Explore the vast range of titles available.

Background: Approximately 40% of all antibiotics related to an acute-care hospital stay are prescribed at the time of hospital discharge. However, there is no metric to compare hospitals on their antibiotic-prescribing at this transition of care. In this study, we sought to build a risk-adjusted metric for comparing hospitals on their overall post-discharge antibiotic use. Methods: This was a retrospective study across all acute-care admissions within the Veterans Health Administration during 2018-2021. For patients discharged to home or self-care, data on antibiotics administered while inpatient and those prescribed at discharge were collected. To predict post-discharge antibiotic use (days of therapy, DOT), we built a zero-inflated negative binomial model with a random intercept for each VA medical center. Data were split into training and testing sets to measure model performance and absolute error. Covariates included patient demographics, medical specialty at discharge, comorbidities, discharge diagnoses of infection, and the length of inpatient antibiotic therapy. Outliers, defined as DOT ≥ 30, were excluded, and the predicted random intercept was used to determine hospital performance. To compare hospitals with a positive versus negative random intercept in our model (i.e. higher vs. lower than expected overall post-discharge use, respectively), we calculated mean total antibiotic duration (inpatient + post-discharge) for two uncomplicated infection types: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Results: 1,804,400 patients were discharged to home or self-care across 130 hospitals. The mean age was 67.8 (SD 12.9), and 93.7% were male. Antibiotics were prescribed to 41.5% while hospitalized and 19.5% at discharge. The median number of post-discharge DOT among those prescribed post-discharge antibiotics was 7 (IQR 4-12). The predictive model detected post-discharge antibiotic use with fidelity, including accurate identification of any post-discharge antibiotic exposure (area under the precision-recall curve=0.97 ) and reliable prediction of the number of post-discharge DOT in those who were exposed (mean absolute error = 1.65; Figure 1). At negative versus positive random intercept hospitals (Figure 2), antibiotic duration for CAP and SSTIs was 7.3 versus 8.1 days (p < 0 .001) and 9.4 vs. 10.2 days (p < 0 .001), respectively. Conclusion: A model using electronically available data was able to accurately predict antibiotic use prescribed at hospital discharge. Hospitals with lower than expected overall post-discharge antibiotic use also prescribed shorter courses of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated cases of CAP and SSTI, which may reflect more robust processes at these sites to reduce antibiotic overuse at discharge. Disclosure: Michi Goto: Contracted Research – Merck

Background: Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing (CHGB) prevents healthcare associated infections (HAIs). CHGB quality is rarely assessed; prior studies identified that concentrations of CHG can be suboptimal, particularly at the neck, and if rinsed after application. In the setting of increased HAI rates on 3 high-risk units, we evaluated CHG skin concentrations, comparing results to bathing documentation and patient reports as part of a quality improvement initiative. Methods: All patients admitted to 3 high-risk units were swabbed for CHG concentration testing at the neck, bilateral upper arms, and groin. Swabs were processed using a semi-quantitative colorimetric CHG assay. A threshold of 0.001875% CHG was used to determine adequacy based on prior studies. Adequacy was assessed by body site, timing of bath, and patient-reported skin care activities using Chi-square tests in SAS 9.4. Per hospital policy, all admitted patients are bathed daily with 2% CHG pre-packed wipes. Patients without a documented CHGB for the duration of the admission were excluded. Results: CHG testing was completed on 63 patients: 23 on medical ICU, 18 surgical ICU, 22 oncology ward, yielding 249 samples. Only ward patients could report the time of last CHGB, which agreed with nursing documentation for 12/21(57%) Adequacy by sample was no different across units: 59/88(67%) Oncology, 68/90(76%) MICU, 56/71(79%) SICU, p=0.2091. Site adequacy was different by site: neck 36/63(57%), left arm 49/62(79%), right arm 50/62(81%), groin 48/62(77%), p=0.0083. Samples taken from the 11 patients with > = 24 hours since last CHGB were more likely to be below threshold concentration: 19/47(40%) versus 47/202(23%) not adequate in the recent treatment grouping. Three patients reported showering soon after the CHGB and 8 patients used moisturizing lotion. The percent of samples below threshold for the showering patients (6/12, 50%) and lotion-users (11/32, 34%) were not significantly different from the non-showering or non-lotion using patient samples (p=0.0588 and 0.2800 respectively). Conclusion: In a facility with longstanding daily CHGB policies in place, 66/249 samples from 63 patients lacked adequate concentrations of CHG for optimal HAI prevention. Even in patients with recent CHGB, 23% of sites tested revealed inadequate levels of CHG, while 60% of those overdue for CHGB kept adequate concentrations. Reliable implementation strategies are required for CHGB so as to ensure maximal infection prevention impact.

Oral presentation skills and self-efficacy are intricately linked in the context of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education. Research indicates that students’ beliefs in their own abilities to deliver oral presentations significantly influence their skill development (Ringeisen et al., 2017 ). Furthermore, collaborative learning and peer assessment (PA) have been shown to foster mutual support and enhance learning outcomes (Zheng et al., 2023 ). However, there remains a gap in understanding how specific collaborative practices, such as PA and group presentations, directly affect self-efficacy in oral presentation contexts among EFL learners. To address this gap, this qualitative study aims to investigate the effects of group presentations and PA on EFL students’ self-efficacy regarding oral presentations. The study involves 30 first-year undergraduate students enrolled in an English literature program at a university in northeastern Iran. Utilizing a qualitative design, data were gathered through semi-structured focus group interviews, which were subsequently recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis revealed five key themes that underscore the positive impact of group presentations and PA on students’ self-efficacy beliefs. Additionally, findings indicate that these collaborative activities not only bolster self-efficacy but also enhance students’ motivation, autonomy, goal-setting abilities, presentation skills, and emotional support. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to both pedagogical practices and theoretical frameworks within EFL education.