutritional interventions among home-care clients.

Background Multimorbidity management can be extremely challenging in patients with dementia. This study aimed to elucidate the approaches of primary care physicians in Japan and the United States (US) in managing multimorbidity for patients with dementia and discuss the challenges involved. Methods This qualitative study was conducted through one-on-one semi-structured interviews among primary care physicians, 24 each from Japan and Michigan, US. Thematic and content analyses were performed to explore similarities and differences among each country’s data. Results Primary care physicians in Japan and Michigan applied a relaxed adherence to the guidelines for patients’ chronic conditions. Common challenges were the suboptimal consultation time, the insufficient number or ability of care-coordinating professionals, patients’ conditions such as difficulties with self-management, living alone, behavioral issues, and refusal of care support. Unique challenges in Japan were free-access medical systems and not being sure about the patients’ will in end-of-life care. In Michigan, physicians faced challenges in distance and lack of transportation between clinics and patients’ homes and in cases where patients lacked the financial ability to acquire good care. Conclusions To improve the quality of care for patients with multimorbidity and dementia, physicians would benefit from optimal time and compensation allocated for this patient group, guidelines for chronic conditions to include information regarding changing priority for older adults with dementia, and the close collaboration of medical and social care and community resources with support of skilled care-coordinating professionals.

With the focus of care shifting from the hospital to the community, supportive nutritional care to old people is to become an important issue to address in the community, since undernutrition has serious consequences, both for the quality of life and for the health care costs. Several modifiable nutritional risk factors relate to undernutrition. Unfortunately, the problem with (risk of) undernutrition is aggravated due to a lack of alertness among e.g. health care staff, leading to insufficient attention for systemic screening and nutritional care. Only a few of the existing screening tools have been validated among old people receiving support at home. Few studies have assessed the beneficial effect of nutritional support among old people in their own home, and recently, it was concluded that such have shown limited effects. One reason may be that the nutritional interventions performed have not taken the multiple nutritional risk factors afore-mentioned into consideration when formulating the action/treatment plan and hence not used a multidisciplinary approach. Another reason may be that the intervention studies have not used validated screening tools to identify those old people most likely to benefit from the nutritional support. However, three recent studies have used a multidisciplinary approach and two have proven a beneficial effect on the quality of life of the old people and the health care costs. These findings suggest that when planning nutritional intervention studies for old people receiving support at home, modifiable nutritional risk factors should be taken into consideration, and a multidisciplinary approach considered.

Abstract A young man with Duchenne muscular dystrophy presented to the UT Southwestern Neuromuscular Cardiomyopathy Clinic with advanced heart failure. Despite maximal medical therapy, his cardiac function continued to decline requiring initiation of inotrope therapy. Given the patient's clinical deterioration, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted as destination therapy after undergoing a multidisciplinary assessment. The patient tolerated the surgical implantation of the LVAD without any significant complications, and he has had a relatively unremarkable course 38 months post-LVAD implantation. A critical factor contributing to the long-term success of this patient was the decision to select an LVAD that would not disrupt the diaphragm and thus preserve the respiratory muscle strength. This case demonstrates that permanent mechanical LVADs should be considered for appropriately selected Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients with medically refractory end-stage cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Older adults in nursing home and home-care are a particularly high-risk population for weight loss or poor nutrition. One negative consequence of undernutrition is increased health care costs. Several potentially modifiable nutritional risk factors increase the likelihood of weight loss or poor nutrition. Hence a structured and multidisciplinary approach, focusing on the nutritional risk factors and involving e.g. dieticians, occupational therapists, and physiotherapist, may be necessary to achieve benefits. Up till now a few studies have been done evaluating the cost-effectiveness of nutritional support among undernourished older adults and none of these have used such a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS: An 11 week cluster randomized trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary nutritional support for undernutrition in older adults in nursing home and home-care, identified by screening with the Eating validation Scheme. Before start of the study there will be performed a train-the-trainer intervention involving educated nutrition coordinators. In addition to the nutrition coordinator, the participants assigned to the intervention group strategy will receive multidisciplinary nutrition support. Focus will be on treatment of the potentially modifiable nutritional risk factors identified by screening, by involving physiotherapist, registered dietician, and occupational therapist, as relevant and independent of the municipality’s ordinary assessment and referral system. The primary outcome parameter will be change in quality of life (by means of Euroquol-5D-3L). Secondary outcomes will be: physical performance (chair stand), nutritional status (weight, Body Mass Index and hand-grip strength), oral care, fall incidents, hospital admissions, rehabilitation stay, moving to nursing homes (for participants from home-care), use of social services and mortality. An economic evaluation will be conducted to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the multidisciplinary support. Furthermore, interviews with nursing home and home-care management, nursing staff and nutrition coordinators in both the control and intervention groups, participants in the intervention group and the involved multidisciplinary team will be performed. CONCLUSION: In this study we will evaluate in a randomized controlled trial whether multidisciplinary nutritional support is cost-effective, in undernourished older adults in home-care and nursing home and contribute to important research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov 2013 NCT01873456 .

Large Language Models have demonstrated expert-level accuracy on medical board examinations, suggesting potential for clinical decision support systems. However, their metacognitive abilities, crucial for medical decision-making, remain largely unexplored. To address this gap, we developed MetaMedQA, a benchmark incorporating confidence scores and metacognitive tasks into multiple-choice medical questions. We evaluated twelve models on dimensions including confidence-based accuracy, missing answer recall, and unknown recall. Despite high accuracy on multiple-choice questions, our study revealed significant metacognitive deficiencies across all tested models. Models consistently failed to recognize their knowledge limitations and provided confident answers even when correct options were absent. In this work, we show that current models exhibit a critical disconnect between perceived and actual capabilities in medical reasoning, posing significant risks in clinical settings. Our findings emphasize the need for more robust evaluation frameworks that incorporate metacognitive abilities, essential for developing reliable Large Language Model enhanced clinical decision support systems. Large Language Models demonstrate expert-level accuracy in medical exams, supporting their potential inclusion in healthcare settings. Here, authors reveal that their metacognitive abilities are underexplored, showing significant gaps in recognizing knowledge limitations, difficulties in modulating their confidence, and challenges in identifying when a problem cannot be answered due to insufficient information.