Explore the vast range of titles available.

PurposeWe aimed to determine the feasibility of targeting low-normal or high-normal mean arterial pressure (MAP) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and its effect on markers of neurological injury.MethodsIn the Carbon dioxide, Oxygen and Mean arterial pressure After Cardiac Arrest and REsuscitation (COMACARE) trial, we used a 23 factorial design to randomly assign patients after OHCA and resuscitation to low-normal or high-normal levels of arterial carbon dioxide tension, to normoxia or moderate hyperoxia, and to low-normal or high-normal MAP. In this paper we report the results of the low-normal (65–75 mmHg) vs. high-normal (80–100 mmHg) MAP comparison. The primary outcome was the serum concentration of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) at 48 h after cardiac arrest. The feasibility outcome was the difference in MAP between the groups. Secondary outcomes included S100B protein and cardiac troponin (TnT) concentrations, electroencephalography (EEG) findings, cerebral oxygenation and neurological outcome at 6 months after cardiac arrest.ResultsWe recruited 123 patients and included 120 in the final analysis. We found a clear separation in MAP between the groups (p < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) NSE concentration at 48 h was 20.6 µg/L (15.2–34.9 µg/L) in the low-normal MAP group and 22.0 µg/L (13.6–30.9 µg/L) in the high-normal MAP group, p = 0.522. We found no differences in the secondary outcomes.ConclusionsTargeting a specific range of MAP was feasible during post-resuscitation intensive care. However, the blood pressure level did not affect the NSE concentration at 48 h after cardiac arrest, nor any secondary outcomes.

PurposeOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors face significant risks of complications and death from hypoxic–ischemic brain injury leading to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST). Accurate multimodal neuroprognostication, including automated pupillometry, is essential to avoid inappropriate WLST. However, inconsistent study results hinder standardized threshold recommendations. We aimed to validate proposed pupillometry thresholds with no false predictions of unfavorable outcomes in comatose OHCA survivors.MethodsIn the multi-center BOX-trial, quantitative measurements of automated pupillometry (quantitatively assessed pupillary light reflex [qPLR] and Neurological Pupil index [NPi]) were obtained at admission (0 h) and after 24, 48, and 72 h in comatose patients resuscitated from OHCA. We aimed to validate qPLR < 4% and NPi ≤ 2, predicting unfavorable neurological conditions defined as Cerebral Performance Category 3–5 at follow-up. Combined with 48-h neuron-specific enolase (NSE) > 60 μg/L, pupillometry was evaluated for multimodal neuroprognostication in comatose patients with Glasgow Motor Score (M) ≤ 3 at ≥ 72 h.ResultsFrom March 2017 to December 2021, we consecutively enrolled 710 OHCA survivors (mean age: 63 ± 14 years; 82% males), and 266 (37%) patients had unfavorable neurological outcomes. An NPi ≤ 2 predicted outcome with 0% false-positive rate (FPR) at all time points (0–72 h), and qPLR < 4% at 24–72 h. In patients with M ≤ 3 at ≥ 72 h, pupillometry thresholds significantly increased the sensitivity of NSE, from 42% (35–51%) to 55% (47–63%) for qPLR and 50% (42–58%) for NPi, maintaining 0% (0–0%) FPR.ConclusionQuantitative pupillometry thresholds predict unfavorable neurological outcomes in comatose OHCA survivors and increase the sensitivity of NSE in a multimodal approach at ≥ 72 h.

Background Cerebral hypoperfusion may aggravate neurological damage after cardiac arrest. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) provides information on cerebral oxygenation but its relevance during post-resuscitation care is undefined. We investigated whether cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO 2 ) measured with NIRS correlates with the serum concentration of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), a marker of neurological injury, and with clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial (COMACARE, NCT02698917) comparing two different levels of carbon dioxide, oxygen and arterial pressure after resuscitation from OHCA with ventricular fibrillation as the initial rhythm. We measured rSO 2 in 118 OHCA patients with NIRS during the first 36 h of intensive care. We determined the NSE concentrations from serum samples at 48 h after cardiac arrest and assessed neurological outcome with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale at 6 months. We evaluated the association between rSO 2 and serum NSE concentrations and the association between rSO 2 and good (CPC 1–2) and poor (CPC 3–5) neurological outcome. Results The median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) NSE concentration at 48 h was 17.5 (13.4–25.0) μg/l in patients with good neurological outcome and 35.2 (22.6–95.8) μg/l in those with poor outcome, p  < 0.001. We found no significant correlation between median rSO 2 and NSE at 48 h, r s  = − 0.08, p  = 0.392. The median (IQR) rSO 2 during the first 36 h of intensive care was 70.0% (63.5–77.0%) in patients with good outcome and 71.8% (63.3–74.0%) in patients with poor outcome, p  = 0.943. There was no significant association between rSO 2 over time and neurological outcome. In a binary logistic regression model, rSO 2 was not a statistically significant predictor of good neurological outcome (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.94–1.04, p  = 0.635). Conclusions We found no association between cerebral oxygenation measured with NIRS and NSE concentrations or outcome in patients resuscitated from OHCA. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02698917 . Registered on 26 January 2016.

Background Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of both the heart and brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrest annually in the USA. Induced cooling of comatose patients markedly improved neurological and functional outcomes in pivotal randomized clinical trials, but the optimal duration of therapeutic hypothermia has not yet been established. Methods This study is a multi-center randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. We investigate two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest to ascertain the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS (modified Rankin Scale, a measure of neurologic disability), across the treatment arms. Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 h of therapeutic cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 h will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each initial cardiac rhythm type (shockable or non-shockable), by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. A maximum sample size of 1800 subjects is proposed. Secondary objectives are to characterize: the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling, the effect on neuropsychological outcomes, and the effect on patient-reported quality of life measures. Discussion In vitro and in vivo studies have shown the neuroprotective effects of therapeutic hypothermia for cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having a good outcome. If the treatment effect of cooling is increasing across duration, for at least some set of durations, then this provides evidence of the efficacy of cooling itself versus normothermia, even in the absence of a normothermia control arm, confirming previous RCTs for OHCA survivors of shockable rhythms and provides the first prospective controlled evidence of efficacy in those without initial shockable rhythms. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04217551. Registered on 30 December 2019.

Background Arginine vasopressin has complex actions in critically ill patients, involving vasoregulatory status, plasma volume, and cortisol levels. Copeptin, a surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin, has shown promising prognostic features in small observational studies and is used clinically for early rule out of acute coronary syndrome. The objective of this study was to explore the association between early measurements of copeptin, circulatory status, and short-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods Serial blood samples were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h as part of the target temperature management at 33 °C versus 36 °C after cardiac arrest trial, an international multicenter randomized trial where unconscious survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were allocated to an intervention of 33 or 36 °C for 24 h. Primary outcome was 30-day survival with secondary endpoints circulatory cause of death and cardiovascular deterioration composite; in addition, we examined the correlation with extended the cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment (eCvSOFA) score. Results Six hundred ninety patients were included in the analyses, of whom 203 (30.3%) developed cardiovascular deterioration within 24 h, and 273 (39.6%) died within 30 days. Copeptin measured at 24 h was found to be independently associated with 30-day survival, hazard ratio 1.17 [1.06–1.28], p  = 0.001; circulatory cause of death, odds ratio 1.03 [1.01–1.04], p  = 0.001; and cardiovascular deterioration composite, odds ratio of 1.05 [1.02–1.08], p  < 0.001. Copeptin at 24 h was correlated with eCvSOFA score with rho 0.19 [0.12–0.27], p  < 0.001. Conclusion Copeptin is an independent marker of severity of the post cardiac arrest syndrome, partially related to circulatory failure. Trial registration Clinical Trials, NCT01020916 . Registered November 26, 2009.

IntroductionOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a public health concern with a high mortality rate. Hypoxic ischaemic brain injury is the primary cause of death in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Several systemic factors, such as hypotension, can exacerbate brain injuries. International guidelines recommend targeting a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of at least 65 mm Hg. Several observational studies suggest that a higher MAP may be associated with better outcomes, but no randomised trials have shown an effect of higher MAP. The ongoing METAPHORE (mean arterial pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest) trial aims to compare a standard MAP threshold (MAP ≥65 mm Hg) with a high MAP threshold (MAP ≥90 mm Hg) to evaluate whether implementing a higher MAP threshold can improve neurological outcomes in patients admitted to ICU after cardiac arrest.Methods and analysisMETAPHORE is a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label trial with a blinded primary outcome assessor, comparing two parallel groups of patients 18 years of age or older, receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for coma defined by a Glasgow Coma Score ≤8/15 after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and sustained ROSC. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a MAP target threshold of 65 mm Hg or higher throughout the ICU stay (control group) or a MAP target threshold of 90 mm Hg or higher during the first 24 hours after randomisation, followed by 65 mm Hg or higher for the remainder of the ICU stay (intervention group). Both groups receive the same general care concerning post-cardiac arrest syndrome management according to international guidelines. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a favourable neurological outcome as defined by a modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0 to 3 measured on day 180 after inclusion by a psychologist blinded to the allocation of the intervention. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of patients alive at ICU and hospital discharge, at day 28 and day 180; proportion of patients alive at ICU discharge with a mRS of 0 to 3; the EuroQOL-5D-5L at day 180; the Clinical Frailty Scale at day 180; the number of ICU-free days, ventilator-free days, catecholamine-free days and renal replacement therapy-free days at day 28; the proportion of patients with acute kidney injury stage 3 and need for renal replacement therapy within ICU stay and proportion of patients with persistent need for renal replacement therapy at ICU discharge; and safety outcomes (cardiovascular, neurological, cutaneous, digestive and haemorrhagic complications within 7 days after inclusion). Subgroup analyses are planned according to initial cardiac arrest rhythm (shockable or non-shockable), chronic hypertension and Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis score. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Recruitment started in October 2024 in 27 French ICUs, and a sample of 1380 patients is expected by October 2027.Ethics and disseminationThe study received approval from the national ethics review board on 8 February 2024 (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est V – 2023-A00257-38). Patients are included after informed consent has been obtained either from a proxy or through an emergency procedure. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05486884.

Background Hyperoxia following out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with a poor outcome. Animal data suggest the first hour post resuscitation may be the most important. In the UK the first hour usually occurs in the prehospital environment. Methods A prospective controlled trial, cluster randomised by paramedic, comparing titrated oxygen with 100% oxygen for the first hour after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following OHCA. The trial was done in a single emergency medical services (EMS) system in the United Kingdom (UK) admitting patients to three emergency departments. This was a feasibility trial to determine whether EMS staff (UK paramedics) can be successfully recruited and deliver the intervention. Results One hundred and fifty seven paramedics were approached and 46 (29%) were consented, randomised and trained. During the study period 624 patients received a resuscitation attempt. A study paramedic was in attendance at 73 (12%) of these active resuscitations. Thirty-five patients were recruited to the trial, 32 (91%) were transported to hospital and 13 (37%) survived to 90 days. The intervention was initiated in 27/35 (77%) of enrolled patients. A reliable oxygen saturation trace was obtained in 22/35 (69%) of patients. Data collection was complete in 33/35 (94%) of patients. Conclusions It may be feasible to complete a randomised trial of titrated versus unrestricted oxygen in the first hour after ROSC following OHCA in the UK. However, the relatively few eligible patients and incomplete initiation of the allocated intervention are challenges to future research. Trial registration ISRCTN 49548506 retrospectively registered on 24.11.2016.

Background The application of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for 12 to 24 hours following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has been associated with decreased mortality and improved neurological function. However, the optimal duration of cooling is not known. We aimed to investigate whether targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33 ± 1 °C for 48 hours compared to 24 hours results in a better long-term neurological outcome. Methods The TTH48 trial is an investigator-initiated pragmatic international trial in which patients resuscitated from OHCA are randomised to TTM at 33 ± 1 °C for either 24 or 48 hours. Inclusion criteria are: age older than 17 and below 80 years; presumed cardiac origin of arrest; and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <8, on admission. The primary outcome is neurological outcome at 6 months using the Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) by an assessor blinded to treatment allocation and dichotomised to good (CPC 1–2) or poor (CPC 3–5) outcome. Secondary outcomes are: 6-month mortality, incidence of infection, bleeding and organ failure and CPC at hospital discharge, at day 28 and at day 90 following OHCA. Assuming that 50 % of the patients treated for 24 hours will have a poor outcome at 6 months, a study including 350 patients (175/arm) will have 80 % power (with a significance level of 5 %) to detect an absolute 15 % difference in primary outcome between treatment groups. A safety interim analysis was performed after the inclusion of 175 patients. Discussion This is the first randomised trial to investigate the effect of the duration of TTM at 33 ± 1 °C in adult OHCA patients. We anticipate that the results of this trial will add significant knowledge regarding the management of cooling procedures in OHCA patients. Trial registration NCT01689077

Background The research study titled “Cluster randomised trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of the i-gel supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation in the initial airway management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (AIRWAYS-2)” is a large-scale study being run in the English emergency medical (ambulance) services (EMS). It compares two airway management strategies (tracheal intubation and the i-gel) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We describe the methods used to minimise bias and the challenges associated with the set-up, enrolment, and follow-up that were addressed. Methods AIRWAYS-2 enrols adults without capacity when there is no opportunity to seek prior consent and when the intervention must be delivered immediately. We therefore adopted a cluster randomised design where the unit of randomisation is the individual EMS provider (paramedic). However, because paramedics could not be blinded to the intervention, it was necessary to automatically enrol all eligible patients in the study to avoid bias. Effective implementation required engagement with four large EMS and 95 receiving hospitals. Very high levels of data capture were required to ensure study integrity, and this necessitated collaborative working across multiple organisations. We sought to manage these processes by using a large and comprehensive electronic study database, implementing efficient trial procedures and comprehensive training. Results Successful implementation of the study design was facilitated by the approaches used. The necessary regulatory and ethical approvals to conduct the study were secured, and benefited from strong patient and public involvement. Early and continued consultation with decision makers within the four participating EMS resulted in a coordinated approach to study set-up. All receiving hospitals gave approval and agreed to collect data. A comprehensive database and programme of training and support were implemented. More than 1500 paramedics have been recruited to the study, and patient enrolment and follow-up has proceeded as planned. Conclusion Care provided by EMS needs to be based on evidence. Although participants may be experiencing life-threatening emergencies, high-quality pre-hospital research is possible in well-designed and well-managed studies. The approaches described here can be used to support successful research that will lead to improved treatment and outcomes in similar patient groups. Trial registration ISRCTN08256118 . Registered on 22 July 2014.

Background The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel affects patient outcomes after cardiac arrest. A CPR feedback device with an accelerometer mounted on a defibrillator can monitor the motion of the patient’s sternum to display and record CPR quality in real time. To evaluate the utility of real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining using a CPR feedback device outside of the hospital, an open-label, cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted in five municipalities of Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Methods Each EMS station within a fire department will be randomly assigned to: 1) the treatment group with real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining using the CPR feedback device (intervention group); or 2) the conventional treatment group without real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining (control group). This trial will include 2850 to 3020 patients over about 4 years. The primary outcome of the trial is 1-month favorable neurological survival, defined as cerebral performance category scale score 1 or 2. Secondary outcomes are 1-month survival, survival to hospital discharge, return of spontaneous circulation, and quality of CPR including fraction, depth, tempo, and ventilation rate. Discussion The trial will assess whether treatment monitored by the CPR feedback device, which allows for real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining using CPR quality data, outperforms conventional treatment without real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining in terms of 1-month favorable neurological survival in cardiac arrest patients receiving CPR outside the hospital. Trial registration University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000021431 . Registered on 11 March 2016.