Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background The operating room is a high-risk environment where proper patient positioning is crucial for minimizing injury and ensuring optimal access to surgical sites. This process requires effective collaboration among surgical team members, particularly operating room nurses who play a vital role in patient safety. Despite advancements in technology, challenges such as pressure injuries persist, with a significant incidence rate. Video-based training (VBT) emerges as a promising educational tool, enhancing knowledge retention and fostering a learner-centered approach. This study aims to evaluate the impact of VBT on adherence to surgical positioning standards, highlighting its potential to improve safety protocols in the operating room. Methods In this clinical trial, 62 qualified operating room nurses (50 women, 12 men, average age: 28.90 ± 3.75 years) were randomly divided into control and intervention group ( n  = 31 in each group). The control group only received positioning recommendations, but in the intervention group, in addition to the recommendations, video-based surgical positioning training was performed for 1 month, at least 3 times a week. The performance of nurses in both groups was evaluated through a researcher-made checklist at baseline and post-intervention. Results Based on findings, there was no significant difference between the two groups in compliance with surgical positioning standards at baseline ( p  = 0.07). However, after the intervention, compliance scores significantly improved in the VBT group compared to the control group ( p  < 0.001). The VBT group showed a mean improvement of 62.12 points, while the control group improved by 10.77 points ( p  < 0.001). Conclusions This preliminary study demonstrated a notable improvement in compliance with surgical positioning standards among operating room nurses following VBT intervention. Despite the promising results, the small sample size and preliminary nature of the research necessitate further studies to confirm these findings and assess long-term outcomes. These initial insights highlight the potential of innovative training methods in enhancing surgical practices.

Intraoperative radiography imaging is essential for accurate spinal implant placement. Hazards caused by ionizing radiation raised concern on personnel’s work life long exposure in the operating room (OR). To particularize a cumulative risk estimation of radiation of personnel and patient, depending on used methods (C-arm fluoroscopy, O-arm navigation) and patient characteristics during spinal surgery, detailed investigation of radiation exposure in a clinical setting is required. Lumbosacral dorsal spinal fusion was performed in 37 patients (19 navigated, 18 fluoroscopy) during this prospective study. Radiation exposure was measured on several body regions with thermoluminescent dosimeters on patient and OR personnel (surgeon, assistant, sterile nurse, radiology technologist). Comparison between patient characteristics and radiation exposure was included. The highest patients values were measured in the surgery field and gonads area during navigation (43.2 ± 19.4 mSv; fluoroscopy: 27.7 ± 31.3 mSv; p = 0.02), followed by the thoracic region during fluoroscopy (7.7 ± 14.8 mSv; navigation: 1.1 ± 1.0 mSv; p = 0.06), other measured regions can be considered marginal in comparison. Amongst OR personnel exposure of the surgeon was significant higher during fluoroscopy (right hand: 566 ± 560 µSv and thoracic region: 275 ± 147 µSv; followed by thyroid and forehead) compared to navigation (right finger: 49 ± 19 µSv; similar levels for all regions; p < 0.001 in all regions). When compared to the surgeon, other OR personnel had significantly lower radiation doses on all body regions using fluoroscopy, and similar dose during navigation. The highest eye’s lens region value was measured during fluoroscopy for the patient (185 ± 165 µSv; navigation: 205 ± 60 µSv; p = 0.57) and the surgeon (164 ± 74 µSv; navigation: 92 ± 41 µSv; p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between patient BMI and radiation exposure to the surgery field during fluoroscopy. To our knowledge, these data present the first real life, detailed comparison of radiation exposure on OR personnel and patients between clinical use of navigation and fluoroscopy. Although patient’s radiation dose is approximately 3-fold during navigation compared to the fluoroscopy, we found that a spinal surgeon could perform up to 10-fold number of surgeries (10.000 versus 883) until maximum permissible annual effective radiation dose would be reached. Especially for a spinal surgeon, who is mainly exposed amongst OR personnel, radiation prevention and protection must remain a main issue.

This study aims to assess the impact of details management on the handling of instruments in the operating room, comprehensively evaluating its impact on device intactness, economic efficiency, overall care quality, and physician satisfaction. We analyzed 1050 procedural packs used in our hospital from March to December 2019. The control group included 525 procedural packs with conventional management (March-August 2019), while the experimental group had 525 instrument packs with details management. Outcome measures included operating room device use, surgical care quality, and device tracking outcome. Details management showed significantly higher device intactness (97.73%), a marked decrease in device preparation errors (0.00%), and more efficient device checking time (1.13±0.41) compared to conventional management (84.09%, 11.36%, 2.85±1.03) (P < .05). The experimental group had higher scores in intraoperative nursing ability, nursing operating specification, nursing staff professionalism, and device care quality (9.08±0.31, 9.23±0.32, 9.17±0.55, 97.81±0.96) compared to the control group (8.11±0.67, 7.98±0.98, 8.35±0.69, 75.25±1.87) (P < .05). Details management was associated with higher economic efficiency and lower incidences of device loss and mix-up compared to conventional management (P < .05). Implementing details management in instrument handling positively affects device intactness, economic efficiency, overall care quality, and physician satisfaction. It enhances device intactness, reduces device checking time, improves economic efficiency and overall care quality, and increases physician satisfaction. The findings provide insights into the benefits of a detailed instrument management approach in a hospital setting.

ImportanceCompliance with the surgical safety checklist during operative procedures has been shown to reduce inhospital mortality and complications but proper execution by the surgical team remains elusive.ObjectiveWe evaluated the impact of remote video auditing with real-time provider feedback on checklist compliance during sign-in, time-out and sign-out and case turnover times.Design, settingProspective, cluster randomised study in a 23-operating room (OR) suite.ParticipantsSurgeons, anaesthesia providers, nurses and support staff.ExposureORs were randomised to receive, or not receive, real-time feedback on safety checklist compliance and efficiency metrics via display boards and text messages, followed by a period during which all ORs received feedback.Main outcome(s) and measure(s)Checklist compliance (Pass/Fail) during sign-in, time-out and sign-out demonstrated by (1) use of checklist, (2) team attentiveness, (3) required duration, (4) proper sequence and duration of case turnover times.ResultsSign-in, time-out and sign-out PASS rates increased from 25%, 16% and 32% during baseline phase (n=1886) to 64%, 84% and 68% for feedback ORs versus 40%, 77% and 51% for no-feedback ORs (p<0.004) during the intervention phase (n=2693). Pass rates were 91%, 95% and 84% during the all-feedback phase (n=2001). For scheduled cases (n=1406, 71%), feedback reduced mean turnover times by 14% (41.4 min vs 48.1 min, p<0.004), and the improvement was sustained during the all-feedback period. Feedback had no effect on turnover time for unscheduled cases (n=587, 29%).Conclusions and relevanceOur data indicate that remote video auditing with feedback improves surgical safety checklist compliance for all cases, and turnover time for scheduled cases, but not for unscheduled cases.

Background Effective feedback is fundamental in clinical education, as it allows trainers to constantly diagnose the trainees’ condition, determine their weaknesses, and intervene at proper times. Recently, different feedback-based approaches have been introduced in clinical training; however, the effectiveness of such interventions still needs to be studied extensively, especially in the perioperative field. Therefore, this study sought to compare the effects of apprenticeship training using sandwich feedback and traditional methods on the perioperative competence and performance of Operating Room (OR) technology students. Methods Thirty final-semester undergraduate OR technology students taking the apprenticeship courses were randomly allocated into experimental ( n  = 15) and control ( n  = 15) groups through the stratified randomization approach. The students in the experimental group experienced Feedback-Based Learning (FBL) using a sandwich model, and the students in the control group participated in Traditional-Based Training (TBT) in six five-hour sessions weekly for three consecutive weeks. All students completed the Persian version of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised (PPCS-R) on the first and last days of interventions. Also, a blinded rater completed a checklist to evaluate all students’ performance via Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on the last intervention day. Besides, the students in the FBL filled out a questionnaire regarding their attitude toward the implemented program. Results The mean total score of the PPCS-R was significantly higher in the FBL than in the TBT on the last intervention day ( P  < 0.001). Additionally, the increase in mean change of PPCS-R total score from the first to last days was significantly more in the FBL ( P  < 0.001). Likewise, the FBL students had higher DOPS scores than the TBT ones ( P  < 0.001). Most FBL students also had a good attitude toward the implemented program ( n  = 8; 53.3%). Conclusion Apprenticeship training using a sandwich feedback-based approach was superior to the traditional method for enhancing perioperative competence and performance of final-semester OR technology students. Additional studies are required to identify the sustainability of the findings.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of airborne colony-forming units (CFU) at incision sites during implantation of prostheses with the incidence of either incisional or prosthesis-related surgical site infections. DESIGN Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Primary, public institution. PATIENTS Three hundred patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, instrumented spinal procedures, or vascular bypass graft implantation. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group or the control group. A novel device (Air Barrier System), previously shown to reduce airborne CFU at incision sites, was utilized in the intervention group. Procedures assigned to the control group were performed without the device, under routine operating room atmospheric conditions. Patients were followed up for 12 months to determine whether airborne CFU levels at the incision sites predicted the incidence of incisional or prosthesis-related infection. RESULTS Data were available for 294 patients, 148 in the intervention group and 146 in the control group. CFU density at the incision site was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P<.001). The density of airborne CFU at the incision site during the procedures was significantly related to the incidence of implant infection (P=.021). Airborne CFU densities were 4 times greater in procedures with implant infection versus no implant infection. All 4 of the observed prosthesis infections occurred in the control group. CONCLUSION Reduction of airborne CFU specifically at the incision site during operations may be an effective strategy to reduce prosthesis-related infections. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01610271 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-8.

Background and Objectives: Surgical smoke generated by energy devices during surgery contains hazardous substances and poses health risks to staff in the operating room. Exposure to surgical smoke must be reduced to minimize the risk of health hazards. Many studies have evaluated surgical smoke qualitatively, but few have performed quantitative assessment. The aim of this study was to quantify the number of particles generated during various breast surgery procedures. Materials and Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, breast surgeries performed at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (the present Institute of Science Tokyo Hospital) between December 2022 and August 2023 were randomly assigned to two groups: the electrosurgical device group and the electrosurgical device with smoke evacuator group. The number of particles generated by energy devices during surgery was measured using a particle counter. Results: Surgical smoke was generated in all procedures. The number of measured particles was significantly less in the electrosurgical device with smoke evacuator group than in the electrosurgical device group during all procedures (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: All breast surgery procedures produced a significant amount of surgical smoke, which was effectively reduced by using an electrosurgical device with a smoke evacuator. These findings support the routine use of smoke evacuators in breast surgery to reduce occupational exposure to hazardous particles. Implementation of such devices could improve operating room safety and may inform future guidelines and institutional policies regarding surgical smoke management.

BackgroundAnaesthesiologists work in a high stress, high consequence environment in which missed steps in preparation may lead to medical errors and potential patient harm. The pre-anaesthetic induction period has been identified as a time in which medical errors can occur. The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation has developed a Pre-Anesthetic Induction Patient Safety (PIPS) checklist. We conducted this study to test the effectiveness of this checklist, when embedded in our institutional Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS), on resident performance in a simulated environment.MethodsUsing a randomised, controlled, observer-blinded design, we compared performance of anaesthesiology residents in a simulated operating room under production pressure using a checklist in completing a thorough pre-anaesthetic induction evaluation and setup with that of residents with no checklist. The checklist was embedded in the simulated operating room's electronic medical record.ResultsData for 38 anaesthesiology residents shows a statistically significant difference in performance in pre-anaesthetic setup and evaluation as scored by blinded raters (maximum score 22 points), with the checklist group performing better by 7.8 points (p<0.01). The effects of gender and year of residency on total score were not significant. Simulation duration (time to anaesthetic agent administration) was increased significantly by the use of the checklist.ConclusionRequired use of a pre-induction checklist improves anaesthesiology resident performance in a simulated environment. The PIPS checklist as an integrated part of a departmental AIMS warrant further investigation as a quality measure.

Background: High-performing and high-reliability teams are an important component of service delivery. With a focused emphasis on safety in acute care hospitals, understanding the nature of surgical teams and team performance is an essential component to achieving high-quality surgical care. More information is needed about the challenges to effective team functioning in the operating room, the influence of working conditions, and the environmental context on surgical team performance. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the nature of surgical teams and how they perform in the operating room to contribute to a broader knowledge about high-performing and high-reliability teams in health care settings. Methodology/Approach: We conducted a qualitative study involving direct observation and semistructured interviews. Field observations of 10 high-complexity surgeries and face-to-face interviews with 26 members of surgical teams were completed at one university medical center. A conceptual framework derived from the literature was developed to guide the selection of surgeries and surgical teams to be observed. Data were transcribed and analyzed to identify the factors and different conditions that influence the performance of these surgical teams. Findings: The type of coordination and the degree of independent and interdependent coordination vary among the seven observed stages of the surgical process. Most of the surgical teams were ad hoc teams and as such, further challenged by consistently frequent \"hand-offs\" for break relief. Additional role demands influence the situational dynamics which can alter the adaptive capacity of the team. Practice Implications: The surgical event evokes a changing degree of coordination and adaptation to complexity and uncertainty. In such environments, relational coordination through leadership can contribute to a successful surgical result, improvement of the overall process, including error reduction, and enhanced knowledge creation and dissemination, particularly germane in research university teaching hospitals.

Background Multi-centre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery are challenging. It is particularly difficult to establish standards of surgery and ensure that interventions are delivered as intended. This study developed and tested methods for identifying the key components of surgical interventions and standardising interventions within RCTs. Qualitative case studies of surgical interventions were undertaken within the internal pilot phase of a surgical RCT for obesity (the By-Band study). Each case study involved video data capture and non-participant observation of gastric bypass surgery in the operating theatre and interviews with surgeons. Methods were developed to transcribe and synchronise data from video recordings with observational data to identify key intervention components, which were then explored in the interviews with surgeons. Results Eight qualitative case studies were undertaken. A novel combination of video data capture, observation and interview data identified variations in intervention delivery between surgeons and centres. Although surgeons agreed that the most critical intervention component was the size and shape of the gastric pouch, there was no consensus regarding other aspects of the procedure. They conceded that evidence about the ‘best way’ to perform bypass was lacking and, combined with the pragmatic nature of the By-Band study, agreed that strict standardisation of bypass might not be required. Conclusions This study has developed and tested methods for understanding how surgical interventions are designed and delivered delivered in RCTs. Applying these methods more widely may help identify key components of interventions to be delivered by surgeons in trials, enabling monitoring of key components and adherence to the protocol. These methods are now being tested in the context of other surgical RCTs. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00786323 , 05/09/2011.