Explore the vast range of titles available.

Dental implant surgery relies extensively on bone drilling, a critical procedure with intrinsic challenges. Drill bits show significant wear and are frequently utilized beyond the manufacturer's recommended limits. Such practices can result in adverse effects, including friction and temperature rise in the surrounding bone area during interventions, with an increased risk of necrosis that can compromise the dental implant osseointegration. This study aimed to compare the quality of osteotomy obtained from two different protocols to determine a possible correlation between the drilling temperature and the tool wear and to evaluate their impact on potential health damage. Experimental evaluations were conducted using synthetic bone that reproduced human bone characteristics. The drilling phase involved real-time temperature acquisition and scanning electron microscopy analysis of tool wear evolution. After the operation, actual hole size and geometry were characterized using a coordinate measuring machine, and temperatures and torques were measured during the subsequent implantation phase. The findings revealed a direct correlation between tool wear and the temperature rise during the drilling phase, while a lower correlation was found with the hole profile geometry variation. The implantation phase demonstrated temperature and torque values within acceptable ranges. This study highlights the importance of adhering to proper tool maintenance and replacement protocols. By following recommended guidelines, practitioners can minimize adverse effects and enhance the success of dental implant procedures.

Purpose Both, knee joint distraction as a relatively new approach and valgus-producing opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), are knee-preserving treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA). The efficacy of knee joint distraction compared to HTO has not been reported. Methods Sixty-nine patients with medial knee joint OA with a varus axis deviation of <10° were randomized to either knee joint distraction ( n  = 23) or HTO ( n  = 46). Questionnaires were assessed at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months. Joint space width (JSW) as a surrogate measure for cartilage thickness was determined on standardized semi-flexed radiographs at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Results All patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) improved significantly over 1 year (at 1 year p  < 0.02) in both groups. At 1 year, the HTO group showed slightly greater improvement in 4 of the 16 PROMS ( p  < 0.05). The minimum medial compartment JSW increased 0.8 ± 1.0 mm in the knee joint distraction group ( p  = 0.001) and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm in the HTO group ( p  < 0.001), with minimum JSW improvement in favour of knee joint distraction ( p  = 0.05). The lateral compartment showed a small increase in the knee joint distraction group and a small decrease in the HTO group, leading to a significant increase in mean JSW for knee joint distraction only ( p  < 0.02). Conclusion Cartilaginous repair activity, as indicated by JSW, and clinical outcome improvement occurred with both, knee joint distraction and HTO. These findings suggest that knee joint distraction may be an alternative therapy for medial compartmental OA with a limited mechanical leg malalignment. Level of evidence Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Purpose Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW HTO) is now a successful operation with a range of indications, requiring an individualised approach to the choice of intended correction. This manuscript introduces the concept of surgical accuracy as the absolute deviation of the achieved correction from the intended correction, where small values represent greater accuracy. Surgical accuracy is compared in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) between gap measurement and computer navigation groups. Methods This was a prospective RCT conducted over 3 years of 120 consecutive patients with varus malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis, who underwent MOW HTO. All procedures were planned with digital software. Patients were randomly assigned into gap measurement or computer navigation groups. Coronal plane alignment was judged using the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA), before and after surgery. Absolute (positive) values were calculated for surgical accuracy in each individual case. Results There was no significant difference in the mean intended correction between groups. The achieved mTFA revealed a small under-correction in both groups. This was attributed to a failure to account for saw blade thickness (gap measurement) and over-compensation for weight bearing (computer navigation). Surgical accuracy was 1.7° ± 1.2° (gap measurement) compared to 2.1° ± 1.4° (computer navigation) without statistical significance. The difference in tibial slope increases of 2.7° ± 3.9° (gap measurement) and 2.1° ± 3.9° (computer navigation) had statistical significance ( P  < 0.001) but magnitude (0.6°) without clinical relevance. Conclusion Surgical accuracy as described here is a new way to judge achieved alignment following knee osteotomy for individual cases. This work is clinically relevant because coronal surgical accuracy was not superior in either group. Therefore, the increased expense and surgical time associated with navigated MOW HTO is not supported, because meticulously conducted gap measurement yields equivalent surgical accuracy. Level of evidence I.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare a minimally invasive chevron osteotomy technique (MIS group) and the well-established open chevron technique (OC group) for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Methods Patients who were scheduled to undergo a hallux valgus surgery by means of a distal chevron osteotomy were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. Pre-operatively, six weeks, 12 weeks, and nine months post-operatively the following outcome parameters were determined: Visual Analog Scores (VAS) of pain, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score, radiographic outcome measures, range of motion (ROM), and patient satisfaction. Results Forty-seven cases were analyzed (25 MIS group; 22 OC group). Both operative techniques achieved significant correction of the hallux deformity. The intermetatarsal angle (IMA) improved from 15.1° to 5.8° in the OC and from 14° to 6.8°in the MIS group, whereas the hallux valgus angle (HVA) improved from 28.3° to 8.5° in the OC versus 26.4° to 6.9° in the MIS group. No significant differences were observed between the groups by any of the determined outcome parameters. Regarding patient satisfaction, statistically significant differences were found between MIS and open surgery 12 weeks post-operatively in favour of the MIS group ( p  = 0.022). Conclusion With the minimally invasive chevron osteotomy, radiological and clinical outcome is comparable to the open technique.

Purpose Open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a widespread treatment option in patients with varus malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis. There is no standardised protocol for post-operative rehabilitation available. The purpose of this study was to compare two post-operative rehabilitation protocols and to evaluate the clinical outcome of early full weight-bearing after open wedge HTO. Methods One hundred and twenty consecutive patients with varus malalignment and medial compartment osteoarthritis received an open wedge HTO using an angular locking plate fixation between December 2008 and December 2011. All patients were assigned randomly into one of two groups with different post-operative rehabilitation protocols (11-day vs. 6-week 20-kg partial weight-bearing). Clinical outcome was evaluated using established instruments (Lequesne, Lysholm, HSS and IKDC scores) preoperatively, 6, 12 and 18 months post-operatively. Deformity analysis was performed preoperatively and during follow-up. Results All clinical scores showed a significant pre- to post-operative improvement. After 6 months, there was a higher improvement in the group of early full weight-bearing. The difference between preoperative and 6-month follow-up for the group with early full weight-bearing and for the group with 20-kg PWB for 6 weeks was 28 ± 26 and 18 ± 22, respectively, for the Lysholm score and −5.0 ± 5.1 and −3.0 ± 3.6, respectively, for the Lequesne score. Conclusions Early full weight-bearing (11-day 20-kg partial weight-bearing) after open wedge HTO without bone graft leads to earlier improvement of the clinical results and can be recommended for post-operative rehabilitation after open wedge HTO and fixation with an angular locking plate. Level of evidence Therapeutic study, Level I.

Purpose This prospective study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of meniscal repair during open-wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and to identify potential risk factors for meniscal healing. Methods Ninety patients with degenerative MMPRTs were included in the final cohort and randomized into three groups. The patients in Group A ( n  = 30) underwent OWHTO and arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair concurrently, those in Group B ( n  = 34) underwent OWHTO only, and those in Group C ( n  = 26) underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded, and meniscal healing was evaluated during second-look arthroscopy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for meniscal healing. Results After a minimum follow-up of 24 months, no significant differences between Groups A and B regarding the final Lysholm ( p  = 0.689) or Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores ( p  = 0.256) were observed. There were significant differences among the three groups regarding the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) ( p  < 0.001, respectively), but the differences between Groups A and B were not significant. During second-look arthroscopy, the healing rate of the MMPRTs was significantly higher in Group A (63.3%) than in Group B (35.3%). Concurrent meniscal repair and changes in the HKA, and MPTA were risk factors for meniscal healing. Conclusion Concurrent arthroscopic meniscal repair during OWHTO did not lead to significant clinical benefits in the treatment of MMPRTs, except for an increased rate of meniscal healing, which was not associated with clinical outcomes. Level of evidence II, prospective comparative study.

Patella alta is a clinical condition where the patella is positioned too proximal in relation to the femoral trochlea. Such an abnormality may cause patellar instability and predispose to recurrent patellofemoral dislocations and patellofemoral pain. There are no conclusive guidelines for determining a threshold for too high positioned patella, as several different methods have been described to measure patellar height. As a surgical solution, distalising tibial tubercle osteotomy has been described to correct excessive patellar height. In the early phase of the distalising tibial tubercle osteotomy postoperative protocol, weightbearing and knee flexion are limited with a brace commonly for 4–8 weeks to avoid potential implant failure leading to displacement of the osteotomy or non-union. The potential risks for adverse effects associated with the limitation rehabilitation protocol include a delay in regaining knee range of motion, stiffness and muscle weakness. As a result, recovery from surgery is delayed and may lead to additional procedures and long-term morbidity in knee function. This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blinded, single centre trial comparing a novel accelerated rehabilitation protocol with the traditional, motion restricting rehabilitation protocol. All skeletally mature patients aged 35 years and younger, referred to as the distalising tibial tubercle osteotomy procedure group, are eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients will be randomised to either the fast rehabilitation group or the traditional rehabilitation group. Patients with patellar instability will be additionally treated with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. The hypothesis of the trial is that the novel accelerated rehabilitation protocol will lead to faster recovery and improved functional outcome at 6, 12 and 24 weeks compared with the conservative rehabilitation protocol. A secondary hypothesis is that the complication rate will be similar in both groups. The study will document short-term recovery and the planned follow-up will be 3 years. After the 1-year follow-up, the trial results will be disseminated in a major peer-reviewed orthopaedic publication. Protocol version 3.6, date 28/11/2023.

Purpose The short-term clinical outcome for midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques was comparable. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical results after three different midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques. Material In the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial (NORDSTEN-SST) 437 patients were randomized to three different midline-retaining posterior decompression techniques: Unilateral laminotomy with crossover (UL), bilateral laminotomy (BL) and spinous process osteotomy (SPO). Primary outcome was the mean change in Oswestry disability index (ODI) score at five-years follow-up. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients classified as success, mean change in EQ-5D, ZCQ-score, NRS-score for leg and low back pain, a seven-point Global Perceived Effect (GPE) Scale and proportion of subsequential spinal surgery. Results The number of patients that completed follow-up data after five years was 358 (82%): In the UL, BL and SPO group the numbers were 122, 119 and 117, respectively. Mean age at baseline was 66.7 (SD 8.2) years, mean BMI was 27.8 (SD 4.1), and 172/358 (48%) were female. In the UL group the mean change was  −18.2 (95% CI  −21.0  −5.4), in the BL group it was  −19.0 (95% CI -21.9–16.1) and in the SPO it was  −18.6 (95% CI  −21.6–15.7) (p = 0.917). No significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the three surgical groups were found, also the subsequent spinal surgery rates were similar. Conclusion There were no significant differences in patient reported outcomes and subsequent spinal surgery rates after the three different decompression techniques at five-year follow-up.

Purpose This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes and arthroscopic findings after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) between neutral and classic targeted coronal alignments in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). Methods Ninety-eight patients with MMPRT were prospectively enrolled in the final cohort and randomized into two groups. Fifty-two patients with the targeted alignment through the Fujisawa point (60–62.5% of the entire tibial plateau width measured from the medial side) during HTO were included in group A, whereas 46 patients with the targeted alignment through the point at 50–55% of the tibial plateau width were included in group B. The clinical and radiographic outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings were statistically compared for comprehensive assessments. Results After a mean follow-up of 37.1 months, we found no significant differences between the two groups regarding the final Lysholm ( p  = 0.205) and Hospital for Special Surgery scores ( p  = 0.084). However, we only observed significant differences between the two groups in terms of the final hip–knee–ankle angle, weight-bearing line ratio, and medial proximal tibial angle ( p  < 0.001). Second-look arthroscopy did not reveal a significant difference in meniscal healing rate ( p  = 0.786). Conclusions Performing HTO with the aim to achieve neutral alignment leads to similar clinical outcomes in patients with MMPRT compared to classic alignment. Although subsequent research is required, the current study provides clinical evidence for the safety and efficacy of the new targeted alignment during HTO, which may avoid long-term complications associated with overcorrection when using the traditional technique.

Abstract Intra-articular injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSC) after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) would be a promising disease-modifying treatment by correcting biomechanical and biochemical environment for arthritic knee with varus malalignment. However, there is a paucity of clinical evidence of the treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) was aimed to assess regeneration of cartilage defect, functional improvement, and safety of intra-articular injection of ADMSCs after MOWHTO compared with MOWHTO alone for osteoarthritic knee with varus malalignment. This RCT allocated 26 patients into the MOWHTO with ADMSC-injection group (n = 13) and control (MOWHTO-alone) group (n = 13). The primary outcome was the serial changes of cartilage defect on periodic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation using valid measurements until postoperative 24 months. Secondary outcomes were the 2-stage arthroscopic evaluation for macroscopic cartilage status and the postoperative functional improvements of patient-reported outcome measures until the latest follow-up. Furthermore, safety profiles after the treatment were evaluated. Cartilage regeneration on serial MRIs showed significantly better in the ADMSC group than in the control group. The arthroscopic assessment revealed that total cartilage regeneration was significantly better in the ADMSC group. Although it was not significant, functional improvements after the treatment showed a tendency to be greater in the ADMSC group than in the control group from 18 months after the treatment. No treatment-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and postoperative complications occurred in all cases. Concomitant intra-articular injection of ADMSCs with MOWHTO had advantages over MOWHTO alone in terms of cartilage regeneration with safety at 2-year follow-up, suggesting potential disease-modifying treatment for knee OA with varus malalignment. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract