Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background. Nintedanib (NTD) has been shown to be useful to slow functional decline of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease also in Autoimmune Systemic Diseases (ASDs) beside systemic sclerosis (SSc) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after the positive results of the INBUILD trial. Here we describe the effectiveness and safety of NTD in ASDs in a real-life setting.   Materials and Methods. The clinical data of ASDs patients with ILD (excluded SSc and RA) treated with NTD from 17 Italian centres were retrospectively evaluated at 12 months prior to NTD introduction; at baseline, and at 12 months after NTD introduction. The following parameters were recorded: ASD clinical features, NTD tolerability, pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Progressors were defined as a drop in %pFVC >= 5 and/or %pDLCO >= 10 within 12 months.   Results. 114 ASD-ILD patients (46.5% male, mean age 69 ± 10 years, median disease duration 5.5 (2-12) years) treated with NTD were identified. Disease features are summarized in Table 1. The most common ASD was anti-synthetase syndrome (31, 27.2%) and the most common antibody was anti-Ro52 (44, 38.6%), most (57.9%) had been previously treated with immunosuppressants. At baseline, 107 (93.9%) patients were on immunosuppressants (see Table 1), with 74 (64.9%) patients on steroid with a median dose of 5 (1.25 – 7.5). Baseline HRCT was available in 109 patients and it showed an UIP pattern in 43 (39.4%) and a NSIP pattern in 66 (60.6%) patients. A significant decline in %pFVC and in %pDLCO was observed in the 12 months prior to NTD introduction (82.4 ± 21 versus 71 ± 16, p <0.001 and 51 ± 17 versus 44 ± 13, p <0.001, respectively) with 54 (69%) being classified as progressors. At 12 months after NTD introduction, follow-up data were available for 54 patients and they showed an improvement in both %pFVC (72 ± 15 to 75 ± 17, p < 0.001) and %pDLCO (43 ± 15 to 45 ± 17; p < 0.001); moreover, the percentage of progressors was significantly lower (69% versus 26%, p < 0.001). The dosage of NTD was reduced to 100 mg BID in 44 (38.6%) patients after a median time of 5 (3 – 9) months, and suspended in 19 (16.7%) patients after a median time of 3 (1-8) months, see Figure 1. During the follow-up, 10 (8.8%) patients died.   Conclusions. In a real-life clinical scenario, NTD, in combination with immunosuppressants, may improve lung function in patients with ASDs. NTD seems to be well-tolerated and the rate of drug suspension is low. Our data support early evaluation of ILD in wide range of ASDs in order to identify patients eligible for antifibrotic drug in association to immunosuppressants.

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive disease characterized by the aberrant accumulation of fibrotic tissue in the lungs parenchyma, associated with significant morbidity and poor prognosis. This review will present the substantial advances achieved in the understanding of IPF pathogenesis and in the therapeutic options that can be offered to patients, and will address the issues regarding diagnosis and management that are still open. Main body Over the last two decades much has been clarified about the pathogenic pathways underlying the development and progression of the lung scarring in IPF. Sustained alveolar epithelial micro-injury and activation has been recognised as the trigger of several biological events of disordered repair occurring in genetically susceptible ageing individuals. Despite multidisciplinary team discussion has demonstrated to increase diagnostic accuracy, patients can still remain unclassified when the current diagnostic criteria are strictly applied, requiring the identification of a Usual Interstitial Pattern either on high-resolution computed tomography scan or lung biopsy. Outstanding achievements have been made in the management of these patients, as nintedanib and pirfenidone consistently proved to reduce the rate of progression of the fibrotic process. However, many uncertainties still lie in the correct use of these drugs, ranging from the initial choice of the drug, the appropriate timing for treatment and the benefit-risk ratio of a combined treatment regimen. Several novel compounds are being developed in the perspective of a more targeted therapeutic approach; in the meantime, the supportive care of these patients and their carers should be appropriately prioritized, and greater efforts should be made toward the prompt identification and management of relevant comorbidities. Conclusions Building on the advances in the understanding of IPF pathobiology, the further investigation of the role of gene variants, epigenetic alterations and other molecular biomarkers reflecting disease activity and behaviour will hopefully enable earlier and more confident diagnosis, improve disease phenotyping and support the development of novel agents for personalized treatment of IPF.

Epithelial cell dysfunction has emerged as a central component of the pathophysiology of diffuse parenchymal diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Alveolar type 2 (AT2) cells represent a metabolically active lung cell population important for surfactant biosynthesis and alveolar homeostasis. AT2 cells and other distal lung epithelia, like all eukaryotic cells, contain an elegant quality control network to respond to intrinsic metabolic and biosynthetic challenges imparted by mutant protein conformers, dysfunctional subcellular organelles, and dysregulated telomeres. Failed AT2 quality control components (the ubiquitin-proteasome system, unfolded protein response, macroautophagy, mitophagy, and telomere maintenance) result in diverse cellular endophenotypes and molecular signatures including ER stress, defective autophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, inflammatory cell recruitment, profibrotic signaling, and altered progenitor function that ultimately converge to drive downstream fibrotic remodeling in the IPF lung. As this complex network becomes increasingly better understood, opportunities will emerge to identify targets and therapeutic strategies for IPF.

Objectives Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic fibrotic lung disease characterized by dry cough, fatigue, and progressive exertional dyspnea. Lung parenchyma and architecture is destroyed, compliance is lost, and gas exchange is compromised in this debilitating condition that leads inexorably to respiratory failure and death within 3–5 years of diagnosis. This review discusses treatment approaches to IPF in current use and those that appear promising for future development. Data Source The data were obtained from the Randomized Controlled Trials and scientific studies published in English literature. We used search terms related to IPF, antifibrotic treatment, lung transplant, and management. Results Etiopathogenesis of IPF is not fully understood, and treatment options are limited. Pathological features of IPF include extracellular matrix remodeling, fibroblast activation and proliferation, immune dysregulation, cell senescence, and presence of aberrant basaloid cells. The mainstay therapies are the oral antifibrotic drugs pirfenidone and nintedanib, which can improve quality of life, attenuate symptoms, and slow disease progression. Unilateral or bilateral lung transplantation is the only treatment for IPF shown to increase life expectancy. Conclusion Clearly, there is an unmet need for accelerated research into IPF mechanisms so that progress can be made in therapeutics toward the goals of increasing life expectancy, alleviating symptoms, and improving well‐being.

BACKGROUND & nbsp;Phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibition is associated with antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effects that may be beneficial in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.& nbsp;METHODS & nbsp;In this phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BI 1015550, an oral preferential inhibitor of the PDE4B subtype, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive BI 1015550 at a dose of 18 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the forced vital capacity (FVC) at 12 weeks, which we analyzed with a Bayesian approach separately according to background nonuse or use of an antifibrotic agent.& nbsp;RESULTS & nbsp;A total of 147 patients were randomly assigned to receive BI 1015550 or placebo. Among patients without background antifibrotic use, the median change in the FVC was 5.7 ml (95% credible interval, -39.1 to 50.5) in the BI 1015550 group and -81.7 ml (95% credible interval, -133.5 to -44.8) in the placebo group (median difference, 88.4 ml; 95% credible interval, 29.5 to 154.2; probability that BI 1015550 was superior to placebo, 0.998). Among patients with background antifibrotic use, the median change in the FVC was 2.7 ml (95% credible interval, -32.8 to 38.2) in the BI 1015550 group and -59.2 ml (95% credible interval, -111.8 to -17.9) in the placebo group (median difference, 62.4 ml; 95% credible interval, 6.3 to 125.5; probability that BI 1015550 was superior to placebo, 0.986). A mixed model with repeated measures analysis provided results that were consistent with those of the Bayesian analysis. The most frequent adverse event was diarrhea. A total of 13 patients discontinued BI 1015550 treatment owing to adverse events. The percentages of patients with serious adverse events or severe adverse events were similar in the two trial groups.& nbsp;CONCLUSIONS & nbsp;In this placebo-controlled trial, treatment with BI 1015550, either alone or with background use of an antifibrotic agent, prevented a decrease in lung function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

At the end of 2019, a highly contagious infection began its ominous conquest of the world. It was soon discovered that the disease was caused by a novel coronavirus designated as SARS-CoV-2, and the disease was thus abbreviated to COVID-19 (COVID). The global medical community has directed its efforts not only to find effective therapies against the deadly pathogen but also to combat the concomitant complications. Two of the most common respiratory manifestations of COVID are a significant reduction in the diffusing capacity of the lungs (DLCO) and the associated pulmonary interstitial damage. One year after moderate COVID, the incidence rate of impaired DLCO and persistent lung damage still exceeds 30%, and one-third of the patients have severe DLCO impairment and fibrotic lung damage. The persistent respiratory complications may cause substantial population morbidity, long-term disability, and even death due to the lung fibrosis progression. The incidence of COVID-induced pulmonary fibrosis caused by COVID can be estimated based on a 15-year observational study of lung pathology after SARS. Most SARS patients with fibrotic lung damage recovered within the first year and then remained healthy; however, in 20% of the cases, significant fibrosis progression was found in 5–10 years. Based on these data, the incidence rate of post-COVID lung fibrosis can be estimated at 2–6% after moderate illness. What is worse, there are reasons to believe that fibrosis may become one of the major long-term complications of COVID, even in asymptomatic individuals. Currently, despite the best efforts of the global medical community, there are no treatments for COVID-induced pulmonary fibrosis. In this review, we analyze the latest data from ongoing clinical trials aimed at treating post-COVID lung fibrosis and analyze the rationale for the current drug candidates. We discuss the use of antifibrotic therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the IN01 vaccine, glucocorticosteroids as well as the stromal vascular fraction for the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with COVID-associated pulmonary damage.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with a dismal prognosis. The average life expectancy of untreated patients with IPF is only 3 to 4 years. Decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) in patients with IPF appears to be almost linear, with patients with well-preserved FVC at baseline experiencing the same rate of decline in FVC as patients with more advanced disease. Two antifibrotic therapies have been approved for the treatment of IPF: nintedanib and pirfenidone. These drugs slow decline in lung function and reduce the risk of acute respiratory deteriorations, which are associated with very high morbidity and mortality. Individual clinical trials have not been powered to show reductions in mortality, but analyses of pooled data from clinical trials, as well as observational studies, suggest that antifibrotic therapies improve life expectancy. Despite this, many individuals with IPF remain untreated. In many cases, this is because the physician perceives that the disease is stable and so does not warrant therapy, or has concerns over the potential side-effects of antifibrotic drugs. There remains a need to educate pulmonologists that IPF is a progressive, irreversible and fatal disease and that prompt treatment is critical to preserving patients’ lung function and improving outcomes. Most individuals can tolerate antifibrotic therapy, and dose adjustment has been shown to be effective at reducing side effects without compromising efficacy. In addition to anti-fibrotic therapies, individuals with IPF benefit from a holistic approach to their care that includes symptom management and supportive care tailored to the needs of the individual. An animation illustrating the themes covered in this article will be available at: http://www.usscicomms.com/respiratory/maher/treatment-of-IPF .

Background Research questions To compare the efficacy of nintedanib and pirfenidone in the treatment of progressive pulmonary fibrosis; and to compare the efficacy of anti-fibrotic therapy (grouping nintedanib and pirfenidone together) in patients with IPF versus patients with progressive lung fibrosis not classified as IPF. Study design and methods A search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials of pirfenidone or nintedanib in adult patients with IPF or non-IPF patients, and with extractable data on mortality or decline in forced vital capacity (FVC). Random effects meta-analyses were performed on changes in FVC and where possible on mortality in the selected studies. Results 13 trials of antifibrotic therapy were pooled in a meta-analysis (with pirfenidone and nintedanib considered together as anti-fibrotic therapy). The change in FVC was expressed as a standardised difference to allow pooling of percentage and absolute changes. The mean effect size in the IPF studies was − 0.305 (SE 0.043) ( p  < 0.001) and in the non-IPF studies the figures were − 0.307 (SE 0.063) ( p  < 0.001). There was no evidence of any difference between the two groups for standardised rate of FVC decline ( p  = 0.979). Pooling IPF and non-IPF showed a significant reduction in mortality, with mean risk ratio of 07.01 in favour of antifibrotic therapy ( p  = 0.008). A separate analysis restricted to non-IPF did not show a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio 0.908 (0.547 to 1.508), p  = 0.71. Interpretation Anti-fibrotic therapy offers protection against the rate of decline in FVC in progressive lung fibrosis, with similar efficacy shown between the two anti-fibrotic agents currently in clinical use. There was no significant difference in efficacy of antifibrotic therapy whether the underlying condition was IPF or non-IPF with progressive fibrosis, supporting the hypothesis of a common pathogenesis. The data in this analysis was insufficient to be confident about a reduction in mortality in non-IPF with anti-fibrotic therapy. Trial Registration PROSPERO, registration number CRD42021266046.

AbstractIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) seriously threatens human life and health, and no curative therapy is available at present. Nintedanib is the first agent approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to treat IPF; however, its mechanism of inhibition of IPF is still elusive. According to recent studies, nintedanib is a potent inhibitor. It can antagonize platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), etc., to inhibit pulmonary fibrosis. Whether there are other signaling pathways involved in IPF remains unknown. This study focused on investigating the therapeutic efficacy of nintedanib in bleomycin-mediated pulmonary fibrosis (PF) mice through PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Following the induction of pulmonary fibrosis in C57 mice through bleomycin (BLM) administration, the mice were randomized into five groups: (1) the normal control group, (2) the BLM model control group, (3) the low-dose Nintedanib administration model group, (4) the medium-dose nintedanib administration model group, and (5) the high-dose nintedanib administration model group. For lung tissues, morphological changes were found by HE staining and Masson staining, ELISA method was used to detect inflammatory factors, alkaline water method to estimate collagen content, and western blotting for protein levels. TUNEL staining and immunofluorescence methods were used to analyze the effect of nintedanib on lung tissue and the impacts and underlying mechanisms of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. After 28 days, bleomycin-treated mice developed significant pulmonary fibrosis. Relative to bleomycin-treated mice, nintedanib-treated mice had markedly reduced degrees of PF. In addition, nintedanib showed lung-protective effects by up-regulating antioxidant levels, down-regulating inflammatory protein expression, and reducing collagen accumulation. We demonstrated that nintedanib ameliorated bleomycin-induced lung injury by inhibiting the P13K/Akt/mTOR pathway as well as apoptosis. In addition, significant improvement in pulmonary fibrosis was seen after nintedanib (30/60/120 mg/kg body weight/day) treatment through a dose-dependent way. Histopathological results further corroborated the effect of nintedanib treatment on remarkably attenuating bleomycin-mediated mouse lung injury. According to our findings, nintedanib restores the antioxidant system, suppresses pro-inflammatory factors, and inhibits apoptosis. Nintedanib can reduce bleomycin-induced inflammation by downregulating PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, PF, and oxidative stress (OS).

Since their approval, there has been no real-world or randomized trial evidence evaluating the effect of the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib on clinically important outcomes such as mortality and hospitalizations. To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the antifibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Using a large U.S. insurance database, we identified 8,098 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis between October 1, 2014 and March 1, 2018. A one-to-one propensity score-matched cohort was created to compare patients treated with antifibrotic medications (  = 1,255) with those not on treatment (  = 1,255). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was acute hospitalizations. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate mortality differences by drug. The use of antifibrotic medications was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.98; value = 0.034). However, this association was present only through the first 2 years of treatment. There was also a decrease in acute hospitalizations in the treated cohort (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.80; value <0.001). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between patients receiving pirfenidone and those on nintedanib (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.79-1.65;  = 0.471). Among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, antifibrotic agents may be associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization compared with no treatment. Future research should test the hypothesis that these treatments reduce early, but not long-term, mortality as demonstrated in our study.