Explore the vast range of titles available.

Nurse practitioners and physician assistants are providing an increasing share of health care services, and education programs have proliferated. These dynamics will have lasting effects on the health care workforce and on relationships among health professionals.

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates remain low among low-income minority populations. OBJECTIVE To evaluate informed decision making (IDM) elements about CRC screening among low-income minority patients. DESIGN Observational data were collected as part of a patient-level randomized controlled trial to improve CRC screening rates. Medical visits (November 2007 to May 2010) were audio-taped and coded for IDM elements about CRC screening. Near the end of the study one provider refused recording of patients’ visits (33 of 270 patients). Among all patients in the trial, agreement to be audio taped was 43.5 % (103/237). Evaluable patient (n = 100) visits were assessed for CRC screening discussion occurrence, IDM elements, and who initiated discussion of each IDM element. PARTICIPANTS Patients were African American (72.2 %), female (63.7 %), with annual household incomes <$20,000 (60.7 %), without health insurance (57.0 %), and limited health literacy (53.7 %). KEY RESULTS Although CRC screening was mentioned during 48 (48 %) visits, no further discussion about screening occurred in 23 visits (19 times mentioned by the participant with no response from providers). During any visit, the maximum number of IDM elements was five; however, only two visits included five elements. The most common IDM element discussed in addition to the nature of the decision was the assessment of the patient’s understanding in 16 (33.3 %) of the visits that included a CRC discussion. CONCLUSIONS A patient activation intervention initiated CRC screening discussions with health care providers; however, limited IDM occurred about CRC screening during medical visits of minority and low-income patients.

In the U.S. primary care practice of the future, the physician's role will increasingly be played by nurse practitioners, and the 150 million adults with one or more chronic conditions will receive some of their care from registered nurses functioning as care managers. The adult population of the United States will soon have a different primary care experience than we’ve been used to. In the primary care practice of the future, the physician’s role will increasingly be played by nurse practitioners (NPs). In addition, the 150 million adults with one or more chronic conditions will receive some of their care from registered nurses (RNs) functioning as care managers. Workforce experts agree on the growing gap between the population’s demand for primary care and the number of primary care physicians available to meet that demand. About 8000 primary care physicians (including doctors of osteopathy . . .

Many countries are facing provider shortages and imbalances in primary care or are projecting shortfalls for the future, triggered by the rise in chronic diseases and multimorbidity. In order to assess the potential of nurse practitioners (NPs) in expanding access, we analysed the size, annual growth (2005-2015) and the extent of advanced practice of NPs in 6 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Cross-country data analysis of national nursing registries, regulatory bodies, statistical offices data as well as OECD health workforce and population data, plus literature scoping review. NP and physician workforces in 6 OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand and USA). The main outcomes were the absolute and relative number of NPs per 100 000 population compared with the nursing and physician workforces, the compound annual growth rates, annual and median percentage changes from 2005 to 2015 and a synthesis of the literature on the extent of advanced clinical practice measured by physician substitution effect. The USA showed the highest absolute number of NPs and rate per population (40.5 per 100 000 population), followed by the Netherlands (12.6), Canada (9.8), Australia (4.4), and Ireland and New Zealand (3.1, respectively). Annual growth rates were high in all countries, ranging from annual compound rates of 6.1% in the USA to 27.8% in the Netherlands. Growth rates were between three and nine times higher compared with physicians. Finally, the empirical studies emanating from the literature scoping review suggested that NPs are able to provide 67-93% of all primary care services, yet, based on limited evidence. NPs are a rapidly growing workforce with high levels of advanced practice potential in primary care. Workforce monitoring based on accurate data is critical to inform educational capacity and workforce planning.

Despite efforts to mitigate a projected primary care physician (PCP) shortage required to meet an aging, growing, and increasingly insured population, shortages remain, compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic, growing inequity, and persistent underinvestment. We examined primary care workforce trends over the past decade and revisited projected primary care clinician workforce needs through the year 2040. Using data from the AMA Masterfile and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we analyzed trends in the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and in outpatient PCP visits by age and gender over the past decade. We then used the Medicare PECOS and Physician & Other Practitioners datasets to identify nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in primary care. Using these baseline clinician enumerations and projected population growth estimates from the US Census Bureau for the years 2020-2040, we calculated estimated primary care workforce needs by 2040. The effects of aging and population growth and baseline shortages in the primary care workforce call for significant increases in the primary care workforce to accommodate rising demands. Office visits to primary care clinicians are projected to increase from 773,606 in 2020 to 893,098 in 2040. We project a need for an additional 57,559 primary care clinicians by 2040. Workforce shortages in primary care continue to expand due to population aging, growth, and heightened rates of clinician burnout & egress.

Impending physician shortages in the United States will necessitate greater reliance on physician assistants and nurse practitioners, particularly in primary care. But how willing are Americans to accept that change? This study examines provider preferences from patients' perspective, using data from the Association of American Medical Colleges' Consumer Survey.We found that about half of the respondents preferred to have a physician as their primary care provider. However, when presented with scenarios wherein they could see a physician assistant or a nurse practitioner sooner than a physician, most elected to see one of the other health care professionals instead of waiting. Although our findings provide evidence that US consumers are open to the idea of receiving care from physician assistants and nurse practitioners, it is important to consider barriers to more widespread use, such as scope-of-practice regulations. Policy makers should incorporate such evidence into solutions for the physician shortage [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Aim. To identify the barriers and enablers to the implementation of a national policy to increase and develop the advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) workforce in Ireland. Background. The Department of Health (Ireland) introduced a policy to increase the number of ANPs to 2% of the nursing workforce. Evaluation provides information to inform successful policy implementation and development of ANP roles in healthcare services. Methods. Qualitative descriptive design. Twenty candidate ANPs participated in four focus groups. Nine key stakeholders were also interviewed. Results. Analysis identified four barriers: lack of infrastructural resources; delay in releasing and arranging replacements for candidate ANPs; role resistance from administration, allied healthcare professionals and other nurses; and lack of organisational readiness. The five enablers were: supportive physicians; Nursing and Midwifery Practice Development Units; supportive directors of nursing; role awareness and clarity; and educational preparation. Conclusions. This evaluation identifies barriers and enablers to the implementation of a national policy to increase the critical mass of advanced practitioners within the healthcare services. Evaluation at the implementation phase informed the roll-out of future advanced practice initiatives. Implications for Nursing Management. To support advanced practice development, leadership, infrastructure, and resource planning are needed to harness known enablers and address identified barriers to the implementation and sustainability of these posts.

Aim . To determine Senior Nurse Managers’ perceptions of integration of Nurse Practitioner roles in Healthcare Organisations across Ireland and Australia. Background . Introduction of the Nurse Practitioner role in both countries is well established with national policies aimed at developing a critical mass in the health workforce. Current policy requires Senior Nurse Managers to be actively involved in the introduction of and oversight of the integration of Nurse Practitioners across healthcare settings. This is integral in the context of the success and sustainability of the services provided by the Nurse Practitioner. Methods . A quantitative, cross‐sectional cloud‐based survey of senior nurse managers across Ireland and Australia from April to September 2022. Results . Of 300 responses received, 122 were eligible for analysis. Of these, 77% expressed that there should be a specific role to support the integration of Nurse Practitioner roles at local level, and 61% recommended that this should occur at a national level, whilst 48% reported the absence of a standardised governance structure. Three reporting structures were identified: professional, clinical, and operational. Autonomous clinical decision making and prescribing were two Nurse Practitioner functions most identified. Fifty‐five percent reported having performance indicators for Nurse Practitioner roles, with 24% agreeing that performance indicators captured the quality of care provided. Thirty‐five percent of senior nurse managers indicated that there were agreed reporting timelines for performance indicators and a requirement for the provision of an annual report. Conclusion . Whilst some participants reported structure to guide and evaluate the work and value of Nurse Practitioners, the approach was inconsistent across organisations and countries. This paper demonstrates that integration is not broadly established across both countries. Implications for the Profession . The main findings were that Nurse Practitioners were misunderstood and the development of a structured framework to support the integration of Nurse Practitioners would provide long‐term benefits.

Purpose: To describe international trends on the developing role of the nurse practitioner‐advanced practice nurse (NP‐APN), including nomenclature, levels and types of NP‐APN education, practice settings, scope of practice, regulatory policies, and political environment. Design: A cross‐sectional, descriptive Web‐based survey sent in February and March 2008 to a total of 174 key informants and active members of the International Nurse Practitioner‐Advanced Practice Nursing Network of the International Council of Nurses. Methods: An international Web‐based survey preceded by a pilot survey. Findings: Ninety‐one nurses from 32 countries responded. Thirteen titles were identified on nomenclature for the NP‐APN in different countries. NP‐APN education was available in 71% of the 31 countries responding to this item, with 50% identifying the master's degree as the most prevalent credential. Twenty‐three countries had formal recognition of the NP‐APN role. Of these, 48% had licensure maintenance or renewal requirements for the NP‐APN, with most requiring continuing education or clinical practice. The greatest support for the NP‐APN role came from domestic nursing organizations (92%), individual nurses (70%), and the government (68%), while opposition came primarily from domestic physician organizations (83%) and individual physicians (67%). Conclusions: Interest in the NP‐APN role has been gaining ground worldwide. This study presents a snapshot of education, practice, and regulation for NP‐APNs as they develop their unique role in delivering health care in various countries. Areas that may require more support are highlighted. Clinical Relevance: The NP‐APN role in healthcare systems is expanding and will benefit from international networking and support.

Physician Assistants (PAs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are widely utilized in United States (US) Emergency Departments(EDs). We sought to characterize ED PA and NP utilization and practice characteristics in US EDs 2010–2017. A retrospective, secondary analysis of the Center for Disease Control's National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was performed. National estimates of ED visits involving PAs/NPs alone (PA/NP), PAs/NPs with physician involvement (PA/NP+), or physician only (PHYS) were analyzed for patient demographics and hospital characteristics. Between 2010 and 2017, 1 billion US ED visits occurred. 8.4% (±4.2%) of visits were seen by a PA/NP, and 11.8% (±4.5%) by a PA/NP+; 76.3% (±7.2%) by PHYS. There was an increase in utilization by PA/NP observed in 2016. PA/NP acuity was highest for semi-urgent/nonurgent (53.2%, ±8.6%). PA/NP see the minority of ambulance arrivals [5.4% (±1.2%)] and admit less patients overall [1.6% (±0.7%)]. Less laboratory [53.6% (±10.0%) vs. 67.0% (±6.2%)] and radiographic [38.0% (±7.0%) vs. 51.6% (±4.6%)] studies were performed during PA/NP only vs. PHYS visits. PA/NP visits were most common for patients 25–44 years old (yo) (31.1%, ±5.5%) and 0–15 yo (23.9%, ±4.7%). Most PA/NP visits result in a length of stay (LOS) between 1 and 1.9 h (33.4%, ±5.7%) compared to most PHYS visits resulting in a LOS greater than 3 h (40.3%, ±3%). From 2010 to 2015, PA/NP utilization remained stable until an increase in 2016. There was a decrease in 2017. Various PA/NP patient characteristics are significant compared to PHYS. PHYS continue to see most ED patients.