Explore the vast range of titles available.

A randomized trial compared peroral endoscopic myotomy with laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy plus Dor’s fundoplication in patients with symptomatic idiopathic achalasia. POEM was noninferior to LHM in controlling symptoms of achalasia at 2 years. Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were more common in the POEM group.

IntroductionPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) demonstrated similar efficacy to surgical myotomy in the management of achalasia. However, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common after POEM. The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with GERD after POEM.MethodAfter searching electronic databases, randomized trials and observational studies including patients with achalasia or other spastic esophageal disorders, treated by POEM, and providing GERD data were selected. GERD was evaluated by 3 methods: pH monitoring, endoscopic findings, and symptoms. For each method, an analysis was performed comparing the outcomes related to the following independent variables: full-thickness (FT) vs circular myotomy, anterior vs posterior, long myotomy vs short myotomy, naive vs previous treatment failure, previous Heller myotomy (HM) vs non-previous-HM, Type I vs II, Type I vs III, and Type II vs III.Results2869 publications were identified, and 25 studies met criteria for inclusion in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 18 were included in the meta-analysis. According to the endoscopic findings, circular and anterior myotomy demonstrated a lower trend of GERD with borderline significance (p = 0.06; p = 0.07, respectively). In the pH monitoring and symptom analyses, circular myotomy, anterior myotomy, treatment naive, and non-HM patients were associated with a lower occurrence of GERD; however, no statistically significant difference was found. When comparing achalasia subtypes, no statistical difference was found in all analyses.ConclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that a circular anterior approach may limit post-POEM GERD and should be considered in appropriate patients.

ObjectivePeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become standard treatment for achalasia with comparable efficacy to surgery. In most of published series, the length of myotomy is 12–13 cm. Shorter cuts could have the advantage of shorter procedure time and possibly reduced gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) rate.DesignThis single-centre, patient-blinded, randomised, non-inferiority clinical trial included 200 patients, who were randomly allocated, to receive either a long-POEM (13 cm; 101 patients) or a short-POEM (8 cm; 99 patients). Primary outcome was defined as an Eckardt symptom score of ≤3 at 24 months after the procedure; a non-inferiority design was chosen with an accepted success range of 6% between the two treatments. Secondary outcomes included operating time, complication rate, postoperative manometry, GORD rate and quality of life.ResultsIn the intention-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates were 89.1% in the long-POEM and 98.0% in the short-POEM group, resulting in an absolute between-group difference of −8.9% (90% CI −14.5 to −3.3).Procedure time was significantly reduced in the short-POEM as compared with the long-POEM group (40 vs 50 min, p<0.0001). Severe adverse events occurred in one patient in both groups.No differences were observed in postoperative GORD: acid exposure >6% on pH monitoring study at 6 months was seen in 34.3% (long-POEM) vs 31.1% (short-POEM), while endoscopic oesophagitis was diagnosed in 37.6% vs 51.5% at 6 months and in 21% vs 24.5% at 24 months. Regular proton pump inhibitor use was not different either (36.8% vs 37.5%).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates non-inferiority of a shorter cut length of POEM as compared with the standard treatment, which saved some procedural time. GORD rate was not reduced by reducing cutting length.Trial registration number NCT03450928.

BackgroundSince Inoue performed the first POEM in 2008, safety and efficacy have been well-established. Early studies focused on refining the technique and avoiding incomplete myotomy. Following the discovery that many patients with abnormal acid exposure are asymptomatic, the focus shifted to post-POEM reflux, but no studies have identified any associated procedural factors. In this study, we examined the intermediate-term results of our previous randomized controlled trial, with particular attention to post-POEM reflux.MethodsPreviously, 100 consecutive patients were randomized to either double- or single-scope POEM. Endoscopy was conducted 2 months post-POEM and annually thereafter. Patients were included in the present study if they completed endoscopy ≥ 6 months post-POEM, and the clinical results of both groups were analyzed with particular attention to clinical efficacy and post-POEM reflux.ResultsMedian follow-up was 3 years, and most myotomies were performed in the posterior location. The final gastric myotomy length was longer in the double-scope group (3.3 vs. 2.6 cm). Clinical efficacy (≥ 80%) and rates of post-POEM reflux (~ 60%) were similar; however, there was a higher incidence of moderate esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade B) in the double-scope group (25% vs. 4%). There were no cases of severe esophagitis (Los Angeles Grade C/D). Among patients with normal endoscopy at 2 months, > 40% developed erosive esophagitis on intermediate-term follow-up.ConclusionsThis is the first study to demonstrate a procedural factor that increases post-POEM esophagitis. Gastric myotomy > 2.5 cm results in increased rates of moderate esophagitis without improving clinical efficacy. Some patients developed esophagitis in a delayed fashion, emphasizing the importance of ongoing surveillance. We also believe that preserving the gastric sling fibers may help to reduce reflux rates. The double-scope method may help to control myotomy length (2.0–2.5 cm) and direction (lesser curve to avoid the gastric sling) to help maximize clinical efficacy while minimizing post-POEM reflux.

INTRODUCTION:Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) may result in a distended distal esophagus, referred to as a blown-out myotomy (BOM), the relevance of which is uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, risk factors, and associated symptoms of BOM after achalasia treatment.METHODS:A data set of the locally treated patients in a randomized controlled trial comparing POEM with pneumatic dilation (PD) was analyzed. A BOM is defined as a >50% increase in esophageal diameter at its widest point in the distal esophagus between the lower esophageal sphincter and 5 cm above.RESULTS:Seventy-four patients were treated in our center, and 5-year follow-up data were available in 55 patients (32 patients [58%] randomized to POEM, 23 [42%] PD). In the group initially treated with POEM, the incidence of BOM increased from 11.5% (4/38) at 3 months, to 21.1% (8/38) at 1 year, 27.8% (10/36) at 2 years, and 31.3% (10/32) at 5 years. None of the patients treated with PD alone developed a BOM. Patients who developed a BOM had a higher total Eckardt score and Eckardt regurgitation component compared with patients who underwent POEM without BOM development (3 [2.75-3.25] vs 2 [1.75-3], P = 0.032, and 1 [0.75-1] vs 0 [0-1], P = 0.041). POEM patients with a BOM more often report reflux symptoms (85% [11/13] vs 46% [2/16], P = 0.023) and had a higher acid exposure time (24.5% [8-47] vs 6% [1.2-18.7], P = 0.027).DISCUSSION:Thirty percent of the patients treated with POEM develop a BOM, which is associated with a higher acid exposure, more reflux symptoms, and symptoms of regurgitation.

BackgroundPeroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an emerging effective treatment for achalasia. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond well to the treatment. After over a decade of clinical practice, potential risk factors associated with POEM failure have been identified. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the evidence of risk factors for POEM failure.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to June 10th, 2022. We included English studies that reported POEM outcomes in achalasia patients and identified risk factors for POEM failure. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed using fixed- or randomized-effect models to pool the effect size.ResultsA total of 27 studies comprising 9371 patients with achalasia were included in this review. The pooled failure rate was 8% (90% CI 7%–10%). We identified sigmoid esophagus (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.45–2.47), type I achalasia (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.04–1.63), and type III achalasia (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89–1.78) were associated with a worse clinical response. Conversely, type II achalasia was associated with a better response (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47–0.75). Prior treatment with Heller myotomy (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.97–8.34) and prior balloon dilation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.07–1.29) were also associated with a higher risk of clinical failure.ConclusionOur meta-analysis results demonstrated that sigmoid esophagus, manometric achalasia subtype, and prior treatment were associated with POEM failure. This information could be used to guide treatment decisions and improve the success rate of POEM in achalasia patients.

Background and aimsPer-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is becoming a standard treatment for achalasia. Long-term efficacy and the rate of post-POEM reflux should be further investigated. The main aim of this study was to analyze safety and mid-term (12 and 24 months) clinical outcomes of POEM.MethodsData on single tertiary center procedures were collected prospectively. The primary outcome was treatment success defined as an Eckardt score < 3 at 12 and 24 months. A total of 155 consecutive patients with achalasia underwent POEM; 133 patients were included into the analysis (22 patients will be analyzed separately as part of a multicenter randomized clinical trial).ResultsPOEM was successfully completed in 132 (99.2%) patients, and the mean length of the procedure was 69.8 min (range 31–136). One patient underwent a drainage for pleural effusion; no other serious adverse events occurred. Treatment success at 3, 12, and 24 months was observed in 95.5% (CI 89.6–98.1), 93.4% (86.5–96.8), and 84.0% (71.4–91.4) of patients, respectively. A total of 11 patients (8.3%) reported initial treatment failure (n = 5) or later recurrence (n = 6). The majority of relapses occurred in patients with achalasia type I (16.7 vs. 1.1% achalasia type II vs. 0% achalasia type III; p<0.05). At 12 months, post-POEM reflux symptoms were present in 29.7% of patients. At 3 months, mild reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 37.6% of patients, and pathological gastroesophageal reflux was detected in 41.5% of patients. A total of 37.8% of patients had been treated with a proton pump inhibitor.ConclusionPOEM resulted in greater than 90% treatment success at 12 months which tends to decrease to 84% after 2 years. More than one-third of the patients had mild reflux symptoms and/or mild esophagitis.

BackgroundLongitudinal incision is the commonly used incision for entry into the submucosal space during peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Transverse incision is another alternative for entry and retrospective data suggest it has less operative time and chance of gas-related events.MethodsThis was a single-center, randomized trial conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing POEM for esophageal motility disorders were randomized into group A (longitudinal incision) and group B (transverse incision). The primary objective was to compare the time needed for entry into the submucosal space. The secondary objectives were to compare the time needed to close the incision, number of clips required to close the incision, and development of gas-related events. The sample size was calculated as for a non-inferiority design using Kelsey method.ResultsSixty patients were randomized (30 in each group). On comparing the 2 types of incisions, there was no difference in entry time [3 (2, 5) vs 2 (1.75, 5) min, p = 0.399], closure time [7 (4, 13.5) vs 9 (6.75, 19) min, p = 0.155], and number of clips needed for closure [4 (4, 6) vs 5 (4, 7), p = 0.156]. Additionally, the gas-related events were comparable between the 2 groups (capnoperitoneum needing aspiration—5 vs 2, p = 0.228, and development of subcutaneous emphysema—3 vs 1, p = 0.301).ConclusionThis randomized trial shows comparable entry time, closure time, number of clips needed to close the incision, and gas-related events between longitudinal and transverse incisions.Registration numberCTRI/2021/08/035829.

Background Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly utilized to treat patients with achalasia. Early results have demonstrated significant improvement of symptoms, but there are concerns about postoperative reflux. With only limited comparative data available, we sought to compare POEM to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication. Methods This is a retrospective review of 42 POEM and 84 LHM patients undergoing primary myotomy for achalasia. Patients were matched by achalasia type, by Eckardt and dysphagia scores, and by quality of life (QOL) metrics. Analysis at 6–12-month follow-up evaluated these metrics, PPI use, pH, manometric, and endoscopic data. Results We matched 25 patients with achalasia types I (6), II (13), and III (6). Follow-up was longer for LHM at 158.1 (36.5–272.9) weeks versus 36.2 (22.2–41.2) weeks ( p  = 0.001). Eckardt scores, QOL metrics, and dysphagia significantly improved in both groups. DeMeester scores and total percent time less than 4 were abnormal in both groups and comparable ( p  = 0.925 and p  = 0.838). Esophagitis was seen in 53.4 % (POEM) and 31.6 % (LHM) (Yates’ p  = 0.91), and PPI use was equivalent at 36 %. Conclusion Early clinical outcomes are excellent with POEM and comparable to the standard of care LHM. Long-term follow-up is required as concerns for reflux persist.

Background Current classification of achalasia does not account for variability in esophageal tortuosity. The esophageal length-to-height ratio (LHR) was developed to objectively quantify tortuosity, based on the premise that the esophagus must elongate to become tortuous. Hence, we assess the relationship of esophageal tortuosity, measured by LHR, to preoperative patient characteristics and post-myotomy outcomes, including longitudinal symptom relief and esophageal emptying. Methods From 01/2014 to 01/2020, 420 eligible adult patients underwent myotomy for achalasia at our institution, 216 (51%) Heller myotomy and 204 (49%) per-oral endoscopic myotomy. LHR was measured on pre- and first postoperative timed barium esophagram (TBE), with larger values signifying greater tortuosity. Variable predictiveness and risk-adjusted longitudinal estimates of symptom relief (Eckardt score ≤ 3) and complete emptying, in relation to LHR and manometric subtype, were estimated. Results Median [15th, 85th percentile] preoperative LHR was 1.04 [1.01, 1.10]. Preoperative esophageal width > 3 cm and age > 68 years were most predictive of increased LHR. Increased LHR corresponded with decreases in longitudinal postoperative symptom relief and complete esophageal emptying, with a 4% difference in symptom relief and 20% difference in complete emptying, as LHR increased from 1.0 to 1.16. After adjusting for patient factors, including LHR, manometric subtype was less predictive of symptom relief, with estimated symptom relief occurring in 4% fewer patients with Type III achalasia, compared to Types I and II. Overall, LHR decreased following myotomy in patients with an initially tortuous esophagus. Conclusion Length-to-height ratio was the only variable highly predictive of both longitudinal post-myotomy symptom relief and complete esophageal emptying, whereas manometric subtype was less predictive. These findings highlight the importance of tortuosity in the treatment of patients with achalasia, suggesting that inclusion of esophageal morphology in future iterations of achalasia classification is warranted. Graphical abstract