Explore the vast range of titles available.

BackgroundThis systematic review examines the feasibility and safety of implementing Enhanced recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols in children.Study designA systematic search of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane library for papers describing ERAS implementation in children between January 2000 and January 2021. The systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The meta-analysis was done using R Software (Ver 4.0.2). p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSixteen studies, describing a total of 1723 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. An average of 15 (range 11–16) relevant components were implemented with an overall compliance close to 84%. The time to initiate feeds and reach full enteral nutrition was reduced in ERAS group with mean difference (MD) of − 21.20 h (95% CI − 22.80, − 19.59, p < 0.01), and − 2.20 days (95% CI − 2.72, − 1.71, p < 0.01), respectively. The use of opioids for postoperative analgesia was reduced with MD of -0.86 morphine equivalents mg/kg (95% CI − 1.40, − 0.32, p < 0.01). The length of hospital stay showed a significant reduction with MD of -2.54 days (95% CI − 2.94, − 2.13, p < 0.01). There was no difference in the complication and readmission rates between the groups.ConclusionERP implementation in pediatric perioperative care is a viable option in a variety of surgical settings. There is clear evidence of a decrease in hospital stay duration with no increase in complication or readmission rates. The length of hospital stay reduced in inverse proportion to the number of ERAS elements implemented. Parental satisfaction is increased by initiating enteral feeding early, minimizing catheter and drain use, and reducing opioid use.

Adhesions following abdominal surgery remain a common cause of bowel obstruction. The incidence is between 1 and 12.6% in children who have had previous abdominal surgery. While conservative management is usually trialled in all patients (including children) suspected of having ASBO, the majority will require surgical intervention. New materials such as Seprafilm® have been studied in the paediatric population, with promising results of its use in index abdominal surgeries to prevent the formation of adhesions. In this article, we conducted a systematic review to present an overview of the current knowledge on the incidence, aetiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of ASBO.

BackgroundLiterature on paediatric surgical conditions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. As a common emergency, timely treatment of testicular torsion acts as a benchmark of adequate emergency service delivery in paediatric surgery. This scoping study aims to synthesise all existing literature on paediatric testicular torsion in LMICs.MethodsA database search was conducted by the OxPLORE global paediatric surgery research group to identify studies containing the terms ‘testicular torsion’ or ‘acute scrotum’ originating from LMICs. A thematic analysis was applied to the results of the search and the quality of evidence was appraised for all included articles.ResultsThis review included 17 studies with 1798 patients. All studies originated from middle-income countries and the majority (76%) had sample sizes smaller than 100 patients. All studies were appraised as providing less than adequate evidence. Included studies identified long delays to treatment and highlighted ongoing debates on the value of scoring systems and Doppler ultrasonography in diagnosing torsion. Major heterogeneity in surgical approaches to treatment of testicular torsion in children was also observed.ConclusionsLiterature on paediatric testicular torsion in LMICs is scarce and heterogeneous. Prospective, multi-centre research on the management of this common paediatric surgical emergency is urgently required.

PurposeTo develop guidance for the selection of balloon catheter size when performing an oesophageal dilatation for a stricture post oesophageal atresia repair.MethodsThis was a single centre retrospective study at a paediatric tertiary centre. Dilatations were performed between 2015 and 2020. All dilatations were performed under general anaesthesia using balloon catheters under fluoroscopic guidance. Outliers were excluded using ROUT method and descriptive analysis was calculated to 1SD or IQR depending on the normality of data distribution.Results97 patients underwent 341 dilatations. Median age was 19 months (37 weeks corrected gestation—17 years), median weight was 10.7 kg (2.6–72 kg). Balloon catheter sizes ranged from 6–8 mm to 18–20 mm. There was strong correlation between weight and balloon size (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001). There were 2 perforations (0.6%), both diagnosed intra-operatively and treated conservatively. From the results, weight recommendations were created for each balloon size.ConclusionFluoroscopic balloon dilatation is a safe and effective method to treat anastomotic stricture following oesophageal atresia repair. Previous studies have shown correlation between patient weight and oesophageal diameter. We propose guidance for using an appropriate balloon size based on patient’s weight with the aim to reduce complication.

Children undergoing appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis are at an increased risk of post-operative morbidity. Placement of an intra-peritoneal drain to prevent post-operative complications is controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy of prophylactic drain placement to prevent complications in children with complicated appendicitis. A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Cochrane, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to November 2022 for studies directly comparing drain placement to no drain placement in children ≤ 18 years of age undergoing operative treatment of complicated appendicitis. A total of 5108 children with complicated appendicitis were included from 16 studies; 2231 (44%) received a drain. Placement of a drain associated with a significantly increased risk of intra-peritoneal abscess formation (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–2.24, p = 0.004) but there was no significant difference in wound infection rate (OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.74–2.88, p = 0.28). Length of stay was significantly longer in the drain group (mean difference 2.02 days, 95% CI 1.14–2.90, p < 0.001). Although the quality and certainty of the available evidence is low, prophylactic drain placement does not prevent intra-peritoneal abscess following appendicectomy in children with complicated appendicitis.

PurposeIleocecal resection (ICR) is the most frequently performed surgery in paediatric Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. The aim of the study was to compare laparoscopic-assisted and open ICR.MethodsRetrospective review of consecutive CD patients undergoing ICR between March 2014 and December 2021 was performed. The patients were divided into open (OG) and laparoscopic (LG) groups. Compared parameters included patients’ demographics, clinical characteristics, surgery, duration of hospitalisation and follow-up. Complications were classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification (CDc). Risk factors were identified using multivariable analysis.ResultsSixty-two patients (29 females, 46.7%) were included in the analysis, forty-two patients in OG. The median duration of surgery was 130 in OG versus 148 in LG (p = 0.065) minutes. Postoperative complications were reported in 4 patients (12.1%). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications according to CDc (OG 7.14 vs LG 5%, p = 1). The median length of hospitalisation was 8 in OG and 7 days in LG (p = 0.0005). The median length of follow-up was 21.5 months.ConclusionThe laparoscopic-assisted approach had shorter hospital stay and was not associated with increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery should be considered the preferred surgical approach for primary ICR.

This review explores the significant advancements in paediatric surgery in Africa during the twenty-first century, with a particular focus on capacity-building, education, infrastructural development, and research. Historically, paediatric surgery has been an overlooked sector, especially in low-and-middle-income countries in Africa. However, recent years have seen considerable progress. Collaborative efforts such as the Global Initiative for Children’s Surgery, and the formation of the Pan African Paediatric Surgery Association, the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa and the West African College of Surgeons have facilitated knowledge sharing, collaboration, and advocacy for enhancing surgical standards. Local training programmes, including Master of Medicine programmes and fellowships, have been instrumental in building a skilled workforce. These initiatives have been complemented by infrastructural developments through non-governmental organisations like Kids Operating Room, which have expanded access to paediatric surgical care. Technological advancements, particularly in telemedicine, have further enhanced accessibility. Task-sharing strategies, where non-specialist physicians are trained in paediatric surgical skills, have also been utilised to address the shortage of specialised surgeons. Research in paediatric surgery has experienced an upswing, with local health professionals taking the lead. Research has been crucial for understanding the epidemiology of paediatric surgical conditions, and developing prevention strategies, and is increasingly leading to the inclusion of paediatric surgery in national health plans. Despite the progress, challenges remain, including the need for sustainable funding, continued investment in infrastructure, and training and retention of healthcare professionals. The review emphasises the importance of ongoing efforts in community engagement, innovative technologies, and health systems strengthening for the sustainable development of paediatric surgical services in Africa.

BackgroundThe fragility index has been gaining ground in the evaluation of comparative clinical studies. Many scientists evaluated trials in their fields and deemed them to be fragile, although there is no consensus on the definition of fragility. We aimed to calculate the fragility index and its permutations for paediatric surgical trials.MethodsWe searched pubmed for prospectively conducted paediatric surgical trials with intervention and control group without limitations and calculated their (reverse) fragility indices and respective quotients along with posthoc-power. Relationships between variables were evaluated using Spearman’s ρ. We also calculated S values by negative log transformation base-2 of P values.ResultsOf 516 retrieved records, we included 87. The median fragility index was 1.5 (interquartile range: 0–4) and the median reverse fragility index was 3 (interquartile range: 2–4), although they were statistically not different (Mood’s test: χ2 = 0.557, df = 1, P = 0.4556). P values and fragility indices were strongly inversely correlated (ρ = − 0.71, 95% confidence interval: − 0.53 to − 0.85, P < 0.0001), while reverse fragility indices were moderately correlated to P values (ρ = 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.37–0.62, P < 0.0001). A fragility index of 1 resulted from P values between 0.039 and 0.003, which resulted in S values between 4 and 8.ConclusionsFragility indices, reverse fragility indices, and their respective fragility quotients of paediatric surgical trials are low. The fragility index can be viewed as no more than a transformed P value with even more substantial limitations. Its inherent penalisation of small studies irrespective of their clinical relevance is particularly harmful for paediatric surgery. Consequently, the fragility index should be avoided.

BackgroundThe role of simulation training in paediatric surgery is expanding as more simulation devices are designed and validated. We aimed to conduct a training needs assessment of UK paediatric surgical trainees to prioritise procedures for simulation, and to validate a novel 3D-printed simulation model for oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula (OA-TOF) repair.MethodsA questionnaire was sent to UK trainee paediatric surgeons surveying the availability and utility of simulation. The operation ranked as most useful to simulate was OA-TOF repair. 3D-printing techniques were used to build an OA-TOF model. Content, face and construct validity was assessed by 40 paediatric surgeons of varying experience.ResultsThirty-four paediatric surgeons completed the survey; 79% had access to surgical simulation at least monthly, and 47% had access to paediatric-specific resources. Perceived utility of simulation was 4.1/5. Validation of open OA-TOF repair was conducted by 40 surgeons. Participants rated the model as useful 4.9/5. Anatomical realism was scored 4.2/5 and surgical realism 3.9/5. The model was able to discriminate between experienced and inexperienced surgeons.ConclusionUK paediatric surgeons voted OA-TOF repair as the most useful procedure to simulate. In response we have developed and validated an affordable 3D-printed simulation model for open OA-TOF repair.

Purpose Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are standard practice in adult specialties resulting in improved outcomes. It is unclear whether ERAS principles are applicable to Paediatric Surgery. We performed a scoping review to identify the extent to which ERAS has been used in Paediatric Surgery, the nature of interventions, and outcomes. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, and Embase were searched using the terms enhanced recovery, post-operative protocol/pathway, fast track surgery, and paediatric surgery. Studies were excluded if they did not include abdominal/thoracic/urological procedures in children. Results Nine studies were identified (2003–2014; total 1269 patients): three case control studies, one retrospective review and five prospective implementations, no RCTs. Interventional elements identified were post-operative feeding, mobilisation protocols, morphine-sparing analgesia, reduced use of nasogastric tubes and urinary catheters. Outcomes reported included post-operative length of stay (LOS), time to oral feeding and stooling, complications, and parent satisfaction. Fast-track programmes significantly reduced LOS in 6/7 studies, time to oral feeding in 3/3 studies, and time to stooling in 2/3 studies. Conclusion The use of ERAS pathways in Paediatric surgery appears very limited but such pathways may have benefits in children. Prospective studies should evaluate interventions used in adult ERAS on appropriate outcomes in the paediatric setting.