Search Results Heading

MBRLSearchResults

mbrl.module.common.modules.added.book.to.shelf
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
    Done
    Filters
    Reset
  • Discipline
      Discipline
      Clear All
      Discipline
  • Is Peer Reviewed
      Is Peer Reviewed
      Clear All
      Is Peer Reviewed
  • Item Type
      Item Type
      Clear All
      Item Type
  • Subject
      Subject
      Clear All
      Subject
  • Year
      Year
      Clear All
      From:
      -
      To:
  • More Filters
      More Filters
      Clear All
      More Filters
      Source
    • Language
538 result(s) for "Myeloproliferative Disorders - diagnosis"
Sort by:
A randomized study of pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence
RBC-transfusion dependence is common in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of RBC-transfusion independence after therapy with pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence. Two hundred and fifty-two subjects (intent-to-treat (ITT) population) including 229 subjects confirmed by central review (modified ITT population) were randomly assigned (2:1) to pomalidomide or placebo. Trialists and subjects were blinded to treatment allocation. Primary end point was proportion of subjects achieving RBC-transfusion independence within 6 months. One hundred and fifty-two subjects received pomalidomide and 77 placebo. Response rates were 16% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11, 23%) vs 16% (8, 26%; P =0.87). Response in the pomalidomide cohort was associated with ⩽4 U RBC/28 days (odds ratio (OR)=3.1; 0.9, 11.1), age ⩽65 (OR=2.3; 0.9, 5.5) and type of MPN-associated myelofibrosis (OR=2.6; 0.7, 9.5). Responses in the placebo cohort were associated with ⩽4 U RBC/28 days (OR=8.6; 0.9, 82.3), white blood cell at randomization >25 × 10 9 /l (OR=4.9; 0.8, 28.9) and interval from diagnosis to randomization >2 years (OR=4.9; 1.1, 21.9). Pomalidomide was associated with increased rates of oedema and neutropenia but these adverse effects were manageable. Pomalidomide and placebo had similar RBC-transfusion-independence response rates in persons with MPN-associated RBC-transfusion dependence.
Pomalidomide in myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis
Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis is a MPN characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Pomalidomide, an immune-modifying drug, is reported to improve anaemia and thrombocytopenia in some patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis. We designed a phase 2 study of pomalidomide in patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. Subjects received pomalidomide 2.0 mg/day in cohort 1 ( n =38) or 0.5 mg/day in cohort 2 ( n =58). Prednisolone was added if there was no response after 3 months in cohort 1 and based on up-front randomization in cohort 2 if there was no response at 3 or 6 months. Response rates were 39% (95% confidence interval (CI), 26–55%) in cohort 1 and 24% (95% CI, 15–37%) in cohort 2. In a multivariable logistic regression model pomalidomide at 2.0 mg/day (odds ratio (OR), 2.62; 95% CI, 1.00–6.87; P =0.05) and mutated TET2 (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.16–22.17; P =0.03) were significantly associated with responses. Median duration of responses was 13.0 months (range 0.9–52.7). There was no significant difference in response rates or duration in subjects receiving or not receiving prednisolone. Clinical trial MPNSG 01-09 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00949364) and clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT Number: 2009-010738-23)
Diagnostic Techniques in Hematological Malignancies
The diagnosis and monitoring of hematological malignancies is complex and requires a systematic approach. Morphology, cell phenotyping, cytogenetics and molecular genetics are essential, and the results must be integrated. Diagnostic Techniques in Hematological Malignancies details the principles and applications of each of these test types in the diagnosis of hematological malignancies in blood and bone marrow. The first section describes the test modalities – including methodological principles, data interpretation and limitations – and is illustrated by clinical examples. The second section focuses on the clinical entities, detailing the most appropriate tests for diagnosis, staging and monitoring of different hematological malignancies and includes test utilization to identify prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets. With contributions from multiple international experts, this illustrated book is an essential resource for qualified and trainee hematologists, oncologists, and pathologists. It's a practical and useful guide, providing a rational and structured approach to the laboratory assessment of hematological malignancies.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thrombosis and bleeding at diagnosis of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms
Background Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell clonal diseases. Most patients with MPN are asymptomatic at diagnosis although some of them suffer from constitutional symptoms. Thrombosis and bleeding can also be one of the initial manifestations although the reported prevalence varied considerably across the studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to better understand the prevalence and characteristics of thrombosis and bleeding among patients with newly-diagnosed MPN. Methods Using a search strategy that included the terms for myeloproliferative neoplasms, thrombosis, and bleeding, two investigators independently searched for published articles indexed in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to August 2018. The pooled prevalence was calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird random-effects model with a double arcsine transformation. Results A total of 29 cohort studies (8 prospective and 21 retrospective) with 13,436 patients with MPN were included into this meta-analysis. At diagnosis, the pooled prevalence of overall thrombosis among patients with MPN was 20.0% (95% CI, 16.6–23.8%; I 2 96%), with the pooled prevalence of arterial thrombosis of 16.2% (95% CI, 13.0–20.0%; I 2 95%) and the pooled prevalence of venous thrombosis of 6.2% (95% CI, 4.9–7.8%; I 2 89%). Common thrombotic events included cerebrovascular disease/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease, and deep venous thrombosis. The pooled prevalence of hemorrhagic complications among patients who were newly diagnosed with MPN patients was 6.2% (95% CI, 5.0–7.8%; I 2 85%). Common sites of bleeding included gastrointestinal, mucosal, and cutaneous bleeding. Conclusions Thrombosis and bleeding are common initial manifestations of MPN. Investigations for MPN should be considered for patients who present with unexplained thrombosis or abnormal bleeding.
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
The myeloproliferative disorders, comprising polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and myelofibrosis, are clonal hematopoietic cancers that have an indolent course. The clinical manifestations of these entities overlap, as do their genetic drivers. The myeloproliferative neoplasms — polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and primary myelofibrosis — are unique hematopoietic stem-cell disorders that share mutations that constitutively activate the physiologic signal-transduction pathways responsible for hematopoiesis (Table 1). Consequently, these disorders engage in phenotypic mimicry among themselves, as well as with myeloid neoplasms and even benign hematopoietic disorders. In contrast to the myeloid neoplasms, the myeloproliferative neoplasms have a natural history, with supportive care alone, that is usually measured in decades rather than years. 1 However, a facade of benign myeloproliferation masks a clone of transformed hematopoietic stem cells capable of expansion and transformation to an aggressive . . .
An overview on CALR and CSF3R mutations and a proposal for revision of WHO diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms
Disease-specific mutations facilitate diagnostic precision and drug target discovery. In myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), this is best exemplified by the chronic myeloid leukemia-associated BCR-ABL1 . No other mutation in MPN has thus far shown a similar degree of diagnostic accuracy or therapeutic relevance. However, JAK2 and KIT mutations are detected in more than 90% of patients with polycythemia vera and systemic mastocytosis, respectively, and are therefore used as highly sensitive clonal markers in these diseases. JAK2 and MPL mutations also occur in essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF), but their diagnostic value is limited by suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. The molecular diagnostic gap in JAK2/MPL -unmutated ET/PMF is now partially addressed by the recent discovery of calreticulin ( CALR ) mutations in the majority of such cases. However, bone marrow morphology remains the central diagnostic platform and is essential for distinguishing ET from prefibrotic PMF and diagnosing patients those do not express JAK2 , MPL or CALR (triple-negative). The year 2013 was also marked by the description of CSF3R mutations in the majority of patients with chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL). Herein, we argue for the inclusion of CALR and CSF3R mutations in the World Health Organization classification system for ET/PMF and CNL, respectively.
Advances in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms
Abstract The myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) category includes a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by the co-occurrence of clinical and pathologic features of both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms. The recently published International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms revised the entities included in the MDS/MPN category as well as criteria for their diagnosis. In addition to the presence of one or more increased peripheral blood cell counts as evidence of myeloproliferative features, concomitant cytopenia as evidence of ineffective hematopoiesis is now an explicit requirement to diagnose the diseases included in this category. The increasing availability of modern gene sequencing has allowed better understanding of the biologic characteristics of these myeloid neoplasms. The presence of specific mutations in the appropriate clinicopathologic context is now included in the diagnostic criteria for some of MDS/MPN entities. In this review, we highlight what has changed in the diagnostic criteria of MDS/MPN from the WHO 2016 classification while providing practical guidance in diagnosing these diseases.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have a significant impact on patients’ overall health and productivity: the MPN Landmark survey
Background The Philadelphia chromosome−negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) myelofibrosis (MF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET) negatively affect patient quality of life (QoL) and are associated with increased risk of mortality. Methods The MPN Landmark survey was conducted from May to July 2014 in patients with MF, PV, or ET under active management in the United States. The survey assessed respondent perceptions of disease burden and treatment management and included questions on overall disease burden, QoL, activities of daily living, and work productivity. Outcomes were further analyzed by calculated (ie, not respondent-reported) prognostic risk score and symptom severity quartile. Results The survey was completed by 813 respondents (MF, n  = 207; PV, n  = 380; ET, n  = 226). The median respondent age in each of the 3 MPN subtypes ranged from 62 to 66 years; median disease duration was 4 to 7 years. Many respondents reported that they had experienced MPN-related symptoms ≥1 year before diagnosis (MF, 49 %; PV, 61 %; ET, 58 %). Respondents also reported that MPN-related symptoms reduced their QoL, including respondents with low prognostic risk scores (MF, 67 %; PV, 62 %; ET, 57 %) and low symptom severity (MF, 51 %; PV, 33 %; ET, 15 %). Many respondents, including those with a low prognostic risk score, reported that their MPN had caused them to cancel planned activities or call in sick to work at least once in the preceding 30 days (cancel planned activities: MF, 56 %; PV, 35 %; ET, 35 %; call in sick: MF, 40 %; PV, 21 %; ET, 23 %). Conclusions These findings of the MPN Landmark survey support previous research about the symptom burden experienced by patients with MPNs and are the first to detail the challenges that patients with MPNs experience related to reductions in activities of daily living and work productivity.
Fedratinib, a newly approved treatment for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis
Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) is characterized by cytopenias, marrow fibrosis, constitutional symptoms, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, and shortened survival. Constitutive activation of the janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway in MF leads to cell proliferation, inhibition of cell death, and clonal expansion of myeloproliferative malignant cells. Fedratinib is a selective oral JAK2 inhibitor recently approved in the United States for treatment of adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF. In mouse models of JAK2 V617F-driven myeloproliferative disease, fedratinib blocked phosphorylation of STAT5, increased survival, and improved MF-associated disease features, including reduction of white blood cell counts, hematocrit, splenomegaly, and fibrosis. Fedratinib exerts off-target inhibitory activity against bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4); combination JAK/STAT and BRD4 inhibition was shown to synergistically block NF-kB hyperactivation and inflammatory cytokine production, attenuating disease burden and reversing bone marrow fibrosis in animal models of MPNs. In patients, fedratinib is rapidly absorbed and dosed once daily (effective half-life 41 h). Fedratinib showed robust clinical activity in JAK-inhibitor-naïve patients and in patients with MF who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to prior ruxolitinib therapy. Fedratinib is effective regardless of JAK2 mutation status. Onset of spleen and symptom responses are typically seen within the first 1–2 months of treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) with fedratinib are grades 1–2 gastrointestinal events, which are most frequent during early treatment and decrease over time. Treatment discontinuation due to hematologic AEs in clinical trials was uncommon (~3%). Suspected cases of Wernicke’s encephalopathy were reported during fedratinib trials in ~1% of patients; thiamine levels should be monitored before and during fedratinib treatment as medically indicated. Phase III trials are ongoing to assess fedratinib effects on long-term safety, efficacy, and overall survival. The recent approval of fedratinib provides a much-needed addition to the limited therapeutic options available for patients with MF.
International Consensus Classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms: myeloproliferative neoplasms
The recently published International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms summarized the results of an in-depth effort by pathologists, oncologists, and geneticists aimed to update the 2017 World Health Organization classification system for hematopoietic tumors. Along these lines, several important modifications were implemented in the classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). For chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR::ABL1-positive, the definition of accelerated and blast phase was simplified, and in the BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs, the classification was slightly updated to improve diagnostic specificity with a more detailed and better validated morphologic approach and the recommendation of more sensitive molecular techniques to capture in particular early stage diseases. In this regard, high sensitive single target (RT-qPCR, ddPCR) or multi-target next-generation sequencing assays with a minimal sensitivity of VAF 1% are now important for a proper diagnostic identification of MPN cases with low allelic frequencies at initial presentation. This review discusses the updated diagnostic criteria of MPN according to the ICC, particularly by highlighting the new concepts and how they can be applied in clinical settings to obtain an appropriate prognostic relevant diagnosis.