Explore the vast range of titles available.

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease associated with several autoantibodies that attack the neuromuscular junction. Some cases are associated with thymoma. The hallmark of management is individualized immunosuppressive therapy. Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease in which antibodies bind to acetylcholine receptors or to functionally related molecules in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. The antibodies induce weakness of skeletal muscles, which is the sole disease manifestation. 1 – 3 The weakness can be generalized or localized, is more proximal than distal, and nearly always includes eye muscles, with diplopia and ptosis. 2 The pattern of involvement is usually symmetric, apart from the eye involvement, which is often markedly asymmetric and involves several eye muscles. The weakness typically increases with exercise and repetitive muscle use (fatigue) and varies over the course . . .

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease that is characterised by muscle weakness and fatigue, is B-cell mediated, and is associated with antibodies directed against the acetylcholine receptor, muscle-specific kinase (MUSK), lipoprotein-related protein 4 (LRP4), or agrin in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with myasthenia gravis should be classified into subgroups to help with therapeutic decisions and prognosis. Subgroups based on serum antibodies and clinical features include early-onset, late-onset, thymoma, MUSK, LRP4, antibody-negative, and ocular forms of myasthenia gravis. Agrin-associated myasthenia gravis might emerge as a new entity. The prognosis is good with optimum symptomatic, immunosuppressive, and supportive treatment. Pyridostigmine is the preferred symptomatic treatment, and for patients who do not adequately respond to symptomatic therapy, corticosteroids, azathioprine, and thymectomy are first-line immunosuppressive treatments. Additional immunomodulatory drugs are emerging, but therapeutic decisions are hampered by the scarcity of controlled studies. Long-term drug treatment is essential for most patients and must be tailored to the particular form of myasthenia gravis.

In patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis, thymectomy plus prednisone was associated with better clinical outcomes than prednisone alone. Patients treated with thymectomy had fewer hospitalizations for exacerbations and required lower prednisone doses. The first reported use of thymectomy in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis was 75 years ago. 1 Of six patients who underwent surgery, three had a favorable response. Subsequent retrospective studies have shown benefits of thymectomy in patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis but with widely varying rates of clinical improvement or remission. A compilation of retrospective studies comparing surgery with medical management did not show a difference in remission rates. 2 Two studies that showed clinical improvements after thymectomy indicated that benefit occurred in the first few years after the procedure, but after 5 years, rates of clinical improvement were similar among . . .

Key Points The characteristic muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by antibodies directed against the neuromuscular junction MG is divided into subgroups on the basis of specific antibodies, other biomarkers, and clinical characteristics, such as age of onset, presence of thymoma, and involvement of ocular muscles The most common antibodies detected in MG are antibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChRs), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4) Additional antibodies of interest in MG are directed against agrin, titin, K V 1.4, ryanodine receptors, collagen Q, and cortactin Therapy should be tailored to the individual patient and guided by MG subgroup, and can include symptomatic drug therapy, immunosuppressive drug therapy, thymectomy and/or supportive therapy The aim of treatment should be normal or near-normal function, which in most patients requires long-term immunosuppressive treatment with a drug combination that is individualized for the patient for optimal effectiveness The characteristic muscle weakness in myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by antibodies against target molecules the neuromuscular junction. Here, Nils Gilhus and colleagues review how these antibodies and other biomarkers can be used to guide MG subgroup classification and treatment, as well as the best tests to detect these antibodies. Moreover, they discuss how the various antibodies are involved in MG pathogenesis. Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder caused by autoantibodies that target the neuromuscular junction, leading to muscle weakness and fatigability. Currently available treatments for the disease include symptomatic pharmacological treatment, immunomodulatory drugs, plasma exchange, thymectomy and supportive therapies. Different autoantibody patterns and clinical manifestations characterize different subgroups of the disease: early-onset MG, late-onset MG, thymoma MG, muscle-specific kinase MG, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 MG, seronegative MG, and ocular MG. These subtypes differ in terms of clinical characteristics, disease pathogenesis, prognosis and response to therapies. Patients would, therefore, benefit from treatment that is tailored to their disease subgroup, as well as other possible disease biomarkers, such as antibodies against cytoplasmic muscle proteins. Here, we discuss the different MG subtypes, the sensitivity and specificity of the various antibodies involved in MG for distinguishing between these subtypes, and the value of antibody assays in guiding optimal therapy. An understanding of these elements should be useful in determining how to adapt existing therapies to the requirements of each patient.

Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is categorized into several subgroups, including seronegative MG. Seronegative human patients are well documented, but seronegative dogs remain clinically uncharacterized and their prevalence unknown. Objectives This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of canine MG subgroups. Animals One hundred sixty‐seven owner‐owned dogs diagnosed with MG from three referral centers. Methods Retrospective case series. We classified myasthenic dogs into subgroups, adhering to human guidelines. Results We classified 167 dogs into four subgroups: acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody‐positive generalized (49.7%, n = 83/167), focal (19.2%, n = 32/167) and thymoma‐associated MG (9%, n = 15/167) and seronegative MG (22.2%, n = 37/167). Dogs with thymoma‐associated MG were older (median 102 months; Interquartile Range (IQR) 96–120; p < 0.001) and seronegative dogs were younger (median 30 months; IQR 11.5–66; p = 0.017), compared to the generalized subgroup (median 67 months; IQR 36–96). Seronegative dogs presented less frequently with megaesophagus, compared to the generalized subgroup (63.8% vs. 85.7%; Odds Ratio 3.4; 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 1.4–8.9; p = 0.025). Myasthenic dogs' survival time was significantly reduced when thymoma (Hazard Ratio (H.R.) 3.7; 95% C.I. 1.4–9.9; p = 0.028) or esophageal weakness (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 2.0–7.0; p < 0.001) was present. Conversely, a higher likelihood of remission was achieved when esophageal weakness was absent (H.R. 3.8; 95% C.I. 1.4–10.0; p = 0.007). Conclusion and Clinical Importance Dogs with seronegative MG are more common than previously reported. Myasthenic subgroups differ in presentation and outcome, with esophageal weakness key to survival and remission. Diagnostic tests for seronegative dogs and effective treatments for esophageal weakness in myasthenic dogs are urgently needed.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by antibodies which attack receptors at the neuromuscular junction. One of the main difficulties in predicting the clinical course of MG is the heterogeneity of the disease, where disease progression differs greatly depending on the subgroup that the patient is classified into. MG subgroups are classified according to: age of onset [early-onset MG (EOMG; onset ≤ 50 years) late-onset MG (LOMG; onset > 50 years]; the presence of a thymoma (thymoma-associated MG); antibody subtype [acetylcholine receptor antibody seropositive (AChR+) and muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibody seropositive (MuSK+)]; as well as clinical subtypes (ocular generalized MG). The diagnostic tests for MG, such as antibody titers, neurophysiological tests, and objective clinical fatigue score, do not necessarily reflect disease progression. Hence, there is a great need for reliable objective biomarkers in MG to follow the disease course as well as the individualized response to therapy toward personalized medicine. In this regard, circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as promising potential biomarkers due to their accessibility in body fluids and unique profiles in different diseases, including autoimmune disorders. Several studies on circulating miRNAs in MG subtypes have revealed specific miRNA profiles in patients' sera. In generalized AChR+ EOMG, miR-150-5p and miR-21-5p are the most elevated miRNAs, with lower levels observed upon treatment with immunosuppression and thymectomy. In AChR+ generalized LOMG, the miR-150-5p, miR-21-5p, and miR-30e-5p levels are elevated and decrease in accordance with the clinical response after immunosuppression. In ocular MG, higher levels of miR-30e-5p discriminate patients who will later generalize from those remaining ocular. In contrast, in MuSK+ MG, the levels of the let-7 miRNA family members are elevated. Studies of circulating miRNA profiles in Lrp4 or agrin antibody-seropositive MG are still lacking. This review summarizes the present knowledge of circulating miRNAs in different subgroups of MG.

The 2 main subgroups of autoimmune myasthenia gravis, a neuromuscular junction disorder associated with muscle weakness, are early- and late-onset forms, defined by onset before or after 50 years of age. Both carry acetylcholine-receptor autoantibodies but differ in sex ratios, genetics, and occurrence of disease-specific thymus inflammation. To distinguish the 2 forms by cellular immune phenotyping, we applied multimodal techniques, including deep spectral cytometric phenotyping and single-cell sequencing. Analysis of 2 independent cohorts identified immunological differences driven by 3 main lymphocyte populations. Lower frequencies of mucosa-associated invariant T cells and naive CD8+ T cells were observed in late-onset myasthenia, suggesting enhanced immune senescence. A highly differentiated, canonical NK cell population was reduced in early-onset myasthenia and negatively correlated with the degree of thymic hyperplasia. Using only the frequency of these 3 populations, correct myasthenia subgroup assignment could be predicted with 90% accuracy. These distinct immunocellular endophenotypes for early- and late-onset disease suggest differences in immunopathogenic processes. Along with demographic factors and other disease subgroup-specific features, the frequency of the identified cell subpopulations may improve clinical classification.

Study objectives: Minimal-access thymectomy has become increasingly popular as surgical treatment for patients with nonthymomatous myasthenia gravis (NTMG) because of its comparable efficacy, safety, and lesser degree of tissue trauma compared with conventional open surgery. We reviewed and analyzed our data on video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) thymectomy and present the clinical outcomes according to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America classification. Design: A retrospective review of VATS thymectomy for NTMG in a university hospital over a 12-year period. Data were collected from the medical records and supplemented with telephone surveys. The impact of surgery and other variables potentially affecting complete stable remission (CSR) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves; comparisons between survival curves was performed using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 38 consecutive patients underwent VATS thymectomy for NTMG. Median postoperative stay was 3 days. Pathologic examination revealed thymic hyperplasia in 61.1% of cases, normal thymus in 22.2%, and thymic atrophy in 16.6%. There was no perioperative mortality; complications occurred in four patients. After a median follow-up of 69 months, 91.6% of patients experienced improvement, with crude CSR achieved in 22.2%. Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a 75% CSR rate at 10-year follow-up. On univariate analysis, only disease duration ≤ 12 months (p = 0.03) was associated with a statistically significant improvement in CSR. Conclusions: VATS thymectomy for NTMG results in symptomatic improvement in the vast majority of patients, with a high rate of CSR. The procedure is associated with low morbidity and no perioperative mortality. Future studies on thymectomy for myasthenia gravis should be reported in a standardized manner to allow accurate comparisons between results in the absence of randomized prospective trials.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease associated with antibodies directed to the postsynaptic muscle components of the neuromuscular junction. The heterogeneous nature of the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody response had led to the categorization of AChR antibodies into 3 types: binding, blocking, and modulating antibodies. The purpose of this study is to compare the AChR antibodies’ type with the clinical severity of MG patients. The patients enrolled in the study had been tested for both binding and blocking antibodies and had disease duration exceeding 2 years since diagnosis. The patients were divided into five main classes by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America clinical classification. Again, the enrolled patients were divided into ocular and generalized group. We compared the type and titer of antibodies and the thymus status between the ocular and generalized group. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 16 patients (47 %) had both blocking and binding AChR antibodies, 11 patients (31 %) had only binding antibodies, and 8 patients (22 %) had only blocking antibodies. By defined clinical classification, the ocular and generalized groups included 10 and 25 patients, respectively. Sixteen patients in the generalized group possessed both AChR antibodies, with the remaining patients displaying only the binding antibody. All the patients with only blocking antibody were classified into ocular group. Use of binding and blocking antibodies’ tests may, therefore, be more helpful in predicting the prognosis and diagnoses of MG patient.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular transmission disorder where well-defined autoantibodies against muscle and muscle cell membrane molecules are directly pathogenetic. All MG patients should be defined for subtype, as such a subclassification has treatment consequences. Ocular MG, early-onset MG, late-onset MG, MG with thymoma, MG with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies and MG with no defined antibodies constitute the six MG categories. The MG diagnostic process includes neurophysiology, neuroimmunology, neuropharmacology and imaging. In addition to symptomatic therapy with acetylcholine esterase inhibitors, most patients need thymectomy and/or immunosuppressive drugs. Today's treatment is not immunospecific and far from antigen-specific, even if the pathogenesis is known in detail. Strategies for acetylcholine receptor tolerance induction, manipulating acetylcholine receptor antigen presentation or suppressing acetylcholine receptor-specific B-cells or plasma cells work in experimental MG, but have not yet been attempted properly for the human disease, or they do not work. Apart from the 10-15% of patients with paraneoplastic MG, the cause of the disease is not known. Until curative or antigen-specific therapy become available, the well-established treatment gives good-to-excellent results in most patients, with acceptable quality of life and no increased mortality. Acute and intensive care treatment during MG exacerbation is a cornerstone in the treatment.