Explore the vast range of titles available.

We examine the preopening process and price discovery from the offer price to the first open price in initial public offerings. The extent of price discovery during preopening is influenced by firm characteristics and preopening attributes, such as volume of shares executed in preopening, canceled orders, order imbalance, and changes in indicative price. Institutional investors cancel 4 orders for every executed order. Each phase of preopening contributes to incremental price discovery. In “hot” IPOs, almost all price discovery processes occur during preopening, whereas in “cold” IPOs, half of the price adjustment occurs after the market opens.

This study examines the role of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) involving publicly traded target firms. We find that deals receiving comment letters have an increased likelihood of deal completion and deal price revision, consistent with the SEC review process reducing information asymmetry, albeit at the cost of delaying the M&A process. Further analyses suggest that the SEC review process generates new value-relevant information via firms’ disclosure amendments in response to comment letters. We address endogeneity concerns using multiple approaches. Our findings that the SEC review process reduces information asymmetry in M&As provide new insight into the real economic consequences of disclosure regulation.

The article is based on data about 349 orders for road construction in Poland. The unit prices (per one kilometer of roads) are compared, arising from the following two types of orders: design-bid-build (DBB) and design & build (D&B). As the exact list of construction works, as well as, the precise number of works is unknown before the contract is signed, the contractor’s risk is higher. The probability of underpricing the offer in the case of D&B orders is higher than that of DBB orders. It is assumed that the contractors, to avoid the potential loss (if the offer is underpriced), raise the value of their offers more than in the case of DBB types of orders. This increase in offer price is usually named risk premium. The averaged unit prices of the roads of the same kind ordered as DBB are compared to D&B orders. To find the risk premium, to the values of DBB orders, the prices of the designs are added. This made the scope of the DBB and D&B orders the same i.e. able to compare. It is discovered that the average unit prices for DBB orders are higher than for D&B orders for four groups of orders, so the risk premium can’t be calculated there. For the other two groups of orders, the risk premium is 19% and 49% of the total value of the DBB order i.e. value of the design plus the value of construction works ordered.

As the proportions of variable renewable sources (VRSs) such as solar and wind energy increase rapidly in the power system, their uncertainties inevitably undermine power supply reliability and increase the amount of operating reserve resources required to manage the system. However, because operating reserves have the characteristics of a public good and their value is related to the social cost of blackouts, it is difficult to determine their market price efficiently, which leads to inefficiencies in procuring operating reserves. This study estimates the operating reserve demand curve (ORDC) of the Korean power system to provide an effective basis for measuring the proper value and quantity of operating reserves needed to meet the reliability standard. A stochastic dynamic optimization model is applied to incorporate the probabilistic characteristics of VRS and the inter-hour constraint, which is necessary for analyzing load-following reserves. An econometric model and the Monte Carlo simulation method are used to generate the forecast profiles of solar and wind generation. The results indicate that the proper amount of hourly operating reserves needed in 2034 is approximately 4.4 times higher than that in 2020 at the current reserve offer price. The ORDC of 2020 has a price-inelastic shape, whereas the ORDC of 2034 has a price-elastic shape because the reserve requirement varies considerably with its offer price level in the high-VRS penetration case. This variability is due to alternatives, such as VRS curtailment or load shedding, which can replace the reserve requirement. This study also showed that VRS curtailment is an effective balancing resource as an alternative to reserves.

In an initial public offering (IPO) the firm can set the offer price of its shares, based on the valuation of the firm, by changing the number of shares. This study uses stock ownership records and hand-collected IPO data to analyze the offer prices, the underpricing of IPO shares (measured as the initial return, IR) and the relationship with the post-IPO ownership structure. Specifically, the paper focuses on individual IPO investors. The results show that for the lowest priced IPOs the IR is significantly higher priced IPOs. Furthermore, for the low-priced IPOs, there is a negative relationship between offer price and breadth of ownership. This implies that stocks with a low price can attract more investors than stocks with higher offer prices. However, for high-priced IPOs the relationship is positive, suggesting that also the IPOs with highest price attract more investors. Overall, this study shows that the offer price of an IPO firm may have a moderate effect on its post-IPO ownership structure.

The pricing of IPOs is a challenging task among underwriters as they require resources from firms. Contrary to the non-financial information presented in a prospectus to set an offer rice, pre-IPO accounting information could arguably influence IPO offer price. This study aims to investigate the relationship between leverage and IPO offer price. A crosssectional Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression was implemented to investigate the relationship between leverage and offer price based on a sample of 129 Malaysian IPOs issued between January 2009 and December 2018. As a result, it was proven that leverage was negatively related to offer prices. Accordingly, it was proposed in the findings that fit, which issued higher leverages prior to IPO listing, often posed high financial risks. Subsequently, underwriters and issuers set a lower price for IPOs to compensate for a higher degree of information asymmetry among retail investors. Among the implications of this study’s findings include investor concerns on accounting information, especially leverage upon determining IPO value and IPO investment.  

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify selected information from the prospectus that might signal the initial public offering (IPO) offer price. Design/methodology/approach This study uses cross-sectional data for a 14-year period from 2000 to 2014 in examining hypotheses relating to Shariah-compliant status, institutional investors, underwriter ranking and shareholder retention, with respect to their associations with the offer price of the IPOs. Further, this study uses ordinary least squares (OLS) for all models, including the models for both subsamples of Shariah- and non-Shariah-compliant IPOs. As for robustness, this study incorporates the quantile regression and quadratic model. Findings The results tend to provide support for the argument that firms with Shariah-compliant status reflect lower uncertainty and project better signalling of quality due to greater scrutiny by the government and thus are able to offer IPOs at higher prices. Similarly, firms with a higher proportion of shareholder retention indicate lower risks as insiders forego their options to diversify their portfolio, and hence could price their IPOs higher. Finally, the involvement of institutional investors and higher underwriter ranking could be used by firms to disregard information asymmetry, and therefore, the issuer might have to discount the IPO offer price. Research limitations/implications This study focuses solely on information in the prospectus that should not be disregarded by the investors in valuing the appropriateness of the IPO offer price. This study contributes in terms of providing a better understanding of the determinant factors of the IPO offer price of the firms which are Shariah-compliant. Originality/value This paper provides evidence for the determinants of the IPO offer price in a fixed pricing mechanism for both Shariah-and non-Shariah-compliant IPOs.

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to contribute to the literature on seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) by examining the underpricing of European real estate corporations and identifying determinants explaining the phenomenon of setting the offer price at a discount at SEOs.Design/methodology/approachWith a sample of 470 SEOs of European real estate investment trusts (REITs) and real estate operating companies (REOCs) from 2004 to 2018, multivariate regression models are applied to test for theories on the pricing of SEOs. This paper furthermore tests for differences in underpricing for REITs and REOCs as well as specialized and diversified property companies.FindingsSignificant underpricing of 3.06 percent is found, with REITs (1.90 percent) being statistically less underpriced than REOCs (5.08 percent). The findings support the market timing theory by showing that managers trying to time the equity market gain from lower underpricing. Furthermore, underwritten offerings are more underpriced to reduce the risk of the arranging bank, but top-tier underwriters are able to reduce offer price discounts by being more successful in attracting investors. The results cannot support the value uncertainty hypothesis, but they are in line with placement cost stories. In addition, specialized property companies are subject to lower underpricing.Practical implicationsAn optimal issuance strategy taking into account timing, relative offer size and the choice of the underwriter can minimize the amount of “money left on the table” and therefore contribute to the lower cost of raising capital.Originality/valueThis is the first study to investigate SEO underpricing for European real estate corporations, pricing differences of REITs and REOCs in seasoned offerings and the effect of market timing on the pricing of SEOs.

The primary focus of this paper is to develop an empirical model to study the relationship between key Financial Performance Indicators and IPO Offer Prices. It seeks to assist Indian IPO investors to make more informed decisions by advancing their knowledge about relevant Pre-IPO Financial Performance Indicators that are effective predictors of Offer Price. The purpose is this study is to provide all the stakeholders with an approach to evaluate the Offer Price of IPOs. This will help the stakeholders to overcome pricing anomalies. The companies listed in the National Stock Exchange of India between the financial years 2015-2016 to 2020-2021 are taken as the sample of the study. The secondary data are analyzed by constructing a multiple linear regression model. This study uses a range of fundamental factors related to financial performance in a single framework to demonstrate that an IPO Offer Price can be assessed by its Pre-IPO Financial Performance. The findings of this study validate the objectives of the model constructed. This research shows that the Pre-IPO Financial Performance has an influential role in explaining the IPO offering price. The results of the study show that variables such as Net Asset Value (NAV), Return on Assets (ROA), Profit after Tax (PAT), and Return on Net Worth (RONW) have a substantial impact on IPO Offering Price. The findings of the research will assist IPO issuers in pricing their offerings better and more competitively. Furthermore, this study will also minimize the gap between offering and listing prices to prevent speculative failure. The study will help investors with minimal resources to evaluate the value of any IPO issue. An IPO's value can be fairly estimated, and investors can decide whether the issue is worth investing in or not.

Competitive pressures and economic turbulence increase the need to find new ways to maintain a stable financial position. This task is also faced by the railway transport and makes transport companies look for new markets for new works and services. The article considers the market of track structure maintenance services and reveals the factors that influence the volume of this market. The authors of the article consider the pricing policy for track structure maintenance services. Based on the analysis of competitors’ prices and the pricing policy pursued by the infrastructure directorate, an approach to the formation of the pricing strategy in this market segment is proposed.