Explore the vast range of titles available.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204738.].

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant disorder due to deficiency or malfunction of C1 inhibitor protein. It is characterised by recurrent angioedema episodes involving skin and mucosal surfaces. Rare attacks involving upper airway can be life threatening. Attacks are often unpredictable in onset, progression and severity. Deaths resulting from laryngeal angioedema are well recognised. Morbidity and mortality can successfully be reduced with prophylactic C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH). This requires careful monitoring and individualised therapy. We describe a young girl who presented with recurrent angioedema episodes. The aim is to emphasise that careful monitoring and follow up can significantly influence the quality of care and therapeutic outcomes. She presented multiple times with angioedema involving head and neck region and required multiple paediatric Intensive care unit admissions with potential risk of air way compromise. Her C1 esterase inhibitor protein level was normal with significantly low level of C1 esterase inhibitor functional protein, consistent with type 2 hereditary angioedema. She was initially started on weekly prophylactic C1INH therapy. She continued to have breakthrough angioedema episodes with reduce frequency and severity. A careful review showed that most breakthrough attacks were on day six and day seven since last C1INH therapy. Weekly prophylactic therapy was changed to every 6th day and she was closely followed up. She did not have any breakthrough angioedema episodes on every sixth day C1INH therapy for the following 8 months. C1INH therapy is expensive and may not be available in resource limited centres. We conclude that it is important to make an individualised treatment plan to improve outcome when managing a patient with HAE based on best available sources and considering the needs of the individual patient.Key words:HAE, long term prophylaxis, C1INH.6th day regimen

Introduction Knowledge of HIV status relies on accurate HIV testing, and is the first step towards access to HIV treatment and prevention programmes. Globally, HIV‐status unawareness represents a significant challenge for achieving zero new HIV infections and deaths. In order to enhance knowledge of HIV status, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends a testing strategy that includes the use of HIV‐specific antibody point‐of‐care tests (POCT). These POCTs do not detect acute HIV infection, the stage of disease when viral load is highest but HIV antibodies are undetectable. Complicating things further, in the presence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP), other currently available testing technologies, such as viral load detection for diagnosis of acute HIV infection, may yield false‐negative results. In this scoping review, we evaluate the evidence and discuss alternative HIV testing algorithms that may mitigate diagnostic dilemmas in the setting of increased utilization of ART for immediate treatment and prevention of HIV infection. Discussion Missed acute HIV infection prevents people living with HIV (PLHIV) from accessing early treatment, increases likelihood of onward transmission, and allows for inappropriate initiation or continuation of PrEP, which may result in HIV drug resistance. While immediate ART is recommended for all PLHIV, studies have shown that starting ART in the setting of acute HIV infection may result in a delayed or complete absence of development of HIV‐specific antibodies, posing a diagnostic challenge that is particularly pertinent to resource‐limited, high HIV burden settings where HIV‐antibody POCTs are standard of care. Similarly, ART used as PrEP or PEP may supress HIV RNA viral load, complicating current HIV testing algorithms in resource‐wealthy settings where viral detection is included. As rollout of PrEP continues, HIV testing algorithms may need to be modified. Conclusions With increasing use of PrEP and ART in acute infection we anticipate diagnostic challenges using currently available HIV testing strategies. Research and surveillance are needed to determine the most appropriate assays and optimal testing algorithms that are accurate, affordable and sustainable.

Introduction New longer‐acting antiretroviral (ARV) drugs—that is single doses with antiviral activity for at least a month—are being utilized for HIV treatment and pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) but have not been explored for post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP). A “one‐and‐done” simplification of PEP has the potential to serve the HIV prevention needs of individuals not being met with traditional services and expand overall biomedical HIV prevention coverage. We discuss challenges with the assessment of PEP effectiveness in human trials and potential study designs that could generate evidence needed to inform the use of new, single‐administered, long‐acting ARVs for PEP. Discussion Challenges with determining the effectiveness of new long‐acting PEP agents in human trials include the low likelihood of observing an HIV acquisition and the short period for outcome assessment (likely 1 month) following PEP administration. Additional challenges include recruiting individuals in the brief window in which they could benefit (<72 hours of a potential HIV exposure) and ethics of conducting informed consent during a period of high stress/vulnerability. Consequently, design approaches where the efficacy goal is to establish that the HIV incidence rate following PEP administration (of the standard or a novel agent) approaches zero should be considered. HIV RNA testing conducted within 5 days of a potential exposure could define prevention per exposure. Novel recruitment venues—such as community‐based retail or online pharmacies—could be used to reach individuals after a potential exposure. Potential study designs include one‐ or two‐arm individual‐level product assignment aimed at demonstration of short‐course efficacy or longer‐term effectiveness compared to a background rate; cluster‐randomized controlled trials of recruitment venues; and novel individual‐level approaches that either do not or do utilize randomization in combination with choice, enabling assessment of preferences and effectiveness. Conclusions Over the past decade, multiple new HIV PrEP products—but no new PEP products—have been developed to meet the diverse needs of individuals seeking HIV prevention services. Challenges exist with generating PEP effectiveness evidence, but they are not insurmountable. Effectiveness research on new PEP products could advance the number of HIV prevention options available.

Introduction Private pharmacies in Africa reach individuals with ongoing and periodic HIV risk, yet few countries currently leverage pharmacies as an HIV service delivery platform. We conducted a 6‐month pilot to evaluate a model for pharmacy provider‐led delivery of HIV pre‐ and post‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) in Kenya. Methods At 12 private pharmacies in Kisumu and Kiambu Counties, licensed pharmacy providers initiated and managed eligible clients ≥18 years on PrEP and PEP under remote clinician supervision (NCT04558554); four of these pharmacies additionally offered sextually transmitted infection (STI) testing. PrEP/PEP clients were scheduled for follow‐up 1 month later and then quarterly (PrEP clients only). Primary outcomes included PrEP and PEP initiation and continuation during the pilot period. Client and providers rated the model across multiple constructs of acceptability and feasibility from established frameworks. Results From January to July 2022, 1028 clients interested in PrEP, PEP and/or STI testing were screened and 829 initiated one or more service: 661 PrEP, 162 PEP and 52 STI testing. About half of clients (48%, 398/829) were male, most were unmarried (78%, 644/829) and PrEP‐naïve (89%, 737/829), and the median age was 25 years (IQR 22–31). Most PrEP clients reported inconsistent condom use (88%, 581/661) or sex with partners of unknown HIV status (70%, 460/661) in the past 6 months. Most PEP clients reported condomless sex (48%, 78/162) or a condom break (46%, 75/162) in the past 72 hours; 4% (6/162) reported sexual assault. Among PrEP clients eligible for a refill, 73% (479/658) refilled at least once and 60% (197/328) twice. Among PEP clients eligible for follow‐up, 44% (65/148) completed follow‐up HIV testing and 20% (30/148) transitioned to PrEP. Among STI clients, 19% (10/52) tested positive for gonorrhoea (n = 7) and/or chlamydia (n = 5). Most clients and providers (≥92%) found the delivery model and its implementation strategies acceptable. All providers (n = 12) thought it was possible to deliver PrEP and PEP at pharmacies in Kenya. Conclusions Pharmacy PrEP/PEP delivery achieved high uptake, continuation and acceptability among eligible clients that could benefit, highlighting the potential of pharmacies to expand HIV prevention service coverage in Kenya, particularly to individuals not accessing these services at clinics.

Introduction Pre‐ and post‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP) are important pillars of the HIV prevention portfolio to reduce the risk of acquisition just before or after HIV exposure. While PrEP efficacy has been elucidated in many randomized clinical trials, corresponding data for PEP is extremely difficult to obtain in a controlled setting. Consequently, it is almost impossible to study the impact of PEP initiation delay and duration on HIV risk reduction clinically, which would inform recommendations on PEP use. Methods We employ pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and viral dynamics models, along with individual factors, such as drug adherence to investigate the impact of initiation delay and PEP duration on HIV risk reduction. We evaluated PEP using two‐ and three‐drug regimens with a TDF/FTC backbone. Moreover, we study PEP efficacy in the context of PrEP‐to‐PEP transitions. Results In our simulations, early initiation of PEP emerged as a pivotal factor for HIV risk reduction. We found that 2‐drug (TDF/FTC) PEP may insufficiently protect when initiated > 1 hour post‐exposure. When adding a third drug, early initiation was still a critical factor; however, over 90% efficacy could be achieved when PEP was initiated 48 hours post‐exposure and taken for at least 14–28 days, depending on the efficacy of the third‐drug component. When investigating PrEP‐PEP transitions, we observed that preceding PrEP can (1) contribute directly to prophylactic efficacy, and (2) boost subsequent PEP efficacy by delaying initial viral dynamics and building‐up drug concentrations, overall facilitating self‐managed transitioning between PrEP and PEP. Conclusions Our study confirms the critical role of early (< 48 hours) PEP initiation, preferably with three drugs taken for 28 days. Self‐start with TDF/FTC and later addition of a third drug is better than not self‐starting. Furthermore, our study highlights the synergy between recent PrEP intake and PEP and may help to inform recommendations on PEP use.

Introduction The expansion of telecommunication networks and smartphones in many African countries could be leveraged to deliver HIV prevention products directly to consumers. In collaboration with a private e‐commerce platform and online pharmacy in Kenya, MYDAWA, we piloted a new model of HIV pre‐ and post‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP/PEP) delivery. Methods In the ePrEP Kenya pilot (NCT05377138), individuals living in Nairobi and Mombasa Counties could complete a free telehealth visit with a remote clinician to assess eligibility for online PrEP/PEP (i.e. ≥18 years; no medical contraindications). Eligible individuals could order HIV testing services—courier delivered to clients’ choice location—for a fee of 250 KES (∼ $2 USD) for self‐testing or 150 KES (∼$ 1 USD) for provider‐administered rapid diagnostic testing. Following confirmation of clients’ HIV‐negative status (via an uploaded test result image), free PrEP/PEP drugs from government supply were courier delivered with or separately from HIV testing services. Clients paid a delivery fee ≤149 KES (∼$1 USD) per courier visit. Results From October 2022 to December 2023, we screened 2257 individuals and enrolled 1915. Most PrEP/PEP clients were men (63%, 1428/1915), ≥25 years (72%, 1631/1915) and never married (80%, 1796/1915); few had ever used PrEP (3%, 48/1915) or PEP (14%, 263/1915). At enrolment, 227 (12%) were preliminarily eligible for PrEP and 1688 (88%) for PEP. Among PrEP‐eligible clients, 89% (203/227) completed HIV testing and 92% (208/227) received PrEP; among PEP‐eligible clients, 92% (1551/1688) completed HIV testing and 92% (1549/1688) received PEP. Most PrEP/PEP clients completed HIV testing within 6 hours of their telehealth visit (53%, 927/1757) and had drugs delivered with testing services (88%, 1546/1757). Among PrEP clients eligible for follow‐up, 47% (120/256) continued PrEP and 4% (10/256) initiated PEP following PrEP discontinuation. Among PEP clients eligible for follow‐up, 7% (99/1428) repeated PEP use and 6% (83/1428) transitioned from PEP to PrEP.). Conclusions Online PrEP/PEP delivery could expand access to prevention services by reaching individuals not engaged in existing delivery platforms. The uptake of online PEP was five times greater than PrEP, underscoring an unmet demand for PEP and highlighting the potential for online pharmacies to deliver time‐sensitive PEP services.

Introduction Antiretroviral‐based HIV prevention, including pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), is expanding in generalized epidemic settings, but additional prevention options are needed for individuals with periodic, high‐risk sexual exposures. Non‐occupational post‐exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is recommended in global guidelines. However, in Africa, awareness of and access to PEP for sexual exposures are limited. We assessed feasibility, acceptability, uptake and adherence in a pilot study of a patient‐centred PEP programme with options for facility‐ or community‐based service delivery. Methods After population‐level HIV testing with universal access to PrEP for persons at elevated HIV risk (SEARCH Trial:NCT01864603), we conducted a pilot PEP study in five rural communities in Kenya and Uganda between December 2018 and May 2019. We assessed barriers to PEP in the population and implemented an intervention to address these barriers, building on existing in‐country PEP protocols. We used community leaders for sensitization. Test kits and medications were acquired through the Ministry of Health supply chain and healthcare providers based at the Ministry of Health clinics were trained on PEP delivery. Additional intervention components were (a)PEP availability seven days/week, (b)PEP hotline staffed by providers and (c)option for out‐of‐facility medication delivery. We assessed implementation using the Proctor framework and measured seroconversions via repeat HIV testing. Successful “PEP completion” was defined as self‐reported adherence over four weeks of therapy with post‐PEP HIV testing. Results Community leaders were able to sensitize and mobilize for PEP. The Ministry of Health supplied test kits and PEP medications; after training, healthcare providers delivered the 28‐day regimen with high completion rates. Among 124 persons who sought PEP, 66% were female, 24% were ≤25 years and 42% were fisherfolk. Of these, 20% reported exposure with a serodifferent partner, 72% with a new or existing relationship and 7% from transactional sex. 12% of all visits were conducted at out‐of‐facility community‐based sites; 35% of participants had ≥1 out‐of‐facility visit. No serious adverse events were reported. Overall, 85% met the definition of PEP completion. There were no HIV seroconversions. Conclusions Among individuals with elevated‐risk exposures in rural East African communities, patient‐centred PEP was feasible, acceptable and provides a promising addition to the current prevention toolkit.

Rabies is a neglected zoonotic disease with a global burden of approximately 59,000 human deaths a year. Once clinical symptoms appear, rabies is almost invariably fatal; however, with timely and appropriate post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) consisting of wound washing, vaccine, and in some cases rabies immunoglobulin (RIG), the disease is almost entirely preventable. Access to PEP is limited in many countries, and when available, is often very expensive. We distributed a standardized assessment tool electronically to a convenience sample of 25 low- and middle-income countries in Asia and Africa to collect information on rabies PEP procurement, forecasting, distribution, monitoring and reporting. Information was collected from national rabies focal points, focal points at the World Health Organization (WHO) country offices, and others involved in procurement, logistics and distribution of PEP. Because RIG was limited in availability or unavailable in many countries, the assessment focused on vaccine. Data were collected between January 2017 and May 2018. We received responses from key informants in 23 countries: 11 countries in Asia and 12 countries in Africa. In 9 of 23 (39%) countries, rabies vaccine was provided for free in the public sector and was consistently available. In 10 (43%) countries, all or some patients were required to pay for the vaccine in the public sector, with the cost of a single dose ranging from US$ 6.60 to US$ 20/dose. The primary reason for the high cost of the vaccine for patients was a lack of funding at the central level to subsidize vaccine costs. In the remaining 4 (17%) countries, vaccine was provided for free but was often unavailable so patients were required to purchase it instead. The majority of countries used the intramuscular route for vaccine administration and only 5 countries exclusively used the dose-sparing intradermal (ID) route. Half (11/22; 50%) of all countries assessed had a standardized distribution system for PEP, separate from the systems used for routine childhood vaccines, and almost half used separate storage facilities at both central and health facility levels. Approximately half (9/22; 41%) of all countries assessed reported having regular weekly, monthly or quarterly reporting on rabies vaccination. While all countries in our assessment had rabies vaccines available in the public sector to some extent, barriers to access include the high cost of the vaccine to the government as well as to patients. Countries should be encouraged to use ID administration as this would provide access to rabies vaccine for many more people with the same number of vaccine vials. In addition, standardized monitoring and reporting of vaccine utilization should be encouraged, in order to improve data on PEP needs.

Background. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for preventing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, but risk compensation (RC) in men who have sex with men (MSM) raises concerns about increased sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The Center for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) PrEP guidelines recommend biannual STI screening, which may reduce incidence by treating STIs that would otherwise remain undiagnosed. We investigated these two counteracting phenomena. Methods. With a network-based mathematical model of HIV, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) transmission dynamics among MSM in the United States, we simulated PrEP uptake following the prescription indications and HIV/STI screening recommendations in the CDC guidelines. Scenarios varied PrEP coverage (the proportion of MSM indicated for PrEP who received it), RC (a reduction in the per-act probability of condom use), and the STI screening interval. Results. In our reference scenario (40% coverage, 40% RC), 42% of NG and 40% of CT infections would be averted over the next decade. A doubling of RC would still result in net STI prevention relative to no PrEP. STIs declined because PrEP-related STI screening resulted in a 17% and 16% absolute increase in the treatment of asymptomatic and rectal STIs, respectively. Screening and timely treatment at quarterly vs biannual intervals would reduce STI incidence an additional 50%. Conclusions. Implementation of the CDC PrEP guidelines while scaling up PrEP coverage could result in a significant decline in STI incidence among MSM. Our study highlights the design of PrEP not only as antiretroviral medication but as combination HIV/STI prevention incorporating STI screening.