Explore the vast range of titles available.

Delivery room management of extremely low birthweight infants (ELBWIs) has been little studied. A questionnaire was sent to the heads of the 86 Italian neonatal intensive care units provided with on site delivery. The practice of and approach to the resuscitation of ELBWIs were very different among the centres surveyed, reflecting a paucity of evidence and consequent uncertainty among clinicians.

Background To improve patient outcomes and provider team practice, the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative (CPQCC) created the Simulating Success quality improvement program to assist hospitals in implementing a neonatal resuscitation training curriculum. This study aimed to examine the costs associated with the design and implementation of the Simulating Success program. Methods From 2017–2020, a total of 14 sites participated in the Simulating Success program and 4 of them systematically collected resource utilization data. Using a micro-costing approach, we examined costs for the design and implementation of the program occurring at CPQCC and the 4 study sites. Data collection forms were used to track personnel time, equipment/supplies, space use, and travel (including transportation, food, and lodging). Cost analysis was conducted from the healthcare sector perspective. Costs incurred by CPQCC were allocated to participant sites and then combined with site-specific costs to estimate the mean cost per site, along with its 95% confidence interval (CI). Cost estimates were inflation-adjusted to 2022 U.S. dollars. Results Designing and implementing the Simulating Success program cost $228,148.36 at CPQCC, with personnel cost accounting for the largest share (92.2%), followed by program-related travel (6.1%), equipment/supplies (1.5%), and space use (0.2%). Allocating these costs across participant sites and accounting for site-specific resource utilizations resulted in a mean cost of $39,210.69 per participant site (95% CI: $34,094.52-$44,326.86). In sensitivity analysis varying several study assumptions (e.g., number of participant sites, exclusion of design costs, and useful life span of manikins), the mean cost per site changed from $35,645.22 to $39,935.73. At all four sites, monthly cost of other neonatal resuscitation training was lower during the program implementation period (mean = $1,112.52 per site) than pre-implementation period (mean = $2,504.01 per site). In the 3 months after the Simulating Success program ended, monthly cost of neonatal resuscitation training was also lower than the pre-implementation period at two of the four sites. Conclusions Establishing a multi-site neonatal in situ simulation program requires investment of sufficient resources. However, such programs may have financial and non-financial benefits in the long run by offsetting the need for other neonatal resuscitation training and improving practice.

Background: Neonatal resuscitation is guided by Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) algorithms; however, human factors affect resuscitation. Video recordings demonstrate that deviations are common. Additionally, code documentation is prone to inaccuracies. Our long-term hypothesis is that the use of an automated resuscitation recorder (ARR) app will improve adherence to NRP and code documentation; the purpose of this study was to determine its feasibility. Methods: We performed a simulation-based feasibility study using simulated code events mimicking NRP scenarios. Teams used the app during resuscitation events. We collected data via an initial demographics survey, video recording, ARR-generated code summary and a post-resuscitation survey. We utilized standardized grading tools to assess NRP adherence and the accuracy of code documentation through resuscitation data point (RDP) scoring. We evaluated provider comfort with the ARR via post-resuscitation survey ordinal ratings and open-ended question text mining. Results: Summary statistics for each grading tool were computed. For NRP adherence, the median was 68% (range 60–76%). For code documentation accuracy and completeness, the median was 77.5% (range 55–90%). When ordinal ratings assessing provider comfort with the app were reviewed, 47% chose “agree” (237/500) and 36% chose “strongly agree” (180/500), with only 0.6% (3/500) answering “strongly disagree”. A word cloud compared frequencies of words from the open-ended text question. Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of ARR use during neonatal resuscitation. The median scores for each grading tool were consistent with passing scores. Post-resuscitation survey data showed that participants felt comfortable with the ARR while highlighting areas for improvement. A pilot study comparing ARR with standard of care is the next step.

Resuscitation guidelines recommend administration of free-flow oxygen to newly born infants who breathe but remain cyanosed. Self-inflating resuscitation bags are described as unreliable for this purpose. We measured oxygen concentrations ⩾80% delivered through a 240 mL Laerdal self-inflating resuscitation bag and from 5 mm tubing inside a cupped hand.

Each year in the US, some four hundred thousand newborns need help breathing when they are born. Due to the frequent need for resuscitation at birth, it is vital to have evidence-based care guidelines and to provide effective neonatal resuscitation training. Every five years, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) reviews the science of neonatal resuscitation. In the US, the American Heart Association (AHA) develops treatment guidelines based on the ILCOR science review, and the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) translates the AHA guidelines into an educational curriculum. In this report, we review recent advances in neonatal resuscitation training and practice. We begin with a review of the new 7th edition NRP training curriculum. Then, we examine key changes to the 2015 AHA neonatal resuscitation guidelines. The four components of the NRP curriculum reviewed here include eSim , Performance Skills Stations, Integrated Skills Station, and Simulation and Debriefing. The key changes to the AHA neonatal resuscitation guidelines reviewed include initial steps of newborn care, positive-pressure ventilation, endotracheal intubation and use of laryngeal mask, chest compressions, medications, resuscitation of preterm newborns, and ethics and end-of-life care. We hope this report provides a succinct review of recent advances in neonatal resuscitation.

Objective: Neonatal intubation skills are initially taught through the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) and thereafter complemented by further practical clinical training. The aim of this study is to compare the ability of NRP trained individuals to successfully complete a neonatal intubation. Study Design: A prospective observational study was performed at an inborn high-risk level 3 perinatal center. Participants were postgraduate years 1 and 3 pediatric residents, neonatal–perinatal medicine subspecialty residents and fellows, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) respiratory therapists (RTs) with earlier NRP training. Intubations were scored on a checklist as well as a global assessment scale. Characteristics of the intubation attempt were recorded for each patient. Result: Fifty neonatal intubations were assessed, of which 73% of the attempts were deemed successful. A higher proportion of endotracheal tubes were successfully placed by RTs (100%, P <0.05), compared with both NICU fellows (69%) and pediatric residents (63%). The overall mean time for successful neonatal intubation was 51±28 s, which is greater than twice the time currently recommended by the NRP and American Heart Association guidelines. Attempts by pediatric residents and NICU fellows were longer ( P <0.05, analysis of variance) and received lower global assessment scale ( P <0.05, analysis of variance) and checklist ( P <0.05, analysis of variance) scores, when compared with RTs. Conclusion: The success rate and overall quality of neonatal intubations performed by neonatal and pediatric trainees in Canada did not meet NRP standards; in particular, the time taken to intubate by pediatric residents and neonatal fellows is concerning. Re-evaluation of training methods and the volume of formalized exposure to neonatal intubation in Canadian residency programs are required.

Background: In 2016, the neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) changed its recommendation to perform endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). The objective of this study is to compare outcomes in non-vigorous neonates born through MSAF before and after the change in the NRP’s recommendations. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study in a single center assessing all neonates ≥34 weeks of gestation with MSAF in 2010–2015 (pre-implementation of new guidelines) and 2017–2022 (post-implementation of new guidelines). Results: Neonates receiving tracheal suctioning were more likely to be diagnosed with MAS (29.3% vs. 19.7%; p = 0.03) and PPHN (8.9% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.003) and more likely to receive surfactant (7.6% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.03). Conclusions: In our institution, non-vigorous neonates born via MSAF after the change in NRP guidelines were less likely to be diagnosed with MAS and PPHN and were less likely to receive surfactant. Our study supports current NRP guidelines.

Background 360° video and virtual reality (VR) simulation may offer innovative opportunities as portable simulation-based technologies to enhance Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training, updates, and refreshers. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 360° video with VR simulation in NRP training and the effect on NRP learning outcomes. Methods Thirty ( N  = 30) NRP providers were randomly assigned to either VR simulation or 360° video study groups ( n  = 15 each) with pre and posttests of confidence, posttests of user satisfaction, usefulness, presence, and simulator sickness, and a performance demonstration of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) on a manikin-simulator. Participants were then exposed to the other condition and again post-tested. Results Both systems were positively viewed. However, participants reported significantly higher perceptions of usefulness in enhancing learning and increased sense of presence with the VR simulation. VR simulation participants gained more confidence in certain NRP skills, such as proper mask placement (adjusted p -value 0.038) and newborn response evaluation (adjusted p -value 0.017). A blinded assessment of PPV skills showed participants exposed to VR performed significantly better in providing effective PPV (adjusted p -value 0.005). Conclusions NRP providers found both systems useful; however, VR simulation was more helpful in improving learning performance and enhancing learning. Participants reported an increased feeling of presence and confidence in certain areas with VR and performed better on a crucial NRP skill, providing effective PPV. VR technologies may offer an alternative modality for increasing access to standardized and portable refresher learning opportunities on NRP.

Objectives Virtual reality (VR) offers the potential to provide a lifelike, safe, and interactive environment where healthcare providers can practice and refresh their skills. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) is an evidence-based and standardized approach for training healthcare providers on the resuscitation of the newborn where VR can be applied. Here we describe a development study for a VR-NRP simulation. This contribution is relevant for researchers and developers in the health sector interested in the integration of VR and other extended reality (XR) technologies in medical education and training. Methods For the implementation of the VR simulation, we used the Unity game engine, a VR-capable laptop, and an HTC Vive Pro Head-Mounted Display. We focused on the skill of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) using a bag and mask as the main scenario for the simulation since this is a foundational skill in NRP. To validate the prototype, we compared the VR-NRP simulation with 360° immersive VR videos in a crossover study involving 30 health-care providers and students, collecting various data through questionnaires and skill assessments by NRP instructors. Results We described in detail the creation process by which a highly realistic VR simulation was produced reflecting the visual elements and sounds of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in a hospital setting. In the crossover study, we found both VR technologies were positively viewed by healthcare professionals and performed very similarly. However, the VR simulation provided a significantly increased feeling of presence. Participants found the VR simulation more useful and reported higher confidence in NRP skills such as proper mask placement and newborn response evaluation, reflecting improved experiential learning outcomes. Conclusion This research represents a step forward in understanding how VR technologies can be developed and applied for effective, immersive medical training, increasing the availability of NRP refresher sessions, and providing insights into similar applications.

Objective: Experts believe good teamwork among health care providers may improve quality. We sought to measure the frequency of team behaviors during delivery room care and to explore how these behaviors relate to the quality of care. Study design: We video recorded neonatal resuscitation teams then used independent observers to measure teamwork behaviors and compliance with Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines (a measure of quality of care). Results: Observer agreement was either fair or good for all teamwork behaviors except workload management, vigilance, and leadership, for which agreement was slight. All teams ( n =132) exhibited the behaviors information sharing and inquiry, and all but one team exhibited vigilance and workload management. Other behaviors were present less often: assertion in 19.9% of teams, teaching 16.7%, leadership 19.7%, evaluation of plans 12.9%, and intentions stated 9.1%. Factor analysis identified three fundamental components of teamwork: communication (comprised of information sharing and inquiry); management (workload management and vigilance); and leadership (assertion, intentions shared, evaluation of plans, and leadership). All three components were weakly but significantly correlated with independent assessments of NRP compliance and an overall rating of the quality of care. Conclusion: Most team behaviors can be reliably observed during delivery room care by neonatal resuscitation teams, and some are infrequently used. We found weak but significant and consistent correlations among these behaviors with independent assessments of NRP compliance and an overall rating of the quality of care. These findings support additional efforts to study team training for delivery room care and other areas of healthcare.