Explore the vast range of titles available.

Cycles with progesterone elevation during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI are commonly managed with a \"freeze-all\" strategy, due to a well-recognized detrimental effect of high progesterone levels on endometrial receptivity. However, also a detrimental effect of elevated progesterone on day-3 embryo quality has recently been found with regards to top quality embryo formation rate. Because blastocyst culture and cryopreservation are largely adopted, we deemed relevant to determine whether this detrimental effect is also seen on blastocyst quality on day 5-6. This issue was investigated through a large two-center retrospective study including 986 GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles and using top quality blastocyst formation rate as the main outcome. Results showed that on multivariate analysis sperm motility (p<0.01) and progesterone levels at ovulation triggering (p = 0.01) were the only two variables that significantly predicted top quality blastocyst formation rate after adjusting for relevant factors including female age, BMI, basal AMH and total dose of FSH used for COS. More specifically, progesterone levels at induction showed an inverse relation with top quality blastocyst formation (correlation coefficient B = -1.08, 95% CI -1.9 to -0.02) and ROC curve analysis identified P level >1.49 ng/ml as the best cut-off for identification of patients at risk for the absence of top quality blastocysts (AUC 0.55, p<0.01). Our study is the first to investigate the top quality blastocyst formation rate in relation to progesterone levels in IVF/ICSI cycles, showing that increasing progesterone is associated with lower rates of top quality blastocyst. Hence, the advantages of prolonging COS to maximize the number of collected oocytes might eventually be hindered by a decrease in top quality blastocysts available for transfer, if increasing progesterone levels are observed. This observation extends the results of two recent studies focused on day-3 embryos and deserves further research.

Introduction:  The question of whether assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and ovulation induction are related to a higher incidence of ovarian tumors (OTs) is still controversial in the literature. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for case–control and cohort studies that investigated ART and ovulation induction exposure as risk factors for OT in infertile women. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed for all endpoints. Results: A total of nine case–control and twelve cohort studies were included, encompassing 439,477 women. ART was not associated with a higher risk of OTs (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.86–1.29; p = 0.64; I 2  = 36%), nor when considering only borderline OTs (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.84–1.51; p = 0.42; I 2  = 31%). In a subgroup analysis by study type, the risk difference of OTs remained non-significant for case–control (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.70–1.78; p = 0.65; I 2  = 60%) and cohort studies (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.87–1.27; p = 0.60; I 2  = 1%). For borderline OTs, the difference between groups was also non-significant for case–control studies (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.73–2.87; p = 0.30; I 2  = 40%) and cohort studies (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.75–1.34; p = 0.99; I 2  = 24%). Conclusion: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, ART exposure in infertile women was not associated with a higher risk of OTs in general or borderline tumors, even when accounting for study type differences.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the evidence on the efficacy and safety of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP) for luteal phase support. Embase and MEDLINE were searched for studies that evaluated the effect of luteal phase support with daily administration of oral dydrogesterone (20 to 40 mg) versus MVP capsules (600 to 800 mg) or gel (90 mg) on pregnancy or live birth rates in women undergoing fresh-cycle IVF (protocol registered at PROSPERO [CRD42018105949]). Individual participant data (IPD) were extracted for the primary analysis where available and aggregate data were extracted for the secondary analysis. Nine studies were eligible for inclusion; two studies had suitable IPD (full analysis sample: n = 1957). In the meta-analysis of IPD, oral dydrogesterone was associated with a significantly higher chance of ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 1.61; P = 0.0075) and live birth (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.57; P = 0.0214) compared to MVP. A meta-analysis combining IPD and aggregate data for all nine studies also demonstrated a statistically significant difference between oral dydrogesterone and MVP (pregnancy: OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.34; P = 0.04; live birth: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.38; P = 0.02). Safety parameters were similar between the two groups. Collectively, this study indicates that a higher pregnancy rate and live birth rate may be obtained in women receiving oral dydrogesterone versus MVP for luteal phase support.

PurposeTo identify and characterise appropriate comparison groups for population studies of health outcomes in ART-conceived births: ovulation induction (OI), subfertile untreated and fertile natural conceptions. Our secondary objective was to examine whether known risks of pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in ART births are elevated in comparison with subfertile (untreated and OI) conception groups.MethodsWe linked State and Commonwealth datasets to identify all live and stillbirths (≥ 20 weeks) in Western Australia from 2003 to 2014 by method of conception. Demographic characteristics, maternal pre-existing conditions, adverse obstetric history and pregnancy complications were compared across conception groups. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pregnancy complications and birth outcomes in singletons.ResultsWe identified 9456 ART, 3870 OI, 11,484 subfertile untreated and 303,921 fertile naturally conceived deliveries. OI and subfertile untreated groups more closely resembled the ART group than the fertile group; however, some differences remained across parity, maternal age, pre-existing conditions and obstetric history. In multivariate analyses, ART singletons had greater risks of placental problems (e.g. placenta praevia aRR 2.42 (95% CI 1.82–3.20)) and adverse birth outcomes (e.g. preterm birth aRR 1.38 (95% CI 1.25–1.52)) than the subfertile untreated group, while OI singletons were more similar to the subfertile group with higher risk of preeclampsia and gestational diabetes.ConclusionOI and subfertile untreated conception groups offer improved options for interpreting health outcomes in ART births. Pregnancy complications (particularly placental disorders) and adverse outcomes at delivery are more common following ART.

PurposesPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a major cause of female infertility, being present in up to 20% of women of childbearing age. Insulin resistance (IR) plays an important role in the pathophysiology of PCOS; therefore, its treatment may benefit women with the syndrome. The main drug used for IR management is metformin (MT). We aim to review the literature on the use of metformin in women with PCOS.MethodsUsing the terms “metformin” and “polycystic ovary syndrome,” we conducted a search the PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. The research was restricted to articles published in English. Initially, only published meta-analyses were included, in the absence of meta-analyzes, RCT and well-designed prospective studies were used.ResultsMetformin increases success rates and decreases complication rates when used as an adjunctive medication for ovulation induction during low complexity assisted reproduction treatments and during ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization in women with PCOS. Evidence about the effect of metformin on fetal and obstetric complication rates is conflicting. Metformin is associated with high incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms; however, serious adverse effects are rare and there is no evidence of teratogenicity.ConclusionFor women with PCOS, metformin is a good adjunctive medication for ovulation induction/stimulation for high and low complexity assisted reproduction therapies. The adverse effects are mostly mild, and there is no risk of teratogenicity, but the risk of long-term complications for the offspring is not yet defined. High heterogeneity of the studies limits extrapolation of findings, and further research is needed to determine which women will benefit most from the medication.

PurposePlatelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy has been used as an adjunct to fertility treatments in women with very low ovarian reserve and premature ovarian insufficiency. Recent literature in both humans and animals suggest that intraovarian PRP administration in the setting of poor ovarian reserve may help ovarian function and increase the chances of pregnancy.MethodsA comprehensive literature search through PubMed, MEDLINE databases, and recent abstracts published at relevant society meetings was performed and resulted in 25 articles and 2 abstracts published that studied effect of PRP on the ovaries for the purpose of reproduction.ResultsThis review article presents all the data published to date pertaining to intraovarian PRP injection and pregnancy, both naturally and after in vitro fertilization. It also presents the most recent data on the use of ovarian PRP in in vitro and animal model studies highlighting the possible mechanisms by which PRP could impact ovarian function.ConclusionsEven though recent commentaries questioned the use of PRP as an “add-on” therapy in fertility treatment because it has not been thoroughly studied, the recent basic science studies presented here could increase awareness for considering more serious research into the efficacy of PRP as an adjunct for women with poor ovarian reserve, premature ovarian insufficiency, and even early menopause who are trying to conceive using their own oocytes. Given its low-risk profile, the hypothetical benefit of PRP treatment needs to be studied with larger randomized controlled trials.

Rosenberg et al present several facts about ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurs almost exclusively after ovarian stimulation during in vitro fertilization. Hyperstimulation of the ovaries can trigger the release of vasoactive peptides causing vascular permeability, which leads to hypovolemia, ascites, and pleural effusions. The resulting hemoconcentration increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and end-organ injury.

Background Individualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials. Methods We evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper–Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used. Results Initially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively. Conclusions This systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%.

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to improve the in vitro maturation (IVM) procedure using oocytes from surplus ovarian tissue after fertility preservation.MethodsTwenty-five patients aged 17–37 years were included in the study. Maturation was compared between oocytes collected in HEPES-buffered medium or saline, and we determined whether transport on ice prior to oocyte collection affected maturation. Two different IVM media were used that were supplemented with and without recombinant human midkine. Mature oocytes were assessed for aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing (NGS).ResultsOn average, 36 immature oocytes were collected from each patient (range 7–90, N = 895). Oocytes recovered from HEPES-buffered medium matured at a higher rate than oocytes recovered from saline (36% vs 26%, p < 0.01). Ovarian transportation on ice prior to the procedure negatively affected maturation compared with non-transported samples (42% vs 27%, p < 0.01). The addition of midkine improved maturation rate (34% vs 27%, p < 0.05). On average, 11 MII oocytes were obtained per patient (range 1–30). NGS of 53 MII oocytes and their first polar bodies indicated that 64% were euploid.ConclusionsThe study demonstrated unexpectedly high number of immature oocytes collected from surplus ovarian tissue without any stimulation. The overall MII rate was one in three, resulting in a total number of MII oocytes that was similar to the number obtained after ovarian stimulation. If these MII oocytes prove suitable for IVF, they will provide a substantial improvement in fertility preservation for patients and advance IVM as an interesting platform for further improvements in assisted reproduction.

PurposeTo evaluate whether the type of frozen embryo transfer (FET) regimen — ovulation-induced regimens vs. hormone replacement therapy regimens (HRT) — is associated with live birth rates and the risk of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy (HDP) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).MethodsAll studies in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. Inclusion criteria included studies on women with a diagnosis of PCOS, utilization of FET, and reporting of pregnancy and/or obstetric outcomes. Studies were excluded if they were case series or conference abstracts or used other FET regimens. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. Primary outcomes include relative risk (RR) of live birth and HDP.ResultsEleven studies were included in the meta-analysis for the final review. Ovulation-induced regimens were associated with a higher live birth rate (8 studies, RR 1.14 [95% CI 1.08, 1.21]) compared to HRT regimens. The risk of HDP (3 studies RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.53, 1.15]) was not significantly different. Ovulation-induced regimens were associated with a lower miscarriage rate (9 studies, RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.59–0.76]). Rates of clinical pregnancy (10 studies, RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.99, 1.11]) and ectopic pregnancy (7 studies, RR 1.40 [95% CI 0.84, 2.33]), were not significantly different.ConclusionThis SR/MA demonstrates that for women with PCOS, ovulation-induced FET regimens are associated with higher rates of live birth and lower rates of miscarriage compared to HRT regimens.