Catalogue Search | MBRL
Search Results Heading
Explore the vast range of titles available.
MBRLSearchResults
-
DisciplineDiscipline
-
Is Peer ReviewedIs Peer Reviewed
-
Series TitleSeries Title
-
Reading LevelReading Level
-
YearFrom:-To:
-
More FiltersMore FiltersContent TypeItem TypeIs Full-Text AvailableSubjectCountry Of PublicationPublisherSourceTarget AudienceDonorLanguagePlace of PublicationContributorsLocation
Done
Filters
Reset
37,117
result(s) for
"PLAGIARISM"
Sort by:
The words : there's more than one way to take a life
by
Rister, Laura film producer
,
Elwes, Cassian, 1959- film producer
,
Laliberté, Michèle production designer
in
Plagiarism Drama
,
Novelists Drama
2000
\"Struggling writer Rory Jansen (Bradley Cooper) rockets to fame after passing off a brilliant found manuscript as his own, but experiences an acute crisis of conscience after his stint in the spotlight changes him in ways he never expected\"--Allmovie.com, January 26, 2018.
Learning about plagiarism
by
Clapper, Nikki Bruno, author
in
Plagiarism Juvenile literature.
,
Literary ethics Juvenile literature.
,
Media literacy Juvenile literature.
2016
\"Introduces readers to the media literacy skills needed to understand plagiarism. Includes a hands-on activity related to media literacy\"-- Provided by publisher.
Peer review declaration
in
Plagiarism
2021
All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • 1. Does the paper address relevant scientific questions within the scope of the conference? • 2. Does the paper present novel concepts, ideas, tools, or data? • 3. Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions and substantial conclusions reached? • 4. Is the overall presentation well structured and clear and the language fluent and precise? • 5. Do the authors give proper credit to related work and clearly indicate their own new/original contribution? Resubmission is allowed. • Conference submission management system: Easychair.org and ai-conf.org • Number of submissions received: 32 • Number of submissions sent for review: 32 • Number of submissions accepted: 20 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 4 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Plagiarism check was performed on all accepted papers. • Contact person for queries: Igor Balk Global Innovation Labs, USA (science [at] ai-conf.org)
Journal Article