Explore the vast range of titles available.

The use of azithromycin reduces maternal infection in women during unplanned cesarean delivery, but its effect on those with planned vaginal delivery is unknown. Data are needed on whether an intrapartum oral dose of azithromycin would reduce maternal and offspring sepsis or death. In this multicountry, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, we assigned women who were in labor at 28 weeks' gestation or more and who were planning a vaginal delivery to receive a single 2-g oral dose of azithromycin or placebo. The two primary outcomes were a composite of maternal sepsis or death and a composite of stillbirth or neonatal death or sepsis. During an interim analysis, the data and safety monitoring committee recommended stopping the trial for maternal benefit. A total of 29,278 women underwent randomization. The incidence of maternal sepsis or death was lower in the azithromycin group than in the placebo group (1.6% vs. 2.4%), with a relative risk of 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.79; P<0.001), but the incidence of stillbirth or neonatal death or sepsis was similar (10.5% vs. 10.3%), with a relative risk of 1.02 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.09; P = 0.56). The difference in the maternal primary outcome appeared to be driven mainly by the incidence of sepsis (1.5% in the azithromycin group and 2.3% in the placebo group), with a relative risk of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.55 to 0.77); the incidence of death from any cause was 0.1% in the two groups (relative risk, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.51 to 2.97). Neonatal sepsis occurred in 9.8% and 9.6% of the infants, respectively (relative risk, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.10). The incidence of stillbirth was 0.4% in the two groups (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.53); neonatal death within 4 weeks after birth occurred in 1.5% in both groups (relative risk, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.24). Azithromycin was not associated with a higher incidence in adverse events. Among women planning a vaginal delivery, a single oral dose of azithromycin resulted in a significantly lower risk of maternal sepsis or death than placebo but had little effect on newborn sepsis or death. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others; A-PLUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03871491.).

There is limited data on antibiotic treatment in hospitalized neonates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to describe patterns of antibiotic use, pathogens, and clinical outcomes, and to develop a severity score predicting mortality in neonatal sepsis to inform future clinical trial design. Hospitalized infants <60 days with clinical sepsis were enrolled during 2018 to 2020 by 19 sites in 11 countries (mainly Asia and Africa). Prospective daily observational data was collected on clinical signs, supportive care, antibiotic treatment, microbiology, and 28-day mortality. Two prediction models were developed for (1) 28-day mortality from baseline variables (baseline NeoSep Severity Score); and (2) daily risk of death on IV antibiotics from daily updated assessments (NeoSep Recovery Score). Multivariable Cox regression models included a randomly selected 85% of infants, with 15% for validation. A total of 3,204 infants were enrolled, with median birth weight of 2,500 g (IQR 1,400 to 3,000) and postnatal age of 5 days (IQR 1 to 15). 206 different empiric antibiotic combinations were started in 3,141 infants, which were structured into 5 groups based on the World Health Organization (WHO) AWaRe classification. Approximately 25.9% (n = 814) of infants started WHO first line regimens (Group 1-Access) and 13.8% (n = 432) started WHO second-line cephalosporins (cefotaxime/ceftriaxone) (Group 2-\"Low\" Watch). The largest group (34.0%, n = 1,068) started a regimen providing partial extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/pseudomonal coverage (piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, or fluoroquinolone-based) (Group 3-\"Medium\" Watch), 18.0% (n = 566) started a carbapenem (Group 4-\"High\" Watch), and 1.8% (n = 57) a Reserve antibiotic (Group 5, largely colistin-based), and 728/2,880 (25.3%) of initial regimens in Groups 1 to 4 were escalated, mainly to carbapenems, usually for clinical deterioration (n = 480; 65.9%). A total of 564/3,195 infants (17.7%) were blood culture pathogen positive, of whom 62.9% (n = 355) had a gram-negative organism, predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 132) or Acinetobacter spp. (n = 72). Both were commonly resistant to WHO-recommended regimens and to carbapenems in 43 (32.6%) and 50 (71.4%) of cases, respectively. MRSA accounted for 33 (61.1%) of 54 Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Overall, 350/3,204 infants died (11.3%; 95% CI 10.2% to 12.5%), 17.7% if blood cultures were positive for pathogens (95% CI 14.7% to 21.1%, n = 99/564). A baseline NeoSep Severity Score had a C-index of 0.76 (0.69 to 0.82) in the validation sample, with mortality of 1.6% (3/189; 95% CI: 0.5% to 4.6%), 11.0% (27/245; 7.7% to 15.6%), and 27.3% (12/44; 16.3% to 41.8%) in low (score 0 to 4), medium (5 to 8), and high (9 to 16) risk groups, respectively, with similar performance across subgroups. A related NeoSep Recovery Score had an area under the receiver operating curve for predicting death the next day between 0.8 and 0.9 over the first week. There was significant variation in outcomes between sites and external validation would strengthen score applicability. Antibiotic regimens used in neonatal sepsis commonly diverge from WHO guidelines, and trials of novel empiric regimens are urgently needed in the context of increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The baseline NeoSep Severity Score identifies high mortality risk criteria for trial entry, while the NeoSep Recovery Score can help guide decisions on regimen change. NeoOBS data informed the NeoSep1 antibiotic trial (ISRCTN48721236), which aims to identify novel first- and second-line empiric antibiotic regimens for neonatal sepsis. ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT03721302).

Background The high rates of culture-positive sepsis, sepsis-related mortality, and multidrug resistance in neonates admitted to special care newborn units in district hospitals (DH) in India necessitate urgent actions to prevent infections in these settings. Immediate kangaroo mother care (iKMC), initiated before stabilization within the first few hours of life, has been shown to reduce neonatal mortality among low birth weight (LBW) neonates admitted to tertiary care hospitals. However, the effect of iKMC on sepsis and sepsis-related mortality, particularly in DH, remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether iKMC can lower the incidence of mortality or culture-positive sepsis in LBW neonates admitted to neonatal units in district hospitals. Methods This stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial will be conducted in ten district hospitals in Chhattisgarh, India, over 42 months. All neonates weighing between 1000 and 1799 g at birth and admitted to the participating hospitals, in whom KMC can be initiated within 12 h of life, will be eligible for inclusion. During the pre-intervention period (control), routine KMC will be practiced at the sites as is. Following a baseline period of 6 months, iKMC will be implemented sequentially in ten steps across the ten study sites at intervals of 3 months. The intervention includes initiating continuous skin-to-skin contact with the mother or relatives within 12 h of life, continuing KMC until discharge or weight 2.5 kg, and providing breastfeeding support. The primary outcome is the incidence of all-cause neonatal mortality and/or culture-positive sepsis until 28 days of life. Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals will be reported and analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. An intention-to-treat analysis will be conducted. Discussion The PRISM (Protective Role of Immediate KMC in neonatal Sepsis and Mortality) trial will sequentially implement iKMC for LBW neonates in ten district hospitals with a relatively high burden of sepsis in India. If proven effective in reducing the risks of sepsis or neonatal mortality, the trial will provide necessary evidence for its safety and efficacy, as well as the impetus for implementing and upscaling the intervention in district hospitals across India and other low- and middle-income countries. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registry of India, CTRI/2024/09/074269. Registered on 24/09/2024, https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MTE0MzY3&Enc=&userName=immediate%20kangaroo%20mother%20care .

Neonatal sepsis is the cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Precise estimates of neonatal sepsis burden vary by setting. Differing estimates of disease burden have been reported from high-income countries compared with reports from low-income and middle-income countries. The clinical manifestations range from subclinical infection to severe manifestations of focal or systemic disease. The source of the pathogen might be attributed to an in-utero infection, acquisition from maternal flora, or postnatal acquisition from the hospital or community. The timing of exposure, inoculum size, immune status of the infant, and virulence of the causative agent influence the clinical expression of neonatal sepsis. Immunological immaturity of the neonate might result in an impaired response to infectious agents. This is especially evident in premature infants whose prolonged stays in hospital and need for invasive procedures place them at increased risk for hospital-acquired infections. Clinically, there is often little difference between sepsis that is caused by an identified pathogen and sepsis that is caused by an unknown pathogen. Culture-independent diagnostics, the use of sepsis prediction scores, judicious antimicrobial use, and the development of preventive measures including maternal vaccines are ongoing efforts designed to reduce the burden of neonatal sepsis.

ObjectiveDefinitive guidance regarding the duration of antibiotics for neonatal sepsis is lacking. We hypothesised that a 7-day antibiotic course is non-inferior to a 14-day course for treating culture-proven sepsis.DesignRandomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial with masked outcome assessment in eight centres in a low and middle-income country.PatientsNeonates with a birth weight (BW) ≥1000 g and blood culture-proven sepsis were randomised on day 7 of sensitive antibiotic therapy provided sepsis had clinically remitted. Exclusions: Staphylococcus aureus or fungal sepsis, and infections requiring prolonged antibiotics. We planned to enrol 350 per group, assuming 10% rate of primary outcome, +7% non-inferiority margin, one-sided 5% alpha, 90% power, 10% loss to follow-up.Intervention7 days (no further treatment); comparison: 14 days (7 days postrandomisation).OutcomesPrimary: relapse (definite or probable) within day 21 postantibiotic completion. Secondary outcomes: composite of mortality or definite/probable/secondary sepsis and duration of hospitalisation. One interim analysis (per protocol (PP)) was planned.Results126 and 135 subjects were recruited in 7-day and 14-day groups, respectively, with mean (SD) birth weight (BW) 2250.9 (741.1) and 2187.8 (718.8) g. The trial was terminated early, based on interim PP analysis. 2/125 and 6/130 subjects had the primary outcome in 7-day and 14-day groups, respectively (risk difference (RD)=−3.0% (99.5% CI −9.2%, +3.1%), below non-inferiority margin). The composite secondary outcome also favoured the 7-day regimen (RD: −3.7% (99.5% CI −12.4% to +5.1%)). Duration of hospitalisation was shorter in 7-day group (median difference: −4 days (95% CI −5 to –3)).ConclusionsA 7-day course of antibiotics may be non-inferior to a 14-day course for uncomplicated bacterial neonatal sepsis.Trial registration number NCT03280147.

In Switzerland and other high-income countries, one out of 3000 to 5000 term and late preterm neonates develops early onset sepsis (EOS) associated with a mortality of around 3%, while incidence and mortality of EOS in very preterm infants are substantially higher. Exposure to antibiotics for suspected EOS is disproportionally high compared to the incidence of EOS with consequences for future health and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A safe reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatment has to be a major goal of new management strategies and guidelines. Antibiotics should be administered immediately in situations with clinical signs of septic shock. Group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) are the leading pathogens of EOS. Amoxicillin combined with an aminoglycoside remains the first choice for empirical treatment. Serial physical examinations are recommended for all neonates with risk factors for EOS. Neonates without any clinical signs suggestive of EOS should not be treated with antibiotics. In Switzerland, we do not recommend the use of the EOS calculator, a risk stratification tool, due to its unclear impact in a population with an observed antibiotic exposure below 3%. Not all neonates with respiratory distress should be empirically treated with antibiotics. Isolated tachypnea or respiratory distress starting immediately after delivery by elective caesarean section or a clearly assessed alternative explanation than EOS for clinical signs may point towards a low probability of sepsis. On the other hand, unexplained prematurity with risk factors has an inherent higher risk of EOS. Before the start of antibiotic therapy, blood cultures should be drawn with a minimum volume of 1 ml in a single aerobic blood culture bottle. This standard procedure allows antibiotics to be stopped after 24 to 36 h if no pathogen is detected in blood cultures. Current data do not support the use of PCR-based pathogen detection in blood as a standard method. Lumbar puncture is recommended in blood culture–proven EOS, critical illness, or in the presence of neurological symptoms such as seizures or altered consciousness. The accuracy of a single biomarker measurement to distinguish inflammation from infection is low in neonates. Therefore, biomarker guidance is not a standard part of decision-making regarding the start or stop of antibiotic therapy but may be used as part of an algorithm and after appropriate education of health care teams. Every newborn started on antibiotics should be assessed for organ dysfunction with prompt initiation of respiratory and hemodynamic support if needed. An elevated lactate may be a sign of poor perfusion and requires a comprehensive assessment of the clinical condition. Interventions to restore perfusion include fluid boli with crystalloids and catecholamines. Neonates in critical condition should be cared for in a specialized unit. In situations with a low probability of EOS, antibiotics should be stopped as early as possible within the first 24 h after the start of therapy. In cases with microbiologically proven EOS, reassessment and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in neonates is an important step to minimize AMR. Conclusion : This guideline, developed through a critical review of the literature, facilitates a probability-based approach to the management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis. What is Known: • Neonatal exposure to antibiotics is disproportionally high compared with the incidence of early onset sepsis with implications for future health and antimicrobial resistance. What is New: • A probability-based approach may facilitate a more balanced management of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic stewardship.

Sepsis remains a significant cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Neonatal sepsis presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms that necessitate tests to confirm the diagnosis. Early and accurate diagnosis of infection will improve clinical outcomes and decrease the overuse of antibiotics. Current diagnostic methods rely on conventional culture methods, which is time-consuming, and may delay critical therapeutic decisions. Nonculture-based techniques including molecular methods and mass spectrometry may overcome some of the limitations seen with culture-based techniques. Biomarkers including hematological indices, cell adhesion molecules, interleukins, and acute-phase reactants have been used for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. In this review, we examine past and current microbiological techniques, hematological indices, and inflammatory biomarkers that may aid sepsis diagnosis. The search for an ideal biomarker that has adequate diagnostic accuracy early in sepsis is still ongoing. We discuss promising strategies for the future that are being developed and tested that may help us diagnose sepsis early and improve clinical outcomes.ImpactReviews the clinical relevance of currently available diagnostic tests for sepsis.Summarizes the diagnostic accuracy of novel biomarkers for neonatal sepsis.Outlines future strategies including the use of omics technology, personalized medicine, and point of care tests.

Background/Objectives: Late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g and/or gestational age <32 weeks), with limited preventive strategies. We evaluated whether early enteral bovine lactoferrin (bLf), given its antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant properties, reduces LOS and improves immunologic, antioxidant, and hematologic markers in these infants. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 103 VLBW infants received bLf (150 mg/kg/day; n = 50) or the placebo (n = 53) within 72 h of birth for four weeks or until discharge. Outcomes included culture-confirmed LOS, mortality, and major morbidities. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated, adjusting for gestational age, human milk intake, and ventilatory support when ≥25 events occurred. Pre/post changes in cytokines, total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and hemoglobin (Hb) were analyzed for interaction effects (time x intervention). Results: bLf reduced LOS (adjusted RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31–0.93; p = 0.028), without differences in other morbidities or mortality. bLf preserved MCP-1 levels, declining in the placebo group (interaction p = 0.022). Among LOS infants receiving bLf, IL-6 remained stable and MCP-1 increased, while both declined in other groups (interaction p = 0.007 for IL-6; p = 0.052 for MCP-1). Although TAC showed a non-significant interaction, the placebo group declined (p = 0.002), while bLf remained stable (p = 0.400) in the post hoc analysis. In non-transfused infants, bLf increased Hb by 0.9 g/dL vs. controls (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Early bLf supplementation safely reduces LOS in VLBW infants and may support immunologic, antioxidant, and hematologic stability.

Introduction In low and middle-income countries, a key driver of neonatal morbidity and mortality is neonatal sepsis. Rapid and precise diagnosis of neonatal sepsis remains a critical challenge due to limited laboratory facilities. Blood culture results, the diagnostic gold standard, are often unavailable or delayed; therefore, procalcitonin (PCT) has been considered as a potential inflammatory biomarker of bacterial infection.This study assessed the diagnostic performance of PCT in neonates with sepsis at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Owerri, Nigeria. Methods This cross-sectional study recruited 75 neonates aged 0–28 days with clinical suspicion of sepsis between June 2023 and February 2024. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained using a structured questionnaire, serum PCT levels were measured using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and blood culture was performed as the gold standard. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for neonatal sepsis. Secondary outcomes included comparison of diagnostic performance between early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONNS) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONNS), and description of microbial isolates. Diagnostic indices (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, NPV) were calculated at different PCT thresholds. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analysed to determine the area under the curve (AUC). Results Of the 75 neonates, 55 (73.3%) had culture-confirmed sepsis and 32 (58.2%) early-onset neonatal sepsis. Serum PCT levels were not normally distributed (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, p  < 0.001) and were summarized using medians and interquartile ranges. At a PCT cut-off of ≥ 2 ng/mL, sensitivity and NPV were 72.7% and 57.1% respectively while specificity and PPV remained 100% for all neonates. The AUC for PCT was significantly higher in EONNS (0.964, 95% CI: 0.910–1.000) compared to LONNS (0.788, 95% CI: 0.638–0.938). Gram-negative organisms (63.6%) were the most common isolates, mainly Escherichia coli (34.5%). Conclusion Serum procalcitonin demonstrates high specificity for culture-confirmed neonatal sepsis at a cut-off of ≥ 2.0 ng/mL in this cohort, with better diagnostic performance in early-onset disease. These findings apply to the studied population and cut-off thresholds. PCT measurement integration in Nigeria can be a priceless tool for guiding rational antibiotic therapy; particularly where rapid confirmation of sepsis is critical to improving neonatal survival outcomes.

Progress has been made in the reduction of morbidity and mortality from neonatal sepsis. However, diagnosis continues to rely primarily on conventional microbiologic techniques, which can be inaccurate. The objective of this review is to provide the clinician with an overview of the current information available on diagnosing this condition. We review currently available diagnostic approaches for documenting neonatal sepsis and also describe novel approaches for diagnosing infection in neonates who are under development and investigation. Substantial progress has been made with molecular approaches and further development of non-culture-based methods offer promise. The potential ability to incorporate antimicrobial resistance gene testing in addition to pathogen identification may provide a venue to incorporate a predominantly molecular platform into a larger program of neonatal care.