Explore the vast range of titles available.

Immunocompromised patients have been shown to have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. Here we compared the B-cell, T-cell and neutralizing antibody response to WT and Omicron BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 virus after the fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies (HM, n=71), solid tumors (ST, n=39) and immune-rheumatological (IR, n=25) diseases. The humoral and T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were analyzed by quantifying the anti-RBD antibodies, their neutralization activity and the IFN-γ released after spike specific stimulation. We show that the T-cell response is similarly boosted by the fourth dose across the different subgroups, while the antibody response is improved only in patients not receiving B-cell targeted therapies, independent on the pathology. However, 9% of patients with anti-RBD antibodies did not have neutralizing antibodies to either virus variants, while an additional 5.7% did not have neutralizing antibodies to Omicron BA.2, making these patients particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The increment of neutralizing antibodies was very similar towards Omicron BA.2 and WT virus after the third or fourth dose of vaccine, suggesting that there is no preferential skewing towards either virus variant with the booster dose. The only limited step is the amount of antibodies that are elicited after vaccination, thus increasing the probability of developing neutralizing antibodies to both variants of virus. These data support the recommendation of additional booster doses in frail patients to enhance the development of a B-cell response directed against Omicron and/or to enhance the T-cell response in patients treated with anti-CD20.

This longitudinal study examined how active gastrointestinal (GI) cancer types affect immune responses to SARS-CoV-2, focusing on the ability to neutralize the Omicron variants. Patients with GI cancer (n = 168) were categorized into those with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic metastatic GI cancer, non-hepatic metastatic GI cancer, and two control groups of patients with and without underlying liver diseases. Humoral and cellular immune responses were evaluated before and after Omicron antigen exposures. In the pre-Omicron era, humoral SARS-CoV-2 immunity decreased after three antigen contacts without further antigen exposure. While Omicron neutralization was significantly lower than wildtype neutralization (p < 0.01), Omicron infections were yet mild to moderate. Additional Omicron exposures improved IgG levels (p < 0.01) and Omicron neutralization (p < 0.01). However, this effect was significantly less intense in patients with active GI cancer, particularly in patients with pancreaticobiliary neoplasms (PBN; p = 0.04), with underlying immunodeficiency (p = 0.05), and/or under conventional chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Pre-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 immunity prevented severe clinical courses of infections with Omicron variants in patients with GI cancer. However, in patients with PBN, with underlying immunodeficiency, and/or under conventional chemotherapy initial contacts with Omicron antigens triggered only reduced immune responses. Thus, subgroups could be identified for whom booster vaccinations are of special clinical significance.

Worldwide, millions of persons have received multiple COVID-19 vaccinations and subsequently recovered from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron breakthrough infections. In 2 small, matched cohorts (n = 12, n = 24) in Denmark, we found Omicron BA.1/BA.2 breakthrough infection after 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccination provided improved Omicron BA.5 neutralization over 3-dose vaccination alone.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant concern for everyone. Recent data from many worldwide reports suggest that most infections are caused by the Omicron variant and its sub-lineages, dominating all the previously emerged variants. The numerous mutations in Omicron’s viral genome and its sub-lineages attribute it a larger amount of viral fitness, owing to the alteration of the transmission and pathophysiology of the virus. With a rapid change to the viral structure, Omicron and its sub-variants, namely BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5, dominate the community with an ability to escape the neutralization efficiency induced by prior vaccination or infections. Similarly, several recombinant sub-variants of Omicron, namely XBB, XBD, and XBF, etc., have emerged, which a better understanding. This review mainly entails the changes to Omicron and its sub-lineages due to it having a higher number of mutations. The binding affinity, cellular entry, disease severity, infection rates, and most importantly, the immune evading potential of them are discussed in this review. A comparative analysis of the Delta variant and the other dominating variants that evolved before Omicron gives the readers an in-depth understanding of the landscape of Omicron’s transmission and infection. Furthermore, this review discusses the range of neutralization abilities possessed by several approved antiviral therapeutic molecules and neutralizing antibodies which are functional against Omicron and its sub-variants. The rapid evolution of the sub-variants is causing infections, but the broader aspect of their transmission and neutralization has not been explored. Thus, the scientific community should adopt an elucidative approach to obtain a clear idea about the recently emerged sub-variants, including the recombinant variants, so that effective neutralization with vaccines and drugs can be achieved. This, in turn, will lead to a drop in the number of cases and, finally, an end to the pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant contains extensive sequence changes relative to the earlier-arising B.1, B.1.1, and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants that have unknown effects on viral infectivity and response to existing vaccines. Using SARS-CoV-2 virus-like particles (VLPs), we examined mutations in all four structural proteins and found that Omicron and Delta showed 4.6-fold higher luciferase delivery overall relative to the ancestral B.1 lineage, a property conferred mostly by enhancements in the S and N proteins, while mutations in M and E were mostly detrimental to assembly. Thirty-eight antisera samples from individuals vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson vaccines and convalescent sera from unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors had 15-fold lower efficacy to prevent cell transduction by VLPs containing the Omicron mutations relative to the ancestral B.1 spike protein. A third dose of Pfizer vaccine elicited substantially higher neutralization titers against Omicron, resulting in detectable neutralizing antibodies in eight out of eight subjects compared to one out of eight preboosting. Furthermore, the monoclonal antibody therapeutics casirivimab and imdevimab had robust neutralization activity against B.1 and Delta VLPs but no detectable neutralization of Omicron VLPs, while newly authorized bebtelovimab maintained robust neutralization across variants. Our results suggest that Omicron has similar assembly efficiency and cell entry compared to Delta and that its rapid spread is due mostly to reduced neutralization in sera from previously vaccinated subjects. In addition, most currently available monoclonal antibodies will not be useful in treating Omicron-infected patients with the exception of bebtelovimab.

The massive and rapid transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has led to the emergence of several viral variants of concern (VOCs), with the most recent one, B.1.1.529 (Omicron), which accumulated a large number of spike mutations, raising the specter that this newly identified variant may escape from the currently available vaccines and therapeutic antibodies. Using VSV-based pseudovirus, we found that Omicron variant is markedly resistant to neutralization of sera from convalescents or individuals vaccinated by two doses of inactivated whole-virion vaccines (BBIBP-CorV). However, a homologous inactivated vaccine booster or a heterologous booster with protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) significantly increased neutralization titers to both WT and Omicron variant. Moreover, at day 14 post the third dose, neutralizing antibody titer reduction for Omicron was less than that for convalescents or individuals who had only two doses of the vaccine, indicating that a homologous or heterologous booster can reduce the Omicron escape from neutralizing. In addition, we tested a panel of 17 SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Omicron resists seven of eight authorized/approved mAbs, as well as most of the other mAbs targeting distinct epitopes on RBD and NTD. Taken together, our results suggest the urgency to push forward the booster vaccination to combat the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

The continued diversification of SARS-CoV-2 omicron lineage has given rise to the JN.1 variant and descendant strains (KP.2, KP.3, and XEC) that have prolonged the JN.1 infection wave. JN.1 and KP.2 show decreased susceptibility to neutralization sera in recipients of XBB.1.5 vaccine boosters, supporting the recent authorization of JN.1- and KP.2-matched mRNA vaccines in the United States, Europe, and other regions. We evaluated the immunogenicity of two updated monovalent variant-containing formulations of mRNA-1273 vaccines encoding the spike protein of the omicron subvariants JN.1 (mRNA-1273.167) and KP.2 (mRNA-1273.712) as compared with the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccine (mRNA-1273.815). The vaccines were administered either as a two-dose primary series in naive mice or as a booster (third) dose in mice previously immunized with two-dose primary series of mRNA-1273 (ancestral strain). The neutralizing antibody response elicited by these vaccines against JN.1 subvariants (KP.3 and LA.2) and the recombinant strain (XEC), which achieved dominance in the United States during late 2024, was evaluated. Primary series immunization with either JN.1- or KP.2-matched vaccine elicited robust neutralizing antibody titers against the matched strains and effectively cross-neutralized KP.3, LA.2, and XEC, but not the antigenically distant XBB.1.5. Similarly, JN.1- and KP.2-matched vaccines administered as a booster (third) dose increased titers against the corresponding strains and JN.1-related subvariants, but not against XBB.1.5. These data suggest these strains are antigenically similar with relatively few spike differences between JN.1 and KP.2/JN.1-related subvariants. Our results demonstrate the potency of JN.1- and KP.2-containing mRNA-1273 vaccines in neutralizing the matched variants and their utility in cross-neutralizing JN.1-related subvariants KP.3, LA.2, and XEC. Taken together, these data suggest that the licensed JN.1 and KP.2 mRNA vaccines are likely to continue to protect against the emerging strains as the JN.1 lineage further evolves. •JN.1- and KP.2-matched mRNA-1273 vaccines neutralized matched strains in mice.•These vaccines effectively cross-neutralized JN.1 subvariants KP.3, LA.2, and XEC.•Low cross-neutralization was observed for the antigenically distant strain XBB.1.5.•Data support the protective potential of these updated vaccines.

The global spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants poses a serious threat to human health worldwide. Recently, the emergence of Omicron has presented a new challenge to the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic. A convenient and reliable in vitro neutralization assay is an important method for validating the efficiency of antibodies, vaccines, and other potential drugs. Here, we established an effective assay based on a pseudovirus carrying a full-length spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the HIV-1 backbone, with a luciferase reporter gene inserted into the non-replicate pseudovirus genome. The key parameters for packaging the pseudovirus were optimized, including the ratio of the S protein expression plasmids to the HIV backbone plasmids and the collection time for the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Kappa, and Omicron pseudovirus particles. The pseudovirus neutralization assay was validated using several approved or developed monoclonal antibodies, underscoring that Omicron can escape some neutralizing antibodies, such as REGN10987 and REGN10933, while S309 and ADG-2 still function with reduced neutralization capability. The neutralizing capacity of convalescent plasma from COVID-19 convalescent patients in Wuhan was tested against these pseudoviruses, revealing the immune evasion of Omicron. Our work established a practical pseudovirus-based neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2 variants, which can be conducted safely under biosafety level-2 (BSL-2) conditions, and this assay will be a promising tool for studying and characterizing vaccines and therapeutic candidates against Omicron-included SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2. In November 2021, the Omicron variant was discovered and immediately classified as a variant of concern (VOC), since it shows substantially more mutations in the spike protein than any previous variant, especially in the receptor-binding domain (RBD). We analyzed the binding of the Omicron RBD to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 receptor (ACE2) and the ability of human sera from COVID-19 patients or vaccinees in comparison to Wuhan, Beta, or Delta RBD variants. Methods All RBDs were produced in insect cells. RBD binding to ACE2 was analyzed by ELISA and microscale thermophoresis (MST). Similarly, sera from 27 COVID-19 patients, 81 vaccinated individuals, and 34 booster recipients were titrated by ELISA on RBDs from the original Wuhan strain, Beta, Delta, and Omicron VOCs. In addition, the neutralization efficacy of authentic SARS-CoV-2 wild type (D614G), Delta, and Omicron by sera from 2× or 3× BNT162b2-vaccinated persons was analyzed. Results Surprisingly, the Omicron RBD showed a somewhat weaker binding to ACE2 compared to Beta and Delta, arguing that improved ACE2 binding is not a likely driver of Omicron evolution. Serum antibody titers were significantly lower against Omicron RBD compared to the original Wuhan strain. A 2.6× reduction in Omicron RBD binding was observed for serum of 2× BNT162b2-vaccinated persons. Neutralization of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 was completely diminished in our setup. Conclusion These results indicate an immune escape focused on neutralizing antibodies. Nevertheless, a boost vaccination increased the level of anti-RBD antibodies against Omicron, and neutralization of authentic Omicron SARS-CoV-2 was at least partially restored. This study adds evidence that current vaccination protocols may be less efficient against the Omicron variant.

•Serum from breakthrough infections can induce broad neutralization.•Vaccines play a role by reducing viral load and attenuating infection symptoms.•Omicron XBB.1.16 exhibits a high potential for immune escape. To assess the levels of and neutralizing antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and its mutants in serum samples from patients with breakthrough infection. Sixty-four patients with breakthrough infections were recruited for this cross-sectional study. All samples were used to neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 and its mutants using a focused reduction neutralization assay. A total of 512 serum samples were obtained from unvaccinated patients who received one dose of vaccine (n = 12), received two doses of vaccine (n = 15), and received three doses of vaccine (n = 37). The geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron subvariant was significantly lower (GMT 66.8 and 56.1) compared to the original strain, regardless of whether two or three doses of vaccine were administered. This result highlights that sera from breakthrough infections induce broad neutralization, but Omicron XBB.1.16 exhibits high immune evasion potential.