Explore the vast range of titles available.

For patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), therapeutic options are limited. Raltegravir is a new molecule that inhibits HIV integrase. In two phase 3 studies, raltegravir was found to be superior to placebo, in the context of optimized background antiviral therapy, in suppressing HIV viral load at 48 weeks (62.1% vs. 32.9%). In two phase 3 studies, raltegravir was found to be superior to placebo, in the context of optimized background antiviral therapy, in suppressing HIV viral load at 48 weeks (62.1% vs. 32.9%). Highly active antiretroviral therapy is the standard of care for patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. 1 Combination regimens have resulted in improved survival, decreased morbidity, and cost-effective care for patients with a CD4 count of less than 350 per cubic millimeter. 2 – 8 However, viral suppression cannot always be achieved or sustained with standard treatments because of the development of viral resistance, toxic effects of drugs, or lack of adherence. 9 – 18 The majority of HIV-infected patients in whom highly active antiretroviral therapy fails have resistant viral quasispecies. 12 – 15 , 19 , 20 Cross-resistance to agents within a drug class may exhaust . . .

In subgroups of two phase 3 studies, patients with high-risk features for failure of antiretroviral therapy, such as a low CD4 count, high base-line level of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 RNA, or unfavorable genotypic or phenotypic sensitivity score, raltegravir was superior to placebo in terms of a virologic response at 48 weeks. However, among these patients, in whom antiretroviral therapy had been used previously, 23% of raltegravir recipients had virologic failure by 48 weeks. In patients with high-risk features for failure of antiretroviral therapy, raltegravir was superior to placebo in terms of a virologic response at 48 weeks. However, among these patients, in whom antiretroviral therapy had been used previously, 23% of raltegravir recipients had virologic failure by 48 weeks. Despite the substantial decrease in mortality and morbidity rates associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy over the past decade, there is still a substantial need for effective antiretroviral drugs for patients infected with resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). 1 , 2 The majority of licensed antiretroviral drugs belong to three classes targeting either the HIV-1 protease or reverse transcriptase, and considerable cross-resistance exists among drugs within each class. 3 , 4 In patients with resistant virus, use of antiretroviral agents from new classes offers considerable potential benefit because of the absence of cross-resistance. 5 – 7 HIV-1 integrase represents a new therapeutic target. 8 , . . .

Abstract Context OBE2109 is a potent, oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist being developed for the treatment of sex-hormone–dependent diseases in women. Objective We assessed the pharmacodynamics and safety of OBE2109 alone and combined with estradiol (E2)/norethindrone acetate (NETA) add-back therapy on E2 levels and vaginal bleeding. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study in 76 healthy premenopausal women. Interventions Women were randomly assigned to take the following doses (in milligrams) once daily for 6 weeks: OBE2109, 100 or 200; or OBE2109/E2/NETA, 100/0.5/0.1, or 100/1.0/0.5, or 200/1.0/0.5. Main Outcome Measures E2 concentrations, bleeding pattern, exploratory bone metabolism biomarkers, and adverse events. Results OBE2109 100 mg and 200 mg alone reduced E2 levels to reach median levels of 19.5 and 3.2 pg/mL, respectively, at week 4. Median E2 levels after combined OBE2109/add-back therapy ranged between 25 and 40 pg/mL. OBE2109 100 mg or 200 mg alone induced amenorrhea. By day 15, >85% of women had no vaginal bleeding during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Add-back therapy partially impaired bleeding control: The highest amenorrhea rate (53%) was observed with OBE2109 100 mg/1.0 mg/0.5 mg. The addition of E2/NETA, particularly at 1 mg/0.5 mg, mitigated the increase of two bone markers induced by OBE2109 200 mg. Conclusion OBE2109 promptly lowered E2 levels. Add-back therapy may be required to prevent adverse effects on bone in women treated with the 200-mg dose (at 100 mg in some women). These results provide a basis for OBE2109 regimen selection to treat sex-hormone–dependent diseases. OBE2109 with and without E2/NETA (1 mg/0.5 mg) add-back resulted in controlled bleeding and E2 concentrations.

The potential for cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2)-selective inhibitors to increase the risk for myocardial infarction is controversial. The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) aimed to assess gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety of the COX2 inhibitor lumiracoxib compared with two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, naproxen and ibuprofen. 18 325 patients age 50 years or older with osteoarthritis were randomised to lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n=9156), naproxen 500 mg twice daily (4754), or ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily (4415) in two substudies of identical design. Randomisation was stratified for low-dose aspirin use and age. The primary cardiovascular endpoint was the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration endpoint of non-fatal and silent myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. Analysis was by intention to treat. 81 (0·44%) patients did not start treatment and 7120 (39%) did not complete the study. At 1-year follow-up, incidence of the primary endpoint was low, both with lumiracoxib (59 events [0·65%]) and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (50 events [0·55%]; hazard ratio 1·14 [95% CI 0·78–1·66], p=0·5074). Incidence of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) in the overall population in the individual substudies was 0·38% with lumiracoxib (18 events) versus 0·21% with naproxen (ten) and 0·11% with lumiracoxib (five) versus 0·16% with ibuprofen (seven). In the naproxen substudy, rates of myocardial infarction (clinical and silent) did not differ significantly compared with lumiracoxib in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (hazard ratio 2·37 [95% CI 0·74–7·55], p=0·1454), overall (1·77 [0·82–3·84], p=0·1471), and in patients taking aspirin (1·36 [0·47–3·93], p=0·5658). In the ibuprofen substudy, these rates did not differ between lumiracoxib and ibuprofen in the population not taking low-dose aspirin (0·75 [0·20–2·79], p=0·6669), overall (0·66 [0·21–2·09], p=0·4833), and in patients taking aspirin (0·47 [0·04–5·14], p=0·5328). The primary endpoint, including incidence of myocardial infarction, did not differ between lumiracoxib and either ibuprofen or naproxen, irrespective of aspirin use. This finding suggests that lumiracoxib is an appropriate treatment for patients with osteoarthritis, who are often at high cardiovascular risk and taking low-dose aspirin.

Cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX2)-selective inhibitors should reduce ulcer complications compared with non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but evidence is limited, and the possibility that these inhibitors increase cardiovascular events has been raised. The Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET) aimed to assess gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety of the COX2 inhibitor lumiracoxib compared with two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, naproxen and ibuprofen. 18 325 patients age 50 years or older with osteoarthritis were randomised to lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n=9156), naproxen 500 mg twice daily (4754), or ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily (4415) for 52 weeks, in two substudies of identical design (lumiracoxib vs ibuprofen or naproxen). Randomisation was stratified for low-dose aspirin use and age. The primary endpoint was the difference in time-to-event distribution of upper gastrointestinal ulcer complications (bleeding, perforation, or obstruction); analysis was by modified intention to treat. The principle measure of adverse cardiovascular events was the Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration endpoint (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death); this analysis was intention to treat. 81 (0·44%) patients did not start treatment and 7120 (39%) did not complete the study. In patients not taking aspirin, the cumulative 1-year incidence of ulcer complications was 1·09% (95% CI 0·82–1·36) with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (64 events) versus 0·25% (95% CI 0·12–0·39) with lumiracoxib (14 events; hazard ratio 0·21 [95% CI 0·12–0·37], p<0·0001). Reductions in ulcer complications were also significant in the overall population (0·34 [0·22–0·52], p<0·0001) but not in those taking aspirin (0·79 [0·40–1·55], p=0·4876). In the overall population, 0·55% (50/9127) of those on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 0·65% (59/9117) of those on lumiracoxib reached the cardiovascular endpoint (1·14 [0·78–1·66], p=0·5074). Lumiracoxib showed a three to four-fold reduction in ulcer complications compared with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs without an increase in the rate of serious cardiovascular events, suggesting that lumiracoxib is an appropriate treatment for patients with osteoarthritis.

Raltegravir (MK-0518) is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor with potent in-vitro activity against HIV-1 strains including those resistant to currently available antiretroviral drugs. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of raltegravir when added to optimised background regimens in HIV-infected patients. HIV-infected patients with HIV-1 RNA viral load over 5000 copies per mL, CD4 cell counts over 50 cells per μL, and documented genotypic and phenotypic resistance to at least one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and one protease inhibitor were randomly assigned to receive raltegravir (200 mg, 400 mg, or 600 mg) or placebo orally twice daily in this multicentre, triple-blind, dose-ranging, randomised study. The primary endpoints were change in viral load from baseline at week 24 and safety. Analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the number NCT00105157. 179 patients were eligible for randomisation. 44 patients were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg raltegravir, 45 to receive 400 mg raltegravir, and 45 to receive 600 mg raltegravir; 45 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo. One patient in the 200 mg group did not receive treatment and was therefore excluded from the analyses. For all groups, the median duration of previous antiretroviral therapy was 9·9 years (range 0·4–17·3 years) and the mean baseline viral load was 4·7 (SD 0·5) log10 copies per mL. Four patients discontinued due to adverse experiences, three (2%) of the 133 patients across all raltegravir groups and one (2%) of the 45 patients on placebo. 41 patients discontinued due to lack of efficacy: 14 (11%) of the 133 patients across all raltegravir groups and 27 (60%) of the 45 patients on placebo. At week 24, mean change in viral load from baseline was −1·80 (95% CI −2·10 to −1·50) log10 copies per mL in the 200 mg group, −1·87 (−2·16 to −1·58) log10 copies per mL in the 400 mg group, −1·84 (−2·10 to −1·58) log10 copies per mL in the 600 mg group, and −0·35 (−0·61 to −0·09) log10 copies per mL for the placebo group. Raltegravir at all doses showed a safety profile much the same as placebo; there were no dose-related toxicities. In patients with few remaining treatment options, raltegravir at all doses studied provided better viral suppression than placebo when added to an optimised background regimen. The safety profile of raltegravir is comparable with that of placebo at all doses studied.

Abstract Context SJX-653 is a novel neurokinin 3 receptor (NK3R) antagonist. The NK3 pathway is a central regulator of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion and has also been implicated in the generation of hot flashes. Therefore, decreases of luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone in men serve as sensitive pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of central NK3 antagonism. Objective To characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic activity of SJX-653 in healthy men. Design A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study. Setting Phase 1 unit. Patients or Other Participants Seven cohorts of 6 healthy men 18–45 years of age (4:2 randomization to SJX-653/placebo per cohort). Intervention(s) Single oral doses of 0.5–90 mg SJX-653. Main Outcome Measure(s) Safety assessments and serial pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD measurements. Results SJX-653 was well tolerated at all dose levels. Cmax and AUC0-24 increased in a dose-proportional manner. The terminal elimination half-life ranged between 9.8 and 12.5 hours independent of dose. A statistically significant, dose-dependent, reversible reduction of LH and testosterone was observed with near maximal effect after 15 mg and little to no effect at 4.5 mg. Maximal LH reduction was 70 ± 7% (mean ± sd) at 6 hours after 30 mg SJX-653 versus 10 ± 43% for placebo (P = 0.0006); maximal T reduction was of 68 ± 5% at 8 hours after 60 mg SJX-653 versus 18 ± 11% for placebo (P < 0.0001). The plasma IC50 for LH reduction was 33 ng/mL. Conclusions These data demonstrate clinical proof-of-mechanism for SJX-653 as a potent centrally-acting NK3R antagonist.

Abstract Objective To evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of TU2670, a novel orally active, nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administered to healthy female participants. Methods This was a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose ascending trial that took place in multiple medical centers. A total of 16 healthy premenopausal women (23 to 45 years of age) were randomized and received 20, 40, 80, and 160 mg TU2670 (GnRH antagonist) or placebo 7 days (±1 day) after the onset of menstrual bleeding. We performed a noncompartmental analysis for pharmacokinetic parameters and calculated relative minimum concentration values (Cmin, % Baseline) of serum pharmacodynamic (PD) markers (luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and estradiol). Results There were no significant differences among treatments with respect to vital signs, electrocardiography, adverse events, ovulation test results, and ultrasonography. The median Tmax of TU2670 occurred 0.75 to 1.00 hours after dosing, and concentrations then declined, with a mean apparent half-life (t1/2) of 3.0 to 5.9 hours. AUClast (17.7-417.9 ng·h/mL) and Cmax (8.1-95.4 ng/mL) increased in a dose-dependent manner. The PD analysis after a single administration of TU2670 revealed dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol. Maximal suppression of the pre-dose baseline (%) was 58% to 82% at 6 to 8 hours for LH, 28% to 39% at 6 to 12 hours for FSH, and 34% to 82% at 12 to 24 hours for estradiol. Conclusion The single administration of TU2670 in healthy premenopausal women was well tolerated and resulted in the dose-dependent suppression of LH, FSH, and estradiol, suggesting rapid and significant inhibition of pituitary and ovarian hormones.

Background Atopic eczema (AE) is a common skin problem that impairs quality of life and is associated with the development of other atopic diseases including asthma, food allergy and allergic rhinitis. AE treatment is a significant cost burden for health care providers. The purpose of the trial is to investigate whether daily application of emollients for the first year of life can prevent AE developing in high-risk infants (first-degree relative with asthma, AE or allergic rhinitis). Methods This is a protocol for a pragmatic, two-arm, randomised controlled, multicentre trial. Up to 1400 term infants at high risk of developing AE will be recruited through the community, primary and secondary care in England. Participating families will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive general infant skin-care advice, or general skin-care advice plus emollients with advice to apply daily to the infant for the first year of life. Families will not be blinded to treatment allocation. The primary outcome will be a blinded assessment of AE at 24 months of age using the UK Working Party Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Eczema. Secondary outcomes are other definitions of AE, time to AE onset, severity of AE (EASI and POEM), presence of other allergic diseases including food allergy, asthma and hay fever, allergic sensitisation, quality of life, cost-effectiveness and safety of the emollients. Subgroup analyses are planned for the primary outcome according to filaggrin genotype and the number of first-degree relatives with AE and other atopic diseases. Families will be followed up by online and postal questionnaire at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months with a face-to-face visit at 24 months. Long-term follow-up until 60 months will be via annual questionnaires. Discussion This trial will demonstrate whether skin-barrier enhancement through daily emollient for the first year of life can prevent AE from developing in high-risk infants. If effective, this simple and cheap intervention has the potential to result in significant cost savings for health care providers throughout the world by preventing AE and possibly other associated allergic diseases. Trial registration ISRCTN registry; ID: ISRCTN21528841 . Registered on 25 July 2014.

Infection with hepatitis C virus is the leading cause of infectious disease mortality in the United States. BZF961 is a novel small molecule inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3-4A protease. Here we present the results of a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicentered study in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype-1 infection. Patients were enrolled sequentially in 2 parts and treated for 3 days. BZF961 was administered as monotherapy (500 mg BID for 3 days) or in combination with the cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor ritonavir to boost its exposure (BZF961 10, 20, or 50 mg QD or BID). BZF961 was safe and well tolerated in the patients studied with no serious adverse events. There were no appreciable differences in adverse events among patients who received BZF961, BZF961 with ritonavir, or placebo. There was a significant, clinically meaningful reduction in viral load from baseline in patients treated either with BZF961 500 mg every 12 hours alone or BZF961 50 mg every 12 hours in combination with ritonavir. Activity against the hepatitis C virus of the lower-dose regimens was apparent but more modest. There were no relevant changes from baseline viral loads in placebo-treated patients. Coadministration of ritonavir with BZF961 boosted BZF961 exposure (including Cmin, which is the clinically relevant parameter associated with antiviral activity) in a therapeutic range with less variability compared with BZF961 alone. For strategic reasons, BZF961 is no longer under development.